Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Coincidence of abandoned settlements and climate change in the Xinjiang oases zone during the last 2000 years
*Corresponding author: Fang Xiuqi, Professor, E-mail:xfang@bnu.edu.cn
Author: Jia Dan (1991-), PhD Candidate, specialized in the research of climate change and human adaptation. E-mail:Jiadan2012@163.com
Received date: 2016-11-03
Accepted date: 2017-03-16
Online published: 2017-09-05
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41371201, No.41430528
Project of Global Change, No.2010CB950103
Copyright
The study on the relationship of abandoned settlements and climate change in the oases could provide a historical reference for understanding human responses to present and future global warming in the arid zone. A total of 554 abandoned historical settlements in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China, were used to examine the relationship between abandoned settlements and temperature change over the past 2000 years. The analysis covered dynastic epochs from the Han Dynasty (206BC-220AD) to the Qing Dynasty (1644AD- 1911AD) in the oases of Xinjiang. Greater density of settlements was found at the oases larger than 2000 km2, which were more stable and less sensitive to climate change compared to smaller oases. Settlements flourished at small oases and the middle and lower reaches of rivers during warm periods and shrank back to piedmont basins and upstream alluvial fans during cold periods. These results demonstrated responses of oasis agriculture to climate change.
Key words: abandoned settlements; climate change; oasis; Xinjiang; the last 2000 years
JIA Dan , FANG Xiuqi , ZHANG Chengpeng . Coincidence of abandoned settlements and climate change in the Xinjiang oases zone during the last 2000 years[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017 , 27(9) : 1100 -1110 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-017-1424-2
Figure 1 Overview of the study area (a) and the temperature sequence of the past 2000 years (b). In (a), colored dots indicate abandoned settlements in corresponding dynasties. The star is the location of temperature series of the A’nyemaqen Mountains. In (b), the black solid line represents a 30-year moving average reconstructed April-June maximum temperature by tree-ring width chronology in the A’nyemaqen Mountains (red pentagram) (Chen, 2016); colored segments represent average temperature in each dynasty and the length of the segments indicates the length of the dynasties. In the abbreviation of the dynasty marked in the legend, TJ means Two Jin Dynasties (280-420AD) and NS means Northern and Southern Dynasties (420AD-589AD). |
Table 1 Temperature anomaly and the number of settlements in each dynasty in Xinjiang during the last 2000 years |
Dynasty (years) (Wan, 1978) | Length of dynasty (years) | Number of settlements | Temperature anomaly (°C) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Northern Xinjiang | Southern Xinjiang | |||
Han (206BC-220AD) | 426 | 15 | 99 | -0.0179 |
Two Jin (280AD-420AD) | 140 | 5 | 86 | -0.2632 |
Northern and Southern Dynasties (420AD-589AD) | 169 | 13 | 95 | -0.0868 |
Tang (618AD-907AD) | 289 | 62 | 237 | 0.1096 |
Song (960AD-1279AD) | 319 | 36 | 94 | -0.0994 |
Yuan (1279AD-1368AD) | 89 | 38 | 16 | 0.0493 |
Ming (1368AD-1644AD) | 276 | 9 | 7 | 0.1748 |
Qing (1644AD-1911AD) | 267 | 86 | 57 | -0.1595 |
Figure 2 Spatial distribution of settlements over 8 dynasties in Xinjiang, with topography (colorful dots represent settlements in the corresponding dynasty; the blue line indicates the location of the rivers). (a) Settlements in Han and Two Jin Dynasty (TJ); (b) Settlements in Northern and Southern Dynasty (NS) and Tang Dynasties; (c) Settlements in Song and Yuan dynasties; (d) Settlements in Ming and Qing dynasties. |
Figure 3 Spatial distribution of abandoned settlements in 16 river basins in the Tarim Basin. NDVI in 2009 was used to indicate vegetation distribution in Xinjiang. This dataset was provided by International Scientific & Technical Data Mirror Site, Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences. (http://www. gscloud.cn). |
Table 2 Area of oases (Liang and Zhou, 2010) and the number of abandoned settlements of each river basin in the Tarim Basin |
Name of river basin | Area of oasis (km2) | Number of abandoned settlements |
---|---|---|
Kashgar river | 12719.54 | 91 |
Yarkand river | 9951.36 | 44 |
Aksu river | 7025.53 | 28 |
Muzart-Kuche river | 6824.42 | 64 |
Hotan river | 3138.23 | 22 |
Konqi river | 3021.23 | 37 |
Cele-kaxi-Keriya river | 1732.43 | 15 |
Qiemo river | 757.40 | 6 |
Dinal river | 712.51 | 14 |
Yangxia-Cedel river | 582.66 | 8 |
Tasihong-Sangzhu river | 506.27 | 23 |
Niya river | 257.31 | 1 |
Ruoqiang river | 80.69 | 4 |
Milan river | 66.44 | 3 |
Washixia river | 58.68 | 1 |
Bositantuoge lake-Alamilan-Moleqie river | 21.19 | 4 |
The gray color indicates oasis area less than 2000 km2. |
Figure 4 The relation between area of oasis and number of settlements. (a) Scatter plot between area of oasis and number of settlements in corresponding dynasty (colored solid dots represent corresponding dynasty); (b) Linear regression between area of oasis and total number of abandoned settlements in the Tarim Basin. |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |