Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Perception of pleasure in the urban running environment with street view images and running routes
Zhang An (1982-), Associate Professor, specialized in cartography and GIS. E-mail: zhangan@igsnrr.ac.cn |
Received date: 2022-03-07
Accepted date: 2022-09-13
Online published: 2022-12-25
Supported by
China’s National Key Research and Development Program(2017YFB0503500)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41901321)
The urban environment affects human behavior and health. Most studies on the feelings of street spaces have not considered a specific kind of realistic scene, such as running. To overcome this limitation, we explored the relationship between the urban environment and the pleasure of running. We collected 8260 street view images from 153 running routes in Beijing and invited more than 400 volunteers of different genders and ages to rate their sense of pleasure in street view images of the urban running environment through an online survey. Then, the proportion of visual elements in street images was extracted based on semantic segmentation, and the landscape was divided. Finally, a linear mixed model was used to predict the pleasure scores of different gender and age groups for different landscapes. The results show significant differences in the pleasure scores for different landscapes and age groups. Middle-aged people's sense of pleasure was lower than that of the young and the elderly. More greenery was associated with a higher pleasure score, while the proportion of urban elements such as buildings was negatively correlated with the pleasure score. The results indicate that running in a natural landscape is pleasurable and beneficial for mental health.
Key words: pleasure assessment; running routes; street view; landscape types; age groups
ZHANG An , SONG Liuyi , ZHANG Fan . Perception of pleasure in the urban running environment with street view images and running routes[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2022 , 32(12) : 2624 -2640 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-022-2064-8
Figure 1 Schematic diagram of running routes in Beijing |
Table 1 Pleasure scales |
Scores | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corresponding emotion | Very bad | Bad | Not bad | Pleasant | Very pleasant |
Table 2 Statistics of questionnaire survey results |
Age | Number of questionnaire samples | Number of street view samples for effective evaluation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Men | Women | Total | Men | Women | Total | |
10-19 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 70 | 75 | 145 |
20-29 | 100 | 177 | 277 | 101 | 101 | 202 |
30-39 | 51 | 32 | 83 | 101 | 98 | 199 |
40-49 | 22 | 27 | 49 | 91 | 87 | 178 |
50-59 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 42 | 26 | 68 |
60 and above | 6 | 6 | 12 | 45 | 44 | 89 |
Average | 30 | 27 | 29 | |||
Total samples | 192 | 254 | 446 | 1212 | ||
Valid samples | 192 | 254 | 446 | 881 |
Figure 2 Graphical summary |
Figure 3 Classification method of scene visual elements |
Figure 4 Spatial distribution of pleasure score results |
Figure 5 Overall results of pleasure score |
Table 3 Difference test of pleasure score between men and women |
Gender | Samples | Average of rank | Sum of rank | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Men | 450 | 449.30 | 186336 | 0.319 |
Women | 431 | 432.33 | 202185 |
Figure 6 Difference tests of pleasure scores in different age groups |
Table 4 Difference test of the pleasure score between the urban landscape, transitional landscape, and natural landscape |
Samples | Average of rank | Sum of rank | |
---|---|---|---|
Urban | 231 | 248.88 | 57490.5 |
Transitional | 386 | 344.98 | 133162.5 |
p | p < 0.000 | ||
Urban | 231 | 187.88 | 43401 |
Natural | 264 | 300.6 | 79359 |
p | p < 0.000 | ||
Transitional | 386 | 304.11 | 117387.5 |
Natural | 264 | 356.77 | 94187.5 |
p | p < 0.000 |
Table 5 Pleasure scores of different gender groups on different landscapes |
Urban landscape | Transitional landscape | Natural landscape | |
---|---|---|---|
Men | 2.92 | 3.41 | 3.62 |
Women | 2.82 | 3.43 | 3.56 |
Total average | 2.90 | 3.34 | 3.58 |
Total standard deviation | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.77 |
Figure 7 Different age groups’ pleasure scores for different landscape types |
Figure 8 Correlation between visual elements and pleasure scores (**p < 0.01, *p < 0.05) |
Table 6 Coefficients in the mixed linear models |
Plant | Building | Road | Sidewalk | Sky | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Urban | 2.10*** | −0.27*** | 2.82** | ||
Transitional | 1.39*** | −5.45*** | 7.11*** | ||
Natural | 0.20** | −0.90* |
Table 7 Intercept of specific population |
Landscape | Gender | Age | 10-19 | 20-29 | 30-39 | 40-49 | 50-59 | 60 and above |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Urban | Men | 0.018 | 0.099 | 0.010 | −0.079 | −0.001 | 0.139 | |
Women | 0.089 | 0.045 | −0.066 | −0.079 | −0.038 | −0.135 | ||
Transitional | 0.075 | −0.006 | −0.133 | −0.080 | 0.045 | 0.098 | ||
Natural | 0.011 | −0.028 | −0.017 | −0.009 | 0.025 | 0.018 |
Table 8 Goodness of fit of the pleasure regression model |
R2m | R2c | R2 | |
---|---|---|---|
Urban | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
Transitional | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.20 |
Natural | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |