Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Socio-economic roots of human settlement layout in the marginal zone of the Changtang Plateau uninhabited area:A comparative study of three typical counties
Zhang Haipeng (1992-), PhD Candidate, specialized in economic geography and regional studies. E-mail: zhanghp.19b@igsnrr.ac.cn |
Received date: 2022-04-14
Accepted date: 2022-08-29
Online published: 2023-03-21
Supported by
The Second Comprehensive Scientific Investigation and Research Project of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau(2019QZKK1007)
The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA20010102)
Human activities in the marginal zone of the Changtang Plateau (CTP) uninhabited area are important research topics in China and globally. Based on the core-periphery theory of geography, this paper selected three counties in the marginal zone of the CTP uninhabited area with significant transitional physical geography features and socio-economic conditions as case areas. We used the data set of settlement patches identified by visual interpretation in Google Earth Pro, combining them with field survey data to study the evolution of human settlements on the CTP, the characteristics of settlement layout, and their socio-economic roots. The study found that: (1) Since the democratic reform in Tibet, the production mode of herders on the CTP has transitioned from four-season nomadic herding to cold-season sedentary grazing, warm-season rotational grazing, and then to a combination of sedentary grazing and forage supplementation. In structural changes of grassroots organizations, village boundaries were clarified, grazing ranges were fixed, and settlement systems were formed. (2) On a large scale, the settlement layout on the CTP showed a certain degree of agglomeration in local areas, but the settlements’ spatial agglomeration decreased as the observation scale decreased. The settlement size structure matched the typical rank-size rule of rural settlements. (3) The settlement layout of the CTP showed significant traffic lines and dominant location orientation. These orientation characteristics revealed “core-periphery” regional differences. Changes in production conditions, such as artificial grass cultivation and part-time employment, affected the dependence on traditional grazing points. Settlements moved from resource dependence to dependence on multiple elements, such as resources and facilities. The religious, cultural heritage of the sacred mountains, lakes, and temples influenced the settlement layout, leading to clustering in local areas and to group format. This study expands our understanding of the settlement pattern in the marginal zone of uninhabited areas and provides valuable references for advancing the optimization of the CTP human settlement system in the new era.
ZHANG Haipeng , LIU Weidong , LIU Zhigao , CHENG Han , LIU Hanchu . Socio-economic roots of human settlement layout in the marginal zone of the Changtang Plateau uninhabited area:A comparative study of three typical counties[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2023 , 33(3) : 655 -680 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-023-2100-3
Figure 1 Analytical framework |
Figure 2 Location of the study area (Nagqu County, Nyima County and Shuanghu County) |
Table 1 Comparison of the basic situation of the three counties in the Changtang Plateau |
County name | Area (thousand km2) | Number of townships | Number of administrative villages | Rural per capita disposable income (thousand yuan) | Population (thousand) | Settlements area (km2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NQC | 16.20 | 12 | 141 | 14.30 | 112.95 | 75.94 |
NMC | 72.50 | 14 | 77 | 13.99 | 34.92 | 9.29 |
SHC | 116.64 | 7 | 31 | 11.82 | 14.50 | 3.82 |
County name | Population density (person/km2) | Average patch area (ha) | Lowest altitude (m) | Geographic location | Location conditions | |
NQC | 6.97 | 2.60 | 4260 | Marginal zone of CTP | Prefectural government location | |
NMC | 0.48 | 0.40 | 4537 | Hinterland of CTP | Marginal zone of uninhabited area | |
SHC | 0.12 | 0.68 | 4585 | Hinterland of CTP | Marginal zone of uninhabited area |
Note: The socio-economic data in the table are for 2020. |
Table 2 Pastoral social system and settlement development changes on the Changtang Plateau |
Time | Lifestyle | Residence style | Forms of social organization | Settlement forms |
---|---|---|---|---|
Before the 1960s | Semi-sedentary grazing or seasonal nomadic grazing | Tents | Feudal tribal relations | Seasonal nomadic herding near water and grass combined with winter settlement and a dual settlement model combining settlement and mobility |
After the democratic reform in Tibet | Semi-sedentary grazing or seasonal nomadic grazing | Tents | Mutual aid groups became autonomous grassroots production organizations without village boundaries. A new collective identity was formed among mutual aid group members | Nomadic by season, with settlement in winter and spring, semi-settlement, no village |
The People’s Commune Movement in the 1970s | Settling down and building houses with a relatively fixed grazing area, herders cannot graze beyond the territorial space of the production team or production group | Small stone or adobe houses | Mutual aid groups are changed to production groups under production teams, which belong to collective organizations and communes belong to higher-level administrative bodies | Changes in social organization have begun to clarify the administrative, territorial and collective boundaries of grassroots organizations in pastoral areas, herders no longer move frequently, and semi-settlement |
In the 1980s, the contracting of pasture was implemented in northern Tibet, and the establishment of townships was restored in 1984 in the northern Tibetan pastoral areas | Grazing within a fixed range, herders’ awareness of the boundaries of grazing has increased | Houses | In the northern Tibetan pastoral areas, township-level structures were restored, production teams became administrative villages, and production groups became natural villages | Settlement become the norm, and village prototypes gradually take shape |
In 1994, the Tibet Autonomous Region issued and implemented the Grassland Law of the People’s Republic of China | The boundaries of collective use of pasture are clearly defined, and natural villages are the smallest collective organizations | Houses | Natural villages and administrative villages | The fixation of the means of production fixed the form of the village, and the determination of the right to use pasture had a propulsive significance for the formation of natural villages |
In 2001, the Tibet Autonomous Region began to implement the nomadic settlement project | Poverty alleviation and relocation, ecological migration, nomadic settlement policy began to be implemented, additional supplemental feeding for settled grazing | Progressive diversification of housing functions | Natural villages and administrative villages | Housing, animal sheds, haylofts, etc. |
From 2010 to 2015, the country vigorously implemented the nomadic settlement project | Central financial subsidies for the autonomous regions and various funds to aid Tibet vigorously promote the settlement of herders, settled grazing, the proportion of forage supplementation increased | Housing features are getting better | Natural villages and administrative villages | Housing, barns, haylofts, lambing shed, warming sheds and other facilities are constantly being improved |
Table 3 Spatial agglomeration state of clusters at county and township levels |
Study area | County level | Township level | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Observed mean distance (m) | Expected mean distance (m) | ANN | Observed mean distance (m) | Expected mean distance (m) | ANN | |
NQC | 540.95 | 1424.71 | 0.38 | 577.02 | 1166.94 | 0.50 |
NMC | 918.06 | 2683.51 | 0.34 | 1033.45 | 2368.56 | 0.42 |
SHC | 1986.32 | 5083.16 | 0.39 | 2797.91 | 4430.44 | 0.61 |
Figure 3 Spatial agglomeration status of settlements at village scale |
Figure 4 Rank-size distribution characteristics of settlement systems in three counties |
Figure 5 Traffic proximity characteristics of settlement layout |
Figure 6 Location selection characteristics of settlement layout |
Figure 7 Proximity characteristics of traditional production conditions for settlement layout |
Figure 8 Temple proximity characteristics of the settlement layout |
Figure 9 The symbiotic pattern of settlements and temples in the vicinity of Tangra Yutso and the proximity of the township centers where the temples are located |
Figure 10 Socio-economic factors’ driving mechanism of settlement layout on the Changtang Plateau |
Table 4 Comparison of the characteristics of alpine pastoral towns on the Changtang Plateau and plain agricultural towns |
Characteristics | Alpine pastoral towns | Plain agricultural towns |
---|---|---|
Population | Sparsely populated | Intensive |
Area | Minimal | Large |
Land resources | Wide geographical area | Limited land area and concentrated layout |
Human-land relationship | Attracting population transfer through construction improvement and slow development | Increasing population drives land expansion and frequent dynamic changes |
Agglomeration effect on population and economic factors | Weak | Strong |
Functional structure | Mainly administrative and public service functions, single function | Administrative functions and economic functions are integrated and developed, with diverse functions and stronger economic functions |
Development momentum | Government macro-control and public policy driven, with a few central towns having economic drive | Factor-driven economy with strong endogenous dynamics |
Support systems | Transfer payments, counterpart support and financial subsidies | Economic dividend and social efficiency |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |