Journal of Geographical Sciences >
The implication of mass elevation effect of the Tibetan Plateau for altitudinal belts
Received date: 2015-04-30
Accepted date: 2015-05-27
Online published: 2015-12-31
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41571099.No.41001278
Copyright
The heating effect (or mass elevation effect, MEE) of the Tibetan Plateau (TP) is intense due to its massive body. Some studies have been undertaken on its role as the heat source in summer and its implications for Asian climate, but little has been known of the implications of its MEE for the distribution of mountain altitudinal belts (MABs). Using air temperature data observed and remotely sensed data, MAB/treeline data, and ASTER GDEM data, this paper compares the height of MABs and alpine treelines in the main TP and the surrounding mountains/lowland and explains the difference from the point of view of MEE. The results demonstrate: 1) at same elevation, air temperature and the length of growing season gradually increase from the eastern edge to the interior TP, e.g., at 4500 m (corresponding to the mean altitude of the TP), the monthly mean temperature is 3.58°C higher (April) to 6.63°C higher (June) in the interior plateau than in the Sichuan Basin; the 10°C isotherm for the warmest month goes upward from the edge to the interior of the plateau, at 4000 m in the Qilian Mts. and the eastern edges of the plateau, and up to 4600-5000 m in Lhasa and Zuogong; the warmth index at an altitude of 4500 m can be up to 15°C·month in the interior TP, but much lower at the eastern edges. 2) MABs and treeline follow a similar trend of rising inwards: dark-coniferous forest is 1000-1500 m higher and alpine steppe is about 700-900 m higher in the interior TP than at the eastern edges.
YAO Yonghui , XU Mei , ZHANG Baiping . The implication of mass elevation effect of the Tibetan Plateau for altitudinal belts[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2015 , 25(12) : 1411 -1422 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-015-1242-3
Figure 1 Sketch map of the Tibetan Plateau and treeline and mountain altitudinal belt sites |
Figure 2 Mountain altitudinal belts along three profiles (a. the Mt. Erlang-Nyainqentanglha profile; b. the Mt. Guangguang-Tuoba Beishan profile; c. the Mt. Wutai-Amugang profile) |
Table 1 Reported lapse rates of the Mt. Emei (°C/100 m) |
Month | Jan. | Feb. | Mar. | Apr. | May | Jun. | Jul. | Aug. | Sept. | Oct. | Nov. | Dec. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lapse rate | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.49 |
Table 2 Temperatures and the adjusted temperatures in January and in July near the locations of MABs along the three W-E profiles |
Profiles | MAB sites | Longi- tude | Lati- tude | Altit- ude (m) | Air tem- perature in Jan. (°C) | Air tem- perature in July (°C) | Adjusted height (m) | Adjusted air tem- perature in Jan. (°C) | Adjusted air tem- perature in Jul. (°C) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mt.Erlang- Nyainqentanglha | Langkazi-Yangzhuoyong | 90.50 | 29.70 | 5292 | -10.23 | 6.58 | 5292 | -10.2 | 6.6 |
Bomi-Yigong | 94.62 | 30.17 | 5096 | -10.08 | 8.12 | -11.1 | 7.0 | ||
Zhuka-Dongdala shady slope | 98.64 | 29.70 | 4496 | -5.64 | 10.12 | -9.7 | 5.7 | ||
Zhuka-Dongdala sunny slope | 98.56 | 29.75 | 4050 | -4.23 | 11.36 | -10.6 | 4.5 | ||
East slope of Mt. Ningjing | 99.00 | 29.83 | 3455 | 0.46 | 14.98 | -8.9 | 4.9 | ||
South range of Shaluli | 99.73 | 29.75 | 4483 | -4.75 | 10.35 | -8.9 | 5.9 | ||
Mt. Gaoshi | 101.00 | 30.03 | 3226 | -1.91 | 13.37 | -12.5 | 2.0 | ||
Mt. Zheduo | 101.80 | 30.10 | 4218 | -7.37 | 9.46 | -12.5 | 3.6 | ||
South slope of Mt.Gongga | 102.07 | 29.39 | 2077 | -2.45 | 15.90 | -12.8 | -1.8 | ||
West slope of Mt. Erlang | 102.56 | 30.12 | 3199 | -5.07 | 13.12 | -18.8 | 1.6 | ||
East slope of Mt. Emei | 103.45 | 29.58 | 473 | 4.96 | 26.65 | -21.5 | 0.1 | ||
Mt.Guang- guang- Tuoba Beishan | Southern Qiangtang Plateau | 90.00 | 31.33 | 4943 | -12.24 | 8.44 | 4943 | -12.24 | 8.44 |
Naqu-Nierong | 92.17 | 31.63 | 4636 | -10.18 | 9.96 | -11.75 | 8.28 | ||
Shady slope of Biru-Baqing | 94.59 | 31.50 | 4417 | -8.79 | 9.85 | -11.48 | 6.95 | ||
Lancang River: Angqu-Shangka | 96.84 | 31.45 | 3605 | -3.47 | 13.73 | -10.29 | 6.37 | ||
Lancang River: Changdu | 97.17 | 31.45 | 3533 | -5.84 | 12.78 | -13.03 | 5.03 | ||
Lancang River: Zhaqu-Weng Dagang | 97.21 | 31.52 | 3675 | -2.31 | 13.89 | -8.78 | 6.92 | ||
East slope of Beishanin Tuoba | 97.97 | 31.53 | 4321 | -9.02 | 9.22 | -12.19 | 5.80 | ||
Xinlong of Mt. Daxueshan | 100.31 | 30.94 | 3189 | -4.21 | 12.62 | -13.15 | 2.98 | ||
Songlinkou-Daofu of Mt. Daxue | 101.12 | 30.98 | 2934 | -2.18 | 15.82 | -12.42 | 4.77 | ||
Big/small Jinchuan | 102.06 | 31.48 | 2540 | -0.02 | 17.60 | -12.28 | 4.38 | ||
Mt. Siguliang | 102.90 | 31.10 | 3950 | -10.54 | 11.90 | -15.60 | 6.44 | ||
Mt. Balang | 103.17 | 31.07 | 4047 | -7.63 | 7.89 | -12.20 | 2.96 | ||
South slope of Dabanzhao | 103.05 | 31.67 | 3794 | -11.93 | 11.16 | -17.79 | 4.84 | ||
Mt. Guangguang | 103.61 | 31.01 | 745 | 5.61 | 25.53 | -15.80 | 2.44 | ||
Small Zhaizigou | 103.80 | 31.35 | 3392 | -5.10 | 13.64 | -13.01 | 5.11 | ||
Mt.Wutai- Amugang | Shady slope of Memar Tso Xishan | 81.83 | 34.45 | 5090 | -14.31 | 8.30 | 5742 | -17.64 | 4.71 |
Sunny slope of Memar Tso Xishan | 82.38 | 34.28 | 5282 | -14.24 | 7.62 | -16.59 | 5.09 | ||
East slope of Amugang | 85.50 | 33.50 | 5742 | -17.99 | 5.15 | -17.99 | 5.15 | ||
Tanggula Mts. | 89.92 | 33.20 | 5018 | -13.86 | 8.50 | -17.55 | 4.52 | ||
Qumalai County | 95.78 | 34.13 | 4149 | -11.30 | 11.10 | -19.42 | 2.34 | ||
Shady slope of Hutou Shan | 103.22 | 34.07 | 2471 | -9.23 | 17.00 | -25.92 | -0.99 | ||
Xuebaoding | 103.62 | 32.88 | 3723 | -9.32 | 10.22 | -19.62 | -0.88 | ||
Shady slope of Mt. Tutai | 103.70 | 33.07 | 3622 | -11.47 | 11.16 | -22.28 | -0.50 |
Table 3 Temperature and temperature differences of typical observation stations between the main plateau and surrounding areas (°C) |
Stations | Lat. | Long. | Elev.(m) | Jan. | Feb. | Mar. | Apr. | May | Jun. | Jul. | Aug. | Sept. | Oct. | Nov. | Dec. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lhasa | 29.7 | 91.1 | 3648.9 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 6.3 | 8.7 | 12.7 | 16.1 | 16.5 | 16.1 | 14.2 | 9.7 | 4.0 | 0.8 |
Zuogong | 29.7 | 97.8 | 3780 | -3.9 | -1.9 | 1.5 | 5.0 | 8.7 | 13.0 | 13.3 | 12.8 | 10.9 | 6.2 | 0.0 | -3.4 |
Leshan | 29.6 | 103.8 | 424.2 | 7.4 | 10.7 | 14.3 | 19.0 | 22.4 | 24.4 | 26.9 | 26.0 | 22.8 | 18.3 | 14.2 | 8.7 |
TLhasa-Leshan | 3648.9 | 9.7 | 9.4 | 10.1 | 8.2 | 9.6 | 11.0 | 7.3 | 8.2 | 8.9 | 8.4 | 7.5 | 7.8 | ||
TZuogong-Leshan | 3780 | 5.9 | 5.2 | 6.0 | 5.1 | 6.4 | 8.8 | 4.8 | 5.6 | 6.2 | 5.6 | 4.2 | 4.3 | ||
Anduo | 32.4 | 91.1 | 4800 | -12.3 | -10.4 | -6.4 | -2.1 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 8.4 | 8.2 | 5.3 | -1.2 | -8.5 | -11.3 |
Seda | 32.3 | 100.3 | 3893.9 | -9.6 | -6.7 | -3.0 | 1.6 | 4.9 | 8.7 | 10.7 | 10.1 | 7.3 | 1.7 | -5.2 | -8.4 |
Pingwu | 32.4 | 104.5 | 893.2 | 4.7 | 7.9 | 11.7 | 16.2 | 19.8 | 22.7 | 24.8 | 23.3 | 19.6 | 15.4 | 10.9 | 5.5 |
TAnduo-Pingwu | 4800 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 5.1 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 4.1 | 2.0 | 2.4 | ||
TSeda-Pingwu | 3893.9 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | ||
Wudaoliang | 35.2 | 93.1 | 4612.2 | -15.3 | -13.0 | -9.6 | -4.5 | -0.8 | 3.1 | 6.7 | 6.2 | 2.7 | -4.3 | -11.0 | -14.1 |
Lintao | 35.4 | 103.9 | 1893.8 | -5.7 | -0.7 | 4.2 | 9.5 | 13.7 | 17.1 | 19.3 | 18.7 | 13.8 | 8.3 | 1.7 | -4.5 |
TWudaoliang-Lintao | 4612.2 | 4.2 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 3.7 |
Table 4 Monthly temperatures and temperature differences (ΔT) between the main plateau and the surrounding/adjacent lowland areas at an altitude of 4500 m (°C) |
Jan. | Feb. | Mar. | Apr. | May | Jun. | Jul. | Aug. | Sept. | Oct. | Nov. | Dec. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Plateau | -10.19 | -8.16 | -4.73 | -0.1 | 3.77 | 7.83 | 9.94 | 9.59 | 6.9 | 0.13 | -6.3 | -9.14 |
Hengduan Mts. | -7.07 | -5.28 | -2.27 | 0.83 | 5.21 | 8.2 | 10.08 | 9.93 | 7.2 | 2.12 | -3.84 | -6.52 |
Southern main TP | -7.55 | -6.08 | -2.85 | 0.83 | 4.42 | 8.5 | 10.22 | 9.89 | 7.5 | 2 | -3.6 | -6.4 |
Central main TP | -10.8 | -8.26 | -4.41 | 0.21 | 4.02 | 8.45 | 10.56 | 10.11 | 7.39 | 0.49 | -6.22 | -9.56 |
Northern main TP | -13.48 | -11.17 | -7.58 | -1.37 | 3.01 | 6.95 | 9.44 | 9.00 | 6.16 | -2.41 | -9.55 | -12.31 |
Qilian Mts. | -17.41 | -15.58 | -12.08 | -4.19 | 2.11 | 6.13 | 8.94 | 7.93 | 4.4 | -5.44 | -13.08 | -17.16 |
Sichuan Basin | -12.8 | -10.29 | -7.16 | -2.75 | -0.41 | 1.87 | 5.36 | 4.15 | 1.54 | -2.23 | -7.63 | -10.94 |
ΔTHengduan-Sichuan | 5.73 | 5.01 | 4.89 | 3.58 | 5.62 | 6.33 | 4.72 | 5.78 | 5.66 | 4.35 | 3.79 | 4.42 |
ΔTSouthern TP-Sichuan | 5.25 | 4.21 | 4.31 | 3.58 | 4.83 | 6.63 | 4.86 | 5.74 | 5.96 | 4.23 | 4.03 | 4.54 |
ΔTCentral TP-Qilian | 6.61 | 7.32 | 7.67 | 4.4 | 1.91 | 2.32 | 1.62 | 2.18 | 2.99 | 5.93 | 6.86 | 7.60 |
ΔTNorthern TP-Qilian | 3.93 | 4.41 | 4.5 | 2.82 | 0.9 | 0.82 | 0.5 | 1.07 | 1.76 | 3.03 | 3.53 | 4.85 |
Note: cited from Yao and Zhang (2014). |
Figure 3 Spatial distribution of the 10°C isotherm for the warmest month on the Tibetan Plateau |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |