Journal of Geographical Sciences >
NPP vulnerability of the potential vegetation of China to climate change in the past and future
Author: Yuan Quanzhi, PhD, specialized in physical geography. E-mail: yuanqz@sicnu.edu.cn.
*Corresponding author: Wu Shaohong, Professor, specialized in physical geography. E-mail: wush@igsnrr.ac.cn
Received date: 2016-08-22
Accepted date: 2016-09-20
Online published: 2017-04-10
Supported by
Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41530749
Science and Technology Project of Sichuan Provincial Department of Education, No.15ZB0023
Youth Projects of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41301196, No.41501202
Chongqing Foundation and Advanced Research Project, No.cstc2014jcyjA0808
Copyright
Using the Integrated Biosphere Simulator, a dynamic vegetation model, this study initially simulated the net primary productivity (NPP) dynamics of China’s potential vegetation in the past 55 years (1961-2015) and in the future 35 years (2016-2050). Then, taking the NPP of the potential vegetation in average climate conditions during 1986-2005 as the basis for evaluation, this study examined whether the potential vegetation adapts to climate change or not. Meanwhile, the degree of inadaptability was evaluated. Finally, the NPP vulnerability of the potential vegetation was evaluated by synthesizing the frequency and degrees of inadaptability to climate change. In the past 55 years, the NPP of desert ecosystems in the south of the Tianshan Mountains and grassland ecosystems in the north of China and in western Tibetan Plateau was prone to the effect of climate change. The NPP of most forest ecosystems was not prone to the influence of climate change. The low NPP vulnerability to climate change of the evergreen broad-leaved and coniferous forests was observed. Furthermore, the NPP of the desert ecosystems in the north of the Tianshan Mountains and grassland ecosystems in the central and eastern Tibetan Plateau also had low vulnerability to climate change. In the next 35 years, the NPP vulnerability to climate change would reduce the forest-steppe in the Songliao Plain, the deciduous broad-leaved forests in the warm temperate zone, and the alpine steppe in the central and western Tibetan Plateau. The NPP vulnerability would significantly increase of the temperate desert in the Junggar Basin and the alpine desert in the Kunlun Mountains. The NPP vulnerability of the subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests would also increase. The area of the regions with increased vulnerability would account for 27.5% of China.
Key words: climate change; vulnerability; potential vegetation; net primary productivity; IBIS; China
YUAN Quanzhi , WU Shaohong , DAI Erfu , ZHAO Dongsheng , REN Ping , ZHANG Xueru . NPP vulnerability of the potential vegetation of China to climate change in the past and future[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017 , 27(2) : 131 -142 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-017-1368-6
Table 1 Sensitivity analysis of climatic data input |
PFTs | NPP sensitivity to climatic factors change | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tempera- ture (℃) | Temperature difference (℃) | Precipita- tion (mm) | Relative humidity (%) | Cloudi- ness (%) | Wind speed (m/s) | Rainy day (d) | |
Tropical evergreen broad-leaved forest | 5.229 | -0.032 | 0.375 | 0.682 | -0.278 | 0.011 | -0.219 |
Tropical rain and evergreen broad-leaved forest | 6.818 | -0.037 | 0.361 | 0.692 | -0.277 | 0.013 | -0.216 |
Subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest | -0.684 | -0.040 | 0.174 | 0.442 | -0.141 | -0.002 | -0.045 |
Temperate coniferous evergreen forest | -0.026 | -0.081 | 0.553 | 1.082 | 0.184 | -0.053 | -0.092 |
Temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest | 0.001 | -0.086 | 0.656 | 0.733 | 0.186 | -0.033 | -0.064 |
Boreal coniferous evergreen forest | -1.876 | -0.062 | 0.292 | 0.886 | -0.082 | -0.040 | -0.051 |
Boreal broad-leaved cold-deciduous forest | -4.010 | -0.093 | 0.654 | 0.759 | 0.136 | -0.039 | -0.069 |
Boreal coniferous cold-deciduous forest | -4.311 | -0.073 | 0.356 | 0.572 | 0.012 | -0.030 | -0.040 |
Evergreen shrubs | -0.480 | -0.097 | 0.371 | 0.324 | -0.764 | -0.163 | 0.120 |
Cold-deciduous shrubs | -0.485 | -0.069 | 0.212 | 0.261 | -0.686 | -0.031 | 0.176 |
Warm (C4) grasses | 3.601 | -0.020 | 0.559 | 0.611 | -1.916 | -0.049 | 0.390 |
Cool (C3) grasses | -1.590 | -0.116 | 0.348 | 0.510 | -0.022 | -0.042 | -0.035 |
Figure 1 Natural ecosystems’ vulnerability to climate change over the past 55 years in China |
Figure 2 Possible leading factors of vulnerability (a) and the correlation coefficient between these factors and vulnerability (b) |
Figure 3 NPP vulnerability under future climate change (a) and rise or fall of the grade compared with the past (b) |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
International Geosphere-Biosphere Program - Data and
|
[6] |
IPCC, 2014.Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |