Journal of Geographical Sciences >
A spatial-temporal analysis of urban recreational business districts: A case study in Beijing, China
Received date: 2015-06-01
Accepted date: 2015-07-15
Online published: 2015-12-31
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41071110
Copyright
This study has revealed spatial-temporal changes in Recreational Business Districts (RBDs) in Beijing and examined the relationship between the location of urban RBDs and traffic conditions, resident and tourist density, scenic spots, and land prices. A more reasonable classification of urban RBDs (LSC, CPS, and ULA) is also proposed. Quantitative methods such as Gini Coefficient, Spatial Interpolation, Kernel Density Estimation, and Geographical Detector were employed to collect and analyze the data from three types of urban RBDs in Beijing in 1990, 2000, and 2014, respectively, and the spatial-temporal patterns as well as the distribution characteristics of urban RBDs were analyzed using ArcGIS software. It was concluded that (1) both the number and scale of urban RBDs in Beijing have been expanding and the trend for all types of urban RBDs in Beijing to be spatially agglomerated is continuing; (2) the spatial-temporal evolution pattern of urban RBDs in Beijing is “single-core agglomeration-dual-core agglomeration-multi-core diffusion”; and (3) urban RBDs were always located in areas with low traffic density, tourist attractions, high resident and tourist population density, and relatively high land valuations; these factors also affect the scale size of RBDs.
Key words: urban RBD; spatial-temporal pattern; distribution characteristics; Beijing
ZHU He , LIU Jiaming , CHEN Chen , LIN Jing , TAO Hui . A spatial-temporal analysis of urban recreational business districts: A case study in Beijing, China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2015 , 25(12) : 1521 -1536 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-015-1249-9
Figure 1 The study area in Beijing |
Table 1 Statistics of urban RBDs in Beijing in 1999, 2000 and 2014 |
Year | LSC | CPS | ULA | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number | Scale (km2) | Number | Scale (km2) | Number | Scale (km2) | Number | Scale (km2) | |
1990 | 2 | 0.0149 | 13 | 0.3289 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0.3439 |
2000 | 13 | 0.3449 | 16 | 2.5125 | 4 | 1.0920 | 33 | 3.9494 |
2014 | 37 | 2.3953 | 40 | 6.3984 | 11 | 4.6648 | 88 | 13.4584 |
Table 2 Gini Coefficient variation of urban RBDs in Beijing |
Year | |||
---|---|---|---|
1990 | 2000 | 2014 | |
Gini Coefficient of LSCs | 0.5015 | 0.5280 | 0.5949 |
Gini Coefficient of CPSs | 0.5228 | 0.5402 | 0.5998 |
Gini Coefficient of ULAs | - | 0.5079 | 0.5287 |
Note: “-” means there is no data. |
Figure 2 Density distribution of urban RBDs in Beijing in 1990, 2000 and 2014 |
Figure 3 Classification and distribution of urban RBDs in Beijing based on traffic conditions |
Figure 4 Relationship between urban RBDs and population density in Beijing |
Figure 5 Relationship between urban RBDs and tourist density in Beijing |
Figure 6 Relationship between urban RBDs and land valuations in Beijing |
Table 3 Spatial factors influencing the scale size of RBDs |
2000 | 2014 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSC | CPS | ULA | LSC | CPS | ULA | |
Traffic conditions | 0.11 b | 0.24 | 0.38 b | 0.07 b | 0.05 b | 0.14 |
Inhabitant density | 0.34 a | 0.21 | 0.41 b | 0.27 a | 0.08 b | 0.24 |
Tourist density | 0.45 a | 0.28 | 0.44 b | 0.29 a | 0.36 a | 0.32 |
Distance from attractions | 0.20 b | 0.21 | 0.72 a | 0.14 b | 0.03 b | 0.43 |
Land prices | 0.07 b | 0.21 | 0.41 b | 0.09 b | 0.08 b | 0.27 |
Note: a, b means in a row without a common superscript letter are different significantly (P< 0.05). |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |