Applications of GIS

Scale effect and methods for accuracy evaluation of attribute information loss in rasterization

  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Bai Yan (1985-), Ph.D, specialized in earth information science. E-mail:

Received date: 2011-03-04

  Revised date: 2011-04-10

  Online published: 2011-10-03

Supported by

The Independent Research of the State Key Laboratory of Resource and Environmental Information System, No.O88RA100SA; The Third Innovative and Cutting-edge Projects of Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, No.O66U0309SZ


Rasterization is a conversion process accompanied with information loss, which includes the loss of features’ shape, structure, position, attribute and so on. Two chief factors that affect estimating attribute accuracy loss in rasterization are grid cell size and evaluating method. That is, attribute accuracy loss in rasterization has a close relationship with grid cell size; besides, it is also influenced by evaluating methods. Therefore, it is significant to analyze these two influencing factors comprehensively. Taking land cover data of Sichuan at the scale of 1:250,000 in 2005 as a case, in view of data volume and its processing time of the study region, this study selects 16 spatial scales from 600 m to 30 km, uses rasterizing method based on the Rule of Maximum Area (RMA) in ArcGIS and two evaluating methods of attribute accuracy loss, which are Normal Analysis Method (NAM) and a new Method Based on Grid Cell (MBGC), respectively, and analyzes the scale effect of attribute (it is area here) accuracy loss at 16 different scales by these two evaluating methods comparatively. The results show that: (1) At the same scale, average area accuracy loss of the entire study region evaluated by MBGC is significantly larger than the one estimated using NAM. Moreover, this discrepancy between the two is obvious in the range of 1 km to 10 km. When the grid cell is larger than 10 km, average area accuracy losses calculated by the two evaluating methods are stable, even tended to parallel. (2) MBGC can not only estimate RMA rasterization attribute accuracy loss accurately, but can express the spatial distribution of the loss objectively. (3) The suitable scale domain for RMA rasterization of land cover data of Sichuan at the scale of 1:250,000 in 2005 is better equal to or less than 800 m, in which the data volume is favorable and the processing time is not too long, as well as the area accuracy loss is less than 2.5%.

Cite this article

BAI Yan, LIAO Shunbao, SUN Jiulin . Scale effect and methods for accuracy evaluation of attribute information loss in rasterization[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2011 , 21(6) : 1089 -1100 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-011-0902-1


Bai Yan, Liao Shunbao, 2010. Implement method of vector data rasterization that without attribute information loss: A case study of 1 to 250,000 land cover data of China. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 12(3): 385-391. (in Chinese)
Bates P D, Deroo A P J, 2000. A simple raster-based model for flood inundation simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 236: 54-77.
Carvers S J, Brunsdon C F, 1994. Vector to raster error and feature complexity: An empirical study using simulated data. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 8(3): 261-270.
Chen Jianjun, Zhou Chenghu, Cheng Weiming, 2007. Area error analysis of vector to raster conversion of area feature in GIS. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 36(3): 344-350. (in Chinese)
Chen Shupeng, 2002. The time-and-space analysis of population statistics. China Population, Resources and Environment, 12(4): 3-7. (in Chinese)
Chen Shupeng, Chen Xiaoqiu, Zhou Chenghu, 2002. Grid mapping and grid computing. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 27(4): 1-6. (in Chinese)
Cui Buli, Chang Xueli, Zuo Denghua et al., 2009. Rasterizing vector data and its scaling effect for a sand landscape. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(5): 2463-2472. (in Chinese)
Demers M N, 2002. GIS Modeling in Raster. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Galton A, 2003. Granularity-sensitive spatial attributes. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3(2/3): 97-118.
Liao Shunbao, 2010. Study on Data Resource System of Earth System Science. Beijing: Science Press, 59-63. (in Chinese)
Liao Shunbao, Bai Yan, 2010. A new grid-cell-based method for error evaluation of vector-to-raster conversion. Computational Geosciences, 14(4): 539-549.
Ling B, Butler R, 1999. Comparing effects of aggregation methods on statistical and spatial properties of simulated spatial data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 65(1): 73-84.
Liu Mingliang, Tang Xianming, Liu Jiyuan et al., 2001. Research on scaling effect based on 1 km grid cell data. Journal of Remote Sensing, 5(3): 183-190. (in Chinese)
Switzer P, 1975. Estimation of the accuracy of qualitative maps. In: Davis J C, McCullaugh M J. Display and Analysis of Spatial Data. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 380-392.
Vander K, 1992. The vector to raster conversion: (Mis)use in geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 6(2): 159-170.
Wang Xiaoli, Sun Qinghui, Jiang Chengshun, 2006. An optimization algorithm for transferring vector to raster data based on minimized area error. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 35(3): 273-277. (in Chinese)
Wu Guangchen, Zuo Jianzhang, Liu Yan et al., 2009. A high-effective algorithm for rasterization of vector data: Winding number algorithm. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 34(1): 50-52. (in Chinese)
Yang Cunjian, Zhang Zengxiang, 2001. Models of accuracy loss during rasterizing landuse vector data with multi-scale grid size. Geographical Research, 20(4): 416-422. (in Chinese)
Zhang Zengxiang, Wang Xiao, Wang Changyao et al., 2009. National land cover mapping by remote sensing under the control of interpreted data. Journal of Geo-Information Science, 11(2): 216-224. (in Chinese)
Zhao Lei, 2005. Study on Scale Effect of Scaling with Land Use Spatial Data. Beijing: China Agricultural University. (in Chinese)
Zhou Chenghu, Ou Yang, Yang Liao et al., 2006. Vector polygon grid optimization model of the insurance product. Science in China (Series D), 36(suppl.II): 157-163. (in Chinese)