The Fifth Assessment Report of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) noted that global average combined land and ocean surface temperature followed a linear trend between 1880 and 2012 and has increased by 0.85℃ (
PCC, 2014a). Rising temperatures globally have increased the risk of heat-related deaths and illnesses; the risk of mortality and morbidity during periods of extreme heat, particularly for vulnerable urban populations and those working outdoors in urban or rural areas, has been identified as one of the key risks of climate change (
IPCC, 2014b). Indeed, extreme heat events have been reported with increasing frequency all around the world; the summers of 2003 and 2010 were the warmest on record over approximately 25% of Europe (
Barriopedro et al., 2011). In the earlier of these two years, much of Europe was affected by an extreme heatwave that caused more than 66,000 combined deaths in France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Spain (
WMO, 2013), while the latter summer had a wider spatial extent and led to around 55,000 deaths in Russia (
Barriopedro et al., 2011;
Grumm, 2011). Data also show that heatwaves became a more regular occurrence globally between 2011 and 2015 (
WMO, 2016); 5,758 heatwave-related illness cases were reported in China during the summer of 2013, for example (
Gu et al., 2016), while the 2015 heatwave in Pakistan was the worst in more than 30 years, and caused the deaths of more than 1200 people in Karachi alone (
Cheema, 2015). The afternoon temperature reached 51.0℃ in Phalodi in the northwest of India on May 19th, 2016, a new record for the highest observed maximum national temperature (the previous record was 50.6℃, recorded in 1956) (
van Oldenborgh et al., 2018), while on July 7th, 2017, the city of Phoenix in the USA experienced a new record maximum temperature (118℉), the highest in 112 years (
Johnson, 2017). It now seems inevitable that excess heat poses an increasing threat to human life, and that this risk will be greatly aggravated if greenhouse gases are not considerably reduced (
Mora et al., 2017). This phenomenon has attracted the attention of both governments and the scientific community, as a key component of climate change research. A range of previous studies have primarily explored high temperature spatiotemporal characteristics (
Ding et al., 2010;
Ye et al., 2014;
Li et al., 2015;
Yang et al., 2015;
Perkins-Kirkpatrick and Gibson, 2017) and associated atmospheric circulation (
Peng et al., 2005;
Sun et al., 2011;
You et al., 2011;
Trenberth and Fasullo, 2012;
Wang et al., 2017), as well as climatic characteristics (
Zhai and Pan, 2003;
Luterbacher et al., 2004;
Shi et al., 2008;
Schoof et al., 2017), and the impacts of extreme heat (
Liu et al., 2008;
Deng et al., 2009;
Tan et al., 2009;
Gasparrini and Armstrong, 2011;
Zhang et al., 2011;
Blumberg, 2014;
Chen et al., 2015;
Zhao et al., 2015;
Zuo et al., 2015;
Xu et al., 2016;
Benmarhnia et al., 2017). Risk assessments of extreme heat have also started to appear in the Chinese scientific literature, and a good deal of progress has been made nationally in this topic. Xie
et al. (2015) recently presented a new conceptual framework that takes heat stress, social vulnerability, and population exposure into account in order to quantitatively assess county-level heat stress risk patterns across China. This risk assessment focused primarily on past high temperature events, however, and just represented heat stress and population exposure homogeneously at the county level. In earlier work, Yin
et al. (2013) undertook a high temperature exposure analysis based on a number of extreme scenarios with return periods of 5 years, 10 years, 20 years, and 50 years, utilizing meteorological observation data, while He e
t al. (2010) assessed spatial patterns in extreme heat hazards across China within recent (between 1961 and 1990) and future (between 2011 and 2100) time periods on the basis of the IPCC SRES B2 emission scenario. More recently, Dong
et al. (2014) projected future extreme heat risk based on 22 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) model simulations and socioeconomic data to assess disaster vulnerability throughout China by integrating population density, gross domestic product, and cropland area percentage. One drawback of the Dong
et al.’s study (2014) is that a detailed analysis of population exposure to high temperature was not performed. One aim of this study is therefore to project changes in population exposure to extreme heat under the RCP8.5 scenario across China at the level of individual grid cells based on NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Projections (NEX-GDDP) and the Greenhouse Gas Initiative (GGI) population scenario, in order to evaluate the relative importance of population and climate as drivers of national level population exposure as well as at the level of meteorological geographical divisions. The results of this study provide a clear scientific basis for the identification of hotspots of population exposure to extreme heat, and thus of targets for disaster risk prevention.