Human-Environment Interactions

MRICES: A new model for emission mitigation strategy assessment and its application

  • 1. Institute of Policy and Management, CAS, Beijing 100190, China;
    2. School of Business Administration, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
    3. East China Normal University, Key Laboratory of Geographical Information Science, Ministry of State Education of China, Shanghai 200062, China;
    4. School of Public Policy, George Mason University, Virginia 22030, USA

Received date: 2012-01-09

  Revised date: 2012-08-16

  Online published: 2012-12-15


Many global emission reduction strategies have been proposed, but few have been assessed quantitatively from the view of equality, efficiency and effectiveness. Integrated assessment models (IAM) is one of the effective ways to make climate policy modeling. So in this paper we developed the MRICES (Multi-regional integrated model of climate and economy with GDP spillovers) model, which is an IAM but extends to include GDP spillover mechanism, to make assessment on several strategies for global emission reduction, including the egalitarianism strategy, the UNDP strategy and the Copenhagen Accord. Using 1990 as a baseline for historical emission levels, the egalitarian strategy argues that developed countries should implement urgent emission reductions, whereas developing countries are allowed relatively higher future emission quotas. The UNDP strategy addresses the issue of substantial changes in global temperature but acknowledges that developing countries are not able to afford more costs for mitigation measures, which is inequitable from the perspective of a country’s right to develop. We also simulated the Copenhagen Accord to determine the consequences by the year 2100 if each country continues their current emission mitigation actions, and results indicated that the increase in global temperature will be 2.8℃ by 2100; consequently, much stronger emission reduction efforts must be implemented after 2020. Based on analysis on mitigation strategies, it is recognized that the common but differentiated responsibility principle must be insisted when making global mitigation strategy. To comply with this principle, the emission reduction baseline of developed and developing countries should be discriminated, so 1990 and 2005 can be taken as the base year for developed and developing countries respectively.

Cite this article

WANG Zheng, WU Jing, ZHU Qianting, WANG Lijuan, GONG Yi, LI Huaqun . MRICES: A new model for emission mitigation strategy assessment and its application[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2012 , 22(6) : 1131 -1148 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-012-0987-1


Baer P, Athanasiou T, 2008. The Right to Development in a Climate Constrained World: Greenhouse Development Rights Framework.
BASIC, 2006. The Sao Paulo Proposal for an Agreement on Future International Climate Policy.
Buonanno P, Carraro C, Galeotti M, 2003. Endogenous induced technical change and the costs of Kyoto. Resource and Energy Economics, 25: 11-34.
Burniaux J, Nicoletti G, Oliviera-Martins J, 1992. GREEN: A Global Model for Quantifying the Cost of Policies to Curb CO2 Emissions. OECD, Paris.
Bussolo M, de Hoyas R, Medvedev D et al., 2008. Global climate change and its distributional impacts. Paper presented to Eleventh Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Helsinki, June.
Chen Wenying, Gao Pengfei, He Jiankun, 2004. Impact of carbon mitigation on China's energy system using China MARKAL-MACRO model. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 44(3): 342-346. (in Chinese)
Dixon P B, Parmenter B R, Sutton J et al., 1982. ORANI: A multisectoral model of the Australian economy. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Eyckmans J, Tulkens H, 2003. Simulating coalitionally stable burden sharing agreements for the climate change problem. Resource and Energy Economics, 25: 299-327.
Golombek R, Hoel M, 2003. Climate policy under technology spillover. Environmental and Resource Economics, 31(2): 201-227.
Grubb M J, Hope C, Fouquet R, 2002. Climatic implications of the Kyoto Protocol: The contribution of international spillover. Climatic Change, 54: 11-28.
Jha R, 2009. The global financial crisis and short-run prospects for India. ASARC Working Paper.
Jiang Kejun, Hu Xiulian, 2002. Countermeasure analysis on climate change. Beijing: Working Paper of Energy Research Institute National Development and Reform Commission. (in Chinese)
Kelly D L, Kolstad C D, 1999. Integrated assessment models for climate change control. In: Folmer H, Tietenberg T eds. The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 1999/2000, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham: 171-197.
Kemfert G, 2005. Induced technological change in a multi-regional, multi-sectoral integrated assessment model. Ecological Economics, 54: 293-305.
Link P M, Tol R S J, 2004. Possible economic impacts of a shutdown of the Thermohaline Circulation: An application of FUND. Portuguese Economic Journal, 3(2): 99-114.
Liu Ligang, 2009. Impact of the global financial crisis on China: Empirical evidence and policy implications. China & World Economy, 17(6): 1-23.
Loulou R, 2007. Labriet M. ETSAP-TIAM: The TIMES integrated assessment model (Part I): Model structure. Computational Management Science, 5: 7-40.
Loulou R, 2008. ETSAP-TIAM: The TIMES integrated assessment model (Part II): Mathematical formulation. Computational Management Science, 5: 41-66.
Luh Y, Shih K, 2006. International spillovers and East Asian growth: The experience of Japan, Korea and Taiwan. Applied Economics letters, 13(11): 745-750.
Manne A S, Mendelsohn R, Richels R, 1995. MERGE: A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy, 23(1): 17-34.
Manne A S, Richels R, 2004. MERGE: A model for evaluating the regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies.
McKibbin W J, Wilcoxen P J, 1993. The global consequences of regional environmental policies: an integrated macroeconomic, multi-sectoral approach. In: Kaya Y, Nakicenovic N, Nordhaus W D et al. eds. Costs, impacts and benefits of CO2 mitigation, IIASA, Austria.
Nijkamp P, Wang S, Kremers H, 2005. Modeling the impacts of international climate change policies in a CGE context: The use of the GTAP-E model. Economic Modelling, 22: 955-974.
Nordhaus W D, 1990. A general equilibrium model of policies to slow global warming. In: Wood D ed. Economic Models of Energy and Environment, Proceedings of a Workshop, Washington, D.C.
Nordhaus W D, 1991. The slow or not sloe: The economics of the greenhouse effect. The Economic Journal, 101: 920-937.
Nordhaus W D, 1993. Rolling the ‘DICE’: An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Resource and Energy Economics, 15: 27-50.
Nordhaus W D, Boyer J, 2000. Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Nordhaus W D, Yang Z, 1996. A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. American Economic Review, 86(4): 741-765.
OECD, 1992. Global effects of the European carbon tax. Economics Department Working Papers No.125.
Pizer W A, 1999. The optimal choice of climate change policy in the presence of uncertainty. Resource and Energy Economics, 21: 255-287.
Rao S, Keppo I, Riahi K, 2006. Importance of technological change and spillover in long-term climate policy. The Energy Journal, 27: 123-139.
Stern N, 2006. Stern Review on the Economics of Climate Change. Report to the Prime Minister and the Chancellor of the Exchequer on the Economics of Climate Change, London, United Kingdom.
Stern N, 2008. China in the world. Speech in Tsinghua. 23rd Oct.
UNDP, 2008. Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world. Human Development Report 2007/2008.
van der Zwaan B C C, Gerlagh R, Klaassen G et al., 2002. Endogenous technological change in climate change modeling. Energy Economics, 24: 2-19.
Wang Zheng, Hu Qianli, Zheng Yiping, 2002. Simulating the impact of the climate protection expenditure on China’s economic security. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 22(12): 2238-2245. (in Chinese)
Wang Zheng, Li Huaqun, Wu Jing et al., 2010. Policy modeling on the GDP spillovers of carbon abatement policies between China and the United States. Economic Modelling, 27: 40-45.
Wang Zheng, Zheng Yiping, Jiang Yihong, 2004. Dynamic macroeconomic modeling and analysis of CO2 abatement. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 24(7): 1508-1513. (in Chinese)
Weeks J, 2009. The impact of the global financial crisis on the economy of Sierra Leone. International Policy Center for Inclusive Growth, 9: 1-32.