Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Effect of human settlements on urban thermal environment and factor analysis based on multi-source data: A case study of Changsha city
Xiong Ying (1977-), Professor, specialized in land use and urban sprawl, regional and urban planning. E-mail: xiong2001ying@126.com |
Received date: 2021-01-27
Accepted date: 2021-03-20
Online published: 2021-08-25
Supported by
National Social Science Foundation of China(15BJY051)
Open Topic of Hunan Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Utilization(SYS-ZX-202002)
Research Project of Appraisement Committee of Social Sciences Research Achievements of Hunan Province(XSP18ZDI031)
In view of the lack of comprehensive evaluation and analysis from the combination of natural and human multi-dimensional factors, the urban surface temperature patterns of Changsha in 2000, 2009 and 2016 are retrieved based on multi-source spatial data (Landsat 5 and Landsat 8 satellite image data, POI spatial big data, digital elevation model, etc.), and 12 natural and human factors closely related to urban thermal environment are quickly obtained. The standard deviation ellipse and spatial principal component analysis (PCA) methods are used to analyze the effect of urban human residential thermal environment and its influencing factors. The results showed that the heat island area increased by 547 km2 and the maximum surface temperature difference reached 10.1℃ during the period 2000-2016. The spatial distribution of urban heat island was mainly concentrated in urban built-up areas, such as industrial and commercial agglomerations and densely populated urban centers. The spatial distribution pattern of heat island is gradually decreasing from the urban center to the suburbs. There were multiple high-temperature centers, such as Wuyi square business circle, Xingsha economic and technological development zone in Changsha County, Wangcheng industrial zone, Yuelu industrial agglomeration, and Tianxin industrial zone. From 2000 to 2016, the main axis of spatial development of heat island remained in the northeast-southwest direction. The center of gravity of heat island shifted 2.7 km to the southwest with the deflection angle of 54.9° in 2000-2009. The center of gravity of heat island shifted to the northeast by 4.8 km with the deflection angle of 60.9° in 2009-2016. On the whole, the change of spatial pattern of thermal environment in Changsha was related to the change of urban construction intensity. Through the PCA method, it was concluded that landscape pattern, urban construction intensity and topographic landforms were the main factors affecting the spatial pattern of urban thermal environment of Changsha. The promotion effect of human factors on the formation of heat island effect was obviously greater than that of natural factors. The temperature would rise by 0.293℃ under the synthetic effect of human and natural factors. Due to the complexity of factors influencing the urban thermal environment of human settlements, the utilization of multi-source data could help to reveal the spatial pattern and evolution law of urban thermal environment, deepen the understanding of the causes of urban heat island effect, and clarify the correlation between human and natural factors, so as to provide scientific supports for the improvement of the quality of urban human settlements.
XIONG Ying , ZHANG Fang . Effect of human settlements on urban thermal environment and factor analysis based on multi-source data: A case study of Changsha city[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2021 , 31(6) : 819 -838 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-021-1873-5
Figure 1 The study area (Changsha city) |
Figure 2 DEM of Changsha city |
Table 1 Data sources |
Data series | Name of the data | Data source | Use | Time |
---|---|---|---|---|
Remote sensing data | Landsat 5 TM, Landsat 8 OLI TIRS | http://www.gscloud | Inversion of surface temperature and extraction of surface information | 2000.7; 2009.8; 2016.7 |
DEM | http://www.gscloud | Calculation of elevation and slope | 2016 | |
Vector data | Administrative boundary vector data of Changsha city | China Earth System Science Data Sharing Network | Extraction of boundary of the study area | 2016 |
Big spatial data | POI data of Changsha city | Scott map | Extraction of index of economic activity | 2016 |
Table 2 Classification of surface temperature |
Temperature rating | Extremely low temperature zone | Low temperature zone | Relatively low temperature zone | Medium temperature zone | Relatively high temperature zone | High temperature zone | Extremely high temperature zone |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Temperature range | $T<u-2.5std$ | $\begin{matrix} & u-2.5std \le T \\ & <u-1.5std \\ \end{matrix}$ | $\begin{matrix} & u-1.5std \le T \\ & <u-0.5std \\ \end{matrix}$ | $\begin{matrix} & u-0.5std \le T \\ & <u+0.5std \\ \end{matrix}$ | $\begin{matrix} & u+0.5std \le T \\ & <u+1.5std \\ \end{matrix}$ | $\begin{matrix} & u+1.5std \le T \\ & <u+2.5std \\ \end{matrix}$ | $T\ge u+2.5std$ |
Note: u represents the mean value of surface temperature in the study area, and std represents the standard deviation of surface temperature. |
Figure 3 Spatial distribution of UHI in Changsha city in 2000, 2009 and 2016 |
Figure 4 Development direction and centroid migration of UHI in Changsha city in 2000, 2009, and 2016 |
Table 3 Area (km2) and proportion (%) of different temperature categories in 2000, 2009, and 2016 |
Year | Extremely low | Low | Relatively low | Medium | Relatively high | High | Extremely high | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Area | Proportion | Area | Proportion | Area | Proportion | Area | Proportion | Area | Proportion | Area | Proportion | Area | Proportion | |
2000 | 76.04 | 1.93 | 456.42 | 11.59 | 2346.89 | 59.57 | 781.76 | 19.84 | 180.58 | 4.58 | 64.75 | 1.64 | 33.07 | 0.84 |
2009 | 11.67 | 0.30 | 1003.43 | 25.47 | 1443.27 | 36.64 | 871.28 | 22.12 | 280.12 | 7.11 | 227.68 | 5.78 | 102.07 | 2.59 |
2016 | 149.68 | 3.80 | 908.47 | 23.06 | 1274.13 | 32.34 | 852.05 | 21.63 | 371.64 | 9.43 | 278.21 | 7.06 | 105.34 | 2.67 |
Table 4 Statistics of surface temperature categories in administrative districts of Changsha city (km2) |
Category (temperature zone) | Furong | Tianxin | Yuelu | Kaifu | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | 2009 | 2016 | 2000 | 2009 | 2016 | 2000 | 2009 | 2016 | 2000 | 2009 | 2016 | |
Extremely low | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 17.67 | 6.85 | 0.09 | 7.86 |
Low | 0.79 | 0.39 | 0.95 | 7.42 | 6.15 | 1.85 | 27.41 | 43.35 | 160.79 | 28.27 | 16.24 | 15.77 |
Relatively low | 5.53 | 1.40 | 0.80 | 23.41 | 4.12 | 3.64 | 304.21 | 194.52 | 145.28 | 105.07 | 40.88 | 36.57 |
Medium | 8.91 | 4.45 | 2.30 | 17.06 | 11.68 | 9.72 | 139.86 | 162.65 | 80.28 | 28.03 | 62.51 | 50.41 |
Relatively high | 13.39 | 9.15 | 8.78 | 14.02 | 16.26 | 16.52 | 34.94 | 55.74 | 62.31 | 13.59 | 37.60 | 42.48 |
High | 8.98 | 16.99 | 16.29 | 9.85 | 26.46 | 28.14 | 10.31 | 47.48 | 45.48 | 6.77 | 27.05 | 32.25 |
Extremely high | 5.93 | 11.30 | 14.06 | 3.75 | 10.86 | 9.53 | 3.33 | 16.33 | 8.26 | 7.61 | 11.83 | 10.86 |
Category (temperature zone) | Yuhua | Wangcheng | Changsha | |||||||||
2000 | 2009 | 2016 | 2000 | 2009 | 2016 | 2000 | 2009 | 2016 | ||||
Extremely low | 1.63 | 0.00 | 0.24 | 1.04 | 0.02 | 65.80 | 66.37 | 11.55 | 51.51 | |||
Low | 7.96 | 0.30 | 1.30 | 83.00 | 213.84 | 249.37 | 301.57 | 723.16 | 478.44 | |||
Relatively low | 38.20 | 3.20 | 3.70 | 582.09 | 361.73 | 347.29 | 1288.38 | 837.42 | 736.84 | |||
Medium | 24.50 | 13.72 | 9.03 | 275.08 | 304.85 | 211.57 | 288.31 | 311.42 | 488.74 | |||
Relatively high | 18.44 | 21.57 | 24.15 | 35.62 | 68.61 | 69.31 | 50.59 | 71.20 | 148.09 | |||
High | 12.87 | 42.28 | 51.56 | 6.04 | 27.05 | 32.25 | 9.92 | 40.38 | 72.24 | |||
Extremely high | 7.48 | 30.00 | 21.09 | 2.61 | 9.39 | 9.89 | 2.35 | 12.38 | 31.64 |
Figure 5 Percentage of UHI area in administrative districts of Changsha city in 2000, 2009 and 2016 |
Table 5 Indicators influencing urban thermal environment |
First level indicators | Second level indicators | Third level indicators |
---|---|---|
Natural factors | Vegetation and water body | FVC |
MNDWI | ||
Topographic features | DEM | |
Slope | ||
Human factors | Landscape pattern index | CONTAG |
SHDI | ||
DIVISION | ||
COHESION | ||
Intensity of urban construction | NDISI | |
NDBBI | ||
Albedo | ||
Socio-economic activities | POI |
Table 6 Correlation coefficients between factors and surface temperature |
Index | NDISI | FVC | MNDWI | NDBBI | POI | DEM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pearson correlation coefficient | 0.369** | -0.508** | -0.326** | 0.815** | 0.519** | -0.514** |
Correlation results | significant | significant | significant | significant | significant | significant |
Index | Slope | DIVISION | SHDI | CONTAG | COHESION | Albedo |
Pearson correlation coefficient | -0.270** | -0.276** | -0.373** | -0.338* | 0.433** | 0.395** |
Correlation results | significant | significant | significant | significant | significant | significant |
Note: **donates that the correlation was significant at the level of 0.01 (detection<0.01); *donates that correlation was significant at the level of 0.05 (p<0.05). |
Figure 6 Spatial distribution of normalized indicators in Changsha city |
Table 7 Eigenvalue and contribution rate of principal components |
Component | Initial eigenvalue | The load sum of squares | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eigenvalue | Contribution rate (%) | Cumulative contribution rate (%) | Eigenvalue | Variance percentage (%) | Cumulative contribution rate (%) | |
1 | 3.557 | 29.644 | 29.644 | 3.557 | 29.644 | 29.644 |
2 | 2.637 | 21.978 | 51.622 | 2.637 | 21.978 | 51.622 |
3 | 1.893 | 15.778 | 67.400 | 1.893 | 15.778 | 67.400 |
4 | 0.991 | 8.254 | 75.654 | |||
5 | 0.786 | 6.554 | 82.208 | |||
6 | 0.762 | 6.354 | 88.562 | |||
7 | 0.514 | 4.286 | 92.848 | |||
8 | 0.428 | 3.569 | 96.417 | |||
9 | 0.259 | 2.159 | 98.575 | |||
10 | 0.134 | 1.114 | 99.689 | |||
11 | 0.030 | 0.246 | 99.935 | |||
12 | 0.008 | 0.065 | 100.000 |
Table 8 Principal component scoring load matrix |
Impact factors | First principal component | Second principal component | Third principal component |
---|---|---|---|
POI | 0.085 | 0.207 | -0.295 |
MNDWI | -0.506 | -0.470 | 0.136 |
FVC | 0.395 | -0.457 | 0.284 |
DIVISION | 0.930 | -0.175 | -0.219 |
SHDI | 0.936 | -0.188 | -0.227 |
CONTAG | 0.511 | 0.054 | -0.180 |
COHESION | -0.918 | 0.193 | 0.004 |
NDISI | 0.431 | 0.687 | 0.243 |
Slope | -0.206 | -0.600 | 0.432 |
DEM | 0.086 | -0.269 | 0.762 |
Albedo | -0.144 | 0.817 | -0.125 |
NDBBI | 0.192 | 0.699 | -0.331 |
Figure 7 Spatial patterns of the first three principal components of Changsha city |
Table 9 Regression coefficient and test results |
Impact factors | Nonstandardized coefficient | Standardization coefficient Beta | t | Significance | Collinearity statistics | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Standard error | Tolerance | VIF | ||||
Constant | 0.361 | 0.010 | - | 35.175 | 0.000 | - | - |
1 | 0.116 | 0.007 | 0.327 | 15.442 | 0.000 | 0.625 | 1.601 |
2 | 0.012 | 0.008 | 0.031 | 1.471 | 0.000 | 0.644 | 1.553 |
3 | -0.289 | 0.011 | -0.640 | -26.032 | 0.006 | 0.463 | 2.159 |
Note: R2 = 0.805; F = 957.765; significance coefficient is less than 1%. |
Table 10 Interaction between temperature and human and natural factors |
Human factors | Natural factors | Temperature (℃) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Degree of action | Grade (%) | Degree of action | Grade (%) | |
1.754 | 100 | -1.460 | 100 | 0.293 |
1.5786 | 90 | -1.606 | 110 | -0.0274 |
1.4032 | 80 | -1.752 | 120 | -0.3488 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |