Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Immediately downstream effects of Three Gorges Dam on channel sandbars morphodynamics between Yichang-Chenglingji Reach of the Changjiang River, China
Author: Wang Jie, Master Candidate, specialized in fluvial and estuarine morphodynamics. E-mail: jiewang.ec@gmail.com
Received date: 2017-09-08
Accepted date: 2017-12-07
Online published: 2018-03-30
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41576087
National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China, No.41706093
Fund of the Key Laboratory of Coastal Science and Engineering, Beibu Gulf, Guangxi, No.2016ZZD01
Copyright
Sandbars are of vital ecological and environmental significance, which however, have been intensively influenced by human activities. Morphodynamic processes of sandbars along the Yichang-Chenglingji Reach of the Changjiang River, the channel immediately downstream of the Three Gorges Dam (TGD), are assessed based on remote sensing images between 2000 and 2016. It can be found that the entire area of sandbars reduces drastically by 19.23% from 149.04 km2 in 2003 to 120.38 km2 in 2016, accompanied with an increase in water surface width. Owing to differences in sediment grain size and anti-erosion capacity, sandbar area in the upstream sandy gravel reach (Yichang-Dabujie) and downstream sandy reach (Dabujie-Chenglingji) respectively decreases by 45.94% (from 20.79 km2 to 11.24 km2) and 14.93% (from 128.30 km2 to 109.14 km2). Furtherly, morphological evolutions of sandbars are affected by channel type: in straight-microbend channel, mid-channel sandbars exhibit downstream moving while maintaining the basic profile; in meandering channel, point sandbars show erosion and deposition in convex and concave bank respectively, with mid-channel sandbars distributing sporadically; in bending-branching channel, point sandbars experience erosion and move downstream while mid-channel sandbars show erosion in the head part along with retreating outline. We document that the primary mechanism of sandbars shrinkages along the Yichang-Chenglingji Reach can be attributed to TGD induced suspended sediment concentration decreasing and increasing in unsaturation of sediment carrying capacity. Additionally, channel type can affect the morphological evolution of sandbars. Along the Yichang-Chenglingji Reach, sandbars in straight-microbend channel are more affected by water flow than that in bending-branching channel.
WANG Jie , MEI Xuefei , LOU Yaying , WEI Wen , GE Zhenpeng . Immediately downstream effects of Three Gorges Dam on channel sandbars morphodynamics between Yichang-Chenglingji Reach of the Changjiang River, China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018 , 28(5) : 629 -646 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-018-1495-8
Figure 1 Map of the study area. (a) The location of Changjiang River and Yichang-Chenglingji Reach (blue box); (b) the Yichang-Chenglingji Reach. Four inserted satellite images indicate TGD and three typical sandbars are acquired from Google Earth map (http://www.google.cn/maps) |
Table 1 Summary of Landsat satellite products and corresponding water level (m) at four hydrologic stations |
Date | Sensor | Yichang | Zhicheng | Shashi | Jianli |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb. 01, 2000 | Landsat7 ETM+ | 39.53 | 37.65 | 31.70 | 24.21 |
Jan. 10, 2001 | Landsat5 TM | 40.15 | 38.20 | 32.79 | 25.13 |
Jan. 05, 2002 | Landsat7 ETM+ | 39.68 | 38.80 | 32.22 | 24.74 |
Mar. 21, 2003 | Landsat5 TM | 38.92 | 37.45 | 31.24 | 25.72 |
Mar. 07, 2004 | Landsat5 TM | 40.49 | 38.66 | 32.96 | 25.82 |
Feb. 22, 2005 | Landsat5 TM | 38.63 | 37.42 | 30.86 | 26.07 |
Feb. 25, 2006 | Landsat5 TM | 40.15 | 38.26 | 32.20 | 25.57 |
Feb. 12,2007 | Landsat5 TM | 39.01 | 37.62 | 30.78 | 24.37 |
Feb. 15, 2008 | Landsat5 TM | 39.02 | 37.73 | 31.16 | 24.60 |
Jan. 16, 2009 | Landsat5 TM | 39.35 | 37.98 | 31.72 | 24.93 |
Feb. 20, 2010 | Landsat5 TM | 39.31 | 37.88 | 31.31 | 24.98 |
Jan. 06, 2011 | Landsat5 TM | 39.73 | 38.20 | 31.82 | 25.62 |
Jan. 14, 2014 | Landsat8 OLI | 39.85 | 38.08 | 31.62 | 25.38 |
Jan. 01, 2015 | Landsat8 OLI | 39.63 | 37.97 | 31.56 | 25.50 |
Feb. 05, 2016 | Landsat8 OLI | 39.99 | 38.16 | 31.34 | 26.30 |
Figure 2 Temporal variation of sandbar area within Yichang-Chenglingji Reach from 2003 to 2016. (a) ST: total sandbars; (b) SMC: mid-channel sandbars; and (c) SP: point sandbars. The year with grey rectangle indicating data missing |
Figure 3 Temporal variation of sandbar area in (a-c) the upstream sandy gravel reach and (e-f) the downstream sandy reach, with ST, SMC, and SP respectively indicating areas of total sandbars, mid-channel sandbars and point sandbars. The year with grey rectangle indicating data missing |
Figure 4 Temporal variation of the total water surface width (TWSW) of (a) the Yichang-Chenglingji Reach (LT); (b) the upstream sandy gravel reach (LSG); and (c) the downstream sandy reach (LS). The year with grey rectangle indicating data missing |
Table 2 Summary of sandbar area variation within the Yichang-Chenglingji Reach |
Area of total (km2) | Area of mid-channel (km2) | Area of point (km2) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reach | Whole | Sandy gravel | Sandy | Whole | Sandy gravel | Sandy | Whole | Sandy gravel | Sandy |
Before TGD | 145.35 | 20.45 | 126.75 | 38.93 | 10.73 | 26.31 | 106.42 | 10.08 | 100.45 |
After TGD | 132.66 | 12.55 | 107.14 | 35.93 | 7.79 | 25.07 | 96.73 | 4.77 | 82.06 |
Decrease (%) | 8.73 | 38.65 | 15.47 | 7.72 | 24.86 | 4.69 | 9.10 | 52.84 | 18.31 |
Note: pre-TGD: mean value between 2000 and 2003; post-TGD: mean value between 2004 and 2016 |
Table 3 Summary of channel width variation within the Yichang-Chenglingji Reach |
Total reach (km) | Sandy gravel reach (km) | Sandy reach (km) | |
---|---|---|---|
Before TGD | 479.90 | 143.48 | 336.42 |
After TGD | 501.51 | 152.98 | 348.53 |
Increase (%) | 4.50 | 6.62 | 3.60 |
Note: Before TGD: mean value between 2000 and 2003; After TGD: mean value between 2004 and 2016 |
Figure 5 Sandbars geomorphological changes within Guanzhou Channel from 2003 to 2016 |
Figure 6 Sandbars geomorphological changes within Lujiahe Channel from 2003 to 2016 |
Figure 7 Geomorphological changes of sandbars within Zhougongdi Channel from 2003 to 2016 |
Figure 8 Geomorphological changes of sandbars within Tiaoguan Channel from 2003 to 2016 |
Figure 9 Geomorphological changes of sandbars within Jianli Channel from 2003 to 2016 |
Figure 10 Temporal variation of (a) annual water discharge; (b) SSC; and (c) suspended sediment median diameter (D50) at four hydrological stations of Yichang, Zhicheng, Shashi, and Jianli |
Figure 11 Relationship between flow discharge and (a) flow velocity; (b) water depth and (c) SSC |
Figure 12 Temporal variation of (a-c) calculated sediment carrying capacity (Svm) and (d-e) the difference between calculated SCC and SSC (Svm-SSC) under different water discharge scenarios, with (a, d) 5000 m3/s; (b, e) 10000 m3/s; (c, f) 20000 m3/s |
Figure 13 Relationship between sandbar area and Svm-SSC value under different water discharges scenarios: (a) 5000 m3/s; (b) 10000 m3/s; (c) 20000 m3/s |
Figure 14 Evolution model of sandbars in different channel types along the Yichang-Chenglingji Reach following the impact of TGD: (a) straight-microbend channel; (b) meandering channel; and (c) bending-branching channel |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
[46] |
|
[47] |
|
[48] |
|
[49] |
|
[50] |
|
[51] |
|
[52] |
|
[53] |
|
[54] |
|
[55] |
|
[56] |
|
[57] |
|
[58] |
|
[59] |
|
[60] |
|
[61] |
|
[62] |
|
[63] |
|
[64] |
|
[65] |
|
[66] |
|
[67] |
|
[68] |
|
[69] |
|
[70] |
|
[71] |
|
[72] |
|
[73] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |