Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Investigating changes in lake systems in the south-central Tibetan Plateau with multi-source remote sensing
Received date: 2015-12-30
Accepted date: 2016-07-15
Online published: 2017-03-30
Supported by
The “Strategic Priority Research Program (B)” of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.XDB03030406
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41371218, No.41165011
Copyright
Lakes in the Tibetan Plateau are considered sensitive responders to global warming. Variations in physical features of lake systems such as surface area and water level are very helpful in understanding regional responses to global warming in recent decades. In this study, multi-source remote sensing data were used to retrieve the surface area and water level time series of five inland lakes in the south-central part of the Tibetan Plateau over the past decades. Changes in water level and surface area of the lakes were investigated. The results showed that the water level of three lakes (Puma Yumco, Taro Co, Zhari Namco) increased, with expanding surface area, while the water levels of the other two lakes (Paiku Co, Mapam Yumco) fell, with shrinking area. The water levels of the lakes experienced remarkable changes in 2000-2012 as compared with 1976-1999. Spatially, lakes located at the southern fringe of the Tibetan Plateau showed consistency in water level changes, which was different from lakes in the central Tibetan Plateau.
Key words: water level; surface area; lake system; remote sensing; Tibetan Plateau
WU Yanhong , ZHANG Xin , ZHENG Hongxing , *LI Junsheng , WANG Zhiying . Investigating changes in lake systems in the south-central Tibetan Plateau with multi-source remote sensing[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017 , 27(3) : 337 -347 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-017-1380-x
Table 1 Geographical characteristics of the selected lakes |
Lakes | Location | Area (km2) | Temperature (°C) | Precipitation(mm) | Glacier meltwater supply |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Puma Yumco | 28°30′-28°38′N 90°13′-90°33′E | 287.55 | -1.13 | 287 | Yes |
Zhari Namco | 30°44′-31°05′N 85°20′-85°54′E | 971.88 | -1.04 | 174 | No |
Mapam Yumco | 30°34′-30°47′N 81°22′-81°27′E | 409.09 | 5.60 | 154 | No |
Paiku Co | 28°46′-29°02′N 85°30′-85°42′E | 272.35 | -1.20 | 654 | Yes |
Taro Co | 31°03′-31°13′N 83°55′-84°20′E | 483.45 | -0.74 | 174 | No |
Figure.1 Locations of the five selected lakes in the Tibetan Plateau |
Table 2 Multi-source remotely sensed data used for extraction of lake area and level |
Lake | Surface area | Water level ICESat | |
---|---|---|---|
Landsat | MODIS | ||
Puma Yumco (PYC) | 1972-2011 (35 images) | 2001-2012 (552 images) | 2003-2009 (14 periods) |
Zhari Namco (ZNC) | 1976-2012 (48 images) | 2001-2012 (552 images) | 2003-2009 (19 periods) |
Mapam Yumco (MYC) | 1972-2012 (39 images) | 2001-2012 (552 images) | 2003-2009 (19 periods) |
Paiku Co (PKC) | 1976-2012 (27 images) | 2001-2012 (552 images) | 2003-2009 (18 periods) |
Taro Co (TRC) | 1976-2012 (40 images) | 2001-2012 (552 images) | 2003-2009 (12 periods) |
Figure.2 Flowchart of surface area estimation for lakes |
Table 3 Regressive functions between ICESat water level and MODIS surface area data |
Name of lake | Regression equationa | R2 | Significance level |
---|---|---|---|
Puma Yumco (PYC) | Y = ln(x)*661.509 - 3468.351 | 0.721 | α = 0.05 |
Mapam Yumco (MYC) | Y = ln(x)*242,184 - 1051.499 | 0.765 | α = 0.05 |
Taro Co (TRC) | Y = ln(x)*1429.233 - 8369.144 | 0.762 | α = 0.01 |
Paiku Co (PKC) | Y = ln(x)*411.402 - 2035.593 | 0.670 | α = 0.05 |
Zhari Namco (ZNC) | Y = ln(x)*678.377 - 3682.608 | 0.492 | α = 0.05 |
aNote: x denotes the surface area obtained from MODIS data, and Y denotes the water level obtained from ICESat data. |
Table 4 Regressive functions between MODIS and Landsat surface areas |
Name of lake | Regression equationa | R2 | Significance level |
---|---|---|---|
Puma Yumco (PYC) | Y = ln(x)*16.289 - 4918.349 | 0.433 | α = 0.05 |
Mapam Yumco (MYC) | Y = ln(x)*19.660 - 4468.897 | 0.632 | α = 0.01 |
Taro Co (TRC) | Y = ln(x)*30.442 - 4380.375 | 0.575 | α = 0.01 |
Paiku Co (PKC) | Y = ln(x)*32.735 - 4396.264 | 0.481 | α = 0.01 |
Zhari Namco (ZNC) | Y = ln(x)*15.181 - 4508.691 | 0.656 | α = 0.01 |
aNote: x and y denote the surface area obtained from Landsat and MODIS, respectively. |
Figure.3 Changes of area and level for lakes in the Tibetan Plateau during the past decades |
Table 5 Changes of lake area (km2) and lake level (m) of the five lakes |
Lake | 1972-1999 | 2000-2012 | Change | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Area | Lake level | Area | Lake level | Area | Lake level | |
PYC | 284.25 | 5009.52 | 289.35 | 5010.18 | 5.10 | 0.66 |
TRC | 481.15 | 4566.88 | 484.29 | 4567.50 | 3.14 | 0.62 |
ZNC | 963.26 | 4613.23 | 979.54 | 4613.35 | 16.28 | 0.12 |
MYC | 411.42 | 4587.00 | 408.37 | 4586.91 | -3.05 | -0.09 |
PKC | 276.41 | 4580.39 | 270.33 | 4579.29 | -6.08 | -1.10 |
Table 6 Lake level correlation matrix of the selected lakes |
Lake | PYC | TRC | ZNC | MYC | PKC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYC | 1.0 | ||||
TRC | 0.11 | 1.0 | |||
ZNC | -0.11 | 0.83* | 1.0 | ||
MYC | -0.33 | -0.38 | -0.26 | 1.0 | |
PKC | -0.68* | -0.37 | -0.22 | 0.75* | 1.0 |
*Correlation coefficient is significant at the level of 0.01. |
Figure.4 Changes in annual precipitation and temperature of the five lakes during 1972-2012 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |