Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Tracking climate change in Central Asia through temperature and precipitation extremes
Author: Zhang Man, PhD, specialized in extreme climate events in arid areas. E-mail: zhangman14@mails.ucas.ac.cn
Received date: 2018-02-07
Accepted date: 2018-05-30
Online published: 2019-01-25
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41630859
The CAS “Light of West China” Program, No.2015-XBQN-B-17
Copyright
Under the impacts of climate change and human activities, great uncertainties still exist in the response of climate extremes, especially in Central Asia (CA). In this study, we investigated spatial-temporal variation trends and abrupt changes in 17 indices of climate extremes, based on daily climate observations from 55 meteorological stations in CA during 1957-2005. We also speculated as to which atmospheric circulation factors had the greatest impacts on climate extremes. Our results indicated that the annual mean temperature (Tav), mean maximum and minimum temperature significantly increased at a rate of 0.32ºC/10a, 0.24ºC/10a and 0.41ºC/10a, respectively, which was far higher than the increasing rates either globally or across the Northern Hemisphere. Other temperature extremes showed widespread significant warming trends, especially for those indices derived from daily minimum temperature. All temperature extremes exhibited spatially widespread rising trends. Compared to temperature changes, precipitation extremes showed higher spatial and temporal variabilities. The annual total precipitation significantly increased at a rate of 4.76 mm/10a, and all precipitation extremes showed rising trends except for annual maximum consecutive dry days (CDD), which significantly decreased at a rate of -3.17 days/10a. On the whole, precipitation extremes experienced slight wetter trends in the Tianshan Mountains, Kazakhskiy Melkosopochnik (Hill), the Kyzylkum Desert and most of Xinjiang. The results of Cumulative Deviation showed that Tav and Txav had a significant abrupt change around 1987, and all precipitation indices experienced abrupt changes in 1986. Spearman’s correlation analysis pointed to Siberian High and Tibetan Plateau Index_B as possibly being the most important atmospheric circulation factors affecting climate extremes in CA. A full quantitative understanding of these changes is crucial for the management and mitigation of natural hazards in this region.
ZHANG Man , CHEN Yaning , SHEN Yanjun , LI Baofu . Tracking climate change in Central Asia through temperature and precipitation extremes[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019 , 29(1) : 3 -28 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-019-1581-6
Figure 1 Location of Central Asia and the meteorological stations |
Table 1 Definitions of 17 extreme climate indices chosen for this study |
Index | Indicator name | Definitions | Units |
---|---|---|---|
Tav | Mean Tmean | Annual mean temperature | ºC |
Txav | Mean Tmax | Annual average daily maximum temp | ºC |
Tnav | Mean Tmin | Annual average daily minimum temp | ºC |
FD0 | Frost days | Annual count when TN (daily minimum) < 0ºC | days |
ID0 | Ice days | Annual count when TX (daily maximum) < 0ºC | days |
SU25 | Summer days | Annual count when TX (daily maximum) > 25ºC | days |
TXx | Max Tmax | Monthly maximum value of daily maximum temp | ºC |
TNx | Max Tmin | Monthly maximum value of daily minimum temp | ºC |
TXn | Min Tmax | Monthly minimum value of daily maximum temp | ºC |
TNn | Min Tmin | Monthly minimum value of daily minimum temp | ºC |
Prcptot | Annual total wet-day precipitation | Annual total precipitation in wet days (RR ≥1mm) | mm |
CDD | Consecutive dry days | Annual maximum number of consecutive days with RR <1 mm | days |
CWD | Consecutive wet days | Annual maximum number of consecutive days with RR ≥1 mm | days |
R10mm | Number of heavy precipitation days | Annual count of days when RR ≥10 mm | days |
R20mm | Number of very heavy precipitation days | Annual count of days when RR ≥20 mm | days |
Rx1 day | Max 1-day precipitation amount | Monthly maximum 1-day precipitation | mm |
Rx5 day | Max 5-day precipitation amount | Monthly maximum consecutive 5-day precipitation | mm |
Detail definitions of extreme climate indices can be checked on the ETCCDMI website: http://etccdi.pacificclimate. org/list_27_indices.shtml. All indices are calculated by R ClimDex. Temp denotes temperature. RR represents daily precipitation. |
Table 2 Temporal variation trends of extreme temperature indices based on MK test during 1957-2005 in CA |
Index | MK test | Percentage of stations showing increasing trend | Percentage of stations showing significant increasing trend | Percentage of stations showing decreasing trend | Percentage of stations showing significant decreasing trend | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trend rate | Z-value | Trends | Significance level (p) | |||||
Tav | 0.032ºC/a | 4.89 | ↑ | 0.01 | 98.18% | 94.55% | 1.82% | 0 |
Txav | 0.024ºC/a | 3.39 | ↑ | 0.01 | 100% | 70.91% | 0 | 0 |
Tnav | 0.041ºC/a | 5.78 | ↑ | 0.01 | 98.18% | 94.55% | 1.82% | 1.82% |
FD0 | -0.323 days/a | -4.71 | ↓ | 0.01 | 3.64% | 0 | 96.36% | 80.00% |
ID0 | -0.187 days/a | -2.31 | ↓ | 0.05 | 3.64% | 0 | 96.36% | 25.45% |
SU25 | 0.206 days/a | 3.18 | ↑ | 0.01 | 96.36% | 45.45% | 3.64% | 1.82% |
TXx | 0.020ºC/a | 2.67 | ↑ | 0.01 | 81.82% | 29.09% | 18.18% | 1.82% |
TNx | 0.030ºC/a | 5.14 | ↑ | 0.01 | 87.27% | 58.18% | 12.73% | 1.82% |
TXn | 0.059ºC/a | 2.38 | ↑ | 0.05 | 96.36% | 34.55% | 3.64% | 0 |
TNn | 0.088ºC/a | 3.86 | ↑ | 0.01 | 100% | 70.91% | 0 | 0 |
The positive value denotes an increasing trend and negative value represents a decreasing trend. |
Figure 2 Spatial-temporal variation trends of the extreme temperature indices of Tav, Txav and Tnav during 1957-2005 in Central Asia. (a)-(c): Spatial variation trends of (a) Tav, (b) Txav and (c) Tnav (The red filled triangle denotes significant rising trend (P<0.05); the unfilled triangle denotes rising trend but not significant; the black filled inverted-triangle denotes significant falling trend (P<0.05); the unfilled inverted-triangle denotes falling trend but not significant). (d)-(f): Regional annual anomaly series of (d) Tav, (e) Txav and (f) Tnav (The blue column denotes the annual anomaly series and the red dash line represents the linear regression) |
Figure 3 Temporal variation trends of extreme temperature indices during 1957-2005 in CA. (a) Tav, (b) Txav, (c) Tnav, (d) TXx, (e) TNx, (f) SU25, (g) FD0, (h) ID0, (i) TXn and (j) TNn. Red dotted line denotes the mean value of each extreme temperature index before and after abrupt change; Black and blue solid lines represent time series variations and 20-year overlapping averages for each precipitation indices, respectively. |
Table 3 Abrupt change of extreme temperature indices based on the test results of cumulative deviation and student’s t test during 1957-2005 in CA |
Index | Cumulative deviation | Period | Student’s t test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q/Sqrt(n) | Year of change | Mean value | P value | ||
Tav | 2.02* | 1987 | 1957-1986 | 8.25ºC/a | -2.87* |
1987-2005 | 9.09ºC/a | ||||
Txav | 1.58* | 1987 | 1957-1986 | 14.69ºC/a | -2.10* |
1987-2005 | 15.31ºC/a | ||||
Tnav | 2.36* | 1977 | 1957-1976 | 1.58ºC/a | -3.71* |
1977-2005 | 2.66ºC/a | ||||
FD0 | 1.97* | 1976 | 1957-1975 | 154.59 days/a | 3.50* |
1976-2005 | 147.41 days/a | ||||
ID0 | 1.37* | 1986 | 1957-1985 | 70.43 days/a | 2.69* |
1986-2005 | 64.17 days/a | ||||
SU25 | 1.55* | 1973 | 1957-1972 | 109.55 days/a | -3.24* |
1973-2005 | 115.47 days/a | ||||
TXx | 1.80* | 1972 | 1957-1971 | 37.21ºC/a | -2.53* |
1972-2005 | 37.99ºC/a | ||||
TNx | 2.17* | 1973 | 1957-1972 | 22.72ºC/a | -2.81* |
1973-2005 | 23.58ºC/a | ||||
TXn | 1.85* | 1978 | 1957-1977 | -15.67ºC/a | -3.71* |
1978-2005 | -13.53ºC/a | ||||
TNn | 2.35* | 1978 | 1957-1977 | -26.48ºC/a | -4.89* |
1978-2005 | -23.65ºC/a |
Trends significant (significance level< 0.05) are marked with *. |
Figure 4 Regional annual anomaly series for each extreme temperature indices. The blue column denotes the annual anomaly series and the red dash line represents the linear regression. (a) TXx, (b) TNx, (c) SU25, (d) FD0, (e) ID0, (f) TXn and (g) TNn. |
Figure 5 Spatial variation trends of the extreme temperature indices (a) TXx, (b) TNx, (c) SU25, (d) FD0, (e) ID0, (f) TXn and (g) TNn. The red filled triangle denotes significant rising trend (P<0.05); the unfilled triangle denotes rising trend but not significant; the black filled inverted-triangle denotes significant falling trend (p<0.05); the unfilled inverted-triangle denotes falling trend but not significant. |
Table 4 Temporal variation trend of extreme precipitation indices based on the results of MK test during 1957-2005 in CA |
Index | MK test | Percentage of stations showing increasing trend (%) | Percentage of stations showing significant increasing trend (%) | Percentage of stations showing decreasing trend (%) | Percentage of stations showing significant decreasing trend (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trend rate | Z-value | Trends | Significance level (p) | |||||
Prcptot | 0.476 mm/a | 2.11 | ↑ | 0.05 | 81.82 | 25.45 | 18.18 | 1.82 |
CDD | -0.317 days/a | -2.26 | ↓ | 0.05 | 21.82 | 1.82 | 78.18 | 5.45 |
CWD | 0.001 days/a | 0.28 | ↑ | NS | 49.09 | 3.64 | 50.91 | 0 |
R10mm | 0.016 days/a | 2.19 | ↑ | 0.05 | 76.36 | 12.73 | 23.64 | 1.82 |
R20mm | 0.004 days/a | 1.94 | ↑ | 0.1 | 69.09 | 5.45 | 30.91 | 0 |
Rx1 day | 0.040 mm/a | 2.14 | ↑ | 0.05 | 69.09 | 9.09 | 30.91 | 1.82 |
Rx5 day | 0.055 mm/a | 1.50 | ↑ | NS | 65.45 | 10.91 | 34.55 | 3.64 |
The positive value denotes increasing trend and negative value represents decreasing trend. |
Figure 6 Spatial-temporal variation trends of the extreme precipitation indices of Prcptot, CDD and CWD during 1957-2005 in Central Asia. (a)-(c): Spatial variation trends of (a) Prcptot, (b) CDD and (c) CWD. (The red filled triangle denotes significant rising trend (P<0.05); the unfilled triangle denotes rising trend but not significant; the black filled inverted-triangle denotes significant falling trend (P<0.05); the unfilled inverted-triangle denotes falling trend but not significant). (d)-(f): Regional annual anomaly series of (d) Prcptot, (e) CDD and (f) CWD (The blue column denotes the annual anomaly series and the red dash line represents the linear regression). |
Figure 7 Temporal variation trends of extreme precipitation indices during 1957-2005 in CA. (a) Prcptot, (b) CDD, (c) CWD, (d) R10mm, (e) R20mm, (f) Rx1 day and (g) Rx5 day. Red dotted line denotes the mean value of each extreme temperature indices before and after abrupt change; Black and blue solid lines represent time series variations and 20-year overlapping averages for each precipitation indices, respectively. |
Table 5 Abrupt change of extreme precipitation indices based on the test results of cumulative deviation and student’s t test for extreme precipitation indices during 1957-2005 in CA |
Index | Cumulative deviation | Periods | Student’s t test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q/Sqrt(n) | Year of change | Mean value | P value | ||
Prcptot | 1.44* | 1986 | 1957-1985 | 147.25 mm/a | -2.64* |
1986-2005 | 164.88 mm/a | ||||
CDD | 1.58* | 1986 | 1957-1985 | 113.49 days/a | 2.75* |
1986-2005 | 103.10 days/a | ||||
CWD | 0.81 | 1986 | 1957-1985 | 2.99 days/a | -∞* |
1986-2005 | 3.09 days/a | ||||
R10mm | 1.41* | 1986 | 1957-1985 | 3.24 days/a | -1.94 |
1986-2005 | 3.80 days/a | ||||
R20mm | 1.39* | 1986 | 1957-1985 | 0.67 days/a | -∞* |
1986-2005 | 0.82 days/a | ||||
Rx1 day | 1.60* | 1986 | 1957-1985 | 17.80 mm/a | -2.57* |
1986-2005 | 19.29 mm/a | ||||
Rx5 day | 1.52* | 1986 | 1957-1985 | 25.79 mm/a | -2.84* |
1986-2005 | 28.27 mm/a |
Trends significant (significance level< 0.05) are marked with *. |
Figure 8 Regional annual anomaly series for each extreme precipitation indices. The blue column denotes the annual anomaly series and the red dash line represents the linear regression. (a) R10mm, (b) R20mm, (c) Rx1 day and (d) Rx5 day. |
Figure 9 Spatial variation trends of the extreme precipitation indices (a) R10mm, (b) R20mm, (c) Rx1 day, (d) Rx5 day. The red filled triangle denotes significant rising trend (P<0.05); the unfilled triangle denotes rising trend but not significant; the black filled inverted-triangle denotes significant falling trend (P<0.05); the unfilled inverted-triangle denotes falling trend but not significant. |
Table 6 The correlation coefficient values between temperature extremes in CA and atmospheric circulations |
Circulation index | Indices | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tav | Txav | Tnav | FD0 | ID0 | SU25 | TXx | TNx | TXn | TNn | |
AAO | 0.153 | 0.216 | 0.139 | -0.049 | -0.144 | 0.078 | -0.074 | 0.153 | 0.179 | 0.182 |
AO | 0.247 | 0.194 | 0.272 | -0.145 | -0.157 | 0.112 | 0.092 | 0.028 | 0.336* | 0.271 |
NAO | -0.053 | -0.062 | 0.003 | 0.079 | 0.070 | 0.089 | -0.059 | -0.104 | 0.158 | 0.099 |
NOI | -0.166 | -0.046 | -0.260 | 0.264 | 0.143 | 0.125 | 0.054 | 0.055 | -0.119 | -0.228 |
PDO | 0.085 | -0.101 | 0.217 | -0.150 | 0.013 | -0.002 | 0.089 | 0.235 | 0.160 | 0.310* |
PNA | 0.171 | 0.085 | 0.248 | -0.230 | -0.143 | 0.038 | 0.098 | 0.137 | 0.088 | 0.214 |
SH | -0.415** | -0.331* | -0.457** | 0.320* | 0.507** | 0.066 | 0.004 | -0.005 | -0.350* | -0.365* |
SOI | -0.172 | -0.071 | -0.254 | 0.317* | 0.058 | -0.061 | 0.074 | 0.057 | 0.010 | -0.094 |
TPI_B | 0.312* | 0.281 | 0.326* | -0.254 | -0.377** | 0.028 | -0.129 | 0.073 | 0.022 | 0.120 |
WCI_DJFc | 0.402** | 0.277 | 0.485** | -0.382* | -0.265 | 0.266 | -0.042 | 0.300 | 0.347* | 0.394** |
** Significant at p < 0.01; * Significant at p < 0.05. WCI_DJF denotes WCI in December, January and February. |
Table 7 The correlation coefficient values between precipitation extremes in CA and atmospheric circulations |
Circulation index | Indices | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prcptot | CDD | CWD | R10mm | R20mm | Rx1 day | Rx5 day | |
AAO | -0.039 | 0.024 | -0.102 | -0.115 | 0.115 | -0.112 | -0.149 |
AO | -0.048 | -0.139 | 0.045 | -0.038 | -0.113 | -0.045 | -0.077 |
NAO | -0.115 | -0.012 | -0.089 | -0.099 | -0.245 | -0.119 | -0.185 |
NOI | -0.218 | 0.097 | -0.127 | -0.261 | -0.143 | -0.218 | -0.059 |
PDO | 0.252 | -0.246 | 0.056 | 0.243 | 0.094 | 0.226 | 0.146 |
PNA | 0.359* | -0.312* | 0.039 | 0.324* | 0.300* | 0.342* | 0.315* |
SH | -0.313* | 0.170 | -0.204 | -0.265 | -0.232 | -0.199 | -0.131 |
SOI | -0.191 | 0.063 | -0.123 | -0.191 | -0.126 | -0.170 | -0.070 |
TPI-B | 0.531** | -0.422** | 0.311* | 0.516** | 0.568** | 0.344* | 0.451** |
WCI_DJF | 0.117 | -0.269 | 0.195 | 0.082 | 0.015 | 0.212 | 0.258 |
** Significant at p < 0.01; * Significant at p < 0.05. WCI_DJF denotes WCI in December, January and February. |
Figure 10 Time series variations between TPI_B and extreme precipitation indices (a)-(b); and between SH and extreme temperature indices (c)-(d) |
Table 8 Trends of extreme temperature indices from this study and other works |
Index | CA (five countries and Xinjiang of China (1957-2005) | Northwestern China (1960-2003) | Middle East (1950-2003) | Eastern and central Tibetan Plateau (1961-2005) | Southwestern China (1961-2008) | China (1961-2003) | Global (1951-2003) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tav | 4.89* | 5.45* | |||||
Txav | 3.39* | 3.96* | |||||
Tnav | 5.78* | 6.77* | |||||
FD0 | -4.71* | -3.24* | -0.6 | -4.32* | -0.29* | -3.73* | |
ID0 | -2.31* | -2.75* | -2.46* | -0.09 | |||
SU25 | 3.18* | 1 | |||||
TXx | 2.67* | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.28* | 0.11* | 0.07 | 0.21* |
TNx | 5.14* | 0.32* | 0.23* | 0.25* | 0.17* | 0.21* | 0.30* |
TXn | 2.38* | 0.61* | 0.2 | 0.30* | 0.13* | 0.35* | 0.37 |
TNn | 3.86* | 0.85* | 0.28* | 0.69* | 0.29* | 0.63* | 0.71* |
Data Source | This study | Wang et al. (2013b) and Chen et al (2014) | Zhang et al. (2005) | You et al. (2008) | Li et al. (2012) | You et al. (2011) | Alexander et al. (2006) |
Trends significant (significance level< 0.05) are marked with*. |
Table 9 Trends of extreme precipitation indices from this study and other works |
Index | CA (five countries and Xinjiang of China) (1957- 2005) | CA (five countries)(1938- 2005) | Northwestern China (1960-2003) | Middle East (1950- 2003) | Eastern and central Tibetan Plateau (1961- 2005) | Southwestern China (1961- 2008) | China (1961- 2003) | Global (1951- 2003) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prcptot | 2.11* | 3.60* | 6.82* | -0.3 | 6.66 | 0.03 | 3.21 | 10.59* |
CDD | -2.26* | -2.68* | -4.85* | -5.0* | -4.64* | -0.05 | -1.22 | -0.05 |
CWD | 0.28 | 1.70 | 0.047* | -0.07 | -0.08* | |||
R10mm | 2.19* | 2.67* | 0.22* | -0.03 | 0.23 | 0 | ||
R20mm | 1.94 | 2.97* | 0 | |||||
Rx1 day | 2.14* | 0.77 | 0.63* | 0 | 0.27 | 0.05* | 1.37 | 0.85* |
Rx5 day | 1.50 | 1.85* | 0.98* | 0 | -0.08 | 0.03 | 1.90 | 0.55 |
Data Source | This study | Zhang et al. (2017) | Wang et al. (2013a) | Zhang et al. (2005) | You et al. (2008) | Li et al. (2012) | You et al. (2011) | Alexander et al. (2006) |
Trends significant (significance level< 0.05) are marked with *. |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
IPCC, 2012. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field C B,
|
[31] |
IPCC, 2013: Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Stocker T F, Qin D, Plattner G-Ket al. eds. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
|
[56] |
|
[57] |
|
[58] |
|
[59] |
|
[60] |
|
[61] |
|
[62] |
|
[63] |
|
[64] |
|
[65] |
|
[66] |
|
[67] |
|
[68] |
|
[69] |
|
[70] |
|
[71] |
|
[72] |
|
[73] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |