Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Degrading river network due to urbanization in Yangtze River Delta
*Corresponding author: Xu Youpeng, Professor, E-mail: xuyp305@163.com
Author: Han Longfei (1988-), PhD Candidate, specialized in urban hydrology. E-mail: hanlf.nju@gmail.com
Received date: 2015-11-12
Accepted date: 2015-12-15
Online published: 2016-06-15
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41371046
The Commonwealth and Specialized Program for Scientific Research, Ministry of Water Resources of China, No.201201072, No.201301075
Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, No.BK20131278
Copyright
Evolution of river systems under the background of human activities has been a heated topic among geographers and hydrologists. Spatial and temporal variations of river systems during the 1960s-2010s in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) were investigated based on streams derived from the topographic maps in the 1960s, 1980s and 2010s. A list of indices, drainage density (Dd), water surface ratio (WSR), ratio of area to length of main streams (R), evolution coefficient of tributaries (K) and box dimension (D), were classified into three types (quantitative, structural, and complex indices) and used to quantify the variations of stream structure. Results showed that: (1) quantitative indices (Dd, WSR) presented decreasing trend in the past 50 years, and Dd in Wuchengxiyu, Hangjiahu and Yindongnan have decreased most, about 20%. Structurally, the Qinhuai River basin was characterized by significant upward R, and K value in Hangjiahu went down dramatically by 46.8% during the 1960s-2010s. Decreasing tendency in D was found dominating across the YRD, and decreasing magnitude in Wuchengxiyu and Hangjiahu peaks for 7.8% and 6.5%, respectively in the YRD. (2) Urbanization affected the spatial pattern of river system, and areas with high level of urbanization exhibited least Dd (2.18 km/km2), WSR (6.52%), K (2.64) and D (1.42), compared to moderate and low levels of urbanization. (3) Urbanization also affected the evolution of stream system. In the past 50 years, areas with high level of urbanization showed compelling decreasing tendency in quantitative (27.2% and 19.3%) and complex indices (4.9%) and trend of enlarging of main rivers (4.5% and 7.9% in periods of the 1960s-1980s and the 1980s-2010s). In the recent 30 years, areas with low level of urbanization were detected with significant downward trend in Dd and K. (4) Expanding of urban land, construction of hydraulic engineering and irrigation and water conservancy activities were the main means which degraded the river system in the YRD.
HAN Longfei , LEI Chaogui , YANG Liu , DENG Xiaojun , HU Chunsheng , XU Guanglai . Degrading river network due to urbanization in Yangtze River Delta[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016 , 26(6) : 694 -706 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-016-1293-0
Figure 1 Location of the Yangtze River Delta |
Table 1 Definitions of stream structure indices in this study |
Indices | Definitions | Formulas | Units | Explanations |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dd | Drainage density | Dd=L/A, L is total stream length in the basin, A is area of the basin | km/km2 | Dd was firstly introduced by Horton (1945) to indicate the drainage ability |
WSR | Water surface ratio | WSR=(Aw/A)×100%, Aw is total water area, including the water area of streams, ponds and lakes | % | WSR denotes the regulating and storing ability |
K | Development coefficient of tributaries | K=Lb/Lm, Lb is length of tributaries, Lm is length of main streams | No dimension | K refers to developing degree of tributaries |
R | Ratio of area to length of main streams | R=Am/Lm, Am is area of the main streams, Lm is length of main streams | km2/km | R is the average width of main streams, indicating developing degree of main stream |
D | Box dimension | Intersecting the river networks with square boxes with side length r, count the number N(r) of boxes with stream segments. N(r) increases with decreasing r of the box, and we can get a serial of r-N(r). | No dimension | Fractal theory was first introduced to geography, and it denotes the complexity of the pattern of river network (Zhang et al., 2015). |
Figure 2 Fraction contributions of different streams orders to river network in number and length |
Figure 3 Characteristics of stream structure in the Yangtze River Delta in the past 50 years |
Table 2 Change of streams structure in different regions in the past 50 years |
Indices | Period | Study area | Other areas | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | E* | Shanghai* (Yang et al., 2004; Yuan et al., 2005) | Pearl River Delta* (Zhou et al., 2008) | ||
Area (km2) | - | 3841.0 | 4914.0 | 7621.0 | 497.1 | 476.1 | 4962.5 | 1991.8 |
Dd | 1960s | 3.80 | 3.54 | 3.75 | 1.25 | 3.40 | 3.45 | 0.86 |
1980s | 3.27 | 3.87 | 3.24 | 1.58 | 3.06 | 0.84 | ||
2010s | 2.93 | 3.41 | 2.93 | 1.14 | 2.75 | 0.65 | ||
WSR | 1960s | 6.10 | 18.86 | 10.63 | 5.53 | 9.50 | 5.62 | |
1980s | 5.59 | 17.47 | 9.88 | 5.60 | 7.60 | |||
2010s | 4.66 | 15.20 | 8.76 | 7.52 | 6.70 | |||
K | 1960s | 4.93 | 2.54 | 3.65 | 2.52 | 3.39 | 3.39 | 4.42 |
1980s | 4.00 | 3.07 | 2.83 | 2.74 | 2.96 | 3.04 | ||
2010s | 3.83 | 2.56 | 1.94 | 4.37 | 2.53 | 3.50 | ||
R | 1960s | 41.53 | 43.75 | 45.54 | 44.11 | 37.40 | ||
1980s | 42.83 | 48.22 | 47.03 | 39.96 | 34.10 | |||
2010s | 38.85 | 42.94 | 45.66 | 73.23 | 35.60 | |||
D | 1960s | 1.71 | 1.68 | 1.69 | 1.32 | 1.62 | 1.40 | |
1980s | 1.65 | 1.71 | 1.64 | 1.32 | 1.58 | |||
2010s | 1.58 | 1.65 | 1.58 | 1.27 | 1.54 |
Note: *The three periods of region D is 1990, 2003 and 2010, respectively, and there is merely one period (2010) in Shanghai, three periods (1980, 1985 and 2005) in Pearl River Delta; the tributaries development coefficient in Shanghai and Pearl River Delta were calculated with the data provided in their papers; Calculation of WSR in Shanghai does not include lake areas, and its fractal value is computed based on Horton law. |
Table 3 Administrative divisions with different levels of urbanization in the Yangtze River Delta |
Administrative division | Urbanization degree (%)* | |
---|---|---|
High level of urbanization | Municipal district of Changzhou | 58.15 |
Municipal district of Suzhou | 57.76 | |
Municipal district of Wuxi | 49.94 | |
Municipal district of Hangzhou | 46.79 | |
Medium level of urbanization | Kunshan County | 39.68 |
Zhangjiagang County | 38.38 | |
Taicang County | 35.62 | |
Changsu County | 34.64 | |
Wuxian County | 31.93 | |
Wujiang County | 30.18 | |
Low level of urbanization | Haining County | 29.82 |
Haiyan County | 22.20 | |
Qingpu County | 22.05 |
Note: *Urbanization level is calculated by dividing construction area by its total area, and construction area was acquired by remote sensing interpretation. |
Table 4 Characteristics of stream structure in administrative divisions with different levels of urbanization in the Yangtze River Delta |
Indices | Periods | Areas of different urbanization degree | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
High level | Medium level | Low level | ||
Dd | 1960s | 2.45 | 3.80 | 4.47 |
1980s | 2.32 | 4.04 | 3.46 | |
2010s | 1.78 | 3.64 | 2.96 | |
WSR | 1960s | 6.88 | 14.69 | 17.23 |
1980s | 7.14 | 13.51 | 16.25 | |
2010s | 5.55 | 11.85 | 15.30 | |
K | 1960s | 2.93 | 4.90 | 9.12 |
1980s | 2.90 | 4.65 | 6.19 | |
2010s | 2.10 | 4.57 | 2.89 | |
R | 1960s | 40.91 | 41.39 | 41.08 |
1980s | 42.76 | 45.72 | 44.39 | |
2010s | 46.14 | 42.37 | 40.68 | |
D | 1960s | 1.45 | 1.67 | 1.69 |
1980s | 1.43 | 1.69 | 1.61 | |
2010s | 1.38 | 1.66 | 1.61 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |