Research Articles

Visual simulation of regional development differentiation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Region

  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2012-07-30

  Revised date: 2013-01-10

  Online published: 2013-06-15


Regional development differentiation is a complicated spatial and temporal dynamic process. Recent developments in spatial statistics and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have led to an increasing interest in quantitative analysis and visualization of the process. However, so far, few direct connections have been made between the newly developed methods and classic spatial development theories, which would be very helpful for the interpretation and understanding of regional spatiotemporal differentiation. Using basic concepts and academic principles of polarized growth theory and gradient transfer theory, this paper quantifies the concept of regional development space. It then proposes a method based on GIS to visually simulate and analyze regional development spatiotemporal differentiation through a case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Region (BTHMR), China. The main research results are as follows. 1) The proposed method, built on classic theories and well-developed GIS technology, presents a good picture of regional development spatiotemporal differentiation. 2) The levels of regional development, in terms of per capita GDP across BTHMR, diminished significantly with increased distances away from city propers (which can be seen as the regional growth poles), leading to the appearance of development valley zones between different cities. The development valley zones between each city coincided with their boundary areas, which indicates that administrative boundaries have some impact on regional development, if the regional division is based on administrative boundaries. 3) From 1993 to 2007, the development level in the whole BTHMR improved significantly, of which polarized growth was dominant, especially for Beijing and Tianjin. However, as the two economic development engines in BTHMR, the pull effects of both Beijing and Tianjin on their peripheral areas were comparatively weak, except for those on Tangshan. 4) The structure and pattern of gradient transfer and balanced development in the BTHMR had not been completely developed yet, and the sustained polarized development of the regional economy in BTHMR was still going to be the main trend in the next 5-10 years.

Cite this article

LIU Yanhua, XU Yong, GUO Tengyun, WANG Zhiqiang . Visual simulation of regional development differentiation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Metropolitan Region[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2013 , 23(3) : 549 -566 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-013-1028-4


An H S, 2005. Principle of Spatial Economics. Beijing: Economic Science Press. (in Chinese)
Anselin L, 2001. Rao’s score test in spatial econometrics. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 97(1): 113-139.
Beach C M, Slotsve G A, 1996. Are we becoming two societies? Income, polarization and the middle class in Canada. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.
Boudeville J R, 1966. Problems of Regional Economic Planning. Edinburgh: University Press.
Burrough P A, 1986. Principles of Geographical Information Systems for Land Resources Assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chen C, Liu S G, 1999. An initial approach to the construction of methodology in regional economic geography. Geographical Research, 18(1): 1-6. (in Chinese)
Dai X Z, 2002. Discussion on the spatial interaction between Beijing and Tianjin. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 22(3): 257-262. (in Chinese)
Darwent D F, 1969. Growth poles and growth centers in regional planning: A review. Environment and Planning, 1: 5-32.
Esteban J M, Ray D, 1994. On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica, 62(4): 819-851.
Fan C C, 1997. Uneven development and beyond: Regional development theory in post-Mao China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 21(4): 620-639.
Foster J E, Wolfson M C, 1992. Polarization and the decline of the middle class: Canada and the U.S.
[D]. Mimeo: Vanderbilt University.
Friedmann J R, 1967. A general theory of polarized development. Mimeo: Santiago, Chile.
Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A J, 1999. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hirschman A, 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hu L F, Zhou L, 2004. On the disputes over tourist resources across administrative regions. Journal of Guangzhou University (Social Science Edition), 3(1): 58-61. (in Chinese)
Isard W, 1965. Methods of Regional Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Isard W, Schooler E W, 1959. Industrial complex analysis: Agglomeration, economics and regional development. Journal of Regional Science, 1(2): 19-33.
Jenkins S P, 1996. Recent trends in the U.K. income distribution: What happened and why. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(1): 29-46.
Ke S Z, Feser E, 2010. Count on the growth pole strategy for regional economic growth? Spread-Backwash effects in greater central China. Regional Studies, 44(9): 1131-1147.
Kinsey J, 1978. The application of growth pole theory in the Aire Metropolitaine Marsellaise. Geoforum, 9(4/5): 245-267.
Krugman P, 1998. What’s new about the new economic geography. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14(2): 7-17.
Kulkarni R, Schintler L A, Stough R R, et al., 2002. A Kohonen self-organizing map approach to modeling growth pole dynamics. Network and Spatial Economics, 2(2): 175-189.
Lam N S, 1983. Spatial interpolation methods: A review. The American Cartographer, 10(2): 129-149.
Levy F, Murnane R J, 1992. U.S. earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(3): 1333-1381.
Li G P, Liu J, 2004. A comprehensive appraisal on regional grades distribution in China. Industrial Technology and Economy, 23(5): 67-71.
Li G P, Xu Y, 2002. The development and implication of gradient transfer theory. Economist, 4: 69-75. (in Chinese)
Li X, Cheng G D, Lu L, 2000. Comparison of spatial interpolation methods. Advance in Earth Sciences, 15(3): 260-265. (in Chinese)
Li X B, 1999. Visualizing spatial equality of development. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 19(3): 254-257. (in Chinese)
Li X J, 1999. Economic Geography. Beijing: Higher Education Press. (in Chinese)
Lu D D, 2001. An analysis of spatial structure and optimal regional development. Acta Geographica Sinica, 56(2): 127-135. (in Chinese)
Lu D D, 2002. Formation and dynamics of the “pole-axis” spatial system. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 22(1): 1-6. (in Chinese)
Lu Y Q, 2002. The mechanism of the model of dual-nuclei structure. Acta Geographica Sinica, 57(1): 85-96. (in Chinese)
Nijkamp P, 1987. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol 1: Regional Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Perroux F, 1950. Economic Space: Theory and Application. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(1): 89-104.
Rey S J, Montouri B D, 1999. US regional income convergence: A spatial econometric perspective. Regional Studies, 33(2):143-156.
Samuelson P A, 1976. Economics. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Tan C W, Li G P, Yang K Z, 2001. Three development strategies of China Capital Area. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 21(1): 12-18. (in Chinese)
Wang X H, 2003. Application of multivariate statistical analysis in regionalization study. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 23(1): 66-71. (in Chinese)
Wei H K, 2009. Change and prospects of thoughts in new China’s 60-year regional development. Henan Social Sciences, (4): 8-11. (in Chinese)
Wei M, Li G P, 2005. A research of the factors of grades process cohesion based on regional differences. Economic Geography, 25(1): 33-37. (in Chinese)
Wells L T, 2000. Government, business, and academia: Origins of Raymond Vernon's understanding of multinational enterprises. Journal of International Management, 6(4): 279-295.
Xia Y L, Feng Z J, 1982. Gradient theory and regional economy. Research and Advice, (8): 5-7. (in Chinese)
Ying L G, 2000. Measuring the spillover effects: Some Chinese evidence. Papers in Regional Science, 79(1): 75-89.
Zhao X, 1996. Spatial disparities and economic development in China, 1953-1992: A comparative study. Development and Change, 27(1): 131-160.
Zhou Q Y, Liu Z X, Zhu C et al., 1989. Regional Economics. Beijing: China Renmin University Press. (in Chinese)