Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Reconstructing the historical spatial land use pattern for Jiangsu Province in mid-Qing Dynasty
Author: Jin Xiaobin (1974-), specialized in land use and land planning. E-mail: jinxb@nju.edu.cn
Received date: 2016-03-31
Accepted date: 2016-04-30
Online published: 2016-12-20
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41671082
Copyright
This study is proposed to reconstruct a high-resolution spatial distribution of historical land use pattern with all land use types to overcome low-accuracy and/or the monotonic land use type in current historical land use reconstruction studies. The year of 1820 is set as the temporal section and the administrative area of Jiangsu Province is the study area. Land use types being reconstructed include farmland, residential land (including both urban land and rural residential land), water body, and other land (including forest land, grassland, and unused land). Data sources mainly refer to historical documents, historical geographic research outcomes, contemporary statistics, and natural environmental data. With great considerations over regional natural resources and social and economic conditions, a few theoretical assumptions have been proposed to facilitate the adjustment on prefecture farmland, urban land, and rural residential land. Upholding the idea that the contemporary land use pattern has been inherently in sequence with the historical land use pattern as well as the land use pattern shall be consistent to its accessibility, this study reconstructs the land use pattern in Jiangsu Province in 1820 with 100 m*100 m grids based on accessibility analysis and comprehensive evaluation. The outcome has been tested as valid by regionalization and correlation analysis. The resulted spatial distribution shows that back in 1820 in Jiangsu Province: (1) farmland, urban land, rural residential land, water body, and other land take about 48.49%, 4.46%, 0.16%, 15.03%, and 31.86% of the total land area respectively; (2) the land use pattern features high proportion of land in farming while low-proportion land in non-farming uses while population, topography, and the density of water body lead to great spatial variations; and (3) the reconstruction methodology has been tested as reasonable based on significant positive correlations between 1820 data and 1985 for both farmland and rural residential land at the prefecture level.
Key words: land use; grid, reconstruction; mid-Qing Dynasty; Jiangsu Province
JIN Xiaobin , PAN Qian , YANG Xuhong , BAI Qing , ZHOU Yinkang . Reconstructing the historical spatial land use pattern for Jiangsu Province in mid-Qing Dynasty[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016 , 26(12) : 1689 -1706 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-016-1353-5
Figure 1 The location of the study area |
Figure 2 The technical route chart |
Table 1 Suitability evaluation indices for rural residential land and farmland |
Target layer | Index layer | Property | Weight (Rural residential land) | Weight (Farmland) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Natural conditions | Elevation | Interval value | 0.256 | 0.408 |
Slope | Interval value | 0.114 | 0.168 | |
Distance to the nearest river | Negative index | 0.100 | 0.133 | |
Soil texture | Interval value | / | 0.031 | |
pH value | Interval value | / | 0.015 | |
Total nitrogen | Positive index | / | 0.024 | |
Total phosphorus | Positive index | / | 0.019 | |
Total potassium | Positive index | / | 0.006 | |
Soil organic matter | Positive index | / | 0.029 | |
Social and economic conditions | Distance to the nearest town | Negative index | 0.112 | 0.151 |
Distance to the nearest county | Negative index | 0.077 | / | |
The hierarchy of rural residential land | Positive index | 0.340 | / | |
The concentration of farmland | Positive index | / | 0.017 |
Figure 3 Rural residential land (a), urban land (b), and farmland (c) area of the study area in 1820 |
Figure 4 Spatial pattern of land use of the study area in 1820 |
Figure 5 The land use structure of the study area in 1820 |
Figure 6 Correlation analysis for both rural residential land (a) and farmland (b) |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
Editorial Board of Fifty Years of Jiangsu Province, 1999. Fifty Years of Jiangsu Province: 1949 to 1999. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
Local Chronicles Compilation Committee of Jiangsu Province (LCCCJP), 1999. Jiangsu Provincial Annals: Geography Annals. Nanjing: Jiangsu Ancient Book Press. (in Chinese)
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
|
57 |
|
58 |
|
59 |
|
60 |
|
61 |
|
62 |
|
63 |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |