Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Effects of rural-urban migration on vegetation greenness in fragile areas: A case study of Inner Mongolia in China
Author: Li Shiji, PhD Candidate, specialized in land use and land cover change. E-mail:lishiji@foxmail.com
*Corresponding author: Tan Minghong, PhD and Associate Professor, E-mail:tanmh@igsnrr.ac.cn
Received date: 2015-09-28
Accepted date: 2015-11-13
Online published: 2016-07-25
Supported by
Projects of International Cooperation and Exchanges NSFC, No.41161140352
The Major Research Plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.91325302
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41271119
Copyright
Different government departments and researchers have paid considerable attention at various levels to improving the eco-environment in ecologically fragile areas. Over the past decade, large numbers of people have emigrated from rural areas as a result of the rapid urbanization in Chinese society. The question then remains: to what extent does this migration affect the regional vegetation greenness in the areas that people have moved from? Based on normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data with a resolution of 1 km, as well as meteorological data and socio-economic data from 2000 to 2010 in Inner Mongolia, the spatio-temporal variation of vegetation greenness in the study area was analyzed via trend analysis and significance test methods. The contributions of human activities and natural factors to the variation of vegetation conditions during this period were also quantitatively tested and verified, using a multi-regression analysis method. We found that: (1) the vegetation greenness of the study area increased by 10.1% during 2000-2010. More than 28% of the vegetation greenness increased significantly, and only about 2% decreased evidently during the study period. (2) The area with significant degradation showed a banded distribution at the northern edge of the agro-pastoral ecotone in central Inner Mongolia. This indicates that the eco-environment is still fragile in this area, which should be paid close attention. The area where vegetation greenness significantly improved showed a concentrated distribution in the southeast and west of Inner Mongolia. (3) The effect of agricultural labor on vegetation greenness exceeded those due to natural factors (i.e. precipitation and temperature). The emigration of agricultural labor improved the regional vegetation greenness significantly.
LI Shiji , SUN Zhigang , Tan Minghong , LI Xiubin . Effects of rural-urban migration on vegetation greenness in fragile areas: A case study of Inner Mongolia in China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016 , 26(3) : 313 -324 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-016-1270-7
Table 1 Main factors impacting the changes in vegetation in Inner Mongolia |
Category | Indicator | Variable | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Natural factors | ATPa AMTb | Slope ATP Slope AMP | Variation in trend of ATP for 2000-2010 Variation in trend of AMT for 2000-2010 |
Human activities | QALc AALd CAPALe | CRQAL CRAAL CRCAPAL | Rate of change of QAL for 2000-2010 Rate of change of AAL for 2000-2010 Rate of change of CAPAL for 2000-2010 |
SCPALf | CRSCPAL | Rate of change of SCPAL for 2000-2010 |
a ATP = total precipitation. b AMT = annual mean temperature. c QAL = quantity of agricultural labor force. d AAL = average age of agricultural labor force. e CAPAL = cultivated area per capita by agricultural labor force.f SCPAL = stocking capacity per capita by agricultural labor force. |
Figure 1 Spatial distribution of AGSNDVI in Inner Mongolia in 2000 |
Figure 2 Spatial changes in vegetation greenness based on inter-annual trends and significance of AGSNDVI in Inner Mongolia between 2000 and 2010 |
Table 2 Explanatory model for changes in vegetation greenness in Inner Mongolia |
Model | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | t | Sig. | Collinearity statistics | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Std. error | Tolerance | VIF | |||||
Adjusted R2: 0.263 | ||||||||
(Constant) | 0.006 | 0.002 | 2.735 | 0.008 | ||||
Slope ATP | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.359 | 2.545 | 0.014** | 0.629 | 1.590 | |
Slope AMT | -0.343 | 0.169 | -0.273 | -2.028 | 0.048** | 0.687 | 1.455 | |
CRQAL | -0.010 | 0.003 | -0.447 | -3.134 | 0.003*** | 0.613 | 1.631 | |
CRAAL | -0.031 | 0.019 | -0.192 | -1.660 | 0.103 | 0.930 | 1.075 | |
CRCAPAL | -0.002 | 0.001 | -0.265 | -2.151 | 0.036** | 0.824 | 1.214 | |
CRSCPA | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.112 | 0.904 | 0.370 | 0.813 | 1.230 |
Note: * stands for P<0.1; ** stands for P<0.05; *** stands for P<0.01. |
Figure 3 Spatial distribution of the variation trend of AGSNDVI and its main influencing factors in Inner Mongolia |
Figure 4 Spatio-temporal distribution of the agricultural labor force and its changes in Inner Mongolia during the period 2000-2010 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |