Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Spatial difference in variation trends of Chinese cave δ18O over the last 2000 years and its association with the tripole mode of summer rainfall
Liu Xiaokang (1990-), PhD, specialized in speleothem and paleoclimate research. E-mail: liuxk@tjnu.edu.cn |
Received date: 2024-05-15
Accepted date: 2024-09-06
Online published: 2025-09-04
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(42225105)
The Open Foundation of MOE Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental System, Lanzhou University and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(lzujbky-2022-kb04)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(42471177)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(42201175)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41901099)
The existence of an intensifying shift in the East Asian summer monsoon (EASM) since ~2000 years ago that differs from the decreasing trend of Northern Hemisphere summer insolation remains controversial. Therefore, we compared and synthesized stalagmite δ18O records from eastern China to clarify the EASM trend during this period. A total of 30 cave δ18O records that did not consistently indicate a depleted trend during 2-0 ka. Rather, they included increasing (14 caves), decreasing (8 caves), and non-significant (8 caves) trends. The spatially interpolated trends of cave δ18O suggested spatial differences among three subregions: North China (NC), decreasing trend (5 caves); Central-East China/Yangtze River Valley (CEC), increasing trend (17 caves); South China (SC), decreasing trend (8 caves). The cave δ18O evidence supports spatial differences in precipitation in eastern China that have been substantially demonstrated by observations and model simulations. The decreasing δ18O anomaly from NC and SC was associated with the decreasing sea surface temperature over Pacific Decadal Oscillation region and increasing South Oscillation Index. The increasing CEC δ18O anomaly was linked to southward Intertropical Convergence Zone shift and decreasing solar irradiance. Consequently, EASM circulation is jointly forced by external and internal factors at various timescales.
Key words: cave δ18O; variation trend; tripole mode; summer rainfall; last 2000 years
LIU Xiaokang , XU Lingmei , CHEN Shengqian , SHANG Shasha , LIU Jianbao . Spatial difference in variation trends of Chinese cave δ18O over the last 2000 years and its association with the tripole mode of summer rainfall[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2025 , 35(8) : 1773 -1792 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-025-2373-9
Table 1 List of published cave δ18O records over eastern China used in this study |
No. | Caves | Lat (°N) | Log (°E) | Alt (m) | Time period (ka) | Mean resolution (yr) | Dates* | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Nuanhe | 41.33 | 124.92 | 500 | 10.2-0.3 | 40 | 16(7) | Wu et al., 2011 |
2 | Liuli | 41.17 | 125.82 | 490 | 6.7-0 | 12 | 17(6) | Zhao et al., 2021 |
3 | Shihua | 39.83 | 115.67 | 150 | 2.3-0 | 1 | 9(8), annual lamination | Duan et al., 2023b |
4 | Lianhua (Shanxi) | 38.17 | 113.72 | 1200 | 11.5-0.2 | 4-55 | 42(6) | Dong et al., 2015, 2018 |
5 | Huangchao | 36.62 | 118.33 | 518 | 2.12-1.31, 0.85-0.14 | 14 | 12(11) | Tan et al., 2020b |
6 | Magou | 34.32 | 113.38 | 422 | 11.7-1.1 | 4 | 66(2) | Cai et al., 2021 |
7 | Wuya | 33.82 | 105.43 | 1370 | 11.1-2.7, 1.4-0.8, 0.3-0 | 5, 1 | 47(3), annual lamination | Tan et al., 2014, 2020a |
8 | Dongshiya | 33.78 | 111.57 | 840 | 8.7-0 | 12 | 7(1) | Zhang et al., 2018c |
9 | Huangye | 33.58 | 105.12 | 1650 | 1.8-0 | 4 | 28(26) | Tan et al., 2010 |
10 | Jiuxian | 33.57 | 109.10 | 1495 | 19-0 | 4-77, 36-112 | 38(13) | Cai et al., 2010 |
11 | Wanxiang | 33.32 | 105.00 | 1200 | 1.8-0 | 2.5 | 19(19) | Zhang et al., 2008 |
12 | Xianglong | 33.00 | 106.33 | 940 | 6.7-0.7, 0.04-0 | 10 | 57(9) | Tan et al., 2015, 2018a |
13 | Niudong | 31.70 | 110.27 | 1400 | 9.89-0.08 | 13-25 | 16(6) | Zhao et al., 2016 |
14 | Sanbao | 31.67 | 110.43 | 1900 | 13-0.2 | 4-40 | 65(4) | Dong et al., 2010 |
15 | Heshang | 30.45 | 110.42 | 294 | 9.5-0 | 2-16 | 21(5) | Hu et al., 2008 |
16 | Shizi | 29.68 | 106.29 | 401 | 9.4-0 | 30 | 15(3) | Yang et al., 2019 |
17 | Lianhua (Hunan) | 29.48 | 109.53 | 455 | 12.5-0 | 16 | 42(9) | Zhang et al., 2013 |
18 | Furong | 29.23 | 107.90 | 480 | 37.0-0 | 40 | 67(1) | Li et al., 2021a |
19 | Songya | 29.17 | 119.67 | 668 | 1.78-0.11 | 3 | 13(13) | Chen et al., 2022 |
20 | Jinfo | 29.02 | 107.18 | 2114 | 10.5-0.3 | 27 | 16(4) | Yang et al., 2019, 2020 |
21 | Shenqi | 28.93 | 103.10 | 1407 | 2.3-0 | 4.9 | 35(29) | Tan et al., 2018b |
22 | Shigao | 28.18 | 107.17 | - | 9.9-0 | 20 | 12(3) | Jiang et al., 2012 |
23 | Hongyan | 28.10 | 109.15 | 389 | 1.35-0 | 3 | 7(7) | Duan et al., 2022 |
24 | Poya | 27.88 | 108.88 | 748 | 12.68-0.08 | 16 | 17(4) | Duan et al., 2023a |
25 | Jiulong | 27.80 | 113.90 | 162 | 7.3-0.1 | 14 | 15(4) | Zhang et al., 2021b |
26 | Dark | 27.20 | 106.17 | 1120 | 4.75-0.08, 6.1-0.3 | 5, 20 | 29(9), 28(9) | Jiang et al., 2013; Gao et al., 2023 |
27 | Shijiangjun | 26.20 | 105.50 | 1300 | 3.1-0.7 | 2.5 | 49(18) | Chen et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021b |
28 | Wulu | 26.05 | 105.08 | 1440 | 3.3-0.03 | 5 | 29(22) | Zhao et al., 2020 |
29 | Dongge | 25.28 | 108.08 | 680 | 8.9-0, 15.8-0 | 4.5, 19 | 45(15), 45(7) | Dykoski et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2005 |
30 | Jiuluo | 25.16 | 109.75 | 250 | 1.01-0 | 4.7 | 17(15) | Yin et al., 2023 |
*Note: The provided numbers include the total count of dates and the dates available for the last 2000 years from each cave indicated in brackets. |
Table 2 Mann-Kendall trend testing results of Chinese cave δ18O records during 2-0 ka |
No. | Caves and synthesized timeseries | Trend | S value | Z value | p value | Linear fitting equation | Correlation (r2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Nuanhe Cave | Decreasing | -2258 | -3.30 | 9.69×10-4 | y = 0.59x-0.65 | 0.08** |
2 | Liuli Cave | Decreasing | -6410 | -6.43 | 1.25×10-10 | y = 0.62x-0.59 | 0.15** |
3 | Shihua Cave | Non-significant | 727 | 0.74 | 4.60×10-1 | y = -0.10x+0.10 | 0.004 |
4 | Lianhua Cave (Shanxi) | Decreasing | -4683 | -5.89 | 3.86×10-9 | y = 0.81x-0.90 | 0.17** |
5 | Huangchao Cave | Non-significant | -310 | -0.55 | 5.86×10-1 | y = -0.06x-0.17 | 0.001 |
6 | Magou Cave | Increasing | 2198 | 7.92 | 2.41×10-15 | y = -3.10x+4.86 | 0.63** |
7 | Wuya Cave | No trend | -593 | -1.87 | 6.09×10-2 | y = 0.82x-0.68 | 0.16 |
8 | Dongshiya Cave | Increasing | 3144 | 4.13 | 3.69×10-5 | y = -0.45x+0.45 | 0.07** |
9 | Huangye Cave | Increasing | 35940 | 11.90 | 1.12×10-32 | y = -0.21x+0.20 | 0.24** |
10 | Jiuxian Cave | Non-significant | 1761 | 1.85 | 6.49×10-2 | y = -0.19x+0.17 | 0.02 |
11 | Wanxiang Cave | Increasing | 5642 | 7.16 | 8.22×10-13 | y = -1.03x+0.92 | 0.27** |
12 | Xianglong Cave | Increasing | 1396 | 2.49 | 1.29×10-2 | y = -0.43x+0.34 | 0.04* |
13 | Niu Cave | Increasing | 3655 | 3.89 | 1.00×10-4 | y = -0.49x+0.49 | 0.08** |
14 | Sanbao Cave | Increasing | 7109 | 7.86 | 3.79×10-15 | y = -0.81x+0.85 | 0.28** |
15 | Heshang Cave | Increasing | 3562 | 3.74 | 1.88×10-4 | y = -0.32x+0.31 | 0.04** |
16 | Shizi Cave | Non-significant | 1806 | 1.94 | 5.28×10-2 | y = -0.27x+0.27 | 0.02 |
17 | Lianhua Cave (Hunan) | Increasing | 4901 | 5.34 | 9.45×10-8 | y = -0.83x+0.85 | 0.22** |
18 | Furong Cave | Increasing | 11972 | 12.65 | 1.12×10-36 | y = -1.39x+1.36 | 0.65** |
19 | Songya Cave | Decreasing | -4179 | -5.78 | 7.37×10-9 | y = 0.84x-0.79 | 0.16** |
20 | Jinfo Cave | Non-significant | 750 | 0.97 | 3.34×10-1 | y = -0.22x+0.24 | 0.01 |
21 | Shenqi Cave | Increasing | 5106 | 5.35 | 8.57×10-8 | y = -0.64x+0.60 | 0.15** |
22 | Shigao Cave | Increasing | 8224 | 8.62 | 6.41×10-18 | y = -1.12x+1.11 | 0.42** |
23 | Hongyan Cave | Decreasing | -1650 | -3.36 | 7.87×10-4 | y = 0.66x-0.49 | 0.07** |
24 | Poya Cave | Decreasing | -1917 | -2.14 | 3.27×10-2 | y = 0.32x-0.33 | 0.03* |
25 | Jiulong Cave | Non-significant | -1213 | -1.37 | 1.70×10-1 | y = 0.02x-0.02 | 0.0001 |
26 | Dark Cave | Increasing | 4429 | 4.94 | 7.99×10-7 | y = -0.62x+0.65 | 0.12** |
27 | Shijiangjun Cave | Increasing | 1900 | 2.26 | 2.41×10-2 | y = -0.27x+0.27 | 0.02* |
28 | Wulu Cave | Non-significant | -569 | -0.61 | 5.42×10-1 | y = 0.12x-0.12 | 0.005 |
29 | Dongge Cave | Decreasing | -4267 | -4.47 | 7.66×10-6 | y = 0.54x-0.56 | 0.15** |
30 | Jiuluo Cave | Decreasing | -725 | -2.09 | 3.63×10-2 | y = 0.97x-0.51 | 0.09* |
31 | Syn_1 (all records) | Increasing | 6158 | 6.46 | 1.06×10-10 | y = -0.21x+0.19 | 0.25** |
32 | Syn_2 (increasing records) | Increasing | 11594 | 12.16 | 5.10×10-34 | y = -0.67x+0.66 | 0.61** |
33 | Syn_3 (decreasing records) | Decreasing | -9720 | -10.19 | 2.11×10-24 | y = 0.53x-0.52 | 0.47** |
34 | Syn_4 (no-trend records) | Non-significant | 834 | 0.87 | 3.82×10-1 | y = -0.04x+0.01 | 0.003 |
35 | Syn_5 (NC) | Decreasing | -5058 | -5.30 | 1.13×10-7 | y = 0.29x-0.31 | 0.09** |
36 | Syn_6 (CEC) | Increasing | 11028 | 11.57 | 6.13×10-31 | y = -0.56x+0.54 | 0.56** |
37 | Syn_7 (SC) | Decreasing | -3932 | -4.12 | 3.74×10-5 | y = 0.24x-0.27 | 0.09** |
Notes: *95% confidence level, and **99% confidence level. |
Figure 1 Spatial comparison of the variation trends of Chinese cave δ18O records during 2-0 ka. The numbers 1-30 refer to cave locations listed in Tables 1 and 2. The colored circles denote differences in variation trends (increasing, decreasing, and non-significant trends, respectively), and a darker color and larger circle reflect a more significant trend. The purple dashed line depicts the northern limit of the modern summer monsoon (Chen et al., 2018a). |
Figure 2 Comparison of synthesized time series for all cave records (a), increasing-trend cave records (b), decreasing-trend cave records (c), and non-trend cave records (d), respectively. The dashed red lines depict the linear fitting trend for each time series. |
Figure 3 Synthesized time series for three subregions over eastern China (grey columns), including (a) North China, (b) the Central-East China/Yangtze River Valley, and (c) South China, respectively. The red dashed lines depict linear fitting trends of each time series, and the synthesized δ18O time series were filtered at 1/400 yr-1 frequency to emphasize the centennial-scale oscillations (blue and pink solid lines). The light blue and yellow shadings indicate two typical periods during which the tripole spatial differences (“-+-” or “+-+”) were clearly demonstrated by cave δ18O. |
Figure 4 Comparison between (a) the spatial difference in variation trends of cave δ18O and (b) the tripole mode of summer (July-August) rainfall over eastern China during 1961-2018 based on the CN05.1 dataset. It should be noted that uncertainty remains in regard to spatially interpolated trends using the IDW method due to the currently limited cave data. |
Figure 5 Comparison between the synthesized cave δ18O timeseries and the possible forcing factors during the last 2 ka. (b), (e), and (i) Synthesized cave δ18O timeseries for North China (NC_syn), South China (SC_syn), and Central-East China (CEC), respectively; (a) Reconstructed indexes for North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) (Trouet et al., 2009; Olsen et al., 2012); (c) Reconstructed Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) (Yan et al., 2011); (d) Sea surface temperature reconstruction over North Pacific PDO region (PDO_sst) (Mann et al., 2009); (f) Normalized Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) shift index with higher values indicating a southward shift of mean ITCZ positions (Tan et al., 2019); (g) Reconstructed total solar irradiance (dTSI) (Steinhilber et al., 2009); (h) Northern Hemisphere summer insolation (July 21) (Berger and Loutre, 1991). The timeseries in a-g and i were filtered at 1/400 yr-1 frequency to emphasize the centennial-scale oscillations (solid colorful lines). The light blue and yellow shadings indicate two typical periods as same as Figure 3. |
Table 3 Pearson correlation coefficients between synthesized cave δ18O timeseries and internal and external forcing factors |
NC_syn | CEC_syn | SC_syn | PDO_sst | NAO | SOI | ITCZ | TSI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC_syn | 1 | |||||||
CEC_syn | -0.46** | 1 | ||||||
SC_syn | 0.03 | -0.06 | 1 | |||||
PDO_sst | 0.11 | -0.03 | 0.40** | 1 | ||||
NAO | -0.23** | 0.43** | 0.44** | 0.13 | 1 | |||
SOI | -0.25** | 0.01 | 0.32** | 0.05* | 0.12 | 1 | ||
ITCZ | -0.11 | 0.15* | -0.29** | -0.26** | -0.23** | 0.05* | 1 | |
TSI | -0.004 | -0.01 | -0.34** | -0.20** | -0.18* | 0.04 | -0.02 | 1 |
Notes: *95% confidence level, **99% confidence level. |
We express our gratitude to Drs. Xiuyang Jiang, Kan Zhao, Tingyong Li, Fucai Duan, Wuhui Duan, Jianjun Yin, Jingyao Zhao, and Chaojun Chen for generously providing the raw data of cave records. Additionally, we acknowledge those who have contributed to the public availability of previously published data from various websites. We appreciate the reviewers for their valuable suggestions regarding the manuscript.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
|
[56] |
|
[57] |
|
[58] |
|
[59] |
|
[60] |
|
[61] |
|
[62] |
|
[63] |
|
[64] |
|
[65] |
|
[66] |
|
[67] |
PAGES2kConsortium, 2013. Continental-scale temperature variability during the past two millennia. Nature Geoscience, 6(5): 339-346.
|
[68] |
|
[69] |
|
[70] |
|
[71] |
|
[72] |
|
[73] |
|
[74] |
|
[75] |
|
[76] |
|
[77] |
|
[78] |
|
[79] |
|
[80] |
|
[81] |
|
[82] |
|
[83] |
|
[84] |
|
[85] |
|
[86] |
|
[87] |
|
[88] |
|
[89] |
|
[90] |
|
[91] |
|
[92] |
|
[93] |
|
[94] |
|
[95] |
|
[96] |
|
[97] |
|
[98] |
|
[99] |
|
[100] |
|
[101] |
|
[102] |
|
[103] |
|
[104] |
|
[105] |
|
[106] |
|
[107] |
|
[108] |
|
[109] |
|
[110] |
|
[111] |
|
[112] |
|
[113] |
|
[114] |
|
[115] |
|
[116] |
|
[117] |
|
[118] |
|
[119] |
|
[120] |
|
[121] |
|
[122] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |