Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Influences of environmental changes on water storage variations in Central Asia
Author: Hu Weijie (1990-), Research Intern, specialized in hydrology and water resources. E-mail: wjhu@ms.xjb.ac.cn
Received date: 2017-07-24
Online published: 2018-07-20
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.51569027
No.41371419
International Partnership Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.131551KYSB20160002
Special Institute Main Service Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.TSS-2015-014-FW-1-2
Copyright
The spatio-temporal pattern of the global water resource has significantly changed with climate change and intensified human activities. The regional economy and ecological environment are highly affected by terrestrial water storage (TWS), especially in arid areas. To investigate the variation of TWS and its influencing factors under changing environments, the response relationships between TWS and changing environments (climate change and human activities) in Central Asia have been analyzed based on the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data, Climatic Research Unit (CRU) climate data and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) remote sensing data products (MOD16A2, MOD13A3 and MCD12Q1) from 2003 to 2013. The slope and Pearson correlation analysis methods were used. Results indicate that: (1) TWS in about 77 % of the study area has decreased from 2003 to 2013. The total change volume of TWS is about 2915.6 × 108 m3. The areas of decreased TWS are mainly distributed in the middle of Central Asia, while the areas of increased TWS are concentrated in the middle-altitude regions of the Kazakhstan hills and Tarim Basin. (2) TWS in about 5.91% of areas, mainly distributed in the mountain and piedmont zones, is significantly positively correlated with precipitation, while only 3.78% of areas show significant correlation between TWS and temperature. If the response time was delayed by three months, there would be a very good correlation between temperature and TWS. (3) There is a significantly positive relationship between TWS and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) in 13.35% of the study area. (4) The area of significantly positive correlation between TWS and evapotranspiration is about 31.87%, mainly situated in mountainous areas and northwestern Kazakhstan. The reduction of regional TWS is related to precipitation more than evaporation. Increasing farmland area may explain why some areas show increasing precipitation and decreasing evapotranspiration. (5) The influences of land use on TWS are still not very clear. This study could provide scientific data useful for the estimation of changes in TWS with climate change and human activities.
Key words: terrestrial water storage; Central Asia; climate change; land use
HU Weijie , LIU Hailong , BAO Anming , Attia M. El-Tantawi . Influences of environmental changes on water storage variations in Central Asia[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018 , 28(7) : 985 -1000 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-018-1517-6
Figure 1 Study area of Central Asia |
Table 1 Data information |
Data name | Temporal resolution | Spatial resolution |
---|---|---|
GRACE | Monthly | 1° × 1° |
CRU | Monthly | 0.5° × 0.5° |
MOD16A2 | Monthly | 1km × 1km |
MOD13A3 | Monthly | 1km × 1km |
MCD12Q1 | Yearly | 500 m × 500 m |
DEM | 90 m × 90 m |
Figure 2 Temporal variations of TWS |
Figure 3 Spatial variations of TWS |
Figure 4 Spatial variations of climatic factors |
Figure 5 Response relationship between TWS and precipitation |
Figure 6 Response relationship between TWS and temperature |
Figure 7 Spatial variations of vegetation index (NDVI) |
Figure 8 Response relationship between TWS and vegetation |
Figure 9 Spatial variations of evapotranspiration |
Figure 10 Response relationship between TWS and evapotranspiration |
Figure 11 Land use map of Central Asia in 2003 |
Table 2 LUCC of Central Asia and correlation coefficients with TWS |
Land use type | Percentage (%) | Changed area (×104 km2) | Correlation coefficients |
---|---|---|---|
Water | 8.05 | -2.20 | 0.81 |
Evergreen needle-leaf forest | 0.21 | 2.49 | -0.76 |
Evergreen broad-leaf forest | 0.02 | -0.06 | 0.56 |
Deciduous needle-leaf forest | 0.05 | -0.22 | 0.75 |
Deciduous broad-leaf forest | 0.17 | 0.25 | -0.62 |
Shrub land | 6.39 | -8.19 | 0.37 |
Grassland | 47.37 | 8.36 | -0.36 |
Cereal crops | 6.10 | -5.44 | 0.55 |
Broad-leaf crops | 1.08 | 2.32 | -0.58 |
Urban and built-up area | 0.34 | 0.0005 | -0.50 |
Snow and ice | 0.70 | 1.23 | -0.27 |
Bare land | 29.44 | 1.66 | -0.15 |
Unclassified region | 0.09 | -0.19 | 0.40 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
Dijk A I J M V,
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
Khandu,
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |