Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Recent changes in wetlands on the Tibetan Plateau: A review
*Corresponding author: Zhang Yili, Professor, E-mail:zhangyl@igsnrr.ac.cn; Liu Linshan, PhD, E-mail:liuls@igsnrr.ac.cn
Author: Zhao Zhilong (1988-), PhD Candidate, specialized in land-use and land-cover change and physical geography. E-mail:geozhao@163.com
Received date: 2014-11-16
Accepted date: 2014-12-12
Online published: 2015-06-24
Supported by
Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.XDB03030500
The National Key Technology Research and Development Program, No.2013BAC04B02, No.2012BAC06B00
The Key Foundation Project of Basic Work of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China, No.2012FY111400
Copyright
About 80% of global wetland resources are degrading or disappearing; thus the wetland ecosystem has become one of the most seriously threatened ecosystems in the world. As an area sensitive to global changes and acting as a security barrier for the Asian ecosystem, the Tibetan Plateau has about 13.19×104 km2 of wetlands of special significance within China. With the increasing application of remote sensing technology to wetland research, Tibetan Plateau wetland research has entered a period of rapid development. This paper summarizes the remote sensing research literature of the Tibetan Plateau wetlands from 1992 to 2014, and is intended to provide references for future research into the wetlands of the Tibetan Plateau. We have reviewed monitoring methods, research topics, and existing problems. Our review has revealed the following characteristics: (1) Over the past 40 years, the research paradigm of the Tibetan Plateau wetlands has undergone dynamic changes in the monitoring of wetland areas, landscape patterns and the eco-environment based on remote sensing technology. Attention has also been focused on constructing models with an ecological system perspective and analyzing three patterns of change trends within the Tibetan Plateau wetlands. (2) The results of Tibetan Plateau wetland research based on remote sensing were as follows: (a) between 1970 and 2006, the Tibetan Plateau wetland area decreased overall at a rate of 0.23%/a, and the landscape diversity declined at a rate of 0.17%/a; (b) by contrast, between 1976 and 2009, the lake area of the inland river basins in the Tibetan Plateau increased at a rate of 0.83%/a; and (c) the change trend in the Tibetan Plateau wetlands was controlled by climate change. Current problems relating to remote sensing (RS)-based research in the Tibetan Plateau wetlands are computer interpretation accuracy and the processing precision of cloud removal, and the lack of a comprehensive overview of the Tibetan Plateau wetland system. Finally, based on the review, some key activities for future study have been proposed, as follows: (1) Strengthening the integration of the Tibetan Plateau wetland research with remote sensing research; (2) discussing the response and adaptation mechanisms of the Tibetan Plateau wetland ecosystem within the context of global change; (3) strengthening the integration of remote sensing (RS), geographic information system (GIS), and global positioning system (GPS), and promoting the construction of a Tibetan Plateau wetland information platform.
Key words: Tibetan Plateau; wetland; research in remote sensing
ZHAO Zhilong , ZHANG Yili , LIU Linshan , LIU Fenggui , ZHANG Haifeng . Recent changes in wetlands on the Tibetan Plateau: A review[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2015 , 25(7) : 879 -896 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-015-1208-5
Table 1 Performance of the different types of imaging techniques used in remote sensing of the Tibetan Plateau wetlands (Li et al., 2007) |
Resolution parameter | Spatial resolution | Spectral resolution | Time phase | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolution grade | High | Moderate | Low | Hyper-spectral | Multi-spectral | Single | Multiple |
Data source | Aerial images, ALOS | Landsat, SPOT, CBERS, HJ-1A/1B, ENVISAT | MODIS, AVHRR | MODIS, HJ-1A | Landsat, SPOT, CBERS, HJ-1B, AVHRR, ALOS, ENVISAT | Remote sensing images | Remote sensing images |
Advantages | High precision, multi-level classifying, applied in small scale | Low price, accessible, applied in moderate scale long-time series of Landsat data, widely used in Tibetan Plateau wetland research | Low price, accessible, applied on a large scale | Narrow bands, multiple bands, large information, continuous spectra in pixels, high precision, applied to vegetation monitoring, vegetation classification, and biomass estimation | High precision, simple processing, widely used in Tibetan Plateau wetland research | Quickly extracted information, good compatibility with high spatial resolution images | Provides a wealth of in- formation, high precision, mul- tiple phases, applied to wet- land monitor- ing, identifying different ob- jects with same spectrum and same object with different spectra, widely used in Tibetan Plateau wetland research |
Disadvantages | Large data, complex process- ing, high price, ALOS lost connection from 2011 | Hard to carry out multi-level classifica- tion, ENVISAT lost con- nection from 2012 | Hard to carry out multi-level classifica- tion, poor classifying performance | Difficult to obtain, com- plex process- ing, need to combine with high or mod- erate spatial resolution images | Wide bands, fewer bands, less informa- tion, discon- tinuous spec- tra, generally applied in second-level classification | Less infor- mation, low precision, represent objects’ information in one phase, barely used | Complex processing |
Table 2 Wetland change data on the Tibetan Plateau |
Study region | Study period | Wetland* types | Study content | Rate/ value | Annual rate/value | Literature |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tibetan Plateau | 1970s-2006 | Wetland | Area | -8.13% | -0.23% | Jiang et al., 2012 |
1970-2011 | Lake | Water storage | 92.43 km3 | 2.2 km3/a | Song et al., 2013a | |
2003-2009 | Lake | Depth | 0.20 m/a | Phan et al., 2012 | ||
2003-2009 | Lake | Depth | 0.20 m/a | Zhang et al., 2011b | ||
Inland basin of Tibetan Plateau | 1976-2009 | Lake | Area | 27.3% | 0.83% | Li et al., 2011 |
Qomolangma Region | 1976-2006 | Wetland | Area | -0.91% | -0.03% | Nie, 2010 |
1976-2006 | Swamp | Area | -3.84% | -0.13% | Nie, 2010 | |
1990-2010 | Lake | Area | 17.11% | 0.81% | Nie et al., 2013b | |
Lhasa River basin | 1976-2006 | Wetland | Area | -8.8% | -0.28% | Wang et al., 2010 |
1976-2006 | Swamp | Area | -11.94% | -0.39% | Wang et al., 2010 | |
1976-2006 | Lake | Area | -2.59% | -0.09% | Wang et al., 2010 | |
1976-2006 | River | Area | -8.72% | -0.29% | Wang et al., 2010 | |
Qinghai Lake basin | 1977-2004 | Wetland | Area | -3.71% | -0.14% | Li et al., 2009 |
1977-2004 | Swamp | Area | 0.36% | 0.01% | Li et al., 2009 | |
1988-2010 | Lake | Area | 2.96% | 0.13% | Liu et al., 2008 Liu et al., 2013 | |
Three-river source region | 1990-2007 | Wetland | Area | -11.18% | -0.66% | Chen et al., 2012 |
1990-2007 | Swamp | Area | -16.73% | -0.98% | Chen et al., 2012 | |
1990-2007 | Lake | Area | -8.29% | -0.49% | Chen et al., 2012 | |
1990-2007 | River | Area | -8.87% | -0.52% | Chen et al., 2012 | |
Zoige Plateau | 1989-2004 | Wetland | Area | -12.89% | -0.42% | Wang et al., 2007 |
1966-2000 | Swamp | Area | -0.35% | -0.01% | Bai et al., 2013 | |
1966-2000 | Lake | Area | -0.59% | -0.02% | Bai et al., 2013 | |
1966-2000 | River | Area | -1.03% | -0.03% | Bai et al., 2013 | |
Banyou Marsh | 1994-2008 | Swamp | Area | -48.16% | -3.44% | Xu et al., 2014 |
Qaidam Basin | 1956-2000 | Wetland | Area | -36.14% | -0.80% | Zhang et al., 2007 |
* The definitions of wetland in this table are cited from the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (2000), they are areas of marsh, fen, peatland or water. |
Figure 1 Rates of change in wetland area within different regions of the Tibetan Plateau since 1956 (Figures 1 and 2 are made by data reanalysis of 60 papers from 28 cases for wetland research in the Tibetan Plateau. The boundary of the Tibetan Plateau is taken from Zhang et al., 2014b) |
Figure 2 Decadal variation amplitude of wetland (a) and swamp (b) within different regions of the Tibetan Plateau from 1950s to 2000s |
Table 3 Comparison between Tibetan Plateau wetland research before and after using remote sensing |
Before using remote sensing technology | After using remote sensing technology | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Research item | Research content | Literature | Research content | Literature |
Wetland distribution | Wetland investigation in Tibet and Zoige, for example, by field survey; Observing and describing the elements such as wetland distribution and geographical position; Calculating wetland area; Mapping wetland distribution. | Chai and Jin (1963) Zhao et al. (1981) | Dynamic monitoring of wetland in whole plateau by remote sensing and field survey; carrying out monitoring analysis of wetland distribution and change trends within inter-decadal, inter-annual and seasonal scales. | Bian D et al. (2010), Wang et al. (2010), Yao et al. (2010), Shang and Yang (2012), Tan et al. (2012), Tian et al. (2012) |
Wetland type | River, lake, marsh. Marsh can be classified within the second class depending on landform, and within the third class depending on the dominant plant association. | Guan and Chen (1980), Zhao et al. (1981), Chen and Fan (1983) | River, lake, marsh, forest, artificial wetland etc. Wetland can be classified to the fourth class; Carrying out monitoring of wetland type change in long-term series. | Zhang et al. (2000), Chen et al. (2001), Yuan et al. (2002), Zong et al. (2004), Zhao et al. (2006), Wang (2010), Qiao et al. (2010) |
Wetland eco- environment | Mainly describing characteristics of landform, climate, animals, and plants of the wetlands | Sun et al. (1987) | Researching eco-environmental change in the Tibet Plateau wetland; Dynamic monitoring of eco-environmental change from spatial pattern, health, function, and service of ecosystem, and wetland vegetation biomass and wetland ecowater requirements, based on remote sensing. | Zhang (2008), Bian et al. (2010b), Wang (2010), Tan et al. (2012), Song et al. (2013a) |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
|
52 |
|
53 |
|
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
|
57 |
|
58 |
|
59 |
|
60 |
|
61 |
|
62 |
|
63 |
|
64 |
|
65 |
|
66 |
|
67 |
|
68 |
|
69 |
|
70 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
|
73 |
|
74 |
|
75 |
|
76 |
|
77 |
|
78 |
|
79 |
|
80 |
|
81 |
|
82 |
|
83 |
|
84 |
|
85 |
|
86 |
|
87 |
|
88 |
|
89 |
|
90 |
|
91 |
|
92 |
|
93 |
|
94 |
|
95 |
|
96 |
|
97 |
|
98 |
|
99 |
|
100 |
|
101 |
|
102 |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |