Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Substrate damage and recovery after giant clam shell mining at remote coral reefs in the southern South China Sea
Zhou Shengnan (1993‒), PhD Candidate, specialized in coral reef geomorphology and environment. E-mail: zhousn@scsio.ac.cn |
Received date: 2020-01-04
Accepted date: 2021-08-12
Online published: 2022-01-25
Supported by
Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory(Guangzhou)(GML2019ZD0206)
Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory(Guangzhou)(GML2019ZD0104)
National Science & Technology Fundamental Resources Investigation Program of China(2018FY100103)
The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA13010103)
Special Support Program for Cultivating High-level Talents in Guangdong Province(2019BT02H594)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(41776128)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1901217)
Copyright
Giant clam shell mining (GCSM), a unique phenomenon occurring at remote coral reefs in the southern South China Sea (SCS), forms striking scars on the reef flats and damages the reef flat substrate. Through image analyses at three times (2004.02.02, 2014.02.26, and 2019.04.10) and in situ surveys at Ximen Reef, a representative site that has experienced GCSM, we quantified the GCSM-generated substrate damage and the corresponding recovery. GCSM was estimated to have occurred sometime between 2012 and 2014, causing reduction in live coral subarea and formation of micro-relief as trenches and mounds. GCSM-generated damage was restricted to the reef flat. After GCSM, coral and algae subarea increased, and the trenches and mounds tended to be filled and eroded, representing a natural recovery of the substrate. The legal prohibition on human disturbances at the coral reefs contributed to substrate recovery at Ximen Reef. This case also implied that recovery of the other coral reefs that suffered from GCSM is possible.
ZHOU Shengnan , SHI Qi , YANG Hongqiang , ZHANG Xiyang , LIU Xiaoju , TAN Fei , YAN Pin . Substrate damage and recovery after giant clam shell mining at remote coral reefs in the southern South China Sea[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2021 , 31(11) : 1655 -1674 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-021-1916-y
Figure s1 Giant clam shell mining on coral reefs in the South China Sea (from Lee, 2016) (a. a mining boat on a reef flat; b. arc-shaped scars on a satellite image; c. a propeller spinning on the reef flat; d. giant clam shells being moved into a boat) |
Figure 1 Location of the study area in the southern South China Sea (a. Jiuzhang Reefs; b. Ximen Reef; c. Changxian Reef. Image is from Google Earth) |
Figure S2 Google Earth images of Ximen Reef at three times. Green lines are the in-situ sounding lines. |
Figure 2 Image analyses of Ximen Reef at three times (a. enlarged part of the mining area showing the details of the mining scars; b. processed images; c. GRB pseudo-color images; d. classified subareas of the substrate (green: LC; cyan: CA; orange: RS) on the reef flat of Ximen Reef at three times. The yellow line shows the range of the mining area according to the distribution of the arc-shaped mining scars on the image from 2014.02.26, and the green rectangle shows the range of the enlarged part) |
Figure S3 Linear fitting between measured height and logarithmic ratio of blue and red bands (ln(B)/ln(R)) and absolute error distribution against the measured height |
Figure 4 Reconstructed substrate reliefs of the mining area at Ximen Reef at three times (a. enlarged part of the reconstructed substrate relief; b. reconstructed substrate relief; c: Relief trend surface) |
Table S1 Percentages of LC, CA, and RS subareas on the mining area accounting for the total reef flat |
LC (%) | CA (%) | RS (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
2004.02.02 | 18.3 | 7.9 | 17.6 |
2014.02.26 | 10.8 | 8.2 | 24.8 |
2019.04.10 | 10.4 | 11.1 | 22.4 |
Table S2 Percentage differences of LC, CA, and RS subareas on the mining area accounting for the total reef flat during two periods |
Initial class | Final class | 2004.02.02-2014.02.26 (%) | 2014.02.26-2019.04.10 (%) |
---|---|---|---|
LC | LC | 7.9 | 7.0 |
CA | 4.3 | 2.6 | |
RS | 6.1 | 1.2 | |
CA | LC | 1.6 | 2.2 |
CA | 1.7 | 3.3 | |
RS | 4.7 | 2.8 | |
RS | LC | 1.3 | 1.2 |
CA | 2.3 | 5.2 | |
RS | 14.0 | 18.4 |
Table S3 Percentiles of the retrieved height of the mining area at three times |
5% (m) | 25% (m) | 50% (m) | 75% (m) | 95% (m) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004.02.02 | 3.84 | 4.21 | 4.42 | 4.60 | 4.85 |
2014.02.26 | 3.88 | 4.21 | 4.42 | 4.59 | 4.88 |
2019.04.10 | 3.82 | 4.20 | 4.42 | 4.60 | 4.88 |
Figure 5 Variation of the substrate relief on the mining area during two periods (-0.2 m ≤ HD ≤ 0.2 m: no-change in relief; HD ≤ -0.2 m: trenches on 2014.02.26 and decreasing relief on 2019.04.10; HD ≥ 0.2 m: mounds on 2014.02.26 and rising relief on 2019.04.10) |
Figure 3 Photos of typical substrate classes on the reef flat of Ximen Reef (a. LC; b. CA; c. RS; d. trenches and mounds. Photos taken by Shi in June 2020) |
Figure S4 Reconstructed relief of the reef flat of Ximen Reef at three times. The black line shows the range of mining area according to the distribution of the arc-shaped mining scars on the image from 2014.02.26. |
Figure S5 Photos of coral communities on the reef slope of Ximen Reef (taken by Yang in 2016 and 2017) |
Figure 6 Coral predators and coral bleaching found at remote coral reefs in the southern South China Sea (a. A. planci found at Ximen Reef (Photo taken by Yang in June 2019); b. T. hoshinota found at Changxian Reef (Photo taken by Yang in May 2017); c and d. coral bleaching on the reef flat of Ximen Reef (Photos taken by Shi in June 2020)) |
Figure 7 Distribution of parameters indicating coral bleaching event in the South China Sea on June 30, 2020*a. SST anomalies; b. DHW; c. Coral Bleaching Alert Area. Data from Daily Global 5 km Satellite Coral Bleaching Heat Stress Monitoring, Coral Reef Watch, NOAA (https://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/product/5km/*The green solid circle shows the site of Ximen Reef) |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
Bridge,
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
|
[56] |
|
[57] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |