Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Tourism development potential and obstacle factors of cultural heritage: Evidence from traditional music in Xiangxi
Zhang Xianyong (1978-), PhD Candidate, specialized in tourism development of traditional music. E-mail: langjuanyunshu@163.com |
Received date: 2023-02-21
Accepted date: 2023-10-23
Online published: 2024-02-06
Supported by
Project of Hunan Provincial Social Science Achievement Evaluation Committee(XSP2023GLC023)
Excellent Youth Program of the Education Department of Hunan Province(22B0692)
National Natural Science Fundation of China(41971191)
National Natural Science Fundation of China(42171213)
Project of Hunan University of Arts and Science(22BSQD15)
Project of Henan Philosophy and Social Sciences(2022BJJ026)
Traditional music is an important component of cultural heritage. However, studies have scarcely explored the tourism development potential and the obstacle factors of traditional music. This study takes Xiangxi as the research site, constructs an evaluation index system, and utilizes survey and geographical methods. The major research results are as follows: First, the average potential of resource endowment, tourism industry development, and socio-economic conditions are 0.28, 0.36, and 0.24, respectively. The potential of resource endowment is higher in the west and lower in the east, that of tourism industry development is higher in the north and south and lower in the center, and that of socio-economic conditions is higher in the south and lower in the north. Second, the comprehensive potential is 0.29, which is higher in the northwest and southwest regions. Coordination in most administrative units is at a medium level, and most regions have obvious advantages in resource endowment. Third, the primary obstacle factor is socio-economic conditions (39.21%), followed by resource endowment (30.73%) and tourism industry development (30.06%). The administrative units can be classified into four groups: socio-economic condition obstacle, resource endowment and tourism industry development obstacles, resource endowment and socio-economic condition obstacles, and tourism industry development and socio-economic condition obstacles. The highest priority goals for Xiangxi involve economic development and the integration of modern technologies to stimulate passenger flow. For regions with limited traditional music items (eastern area of Xiangxi), tourism development should be restrained and other resources with stronger inherent advantages should be exploited. This study explored the quantification of traditional music tourism potential, representing a novel breakthrough in this field of research. The indicator system and research methods used in this study can provide guidance and methodological references for cultural heritage research. The suggestions proposed in this article contribute to the rational development and effective protection of cultural heritage resources and the healthy development of the tourism industry.
ZHANG Xianyong , PENG Baofa , ZHOU Lulu , LU Chunyang , WANG Yali , LIU Rui , XIANG Hui . Tourism development potential and obstacle factors of cultural heritage: Evidence from traditional music in Xiangxi[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2024 , 34(2) : 309 -328 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-024-2206-2
Figure 1 Logical framework of the study |
Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the research area (Xiangxi, Hunan, China) |
Table 1 Evaluation index system for traditional music tourism development potential |
Primary indicators | Secondary indicators | Interpretation of indicators | Attribute | Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|
Resources endowment | Structure (X1) | For traditional music with 3 levels, assign 3; traditional music with only 2 levels, assign 2; traditional music with only 1 level, assign 1; no traditional music, assign 0 | + | 0.0578 |
Reputation (X2) | National traditional music = 3; provincial traditional music = 2; municipal traditional music = 1 | + | 0.0787 | |
Richness (X3) | Number of traditional music (items) | + | 0.0725 | |
Showability (X4) | Is it suitable for stage performance (yes = 1, no = 0) | + | 0.0734 | |
Experience (X5) | Is it suitable for visitors participation (yes = 1, no = 0) | + | 0.0825 | |
Target tourists (X6) | Mass tourists = 1, specific tourists = 0 | + | 0.0734 | |
Tourism industry development | Star hotels (X7) | Number of star hotels | + | 0.0329 |
Tourist organizations (X8) | Number of travel agencies | + | 0.0878 | |
Tourist accommodations (X9) | Number of beds | + | 0.0629 | |
Tourists (X10) | Number of tourists (104 person) | + | 0.0751 | |
Tourism status (X11) | Tourism income/GDP (%) | + | 0.0420 | |
Socio-economic conditions | Population density (X12) | Total population/Total area (person/km2) | + | 0.0278 |
GDP per capita (X13) | RMB (yuan) | + | 0.0779 | |
Park and green land (X14) | Area of park and green land/ total population (m2) | + | 0.0778 | |
Traffic accessibility (X15) | Road area per capita (m2) | + | 0.0775 |
Note: X2, X4, X5, and X6 are the accumulated results for traditional music items. |
Figure 3 Potential of resource endowment (RE) and its indicators in XiangxiNote: the tourism development potential of traditional music is divided into five levels, lowest (0-0.2), lower (0.2-0.4), medium (0.4-0.6), higer (0.6-0.8), highest (0.8-1), and the same below. |
Figure 4 Potential of tourism industry development (TID) and its indicators in Xiangxi |
Figure 5 Potential for socio-economic conditions (SEC) and its indicators in Xiangxi |
Figure 6 Spatial pattern of comprehensive potential for traditional music in Xiangxi |
Figure 7 Coordination and dominance of tourism development potential for traditional music in Xiangxi |
Figure 8 Hot areas of tourism development potential for traditional music in Xiangxi |
Table 2 Tourism development obstacles of traditional music in Xiangxi |
Categories | 1 | 2 | 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Obstacle factor | Resource endowment | Tourism industry development | Socio-economic conditions |
Obstacle degree (%) | 30.73 | 30.06 | 39.21 |
Table 3 Tourism development obstacle types of traditional music in Xiangxi (%) |
Name | Resource endowment | Tourism industry development | Socio-economic conditions |
---|---|---|---|
Jishou | 1.50 | 35.49 | 63.01 |
Luxi | 35.56 | 32.83 | 31.61 |
Fenghuang | 47.37 | 4.74 | 47.89 |
Huayuan | 32.71 | 37.44 | 29.86 |
Baojing | 28.09 | 39.49 | 32.42 |
Guzhang | 36.72 | 35.93 | 27.35 |
Yongshun | 38.76 | 22.98 | 38.26 |
Longshan | 26.61 | 30.61 | 42.78 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |