Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Spatiotemporal characteristics of Qinghai Lakeice phenology between 2000 and 2016
Author: Qi Miaomiao (1993-), Masters Candidate, specialized in research on lake ice phenology. E-mail: qimiaomiao_mzl@163.com
Received date: 2018-02-07
Accepted date: 2018-03-28
Online published: 2019-01-25
Supported by
Opening Foundation Project of the State Key Laboratory of Cryosphere Sciences, CAS, SKLCS-OP-2016-10
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41261016, No.41561016
Youth Scholar Scientific Capability Promoting Project of Northwest Normal University, No.NWNU-LKQN-14-4
Copyright
Lake ice phenology is considered a sensitive indicator of regional climate change. We utilized time series information of this kind extracted from a series of multi-source remote sensing (RS) datasets including the MOD09GQ surface reflectance product, Landsat TM/ETM+ images, and meteorological records to analyze spatiotemporal variations of ice phenology of Qinghai Lake between 2000 and 2016 applying both RS and GIS technology. We also identified the climatic factors that have influenced lake ice phenology over time and draw a number of conclusions. First, data show that freeze-up start (FUS), freeze-up end (FUE), break-up start (BUS), and break-up end (BUE) on Qinghai Lake usually occurred in mid-December, early January, mid-to-late March, and early April, respectively. The average freezing duration (FD, between FUE and BUE), complete freezing duration (CFD, between FUE and BUS), ice coverage duration (ICD, between FUS and BUE), and ablation duration (AD, between BUS and BUE) were 88 days, 77 days, 108 days and 10 days, respectively. Second, while the results of this analysis reveal considerable differences in ice phenology on Qinghai Lake between 2000 and 2016, there has been relatively little variation in FUS times. Data show that FUE dates had also tended to fluctuate over time, initially advancing and then being delayed, while the opposite was the case for BUS dates as these advanced between 2012 and 2016. Overall, there was a shortening trend of Qinghai Lake’s FD in two periods, 2000-2005 and 2010-2016, which was shorter than those seen on other lakes within the hinterland of the Tibetan Plateau. Third, Qinghai Lake can be characterized by similar spatial patterns in both freeze-up (FU) and break-up (BU) processes, as parts of the surface which freeze earlier also start to melt first, distinctly different from some other lakes on the Tibetan Plateau. A further feature of Qinghai Lake ice phenology is that FU duration (between 18 days and 31 days) is about 10 days longer than BU duration (between 7 days and 20 days). Fourth, data show that negative temperature accumulated during the winter half year (between October and the following April) also plays a dominant role in ice phenology variations of Qinghai Lake. Precipitation and wind speed both also exert direct influences on the formation and melting of lake ice cover and also cannot be neglected.
Key words: lake ice; phenology; freeze-up and break-up; MODIS; Qinghai Lake
QI Miaomiao , YAO Xiaojun , LI Xiaofeng , DUAN Hongyu , GAO Yongpeng , LIU Juan . Spatiotemporal characteristics of Qinghai Lakeice phenology between 2000 and 2016[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019 , 29(1) : 115 -130 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-019-1587-0
Figure 1 A Landsat TM image base map showing the study area discussed in this paper |
Figure 2 Images showing ice cover on Qinghai Lake on February 22nd, 2014 |
Table 1 Theice phenology of Qinghai Lake between 2000 and2016 |
Year | FUS | FUE | BUS | BUE | ICD | AD | FD | CFD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000/2001 | 343 | 6* | 85 | 92* | 114 | 7 | 86 | 79 | |
2001/2002 | 351 | 5 | 92* | 98 | 112 | 6 | 93 | 87 | |
2002/2003 | 355 | 4 | 85* | 89* | 99 | 4 | 85 | 81 | |
2003/2004 | 359* | 12 | 79* | 88 | 94 | 9 | 76 | 67 | |
2004/2005 | 362* | 10 | 69* | 87* | 90 | 18 | 79 | 59 | |
2005/2006 | 340 | 357 | 86* | 100* | 125 | 14 | 108 | 94 | |
2006/2007 | 348 | 7 | 90* | 96 | 113 | 6 | 89 | 83 | |
2007/2008 | 353 | 4* | 97* | 102* | 114 | 5 | 99 | 93 | |
2008/2009 | 344 | 23* | 78* | 92 | 113 | 14 | 69 | 55 | |
2009/2010 | 351 | 365 | 78 | 84* | 98 | 6 | 84 | 78 | |
2010/2011 | 347 | 361 | 91* | 104 | 122 | 13 | 108 | 96 | |
2011/2012 | 350 | 5* | 95 | 103 | 118 | 8 | 98 | 90 | |
2012/2013 | 342 | 361 | 88 | 92 | 115 | 4 | 97 | 92 | |
2013/2014 | 350 | 8 | 65 | 83 | 98 | 18 | 75 | 57 | |
2014/2015 | 346 | 3 | 62* | 88* | 107 | 26 | 85 | 59 | |
2015/2016 | 359 | 12 | 71* | 84* | 90 | 13 | 72 | 59 | |
Average | 350 | 5 | 82 | 93 | 108 | 10 | 88 | 77 | |
Range | 22 | 31 | 35 | 21 | 35 | 22 | 39 | 41 | |
Slope (d/a) | -0.12 | -0.08 | -0.86 | -0.29 | -0.16 | 0.58 | -0.22 | -0.78 |
Notes: *, denotes error date (the maximum error in this study was 3 days); FUS, FUE, BUS, and BUE times are denoted in this table by the number of days in the year (e.g., December 9th is the 343rd day of the year). |
Figure 3 Images to illustrate freezing and melting processes on Qinghai Lake over time (the purple and white regions on these images are lake ice, while the black areas are water) |
Figure 4 Qinghai Lake freeze-melt processes between 2000 and 2016 |
Figure 5 Daily variations in air temperature and wind speed measured at Gangcha meteorological station |
Figure 6 The relationship between winter half year negative accumulated temperature and the FD of Qinghai Lake ice between 2000 and 2016 |
Figure 7 Graphs showing the relationship between mean weekly wind speed measured at Gangcha meteorological station and ice phenology on Qinghai Lake between 2000 and 2016 |
Figure 8 Graphs showing the relationship between precipitation and ice variation (coverage and ablation) on Qinghai Lake between 2000 and 2016 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |