Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Spatio-temporal variations and influencing factors of energy-related carbon emissions for Xinjiang cities in China based on time-series nighttime light data
Zhang Li (1988-), Senior Engineer, specialized in urban and regional planning, regional sustainable development. E-mail: toby.zl@163.com |
Received date: 2021-11-01
Accepted date: 2022-03-14
Online published: 2022-12-25
Supported by
The Third Xinjiang Scientific Expedition Program(2021xjkk0905)
GDAS Special Project of Science and Technology Development(2020GDASYL-20200301003)
GDAS Special Project of Science and Technology Development(2020GDASYL-20200102002)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41501144)
Project of Department of Natural Resources of Guangdong Province(GDZRZYKJ2022005)
This essay combines the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program Operational Linescan System (DMSP-OLS) nighttime light data and the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) nighttime light data into a “synthetic DMSP” dataset, from 1992 to 2020, to retrieve the spatio-temporal variations in energy-related carbon emissions in Xinjiang, China. Then, this paper analyzes several influencing factors for spatial differentiation of carbon emissions in Xinjiang with the application of geographical detector technique. Results reveal that (1) total carbon emissions continued to grow, while the growth rate slowed down in the past five years. (2) Large regional differences exist in total carbon emissions across various regions. Total carbon emissions of these regions in descending order are the northern slope of the Tianshan (Mountains) > the southern slope of the Tianshan > the three prefectures in southern Xinjiang > the northern part of Xinjiang. (3) Economic growth, population size, and energy consumption intensity are the most important factors of spatial differentiation of carbon emissions. The interaction between economic growth and population size as well as between economic growth and energy consumption intensity also enhances the explanatory power of carbon emissions’ spatial differentiation. This paper aims to help formulate differentiated carbon reduction targets and strategies for cities in different economic development stages and those with different carbon intensities so as to achieve the carbon peak goals in different steps.
ZHANG Li , LEI Jun , WANG Changjian , WANG Fei , GENG Zhifei , ZHOU Xiaoli . Spatio-temporal variations and influencing factors of energy-related carbon emissions for Xinjiang cities in China based on time-series nighttime light data[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2022 , 32(10) : 1886 -1910 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-022-2028-z
Figure 1 The administrative divisions and regionalization in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region |
Figure 2 The sensitivity heat map for parameter optimization |
Figure 3 RMSE and Corr coefficients of DMSP and fitted DMSP |
Figure 4 Scatter plots of fitted DMSP and unfitted VIIRS in Urumqi (2012-2013) |
Table 1 Carbon emission factor for different types of fuels |
Energy category | Coal | Coke | Crude | Gasoline | Kerosene | Diesel | Fuel oil | Natural gas | Electricity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard coal coefficient Bi (tce/t) | 0.7143 | 0.9714 | 1.4285 | 1.4714 | 1.4714 | 1.4571 | 1.4286 | 1.33 | 0.1229 |
Carbon emission coefficients Ki (t/tce) | 0.7559 | 0.855 | 0.5857 | 0.5538 | 0.5714 | 0.5921 | 0.6185 | 0.4483 | 0.272 |
Note: The unit conversions in electricity are kg/kWh, the unit conversions in natural are kg/m3. |
Figure 5 The fitting relationship between SOL and carbon emissions |
Figure 6 Spatial distribution of carbon emissions at the kilometer grid-scale in Xinjiang |
Figure 7 Trends of total carbon emissions and carbon emission intensity changes in Xinjiang |
Figure 8 Total carbon emissions of four regions in Xinjiang from 1992 to 2020 |
Figure 9 Per capita carbon emissions of four regions in Xinjiang from 1992 to 2020 |
Figure 10 Carbon emission intensity of four regions in Xinjiang from 1992 to 2020 |
Figure 11 Proportion of carbon emissions of four regions in Xinjiang from 1992 to 2020 |
Figure 12 Spatio-temporal distribution of total carbon emissions in Xinjiang from 1992 to 2020 |
Figure 13 Classification of carbon emissions increment speeds in Xinjiang from 1992 to 2020 |
Figure 14 Four quadrants of per-capita GDP and carbon intensity |
Table 2 Detection results for influencing factors |
Influencing factor | Index | q | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1992 | 2000 | 2010 | 2020 | ||
Economic growth | Gross Domestic Product (GDP) | 0.654*** | 0.685*** | 0.746*** | 0.431* |
The secondary industry output value (SV) | 0.564*** | 0.612*** | 0.672*** | 0.440*** | |
Industrial structure | The ratio of secondary industry output value to GDP (SP) | 0.211** | 0.352*** | 0.215*** | 0.133** |
Population size | Population size (POP) | 0.517** | 0.420 | 0.462* | 0.398* |
Urban population size (UP) | 0.529** | 0.571*** | 0.562*** | 0.391* | |
Urbanization level | Urbanization rate (UR) | 0.115* | 0.313*** | 0.258*** | 0.197** |
Energy consumption intensity | Energy consumption intensity per unit of GDP (EIG) | 0.354*** | 0.205* | 0.268 | 0.378* |
Note: *0.05<p<0.1; **0.01< p <0.05; *** p <0.01 |
Table 3 Detection results of interaction for influencing factors |
Interacting factors | 1992 | Interacting factors | 2000 | Interacting factors | 2010 | Interacting factors | 2020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDP∩EIG | 0.990 | SV∩EIG | 0.934 | GDP∩EIG | 0.942 | SV∩EIG | 0.869 |
POP∩EIG | 0.905 | GDP∩EIG | 0.918 | SV∩EIG | 0.857 | GDP∩EIG | 0.860 |
SV∩EIG | 0.879 | POP∩SP | 0.782 | SV∩UR | 0.830 | UP∩ EIG | 0.789 |
UP∩ EIG | 0.866 | UP∩SP | 0.777 | GDP∩UR | 0.816 | POP∩EIG | 0.777 |
POP∩GDP | 0.798 | POP∩SV | 0.768 | SV∩UP | 0.813 | UR∩ EIG | 0.616 |
POP∩SP | 0.714 | UP∩ EIG | 0.768 | POP∩SV | 0.811 | UR∩ POP | 0.602 |
GDP∩SP | 0.709 | SV∩UP | 0.746 | GDP∩SP | 0.794 | POP∩SP | 0.583 |
SV∩SP | 0.701 | SV∩UR | 0.733 | SV∩SP | 0.793 | UR∩ SV | 0.582 |
GDP∩POP | 0.674 | GDP∩SP | 0.749 | GDP∩POP | 0.774 | SV∩UP | 0.544 |
GDP∩SV | 0.673 | GDP∩POP | 0.724 | UR∩POP | 0.757 | SV∩POP | 0.543 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |