Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Identifying sources and hazardous risks of heavy metals in topsoils of rapidly urbanizing East China
*Corresponding author: Ma Zongwei, E-mail: njumazw@163.com; Lv Jianshu, E-mail: lvjianshu@126.com
Author: Liu Yang (1986-), PhD Candidate, specialized in environmental planning and management.E-mail: liuyang0531py@126.com
Received date: 2015-07-20
Accepted date: 2015-12-28
Online published: 2016-06-15
Supported by
China State-Sponsored Postgraduate Study Abroad Program, No.201306190053
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41101079
The Program B for Outstanding PhD Candidate of Nanjing University, No.2014001B008
The Program for Graduate Student’s Research Innovation of Jiangsu Province, No.CXLX13-051
Copyright
With rapid economic and social development, soil contamination arising from heavy metals has become a serious problem in many parts of China. We collected a total of 445 samples (0-20 cm) at the nodes of a 2 km×2 km grid in surface soils of Rizhao city, and analyzed sources and risk pattern of 10 heavy metals (As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn). The combination of Multivariate statistics analysis and Geostatistical methods was applied to identify the sources and hazardous risk of heavy metals in soils. The result indicated that Cr, Ni, Co, Mn, Cu, and As were mainly controlled by parent materials and came from natural sources. Cd and Hg originated from anthropogenic sources. Pb and Zn, belonging to different groups in multivariate analysis, were associated with joint effect of parent materials and human inputs. Ordinary Kriging and Indicator Kriging suggested that single element and elements association from the same principal components had similar spatial distribution. Through comprehensive assessment on all elements, we also found the high risk areas were located in the populated urban areas and western study area, which could be attributed to the higher geological background in the western part and strong human interference in the eastern part.
LIU Yang , MA Zongwei , LV Jianshu , BI Jun . Identifying sources and hazardous risks of heavy metals in topsoils of rapidly urbanizing East China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016 , 26(6) : 735 -749 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-016-1296-x
Figure 1 The location and sampling sites in Rizhao, East China |
Table 1 The descriptive statistics contents of heavy metals in Rizhao, East China (mg/kg) |
Range | Min | Max | Median | Mean | SD | CV (%) | Skewness | Kurtosis | Background values of eastern Shandong province (Dai et al., 2011) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As | 9.90 | 1.90 | 11.80 | 4.90 | 5.04 | 1.335 | 26.5 | 0.755 | 1.323 | 6.30 |
Cd | 4.78 | 0.026 | 4.81 | 0.095 | 0.20 | 0.227 | 196.9 | 19.922 | 413.056 | 0.108 |
Co | 22.80 | 3.00 | 25.80 | 10.30 | 10.87 | 3.497 | 32.2 | 0.975 | 1.248 | 11.00 |
Cr | 265.40 | 12.20 | 277.60 | 46.00 | 54.09 | 27.387 | 50.6 | 2.934 | 14.994 | 56.20 |
Cu | 94.90 | 4.90 | 99.80 | 15.60 | 17.57 | 8.896 | 50.6 | 3.699 | 22.382 | 19.60 |
Hg | 3.27 | 0.008 | 3.28 | 0.025 | 0.043 | 0.165 | 385.0 | 17.628 | 338.390 | 0.029 |
Mn | 920.00 | 292.00 | 1212.00 | 595.50 | 597.08 | 129.84 | 21.7 | 0.542 | 1.383 | 552.00 |
Ni | 159.20 | 7.10 | 166.30 | 20.20 | 23.52 | 12.829 | 54.6 | 4.346 | 37.054 | 23.50 |
Pb | 54.10 | 18.20 | 72.30 | 26.30 | 27.78 | 6.045 | 21.8 | 2.340 | 9.511 | 25.40 |
Zn | 152.30 | 18.30 | 170.60 | 60.30 | 63.10 | 20.087 | 31.8 | 1.077 | 2.633 | 56.10 |
Table 2 The mean contents of Rizhao compared with typical regions in the world (mg/kg) |
As | Cd | Co | Cr | Cu | Hg | Mn | Ni | Pb | Zn | References | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rizhao | 5.04 | 0.20 | 10.87 | 54.09 | 17.57 | 0.04 | 597.08 | 23.52 | 27.78 | 63.10 | This work |
Juxian county | - | 0.13 | 13.26 | 68.28 | 22.97 | 0.037 | 598.65 | 29.36 | 28.4 | 65.81 | (Lv et al., 2014) |
Huizhou | 10.19 | 0.1 | - | 27.61 | 16.74 | 0.22 | - | 14.89 | 44.66 | 57.21 | (Cai et al., 2012) |
Alicante | - | 0.34 | 7.1 | 26.5 | 22.5 | - | 295 | 20.9 | 22.8 | 52.8 | (Mico et al., 2006) |
Ebro | - | 0.415 | - | 20.27 | 17.33 | 0.0356 | - | 20.5 | 17.54 | 57.53 | (Rodríguez Martín et al., 2006) |
Piemonte | - | - | 19.001 | 46.157 | 58.309 | - | - | 83.163 | 16.101 | 62.683 | (Facchinelli et al., 2001) |
Luhe | - | 0.046 | - | 55.01 | 23.94 | 0.07 | - | 29.37 | 27.37 | 65.12 | (Zhao et al., 2010) |
Zagreb | - | 0.4 | 10.9 | 54.6 | 56.1 | - | 579 | 35.2 | 23.2 | 77.9 | (Sollitto et al., 2010) |
Galicia | - | 0.31 | 14 | 54.1 | 20.5 | - | 659.9 | 23.5 | 11.7 | 98.7 | (Franco-Uria et al., 2009) |
Shunyi | 7.85 | 0.136 | - | - | 22.4 | 0.073 | - | - | 20.4 | 69.8 | (Lu et al., 2012) |
Zhengding | 6.16 | 0.15 | - | 57.77 | 21.22 | 0.08 | - | 25.04 | 18.8 | 69.96 | (Yang et al., 2009) |
Kavadarci | 8.5 | 0.32 | 15 | 50 | 30 | - | 780 | 74 | 21 | 56 | (Stafilov et al., 2013) |
Ireland | 10.2 | 0.326 | 6.2 | 42.6 | 16.2 | 0.086 | 462 | 17.5 | 24.8 | 62.6 | (Zhang, 2006) |
Yangzhong | - | 0.3 | - | 77.2 | 33.9 | 0.2 | - | 38.5 | 35.7 | 98.1 | (Huang et al., 2007) |
Duero | - | 0.159 | - | 20.53 | 11.01 | 0.0421 | - | - | 15.08 | 42.42 | (Nanos and Rodríguez Martín, 2012) |
“-” represents unavailable |
Table 3 Correlation coefficient matrix of heavy metals in soils |
As | Cd | Co | Cr | Cu | Hg | Mn | Ni | Pb | Zn | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As | 1 | 0.029 | -0.009 | -0.044 | 0.208** | 0.031 | 0.044 | -0.060 | -0.066 | -0.105* |
Cd | 0.029 | 1 | 0.036 | 0.020 | 0.084* | 0.030 | 0.071 | 0.025 | 0.199** | -0.047 |
Co | -0.009 | 0.036 | 1 | 0.739** | 0.367** | 0.012 | 0.719** | 0.700** | 0.164** | 0.115** |
Cr | -0.044 | 0.020 | 0.739** | 1 | 0.256** | -0.010 | 0.403** | 0.947** | 0.004 | 0.022 |
Cu | 0.208** | 0.084* | 0.367** | 0.256** | 1 | -0.016 | 0.284** | 0.249** | 0.142** | -0.055 |
Hg | 0.031 | 0.030 | 0.012 | -0.010 | -0.016 | 1 | 0.029 | -0.020 | -0.025 | -0.016 |
Mn | 0.044 | 0.071 | 0.719** | 0.403** | 0.284** | 0.029 | 1 | 0.367** | 0.251** | 0.232** |
Ni | -0.060 | 0.025 | 0.700** | 0.947** | 0.249** | -0.020 | 0.367** | 1 | 0.030 | -0.035 |
Pb | -0.066 | 0.199** | 0.164** | 0.004 | 0.142** | -0.025 | 0.251** | 0.030 | 1 | -0.066 |
Zn | -0.105** | -0.047 | 0.115** | 0.022 | -0.055 | -0.016 | 0.232** | -0.035 | -0.066 | 1 |
** represents significant at the 0.01 level * represents significant at the 0.05 level |
Figure 2 The loadings of the first four principal components |
Figure 3 The result of cluster analysis |
Table 5 The variograms fitting of heavy metals in soils |
Variable | Model | Co | Co+C | Co/Co+C | R/m | Rss | R2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ordinary Kriging | PC1 | Exponential | 3.588 | 18.67 | 0.192 | 45900 | 7.42E-03 | 0.988 |
PC2 | Spherical | 1.297 | 2.195 | 0.591 | 13730 | 4.05E-03 | 0.964 | |
PC3 | Spherical | 0.297 | 1.271 | 0.234 | 8240 | 1.45E-04 | 0.943 | |
PC4 | Exponential | 0.137 | 0.167 | 0.818 | 3330 | 3.61E-03 | 0.553 | |
Univariate Indicator Kriging | As | Spherical | 0.046 | 0.233 | 0.197 | 8110 | 9.01E-04 | 0.875 |
Cd | Exponential | 0.108 | 0.235 | 0.460 | 28890 | 3.83E-04 | 0.975 | |
Co | Exponential | 0.032 | 0.221 | 0.145 | 28680 | 3.55E-04 | 0.975 | |
Cr | Exponential | 0.026 | 0.136 | 0.191 | 7770 | 4.67E-04 | 0.949 | |
Cu | Exponential | 0.024 | 0.195 | 0.123 | 4620 | 3.51E-04 | 0.847 | |
Hg | Exponential | 0.084 | 0.109 | 0.771 | 4500 | 8.50E-04 | 0.670 | |
Mn | Exponential | 0.031 | 0.248 | 0.125 | 5760 | 2.86E-03 | 0.625 | |
Ni | Exponential | 0.025 | 0.201 | 0.124 | 8460 | 3.70E-04 | 0.966 | |
Pb | Spherical | 0.119 | 0.221 | 0.538 | 9480 | 9.46E-04 | 0.879 | |
Zn | Gaussian | 0.130 | 0.318 | 0.409 | 32510 | 3.43E-04 | 0.994 | |
Multiple Variable Indicator Kriging | Co-Cr-Mn-Ni-Zn | Exponential | 0.033 | 0.156 | 0.212 | 19530 | 1.54E-04 | 0.981 |
Cd-Pb | Exponential | 0.115 | 0.172 | 0.669 | 24540 | 1.48E-04 | 0.979 | |
As-Cu | Exponential | 0.016 | 0.128 | 0.125 | 4740 | 2.04E-04 | 0.812 | |
All elements | Exponential | 0.028 | 0.056 | 0.500 | 1660 | 7.49E-06 | 0.986 |
Figure 4 The spatial patterns of the principal components in Rizhao, East China |
Figure 5 Risk probability maps of single heavy metals in Rizhao, East China |
Figure 6 Comprehensive risk probability of heavy metals in Rizhao, East China |
Table 4 Results of factors matrix |
Element | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 |
As | -0.065 | -0.179 | 0.883 | -0.091 |
Cd | 0.160 | 0.881 | 0.173 | 0.140 |
Co | 0.910 | -0.144 | 0.014 | 0.023 |
Cr | 0.810 | -0.471 | -0.118 | 0.029 |
Cu | 0.477 | 0.065 | 0.551 | -0.182 |
Hg | -0.005 | 0.001 | 0.162 | 0.968 |
Mn | 0.756 | 0.170 | 0.107 | 0.037 |
Ni | 0.792 | -0.460 | -0.137 | 0.018 |
Pb | 0.333 | 0.726 | -0.025 | -0.077 |
Zn | 0.748 | 0.518 | -0.151 | 0.004 |
Table 6 Results of environmental risk assessment of Rizhao, East China |
Probability range | Co-Cr-Mn-Ni-Zn | Cd-Pb | As-Cu | Hg | All elements | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Area (hm2) | Percentage (%) | Area (hm2) | Percent- age( %) | Area (hm2) | Percentage (%) | Area (hm2) | Percentage (%) | Area (hm2) | Percentage (%) | |
Non-risk (0-0.2) | 55804 | 30.2 | 45431 | 24.6 | 106320 | 57.6 | 3165 | 1.7 | 2197 | 1.2 |
Low risk (0.2-0.4) | 49423 | 26.8 | 58031 | 31.4 | 61429 | 33.3 | 32820 | 17.8 | 68712 | 37.2 |
Moderate (0.4-0.6) | 42652 | 23. | 32384 | 17.5 | 16397 | 8.9 | 79396 | 43.0 | 102097 | 55.3 |
Considerable risk (0.6-0.8) | 28841 | 15.6 | 38734 | 21.0 | 573 | 0.3 | 50835 | 27.5 | 11713 | 6.3 |
High risk (0.8-1.0) | 7999 | 4.3 | 10139 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 | 18503 | 10.0 | 0 | 0 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
Rizhao Municipal Bureau of Statistics (RMBS), 2012. Rizhao Statistical Yearbook in 2012. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |