Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Evolutionary dynamics of the main-stem longitudinal profiles of ten kongdui basins within Inner Mongolia, China
Author: Gu Zhenkui, PhD, specialized in fluvial geomorphology. E-mail: bygzk853@126.com
Received date: 2017-10-25
Accepted date: 2018-02-22
Online published: 2019-03-20
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41671004, No.41371036
Copyright
The longitudinal profiles of main streams of ten kongdui basins within Inner Mongolian Autonomous Region of China were characterized in this study by analyzing a series of quantitative indexes that are relevant to tectonic activity and river action, and by establishing a series of multiple regression models. The results reveal that all longitudinal profiles are concave in shape, with a range of concavity between 1.1 and 3.1, increasing from west to east. Data also show that the concavity of the profiles is significantly negatively correlated with profile length, altitude difference, average altitude, drainage area and sediment load of the basins. Analysis reveals that kongdui basins have suffered from moderate-to-weak tectonic activity over time, again characterized by a west-to-east weakening trend. Stream power also varies along the main channels of the ten kongdui basins; average values in each case fall between 0.8 W/m and 8.4 W/m, generally higher within the middle reaches. This decreasing trend in stream power within the lower reaches of kongdui basins might provide one key explanation for sedimentation there. Data also show that the average stream power in western and central basins tends to be higher than that in eastern examples, even though both the highest and the lowest values are seen within two middle ones. This analysis shows that the longitudinal profile concavity values are mainly controlled by tectonic activity and that the effect of river action is insignificant.
GU Zhenkui , SHI Changxing , PENG Jie . Evolutionary dynamics of the main-stem longitudinal profiles of ten kongdui basins within Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019 , 29(3) : 417 -431 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-019-1607-0
Figure 1 Map showing location of the tributaries (kongduis) |
Table 1 Kongdui landform elements and sediment yields |
Kongdui | Longitudinal profile length (km) | Altitude difference (m) | Drainage area (km²) | Sediment yield (104 t/yr)* |
---|---|---|---|---|
MBL | 101 | 501 | 1,261 | 439 |
BES | 74 | 545 | 545 | 205 |
HLG | 86 | 439 | 944 | 329 |
XLG | 101 | 394 | 1,194 | 482 |
HTC | 94 | 438 | 875 | 184 |
HQH | 50 | 242 | 213 | 41 |
HSL | 94 | 395 | 1,089 | 201 |
MHG | 72 | 366 | 407 | 72 |
DLG | 68 | 329 | 451 | 77 |
HST | 60 | 268 | 406 | 67 |
*Xu (2014) |
Figure 2 Sketch of definition of concavity index |
Figure 3 The processes followed to acquire parameters |
Table 2 The formulae used in this study to compute geomorphic parameters and corresponding threshold value interpretations |
Parameter | Formula | Threshold value interpretation |
---|---|---|
HI | HI = (Hmean - Hmin) / (Hmax - Hmin) Hmean, Hmax, and Hmin denote the mean, maximum, and minimum heights of a basin, respectively. | HI > 0.7, 0.5 ≤ HI ≤ 0.7, and HI < 0.5 equate to high, moderate, and low levels of tectonic activity, respectively (e.g., Altın, 2012; Mahmood and Gloaguen, 2012). |
AF | AF = 100 × (Ar / At) Ar denotes the area of the basin on the right side of the trunk stream, while At refers to the total basin area. | |AF - 50| > 15, 7 ≤ |AF - 50| ≤ 15, and |AF - 50| < 7 equate to high, moderate, and low levels of tectonic activity, respectively (e.g., Hamdouni et al., 2008; Gao et al., 2013). |
SL | SL = (ΔH / ΔL) × L ΔH denotes the difference in elevation between the ends of the river reach under consideration, while ΔL denotes the length of the reach, L is the distance between the measured reach and the drainage divide. | SL > 500, 300 ≤ SL ≤ 500, and SL < 300 equate to high, moderate, and low levels of tectonic activity, respectively (e.g., Hamdouni et al., 2008; Gao et al., 2016). |
Bs | Bs = B1 / Bw B1 denotes the basin length measured from the headwater to the mouth, while Bw is the maximum basin width. | High, moderate, and low levels of tectonic activity have values of Bs > 3, 2-3, and < 2, respectively (e.g., Hamdouni et al., 2008; Gao et al., 2016). |
Vf | Vf = 2Vfw / [(Eld - Esc) + (Erd - Esc)] Vfw denotes the width of the valley floor, while Eld and Erd refer to the elevations of the left and right valley divides, respectively, and Esc is the elevation of the valley floor. | Vf < 1, 1 ≤ Vf ≤ 3, and Vf > 3 equate to high, moderate, and low levels of tectonic activity, respectively (e.g., Hamdouni et al., 2008; Altın, 2012; Mahmood and Gloaguen, 2012; Gao et al., 2016). For calculating Vf, numerous erosional valley cross-sections were obtained using the “interpolate line” tool in the software ArcGIS. The horizontal width between two shoulders and the width of the valley bottom at a height of 5 m were measured from each valley cross-section, and an average Vf value was calculated for each basin. |
Figure 4 Modern and three hypothetical original profiles for a stream. We assume that the highest profile will remain steady while the other two initial examples will be elevated to the highest extent by later tectonic uplift in the absence of erosion |
Figure 5 Longitudinal profile shapes (a) and CI values (b). Abbreviations: H/Ho, ratio between height at the point of measurement above the river mouth (H) and the total fall of the stream (Ho); L/Lo, ratio between stream length from the river mouth to the point of measurement (L) and total length (Lo) |
Table 3 Correlation coefficients between landform elements within the ten kongdui basins |
Profile length | Altitude difference | Average altitude | Drainage area | Concavity | Sediment yield | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Profile length | 1 | 0.674* | 0.730* | 0.964** | ‒0.844** | 0.854** |
Altitude difference | 1 | 0.961* | 0.592 | ‒0.869** | 0.366 | |
Average altitude | 1 | 0.701* | ‒0.887** | 0.437 | ||
Drainage area | 1 | ‒0.781** | 0.897** | |||
Concavity | 1 | ‒0.639* | ||||
Sediment yield | 1 |
* significant at α = 0.05; **significant at α = 0.01 |
Figure 6 Changes in coefficients and P-values (significance) of correlations between profile CI values and segment averages as segment length increases |
Figure 7 Variation in CI values of 15-km long segments along the longitudinal profiles |
Table 4 Geomorphic indexes and values for the intensity of tectonic activity within the ten kongdui basins evaluated in this study |
Basins | HI | AF | SL | Bs | Vf | IRAT | Geomorphic index class | IRAT class | Intensity | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HI | AF | SL | Bs | Vf | |||||||||
MBL | 0.55 | 61.76 | 245.56 | 3.77 | 6.49 | 2.2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | Moderate |
BES | 0.51 | 21.92 | 286.97 | 2.73 | 6.51 | 2.2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | Moderate |
HLG | 0.54 | 45.52 | 250.92 | 3.08 | 8.37 | 2.4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | Moderate |
XLG | 0.60 | 63.58 | 222.36 | 2.70 | 6.57 | 2.4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | Moderate |
HTC | 0.63 | 56.70 | 224.94 | 3.50 | 5.67 | 2.4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | Moderate |
HQH | 0.31 | 55.54 | 100.96 | 1.75 | 4.85 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | Weak |
HSL | 0.52 | 47.89 | 177.22 | 2.60 | 5.77 | 2.8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | Weak |
MHG | 0.41 | 48.94 | 153.84 | 4.23 | 6.15 | 2.6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | Weak |
DLG | 0.41 | 54.59 | 128.57 | 3.28 | 7.09 | 2.6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | Weak |
HST | 0.50 | 38.83 | 119.75 | 1.24 | 5.30 | 2.6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | Weak |
Figure 8 The intensity of tectonic activity (a) and Hack profiles for the ten kongdui basins evaluated in this study (b) |
Figure 9 Stream power and SPG variations over a fixed 10-km distance in streams across the study area. The gray line denotes stream power while the black one indicates SPG. |
Figure 10 Average stream power values (a) and the lengths of erosional and depositional reaches (b) |
Figure 11 Average values of stream power (a) and simulated concavity (b) |
Table 5 Relations between profile concavity and internal-external forces |
Extreme case | Natural conditions | Regression model | Factor P-value | Equation P-value | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
$e=0$ | Elevation of the stream source is constant and water discharge has remained the same. | $CI=-1.38\times \mathop{I}_{\text{at}}-0.07\times \mathop{SP}_{\text{mean}}+2.51$ | $Iat$: 0.0226 | 0.0333 | 0.62 |
$\mathop{SP}_{mean}$: 0.8980 | |||||
$e=Spl$ | The difference in height between the stream source and the estuary is zero. | $CI=-1.26\times \mathop{I}_{\text{at}}-0.30\times \mathop{SP}_{\text{mean}}+2.53$ | $I\text{at}$: 0.0344 | 0.0288 | 0.64 |
$\mathop{SP}_{mean}$: 0.5930 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |