Journal of Geographical Sciences >
Sand stabilization effect of feldspathic sandstone during the fallow period in Mu Us Sandy Land
*Corresponding author: Liu Yansui (1965-), PhD and Professor, E-mail:liuys@igsnrr.ac.cn
Author: Han Jichang (1966-), Professor, specialized in land engineering, land economy, and allocation of land and water resources.
Received date: 2014-03-20
Accepted date: 2014-08-20
Online published: 2015-04-15
Supported by
The public welfare scientific research of Ministry of Land and Resources, No.201411008
Copyright
Depended on the analysis of ground snow situation, soil moisture loss speed and soil structure after planting crops of Mu Us Sandy Land remedied with feldspathic sandstone in the fallow period, it is concluded that feldspathic sandstone mixed with sand improved the sand stabilization in the governance of Mu Us Sandy Land in the fallow period. The sandy land remedied with feldspathic sandstone had big snow coverage, 25%-75% higher than normal sand; soil moisture losses slowed down, and moisture content rose by over 3 times; soil structure had been improved, and water stable aggregate content increased by 6.52%-18.04%; survival rate of protection forest increased to 85%; and ground flatness is less than 1%. The above conditions weakened sand rising conditions of Mu Us Sandy Land in the fallow period and formed two protective layers of snow cover and soil frozen layer under cold weather so as to prevent against wind erosion.
HAN Jichang , LIU Yansui , ZHANG Yang . Sand stabilization effect of feldspathic sandstone during the fallow period in Mu Us Sandy Land[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2015 , 25(4) : 428 -436 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-015-1178-7
Table 1 Overview of the surveyed regions |
No. | Landform type | Slope aspect | Gradient (°) | Elevation (m) |
---|---|---|---|---|
ZL-1 | After covered with feldspathic sandstone | Sunny slope | 17.3 | 1259 |
ZL-2 | After covered with feldspathic sandstone | Shady slope | 14.7 | 1259 |
ZL-3 | After covered with feldspathic sandstone | - | 0 | 1259 |
YS-1 | Original landform | Sunny slope | 18.0 | 1257 |
YS-2 | Original landform | Shady slope | 13.9 | 1257 |
YS-3 | Original landform | - | 0 | 1257 |
Table 2 Snow cover investigation list |
No. | ZL-1 | ZL-2 | ZL-3 | YS-1 | YS-2 | YS-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Survey time | December 14, 2011, 11:00 a.m. | |||||
Snow thickness (cm) | 7.6 | 11.4 | 9.0 | 5.9 | 10.6 | 8.1 |
Snow coverage (%) | 95 | 99 | 98 | 85 | 95 | 90 |
Thickness of ground dry soil layer (cm) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
Survey time | January 5, 2012, 11:10 a.m. | |||||
Snow thickness (cm) | 4.8 | 10.7 | 8.7 | 0 | 10.0 | 7.5 |
Snow coverage (%) | 85 | 95 | 95 | <10 | 80 | 70 |
Thickness of ground dry soil layer (cm) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.4 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
Figure 1 Dry sand layer with snow (a) and mixed land of feldspathic sandstone with snow cover (b) |
Figure 2 Variation of moisture content as time changes |
Table 3 Mass percentage (%) of water stable aggregate of soil mixed with feldspathic sandstone and sand |
Feldspathic sandstone: sand | Before planting | One-season planting | Two-season planting |
---|---|---|---|
1:1 | 28.22 | 29.29 | 29.33 |
1:2 | 21.55 | 21.87 | 23.92 |
1:5 | 18.38 | 18.02 | 20.82 |
0:1 (sand ) | 10.87 | 11.50 | 11.29 |
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
7 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |