Journal of Geographical Sciences

Figure/Table detail

Land use change and its influencing factors along railways in Africa: A case study of the Ethiopian section of the Addis Ababa-Djibouti Railway

ZHAO Shengbo, QI Junheng, LI Dongxue, WANG Xingping

Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2024, 34(6): 1128-1156. DOI: 10.1007/s11442-024-2242-y

	2013		2021
	OLS	GWR	OLS	GWR
-2 log-likelihood	-1207.75	-1496.56	-1139.96	-1361.77
Classic AIC	-1187.75	-1410.23	-1119.96	-1279.05
AICc	-1187.35	-1402.87	-1119.56	-1272.30
BIC/MDL	-1144.44	-1223.28	-1076.64	-1099.90
CV	0.0073	14384.42	0.0081	141.19
R²	0.5681	0.7417	0.7490	0.8309
Adjusted R²	0.5611	0.7207	0.7449	0.8177

Table 7 Fitting degree comparison between OLS Model and GWR Model in 2013 and 2021

Other figure/table from this article

Figure 1 Location of the study area (Ethiopian section of the Addis Ababa-Djibouti Railway)
Figure 2 The distribution and index of the Landsat remote sensing images
Table 1 The date and filename of Landsat remote sensing images
Figure 3 Distribution of land use classification in the study area in different time periods
Figure 4 An enlarged map of the five buffer zones at 2 km intervals and the spatial distribution of land use along the railway line with Addis Ababa at the center in different time periods
Table 2 Proportion of land use types in different time periods
Table 3 Range of land use change in different time periods
Figure 5 Land use dynamic degree (LDD) of single land use type in different periods
Table 4 Land use dynamic degree (LDD) of comprehensive land use type in different periods
Figure 6 Information entropy (IE) and equilibrium degree (ED) of land use in different years
Table 5 Land use transfer matrix in different periods
Figure 7 Relationship between land use dynamic degrees of land use change and buffer distance in each period
Figure 8 Information entropy and equilibrium degree of land use in each buffer zone in different periods
Figure 9 Land use structure of the buffer zones with a radius of 10 km around the stations along the Ethiopian section of the Addis Ababa-Djibouti Railway in 2021
Figure 10 Proportion of built-up land in 2021 and land use dynamic degree (LDD) of built-up land from 2013 to 2021 of the buffer zones with a radius of 10 km around the stations along the Ethiopian section of the Addis Ababa-Djibouti Railway Note: “Others” includes Feto, Awash, Sirba Kunkur, Mieso, Bike, Harewa, Adigala, Aysha, and Dewale.
Figure 11 Change in land area and number of landscape patches in the Ethiopian section of the Addis Ababa-Djibouti Railway
Figure 12 Landscape fragmentation index of different land use types in the Ethiopian section of the Addis Ababa-Djibouti Railway
Table 6 The influencing factors of built-up land expansion in the area around stations
Table 8 Estimation results of influencing factors of built-up land expansion based on OLS
Figure 13 Spatial distribution of the distance from the train station in the GWR Model
Figure 14 Spatial distribution of the population size in the GWR Model
Figure 15 Spatial distribution of the distance from the central city in the GWR Model
Figure 16 Operation strategy of the Ethiopian section of the Addis Ababa-Djibouti Railway

模态框（Modal）标题

Figure/Table detail