Journal of Geographical Sciences

Interregional compensation for farmland protection: From the perspective of farmland allocation optimization

YANG Bohan, SHENG Siyu, SHANGGUAN Ziheng, KE Xinli

地理学报(英文版), 2024, 34(7): 1437-1454. DOI: 10.1007/s11442-024-2255-6

	Farmland	Forest	Grassland	River	Wetland	Urban land	Rural settlement	Unused land
K_Simulation	0.261	0.107	0.052	0.214	0.160	0.547	0.277	0.303
K_Transloc	0.470	0.327	0.433	0.454	0.317	0.587	0.313	0.434
K_Transtion	0.555	0.328	0.119	0.472	0.504	0.931	0.886	0.697

Table 2 Fine assessment of the land use simulation results (2010-2020)

本文的其它图/表

Figure 1 Framework of interregional compensation for farmland protection through farmland allocation optimization
Table 1 Resistances of each land use class
Figure 2 Correction of farmland development right value
Table 3 Dataset sources and descriptions
Figure 3 Spatial distribution of land-use changes in China from 2020 to 2030
Figure 4 Farmland deficit and surplus in China (a. Farmland deficit and surplus based on food supply-demand balance; b. Farmland deficit and surplus based on ecological supply-demand balance)
Figure 5 Corrected value standards of interregional compensation for farmland protection in China (a. Correction of farmland development right value; b. Correction of farmland ecosystem service value)
Figure 6 Compensation payments for interregional compensation for farmland protection (IRCFP) in China
Figure 7 Comparison of net payments for interregional compensation for farmland protection (IRCFP) in China based on different scenarios (a. Net IRCFP payments based on the present distribution of farmland; b. Net IRCFP payments based on farmland allocation optimization)
Figure 8 Operation mechanism of interregional compensation for farmland protection