Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Warm season temperature reconstruction in North China based on the tree-ring blue intensity of Picea meyeri
Chen Qiaomei (1991-), PhD Candidate, E-mail: cqm@mail.ynu.edu.cn |
Received date: 2022-12-05
Accepted date: 2023-07-20
Online published: 2023-12-14
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China(32061123008)
In the past 30 years, observational climate datasets reveal a significant a drying and warming trend over in North China. Understanding of climatic variability over North China and its driving mechanism in a long-term perspective is, however, limited to a few sites only, especially the lack of temperature reconstructions based on latewood density and blue intensity. In this study, we developed a 281-year latewood blue intensity chronology based on 45 cores of Picea meyeri in western North China. Based on the discovery that the warm season (May-August) mean maximum temperature is the main controlling factor affecting the change in blue light reflection intensity, we established a regression model that explained 37% of the variance during the calibration period (1950-2020), allowing to trace the mean maximum temperature up to 1760 CE. From the past 261 years, we identified seven persistent high temperature periods (1760-1773, 1778-1796, 1805-1814, 1869-1880, 1889-1934, 1984- 2000, 2004-2020) and three persistent low temperature periods (1815-1868, 1935-1963, 1969-1983) in North China. Comparisons of a nearby temperature reconstructions and climate gridded data indicate that our reconstruction record a wide range of temperature variations in North China. The analysis of links between large-scale climatic variation and the temperature reconstruction showed that there is a relationship between extremes in the warm season temperature and anomalous SSTs in the equatorial eastern Pacific, and implied that the extremes in the warm season temperature in North China will be intensified under future global warming.
CHEN Qiaomei , YUE Weipeng , CHEN Feng , HADAD Martín , ROIG Fidel , ZHAO Xiaoen , HU Mao , CAO Honghua . Warm season temperature reconstruction in North China based on the tree-ring blue intensity of Picea meyeri[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2023 , 33(12) : 2511 -2529 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-023-2187-6
Figure 1 Overview of the study area. (a) The geographical distribution of North China. The pink line is the boundary between the Asian monsoon and the westerly, the black circles are the compared sampling sites, and the blue and red circles are the meteorological station (Ningwu) and the sampling point of this study (ZGB), respectively. (b) The monthly mean temperature (T), monthly mean maximum temperature (Tmax), monthly mean minimum temperature (Tmin) and precipitation (P) at Ningwu meteorological station. (c) Topographic features of the sampling site and the distribution of the water system. All compared samples are from the following papers: Cook et al., (2010); Cai et al., (BWD, 2010); Bao et al., (HLBE, 2012); Li et al., (NW, SD, HS, LY, 2018); Chen et al., (NWT, XF, SR, 2020). |
Figure 2 (a) The tree-ring latewood blue intensity standard chronology (LWBI, thin black line), smoothed with a 15-year low-pass filtering (red thick line). Gray shading highlights the ±10% error of the unsmoothed LWBI chronology, and orange fill shows how the sample depth changes over time. (b) Expressed population signal (EPS) (computed over 51 years, lagged by 50 years). (c) Mean inter-series correlation (Rbar) statistics. The EPS > 0.85 threshold is outlined by the vertical dashed line. |
Table 1 Tree-ring blue intensity chronology statistics |
Parameter | MS | SD | SNR | MC | VFE | AOF | EPS | MSC | EPS≥0.85 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZGB | 0.08 | 0.07 | 24.25 | 0.47 | 24.0% | 0.91 | 0.96 | 1740-2020 | 1760 |
Note: MS: mean sensitivity; SD: standard deviation; SNR: signal-to-noise ratio; MC: mean correlation with master series; VFE: variance in first eigenvector; AOF: autocorrelation order first; EPS: expressed population signal; MSC: master series coverage |
Figure 3 The correlations between the latewood blue intensity chronology (LWBI) and monthly meteorological data (including mean maximum temperature, mean temperature, mean minimum temperature, and total precipitation). Correlation analysis between LWBI and instrumental meteorological data of Ningwu meteorological station is based on the original (a) and first-order difference calculation (b). Correlation analysis between LWBI and CRU grid meteorological data is based on the original (c) and first-order difference calculation (d). The sliding correlation analysis of LWBI and CRU grid data over a 21-year window is based on the original (e) and first-order difference calculations (f). Asterisks (*) indicate the 95% confidence level. |
Figure 4 The reconstruction process and characteristic analysis of the mean maximum temperature in North China. (a) Scatter plot of LWBI and observed mean maximum temperature from May to August. (b) Original comparison of reconstructed and observed mean maximum temperatures. (c) First-order difference comparison of reconstructed and observed mean maximum air temperature. (d) Reconstruction of the May-August mean maximum temperature of North China since 1760 CE. The black smooth curve was obtained after 15 years of low-pass filtering of the reconstruction results, and the gray dashed and solid lines represent the long-term mean plus or minus the standard deviation. Gray shading was added for ±10% error in the reconstruction results. (e) The distribution of the kernel density function of the observed (pink area) and reconstructed (gray area) mean maximum temperature during the calibration period (1950-2020) and the mean maximum temperature before (light blue area) and after (purple area) the modern warm period (1850) over the whole period (1760-2020). The vertical lines indicate the center of the peak. (f) Results of MTM analysis of the reconstructed results, with the 99% and 95% confidence levels inferred from red noise spectra; periodicities significant at the 99% level are indicated (arrows). (g) Wavelet power spectrum of the reconstructed results, with significant periods (p < 0.05) highlighted by black lines. |
Table 2 Leave-one-out cross-validation statistics for the warm-season mean maximum temperature reconstructions |
Calibration | Validation | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Period | R2 | Radj2 | F | Period | RE | PMT | ST | DW |
1986-2020 | 0.270 | 0.248 | 12.23** | 1950-1985 | 0.216 | 5.035 | 22+/14-** | 2.064 |
1950-1985 | 0.295 | 0.275 | 14.29** | 1986-2020 | 0.182 | 4.484 | 23+/12-** | 1.718 |
1950-2020 | 0.369 | 0.360 | 40.51** |
Note: R2: model explained variance, Radj2: adjusted R2 considering multiple independent variables in the model, F: statistical significance of the regression model, DW: Durbin-Watson test, RE: reduction of error, ST: sign test, PMT: product means test. ** indicates the 99% confidence level. |
Figure 5 Spatially correlated between CRU gridded climate data from May to August for the 1950-2020 period with (a) observed mean maximum temperature, (b) reconstructed mean maximum temperature, (c) detrended mean maximum temperature, (d) first-order difference of mean maximum temperature. A black square indicates the extent of the study area, marked by 95% of the area covered by black dots as a comparison marker. |
Figure 6 Comparison of the present reconstruction of the mean maximum temperature (May to August) with other paleoclimatic records derived from tree-ring from surrounding regions. (a) Reconstruction of mean maximum temperature from May to August in North China (this study). (b) Reconstruction of mean temperature from May to August in northern-central China (Li et al., 2018). (c) Reconstruction of mean maximum temperature from April to September in Hulunbuir, Inner Mongolia (Bao et al., 2012). (d) Reconstruction of mean temperature from May to July in Lüliang Mountain, Shanxi (Cai et al., 2010). (e) Regional PDSI reconstruction for North China (Cook et al., 2010). (f) Summer monsoon season (July to October) streamflow variation reconstruction for the middle Yellow River (Chen et al., 2020). All sequences are dimensionless and standardized by the Z score, and low-frequency fluctuations are realized by the low-pass filtering method (LOWESS) with a 10-year step size. On the basis of the mean value, all series are filled upward (downward) as red, indicating a warm period (dry period or low streamflow period), while downward (upward) as blue indicates a cold period (wet period or high streamflow period). The common warm period (dry period or low streamflow period) is marked with an orange square, and the common cold period (wet period or high streamflow period) is marked with a purple square. |
Figure 7 Spatial correlation and composite analysis. (a) The original reconstruction is spatially correlated with the SST during the calibration period. (b) The first-order difference of reconstruction is spatially correlated with the SST during the calibration period. (c) Composite modes of SST corresponding to 10 high-temperature years during the calibration period. (d) Composite modes of SST corresponding to 10 low-temperature years during the calibration period. (e) Composite modes of the water vapor flux divergence corresponding to 10 high-temperature years during the calibration period. (f) Composite modes of the water vapor flux divergence corresponding to 10 low-temperature years during the calibration period. |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
|
[56] |
|
[57] |
|
[58] |
|
[59] |
|
[60] |
|
[61] |
|
[62] |
|
[63] |
|
[64] |
|
[65] |
|
[66] |
|
[67] |
|
[68] |
|
[69] |
|
[70] |
|
[71] |
|
[72] |
|
[73] |
|
[74] |
|
[75] |
|
[76] |
|
[77] |
|
[78] |
|
[79] |
|
[80] |
|
[81] |
|
[82] |
|
[83] |
|
[84] |
|
[85] |
|
[86] |
|
[87] |
|
[88] |
|
[89] |
|
[90] |
|
[91] |
|
[92] |
|
[93] |
|
[94] |
|
[95] |
|
[96] |
|
[97] |
|
[98] |
|
[99] |
|
[100] |
|
[101] |
|
[102] |
|
[103] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |