Journal of Geographical Sciences

图/表详细信息

Polycentric urban development with state-led administrative division adjustment: A policy insight for urban spatial transformation

CHEN Youlin, YU Peiheng, WANG Lei, CHEN Yiyun, YUNG Hiu Kwan Esther

地理学报(英文版), 2023, 33(12): 2400-2424. DOI: 10.1007/s11442-023-2182-y

	Variables	(1)	(2)	(3)
Direct effect	ADA×EAST	0.0063 (0.0048)
	ADA×CENTER		0.0139** (0.0071)
	ADA×WEST			-0.0061 (0.0071)
Indirect effect	ADA×EAST	0.1775*** (0.0565)
	ADA×CENTER		-0.1407 (0.1464)
	ADA×WEST			-0.0549 (0.0683)
	Control variable	Yes	Yes	Yes
	City FE	Yes	Yes	Yes
	Year FE	Yes	Yes	Yes
	R²	0.0046	0.0014	0.0012
	Observations	1644	1644	1644

Table 6 The heterogeneity analysis of administrative division adjustment on urban polycentricity

本文的其它图/表

Figure 1 Conceptual framework of polycentric urban development with administrative division adjustment
Figure 2 The geographic location of cities that implemented administrative division adjustment between 2013 and 2018
Note: This map is based on the standard map with approval number GS(2020)4619 downloaded from the standard map service website of the National Bureau of Surveying, Mapping, and Geographic Information, and the base map has not been modified.
Table 1 Definition and statistical description of the variables
Figure 3 Regions with administrative division adjustment and population centers of four cities in China from 2013 to 2018. (a) Shanghai, (b) Hangzhou, (c) Chongqing and (d) Tianjin
Figure 4 The spatiotemporal evolution of urban polycentricity in China in different years: (a) 2013, (b) 2014, (c) 2015, (d) 2016, (e) 2017 and (f) 2018
Note: This map is based on the standard map with approval number GS(2020)4619 downloaded from the standard map service website of the National Bureau of Surveying, Mapping, and Geographic Information, and the base map has not been modified.
Table 2 The global Moran’s I index of polycentric urban structure
Figure 5 The scatter plots of global Moran’s I index in different years: (a) 2013, (b) 2014, (c) 2015, (d) 2016, (e) 2017 and (f) 2018
Figure 6 The parallel trend test results of the SDID model
Table 3 The selection test of the SDID model
Table 4 Benchmark regression results of the OLS and SDID models
Table 5 The direct, indirect and total effects of SDID model in columns (4), (5) and (6) of Table 4
Table 7 The mechanism analysis of administrative division adjustment on urban polycentricity
Table 8 The robustness test of administrative division adjustment on urban polycentricity
Figure 7 Policy related to administrative division adjustment and urbanization

模态框（Modal）标题

图/表 详细信息

图/表详细信息