Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Building national eco-cultural protection areas and the Xiangxi practice in Hunan Province
Liu Chunla, PhD and Associate Professor, specialized in ecological culture geography and regional development. E-mail: liuchunla111@163.com |
Received date: 2019-10-27
Accepted date: 2020-04-17
Online published: 2021-02-25
Supported by
The Construction Program for First-Class Disciplines of Hunan Province(5010002)
Education Department Research Project of Hunan Province(20B362)
Copyright
Since 2007, the Chinese government has initiated the building of national eco-cultural protection areas (NECPAs), thereby embarking on a significant transformation of the model of intangible cultural heritage (ICH) protection in China. To understand the origin and outputs of this policy, this paper demonstrates the context of China’s NECPAs. It proposes a conceptual NECPA framework that mainly features regional overall ICH protection. This is followed by an examination of the case of Xiangxi in Western Hunan as a pilot zone for China’s eco-cultural protection. Xiangxi has performed much related work to promote NECPAs and made great progress in regional overall ICH protection. This insight suggests that there are benefits and costs associated with promotion of China’s NECPAs and regional overall ICH protection. Despite the advantages of institutional innovation, the unexpected side effects actually undermine the success of plan implementation.
LIU Chunla , WU Liping , XU Mei , ZENG Fanchao , JIAO Lipeng . Building national eco-cultural protection areas and the Xiangxi practice in Hunan Province[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020 , 30(12) : 2076 -2092 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-020-1828-2
Figure 1 Distribution of 21 national eco-cultural protection experimental areas in ChinaNote: 1. Minnan eco-cultural protection experimental area; 2. Huizhou eco-cultural protection experimental area; 3. Regong eco-cultural protection experimental area; 4. Qiangzu eco-cultural protection experimental area; 5. Hakka (Meizhou) eco-cultural protection experimental area; 6. Wuling mountain (Xiangxi) Tujia and Miao nationalities eco-cultural protection experimental area; 7. Ocean fisheries (Xiangshan) eco-cultural protection experimental area; 8. Jinzhong eco-cultural protection experimental area; 9. Weishui eco-cultural protection experimental area; 10. Diqing eco-cultural protection experimental area; 11. Dali eco-cultural protection experimental area; 12. Shanbei eco-cultural protection experimental area; 13. Bronze drum (Hechi) eco-cultural protection experimental area; 14. Southeast Guizhou ethnic eco-cultural protection experimental area; 15. Hakka (South Jiangxi) eco-cultural protection experimental area; 16. Gesar (Guoluo) eco-cultural protection experimental area; 17. Wuling mountain (Southwest Hubei) Tujia and Miao nationalities eco-cultural protection experimental area; 18. Wuling mountain (Southeast Chongqing) Tujia and Miao nationalities eco-cultural protection experimental area; 19. Rap (Baofeng) eco-cultural protection experimental area; 20. Tibetan (Yushu) eco-cultural protection experimental area; 21. Hakka (Western Fujian) eco-cultural protection experimental area |
Figure 2 Conceptual framework for eco-cultural protection areas |
Table 1 Policy orientation of China’s intangible cultural heritage (ICH) protection since 2004 (Source: http:// www.ihchina.cn/index.html.) |
Year | Major policies |
---|---|
2004 | Approving “Convention for the Safeguarding of the ICH”; implementing the project of protecting Chinese national folk culture. |
2005 | Strengthening the protection of China’s ICH; establishing the national ICH list assessment committee; appointing the first national class of ICH representatives; conducting a census of ICH. |
2006 | Devising various measures for the protection and management of national ICH and the special funds; establishing the national committee of experts on the protection of ICH. |
2007 | Publishing management measures for the marking of China’s ICH; declaring “Representative Works of Human ICH”; strengthening the protection of time-honored brand ICH. |
2008 | Formulating provisional measures for the recognition and management of representative inheritors of national ICH projects. |
2009 | Delivering the third batch of representative successors of national ICH projects. |
2010 | Aim to protect ICH; building NECPAs. |
2011 | Issuing “ICH protection law.” |
2012 | Strengthening productive protection of ICH; promulgating measures for the management of national special funds for the protection of ICH. |
2014 | Publishing the list of the fourth national class of ICH representational projects. |
2016 | Establishing “Cultural and Natural Heritage Day.” |
2017 | Implementing the project of inheritance and development of Chinese excellent traditional culture; implementing the revitalization plan for Chinese traditional crafts. |
2018 | Publishing management measures for NECPAs; supporting the establishment of ICH poverty alleviation and employment workshops. |
Figure 3 Spatial distribution of Chinese traditional villages in Xiangxi |
Figure 4 Framework for constructing ICH learning system |
Figure 5 Framework for overall protection based on traditional villages |
Figure 6 Framework for combined salvageable preservation and productive protection |
Figure 7 Framework for regional eco-culture and tourism integrated development |
Figure 8 Framework for building regional overall characteristic theme parks |
Figure 9 Crucial indicators of urban and rural population in China |
Figure 10 Crucial indicators of people’s needs for cultural property in China |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |