Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Spatial morphology evolution of rural settlements induced by tourism: A comparative study of three villages in Yesanpo tourism area, China
Author: Xi Jianchao (1972-), PhD and Associate Professor, specialized in tourism planning, land use change driven by tourism and the environmental effect. E-mail:xijc@igsnrr.ac.cn
Received date: 2013-12-30
Accepted date: 2014-03-10
Online published: 2015-04-15
Supported by
National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.40971299
Copyright
Rural tourism has become an important driving force of rural urbanization in China. As the main reception base and important tourism attraction, tourism village is the core element of the tourism destination system. Integrating the method of PRA (Participatory Rural Assessment), GIS technology and high-resolution remote sensing images, this study aims to analyze the spatial morphology evolution of rural settlements induced by tourism through a comparative study of three tourism villages in Yesanpo tourism area. The results suggest the emergence of a “core-periphery” pattern of the spatial evolution of rural settlements. The closer to the core scenic spot, the higher degree of land-use intensity the village shows, as well as the more mature tourism function and greater change in landscape pattern. In particular, Gougezhuang shows an increase of the floor area ratio from 0.17 to 0.44, with the most mature tourism function and the lowest authenticity index of 0.448. Liujiahe has gone through the largest increase in construction land area from 17.3564 ha to 34.1128 ha, with moderately mature tourism function and relatively stable authenticity index of 0.566. Shangzhuang has the lowest construction land scale and intensity, with the poorest tourism function and most well-preserved landscape authenticity index of 0.942. Overall, in terms of the spatial morphology, the three villages show the characteristics of “modern town”, “semi-urbanization” and “traditional village” respectively, in corresponding to three land development types: “intensive reconstruction type”, “enclave extension type” and “in situ utilization type”. The spatial evolution patterns of these three villages imply the spatial characteristics of the touristization of traditional villages in different stages, and also have great representative value for the management of rural settlements in tourism areas in China.
Key words: rural settlements; land use; spatial evolution; Yesanpo tourism area
XI Jianchao , WANG Xinge , KONG Qinqin , ZHANG Nan . Spatial morphology evolution of rural settlements induced by tourism: A comparative study of three villages in Yesanpo tourism area, China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2015 , 25(4) : 497 -511 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-015-1182-y
Figure 1 The location of the study villages |
Table 1 The outline of the three villages (2010) |
Village | Household number | Labor number | Number of tourism employees | Per capita income (yuan/person) | Distance to the Bailixia Canyon scenic area (km) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gougezhuang | 542 | 446 | 942 | 6500 | 0.5 |
Liujiahe | 159 | 177 | 178 | 5500 | 2 |
Shangzhuang | 202 | 191 | 86 | 4200 | 7.5 |
Table 2 Evaluation index system of rural settlement landscape authenticity |
Subject | Index | Standard | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
(3-5 scores) | (1-3 scores) | (1 score) | ||
Building | History | Built before 1970 | Built during 1970-1980 | Built after 1990 |
Typicality | Buildings with obvious geographical features | Buildings with relatively obvious geographical features | Buildings with poor geographical features | |
Locality | Traditional building | Traditional Building with modern decoration | Modern building | |
Yard | The gardening degree of yard | Natural plant | A small amount of modern decoration | Modern decoration |
The living function of yard | Entirely living function | Half living and tourism function | Entirely tourism function | |
The distance among yards | Nature configuration and distance | Regular configuration and the large distance | Regular configuration and equidistant, small distance | |
Settlement | The variety of rural public space | With traditional public space at the center | With traditional public space away from the center | With other space at the center |
The convenience of internal village traffic | Natural materials, with low accessibility | Semi-natural materials, with certain accessibility | Human materials, with high accessibility | |
The integrity of settlement | With more than 75% perfectly reserved historic appearance | With 25%-75% perfectly reserved historic appearance | With less than 25% perfectly reserved historic appearance |
Table 3 Construction expansion of three villages during the period of study |
Village | Construction area of initial phase (m2) | Construction area of current phase (m2) | Expansion area (m2) | Expansion speed (m2/a) | K (%/a) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gougezhuang | 87794 | 160082 | 72288 | 3012.0 | 3.40 |
Liujiahe | 173564 | 341128 | 167564 | 6981.8 | 4.00 |
Shangzhuang | 49727 | 79430 | 29703 | 1237.6 | 2.50 |
Figure 2 Spatial-temporal changes of land-use expansion of the three villages during the study period |
Table 4 Changes of the villages’ plot ratio during the study period |
The plot ratio | Gougezhuang (1986-2010) | Liujiahe (2004-2010) | Shangzhuang (2007-2010) |
---|---|---|---|
The initial phase | 0.17 | 0.08 | 0.28 |
The current phase | 0.44 | 0.34 | 0.26 |
The changes | 0.27 | 0.26 | -0.02 |
Figure 3 Land-use function changes of the three villages during the study period |
Table 5 Dominant types of land-use change in different villages during the study period |
Original land use type | Conversion of land-use type | IV | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Gougezhuang | Liujiahe | Shangzhuang | ||
Public service land | Tourist accommodation | 4.607 | 0.000 | 3.334 |
Ordinary residential land | 0.000 | 0.000 | 3.198 | |
Other land | 0.000 | 0.000 | 21.202 | |
Ordinary residential land | Tourist accommodation | 821.881 | 1.236 | 26.313 |
Tourist shopping | 65.781 | 0.000 | 5.289 | |
Tourist entertainment | 167.390 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
Other land | 0.000 | 17.623 | 0.000 | |
Cultivated land | Public service land | 0.000 | 1.645 | 9.388 |
Other land | 677.165 | 677.165 | 59.106 | |
Ordinary residential land | 0.000 | 4.333 | 19.551 | |
Tourist accommodation | 25.560 | 28.785 | 34.982 | |
Tourist shopping | 2.940 | 1.064 | 1.240 | |
Tourist entertainment | 1.350 | 1.350 | 0.000 | |
Other land vacant and bare land | Ordinary residential land | 10.976 | 18.598 | 11.490 |
Tourist accommodation | 0.867 | 18.989 | 4.907 | |
Tourist shopping | 233.617 | 0.987 | 0.000 | |
Tourist catering | 100.824 | 0.987 | 0.000 | |
Tourist entertainment | 1.524 | 0.611 | 0.000 | |
Public service land | 0.000 | 1.621 | 0.000 |
Table 6 Total scores of the authenticity of the three villages |
Mandatory layer | Index | Village score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gougezhuang | Liujiahe | Shangzhuang | |||
Building style | History | 0.277 | 2.254 | 4.896 | |
Typicality | 0.254 | 2.569 | 4.653 | ||
Locality | 0.251 | 2.988 | 4.264 | ||
Yard structure | The gardening degree of yard | 0.364 | 2.421 | 4.699 | |
The living function of yard | 0.132 | 3.237 | 4.635 | ||
The special distance between households | 0.222 | 2.452 | 4.633 | ||
Settlement pattern | The variety of rural public space | 0.225 | 2.136 | 4.256 | |
The convenience of internal village traffic | 0.336 | 2.251 | 4.231 | ||
The integrity of settlements | 0.256 | 2.241 | 4.987 | ||
AI | 0.048 | 0.566 | 0.942 |
Figure 4 The remote sensing image in 2008 and villages landscape style schematic of Gougezhuang village (left), Liujiahe village (middle), and Shangzhuang village (right) in 2010 |
Figure 5 The evolutionary path and its development trend of rural settlements in different geographical locations in Yesanpo tourism area |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
|
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
|
46 |
|
47 |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |