Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Different trajectories of livelihood transformations in response to the trans-Eurasian exchange in agricultural, pastoral, and agro-pastoral regions of north China during the late Neolithic and Bronze Age
Dong Guanghui (1977‒), Professor, specialized in environmental archaeology and environmental change research. E-mail: ghdong@lzu.edu.cn |
Received date: 2023-06-21
Accepted date: 2024-01-11
Online published: 2024-04-24
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41825001)
NSFC-INSF Joint Research Project(42261144670)
Academician and Expert Workstation of Yunnan Province(202305AF150183)
European Research Council(ERC-2019-ADG 883700-TRAM)
Significant spatiotemporal variation in human livelihood patterns and its relationship to trans-Eurasian exchange and climate change in north China during the late Neolithic and Bronze Age, has been intensively studied in recent years, but the comprehensive influence of natural and social factors on this variation is not well understood. Therefore, we analyze archaeobotanical, zooarchaeological and carbon isotopic data from late Neolithic and Bronze Age sites in agricultural, pastoral, and agro-pastoral regions of north China. Our results demonstrate human subsistence strategies transformed at different speeds in these three geographic areas after wheat, barley, and sheep, goats, and cattle were introduced into north China. Introduced crops and livestock dominated human livelihoods in pastoral regions and became important subsistence in areas above ~1500 m a.s.l. in agro-pastoral regions after ~3600 BP. In agricultural regions, indigenous millet crops were the most important subsistence throughout 6000- 2200 BP, but wheat use increased significantly around 2700 BP. Our study suggests that the introduction of new crops and herbivorous livestock related to the prehistoric trans-Eurasian exchange, and their adaptive advantage in high-cold environments might have rapidly facilitated human adaptability and social development in pastoral regions and northwest margin of agro-pastoral regions during the Bronze Age.
DONG Guanghui , LIANG Huan , LU Yongxiu , WANG Jia . Different trajectories of livelihood transformations in response to the trans-Eurasian exchange in agricultural, pastoral, and agro-pastoral regions of north China during the late Neolithic and Bronze Age[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2024 , 34(4) : 681 -698 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-024-2223-1
Figure 1 The distribution of late Neolithic and Bronze sites with archaeobotanical, zooarchaeological, and carbon isotopic data of human bone collagen in agricultural, pastoral, and agro-pastoral regions of north China |
Figure 2 Spatial differentiation of archaeobotanical (A1 to A4), zooarchaeological (B1 to B4), and carbon isotopic (C1 to C4) data from late Neolithic and Bronze Age sites in agricultural, pastoral, and agro-pastoral regions of north China during four phases differentiated by time |
Figure 3 Latitudinal and elevational variations of archaeobotanical data from 6000 BP to 2200 BP in agricultural (A1 to A4), pastoral (B1 to B4), and agro-pastoral (C1 to C4) regions of north China |
Figure 4 Latitudinal and elevational variations of zooarchaeological data from 6000 BP to 2200 BP in agricultural (A1 to A4), pastoral (B1 to B4), and agro-pastoral (C1 to C4) regions of north China |
Figure 5 Latitudinal and elevational variations of carbon isotope data of human remains from 6000 BP to 2200 BP in agricultural (A1 to A4), pastoral (B1 to B4), and agro-pastoral (C1 to C4) regions of north China |
Figure 6 The average of archaeobotanical (a), zooarchaeological (b), and carbon isotopic (c) data percentages from late Neolithic and Bronze Age sites in agricultural, pastoral and agro-pastoral regions of north China across four phases differentiated by time |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
Gansu Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology GPICRA, 2016. Ganguya Cemetery in Jiuquan. Beijing: Cultural Relics Press. (in Chinese)
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
Institute of Archaeology, CASS IA-CASS, 1999. Shizhaocun and Xishanping. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House. (in Chinese)
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
|
[56] |
|
[57] |
|
[58] |
|
[59] |
|
[60] |
|
[61] |
|
[62] |
|
[63] |
|
[64] |
|
[65] |
|
[66] |
|
[67] |
|
[68] |
|
[69] |
|
[70] |
|
[71] |
|
[72] |
|
[73] |
|
[74] |
|
[75] |
|
[76] |
Qinghai Provincial Archaeology Team QPAT, 1979. No.1 tomb of Majiayao culture in Hetaozhuang, Minhe county, Qinghai Province. Cultural Relics, 9: 29-32. (in Chinese)
|
[77] |
|
[78] |
|
[79] |
|
[80] |
|
[81] |
|
[82] |
|
[83] |
|
[84] |
|
[85] |
|
[86] |
|
[87] |
|
[88] |
|
[89] |
|
[90] |
|
[91] |
|
[92] |
|
[93] |
|
[94] |
|
[95] |
|
[96] |
|
[97] |
|
[98] |
|
[99] |
|
[100] |
|
[101] |
Xi’an Banpo Museum XBM, 1988. Jiangzhai:Neolithic Site Excavation Report. Beijing: Cultural Relic Press. (in Chinese)
|
[102] |
|
[103] |
|
[104] |
|
[105] |
|
[106] |
|
[107] |
|
[108] |
|
[109] |
|
[110] |
|
[111] |
|
[112] |
|
[113] |
|
[114] |
|
[115] |
|
[116] |
|
[117] |
|
[118] |
|
[119] |
|
[120] |
|
[121] |
|
[122] |
|
[123] |
|
[124] |
|
[125] |
Zhouyuan Archaeological Team ZAT, 2011. The excavation of the bronze casting remains in locus west of Zhuangli village at Zhouyuan site in the springs of 2003 and 2004. Acta Archaeologica Sinica, (2): 245-316. (in Chinese)
|
[126] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |