Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Changes in production potentials of rapeseed in the Yangtze River Basin of China under climate change:A multi-model ensemble approach
Author: TIan Zhan, E-mail: tianz@lreis.ac.cn
Received date: 2017-03-06
Accepted date: 2017-09-20
Online published: 2018-11-20
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41671113, No.51761135024, No.41601049, No.41475040
China’s National Science & Technology Pillar Program, No.2016YFC0502702
Copyright
Rapeseed is one of the major oil crops in China and it is very sensitive to climate change. The Yangtze River Basin is the main rapeseed production area in China. Therefore, a better understanding of the impact of climate change on rapeseed production in the basin is of both scientific and practical importance to Chinese oil industry and food security. In this study, based on climate data from 5 General Circulation Models (GCMs) with 4 representative concentration pathways (RCPs) in 2011-2040 (2020s), 2041-2070 (2050s) and 2071-2100 (2080s), we assessed the changes in rapeseed production potential between the baseline climatology of 1981-2010 and the future climatology of the 2020s, 2050s, and 2080s, respectively. The key modelling tool - the AEZ model - was updated and validated based on the observation records of 10 representative sites in the basin. Our simulations revealed that: (1) the uncertainty of the impact of climate change on rapeseed production increases with time; (2) in the middle of this century (2050s), total rapeseed production would increase significantly; (3) the average production potential increase in the 2050s for the upper, middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin is 0.939, 1.639 and 0.339 million tons respectively; (4) areas showing most significant increases in production include southern Shaanxi, central and eastern Hubei, northern Hunan, central Anhui and eastern Jiangsu.
Key words: climate change; rapeseed production; AEZ; Yangtze River Basin
TIAN Zhan , JI Yinghao , SUN Laixiang , XU Xinliang , FAN Dongli , ZHONG Honglin , LIANG Zhuoran , FICSHER Gunther . Changes in production potentials of rapeseed in the Yangtze River Basin of China under climate change:A multi-model ensemble approach[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018 , 28(11) : 1700 -1714 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-018-1538-1
Figure 1 Distribution of rapeseed observation stations in China |
Table 1 The location information of selected 10 stations |
Station | Province | Latitude | Longitude |
---|---|---|---|
Neijiang | Sichuan | 29°35′N | 105°5′E |
Nanbu | Sichuan | 31°21′N | 106°3′E |
Ankang | Shaanxi | 32°43′N | 109°2′E |
Changde | Hunan | 29°3′N | 111°41′E |
Wuchang | Hubei | 30°21′N | 114°19′E |
Nanchang | Jiangxi | 28°33′N | 115°57′E |
Hefei | Anhui | 31°52′N | 117°14′E |
Gaochun | Jiangsu | 31°19′N | 118°53′E |
Longyou | Zhejiang | 29°2′N | 119°11′E |
Jiaxing | Zhejiang | 30°47′N | 120°44′E |
Table 2 Comparison of cultivar parameters |
Cultivar | Original parameters | New parameters | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cya+Cyb | HI | TS1n | TS1x | Cya+Cyb | HI | TS1n | TS1x | |
Wrs 1 | 35+105 | 0.25 | 1500 | 2100 | 55+85 | 0.25 | 1100 | 1600 |
Wrs 2 | 40+120 | 0.25 | 1600 | 2400 | 65+90 | 0.25 | 1200 | 1800 |
Wrs 3 | 45+135 | 0.25 | 1700 | 2700 | 75+95 | 0.25 | 1300 | 1950 |
Wrs 4 | 45+150 | 0.25 | 1800 | 3000 | 85+100 | 0.25 | 1400 | 2100 |
Srs 1 | 0+150 | 0.20 | 1400 | 1850 | 0+105 | 0.23 | 1200 | 2150 |
Srs 2 | 0+120 | 0.21 | 1500 | 2100 | 0+120 | 0.23 | 1300 | 2300 |
Srs 3 | 0+135 | 0.22 | 1600 | 2350 | 0+135 | 0.23 | 1400 | 2400 |
Srs 4 | 0+150 | 0.23 | 1700 | 2600 | 0+150 | 0.23 | 1500 | 2500 |
New 1 | 0+150 | 0.25 | 1500 | 2500 | ||||
New 2 | 0+165 | 0.25 | 1650 | 2600 | ||||
New 3 | 0+180 | 0.24 | 1800 | 2700 | ||||
New 4 | 0+195 | 0.24 | 2000 | 2800 | ||||
New 5 | 0+210 | 0.23 | 2150 | 2900 | ||||
New 6 | 0+225 | 0.23 | 2300 | 3000 |
Wrs: Winter rapeseed; Srs: Spring rapeseed; New: newly added Chinese subtropical rapeseed varieties; Cya: the length before hibernation; Cyb: the length after hibernation; HI: harvest index; TS1n: the minimum threshold of the optimum accumulated temperature during the growth period; TS1x: the maximum threshold of the optimum accumulated temperature during the growth period. |
Figure 2 Technological roadmap |
Figure 3 Comparison of simulated attainable yields with observed yields |
Figure 4 The ensemble yields of rain-fed winter rapeseed in the 2020s (green), 2050s (purple), and 2080s (red). The plus represents the 30-year average rain-fed rapeseed yield from 1981 to 2010 simulated with the observation data as the baseline. The horizontal line denotes the ensemble median. |
Table 3 T-test analysis of rapeseed yield variation in the Yangtze River Basin under future climatic conditions |
Sites | Baseline (kg/ha) | Scenarios | Sig | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020s | 5.37E-04 | *** | ||
Neijiang | 3252 | 2050s | 1.41E-06 | *** |
2080s | 8.52E-01 | |||
2020s | 9.59E-14 | *** | ||
Nanbu | 3338 | 2050s | 7.27E-03 | *** |
2080s | 1.28E-01 | |||
2020s | 9.75E-16 | *** | ||
Ankang | 3207 | 2050s | 1.53E-07 | *** |
2080s | 1.04E-01 | |||
2020s | 3.19E-04 | *** | ||
Changde | 3317 | 2050s | 9.57E-03 | *** |
2080s | 7.26E-03 | *** | ||
2020s | 1.05E-01 | |||
Wuchang | 3125 | 2050s | 7.30E-01 | |
2080s | 5.35E-02 | * | ||
2020s | 1.65E-04 | *** | ||
Nanchang | 3309 | 2050s | 2.13E-04 | *** |
2080s | 1.44E-04 | *** | ||
2020s | 6.54E-02 | * | ||
Hefei | 2992 | 2050s | 5.69E-06 | *** |
2080s | 1.34E-03 | *** | ||
2020s | 5.92E-01 | |||
Gaochun | 2975 | 2050s | 1.71E-02 | ** |
2080s | 1.60E-03 | *** | ||
2020s | 9.98E-09 | *** | ||
Longyou | 3342 | 2050s | 4.33E-08 | *** |
2080s | 3.06E-03 | *** | ||
2020s | 1.47E-03 | *** | ||
Jiaxing | 3280 | 2050s | 1.95E-02 | ** |
2080s | 5.04E-01 |
Note: *, **, and *** denote the level of significance at 10%, 5%, and 1%, respectively. |
Table 4 Total rapeseed production changes for the upper, middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River in the 2080s (million tons) |
Scenarios climate models | Upper reaches (mt) | Middle reaches (mt) | Lower reaches (mt) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
RCP2.6 | GFDL-ESM2M | 0.826 | 2.528 | 0.507 |
NorESM1-M | 1.911 | 2.583 | 0.385 | |
RCP4.5 | GFDL-ESM2M | 0.802 | 3.316 | 0.927 |
NorESM1-M | 1.441 | 2.263 | 0.223 | |
RCP6.0 | GFDL-ESM2M | -0.122 | -2.333 | -0.217 |
NorESM1-M | 0.748 | 1.705 | 0.241 | |
RCP8.5 | GFDL-ESM2M | 0.779 | 0.240 | -0.005 |
NorESM1-M | 1.130 | 2.810 | 0.648 | |
Average | 0.939 | 1.639 | 0.339 |
Figure 5 Rapeseed yield change from the baseline to the mid-21st century (2050s) under RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0 and RCP8.5 scenarios produced with GFDL-ESM2M (a-d) and NorESM-M (e-h) climate models |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
FAO, 2003. World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030: An FAO perspective. Available at: www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4252e/y4252e00.htm.
|
[7] |
FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISSCAS/JRC, 2009. Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.1).
|
[8] |
FAOSTAT, 2015. Available at: .
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
IIASA/FAO, 2012. Global Agro-Ecological Zones (GAEZ v3.0).
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |