Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Influence of river-lake isolation on the water level variations of Caizi Lake, lower reach of the Yangtze River
An Lesheng (1982‒), Associate Professor, specialized in wetland hydrology and eco-hydrology.E-mail: als00316@163.com |
Received date: 2020-03-06
Accepted date: 2020-11-16
Online published: 2021-06-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.(41771107)
Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation, No(1808085MD101)
Outstanding Young Talents Support Program in Universities of Anhui Province in 2020, No(gxyq2020030)
Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No(2020317)
Copyright
In order to explore the water level variations of Caizi Lake under river-lake isolation, the monthly water level of the Chefuling station in Caizi Lake from 1989 to 2018 and the daily water level, rainfall and flow of local hydrological stations in 2018 were analyzed by using the Mann-Kendall trend test and wavelet analysis. Results showed that the difference of the average water level of Caizi Lake between the flood and dry seasons was 3.34 m, with a multi-year average water level of 10.42 m above sea level. The first and second main periods of the water level of Caizi Lake were 128 and 18 months, respectively, with 4 and 29 “up-down” cycles, respectively. From 2018, the next 3‒4 years were likely to be the low water level period. The water level of Caizi Lake was significantly correlated with that of the Anqing hydrological station of the Yangtze River (r=0.824, P<0.01). In addition, the current hydrological staging of Caizi Lake was about 30 days behind than before the sluice was built. Under the dual influences of the river-lake isolation and the Yangtze-to-Huaihe Water Diversion Project (YHWD), the hydrological regime change of Caizi Lake and its eco-environmental effect needed long-term monitoring and research.
Key words: water level; hydrological regime; river-lake isolation; wavelet analysis; Caizi Lake
AN Lesheng , LIAO Kaihua , ZHU Lei , ZHOU Baohua . Influence of river-lake isolation on the water level variations of Caizi Lake, lower reach of the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2021 , 31(4) : 551 -564 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-021-1858-4
Figure 1 Location of the Caizi Lake |
Figure 2 The box and whisker charts (showing maximum, 25 and 75th percentile, mean, median, minimum and/or outliers) of the monthly water level of Caizi Lake |
Table 1 Linear regression tread analysis of the water levels in Caizi Lake from 1989 to 2018 |
Variables | Regression equations | P values |
---|---|---|
Monthly highest water level | Z=‒0.002*t+16.955 | 0.951 |
Monthly average water level | Z=‒0.009*t+29.313 | 0.328 |
Monthly lowest water level | Z= 0.009*t‒10.089 | 0.053 |
Water level in dry season | Z= 0.010*t‒11.965 | 0.006 |
Water level in rising season | Z=‒0.027*t+62.996 | 0.065 |
Water level in flood season | Z=‒0.023*t+59.135 | 0.288 |
Water level in retreating season | Z=‒0.004*t+18.545 | 0.776 |
Note: Z denotes water level; t represents time |
Figure 3 Variations of water level of Caizi Lake in January (a) and July (b) |
Figure 4 The result of M-K mutation testing on the monthly lowest water level of Caizi Lake. The horizontal dotted lines denote P < 0.05. |
Figure 5 Wavelet variance (a), wavelet coefficients as function of scales (b), and wavelet coefficients under 18 and 128-month period scales (c) for monthly water level time series of Caizi Lake |
Table 2 Correlation matrices of water level of the four hydrological stations in 2018 |
Station name | All year round | Dry season | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chefuling | Anqing | Sluice upstream | Sluice downstream | Chefuling | Anqing | Sluice upstream | Sluice downstream | |
Chefuling | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Anqing | 0.824** | 1 | 0.172 | 1 | ||||
Sluice upstream | 0.949** | 0.871** | 1 | 0.561** | ‒0.033 | 1 | ||
Sluice downstream | 0.845** | 0.996** | 0.885** | 1 | 0.447** | 0.923** | 0.101 | 1 |
Note: Chefuling-Chefuling hydrological station; Anqing-Anqing hydrological station of the Yangtze River. **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed) |
Figure 6 Daily water level of 4 hydrologic stations and precipitation of Caizi Lake in 2018 |
Figure 7 Flow duration curves for hydrological stations of Zongyang sluice and Shahebu in 2018. Negative values indicate that the water from the Yangtze River was poured into the Changhe River. |
Table 3 Runoff of tributaries in the Caizi Lake Basin |
Tributary name | River length (km) | Catchment area (km2) | Annual precipitation (mm) | Runoff coefficient | Annual runoff (104 m3) | Average discharge of typical flood process (m3/s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dasha River | Upper Shahebu | 90.8 | 460 | 1421.4 | 0.60 | 38910 | 281.2 |
Lower Shahebu | 936 | 1359.7 | 0.50 | 63634 | |||
Guache River | 59.0 | 328 | 1358.0 | 0.50 | 22271 | 58.5 | |
Longmian River | 55.0 | 316 | 1324.8 | 0.50 | 20932 | 56.4 | |
Kongcheng River | 48.0 | 577 | 1312.8 | 0.50 | 37874 | 90.9 | |
Lake area | 217 | 1349.3 | 1.00 | 11553 | 57.6 | ||
Polder area | 400 | 1353.7 | 0.40 | 21659 | 63.8 | ||
Total | 252.8 | 3234 | 216833 | 608.4 |
Note: The average discharge of a typical flood process is derived from the rainfall data measured at various rainfall stations in the Caizi Lake Basin from June 19 to July 18, 1983 |
Figure 8 The relationship of cumulative increase in water level and cumulative precipitation of Caizi Lake in 2018 |
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |