Research Articles

Geomorphological analysis of the morphometric characteristics that determine the volume of sediment yield of Wadi Al-Arja, South Jordan

Expand
  • Geography, AL-Hussein Bin Talal University, Ma'an, Jordan
Ali Hamdi Abu Salim, PhD, E-mail: alihamdaaaa@yahoo.com

Received date: 2013-03-25

  Revised date: 2013-09-26

  Online published: 2014-03-28

Abstract

This study addresses the morphometric variables that determine the sediment yield in Wadi Al-Arja through the analysis of the impact of different morphometric characteristics along the course of the valley on its sediment yield, as well as the analysis of spatial and formal dimensions and morphologies of the basin and its relationship to the sediment yield. The study also addresses the size of variation in the volume of sediment yield of the river tributaries that make up the water network of the valley under the differences of its morphometric and hydrological characteristics. The study found several results, most notably: The classification of Wadi Al-Arja basin according to the hypsometric integral value (72.1%) within an uneven topography, which increases the force of the erosive activity and the size of the sediment yield if the basin was exposed to moist climatic periods. The study also showed the presence of convergence in the intra-spaces between the river tributaries in the water network. This increases the volume of water flows when these tributaries meet with each other and thus increasing their erosive ability and sediment yield.The study also showed the presence of marked variation in the sediment yield of the river tributaries depending on the differences in its morphometric characteristics. The results of the step-wise regression analysis confirmed the importance of the morphometric and hydrological variables, and plant coverage in interpreting the variation in the size of the sediment yield of the river tributaries of different stream order in Wadi Al-Arja basin, where these variables interpreted 43% of the total variation, with statistical significance less than 0.05.

Cite this article

Ali Hamdi ABU SALIM . Geomorphological analysis of the morphometric characteristics that determine the volume of sediment yield of Wadi Al-Arja, South Jordan[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014 , 24(3) : 457 -474 . DOI: 10.1007/s11442-014-1100-8

References

Ashmore P E, Day T J, 1988. Spatial and temporal patterns of suspended-sediment yield in the Saskatchewan River basin. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 25: 1450-1463.
De Boer D H, Crosby G, 1996. Specific sediment yield and drainage basin scale. In: Walling D E, Webb B W (eds.). Erosion and Sediment Yield: Global and Regional Perspectives. IAHS, 236: 333-338.
Inbar M, 1992. Rates of fluvial erosion in basins with a Mediterranean climate type. Catena, 19: 393-409.
Inoue K, 1992. Downstream change in grain size of river bed sediments and its geomorphological implication in the Kanto plain, central Japan. Geographical Review of Japan, 65: 75-89.
Kumma M, Lu X, Wang J et al., 2010. Basin-wide sediment trapping efficiency of emerging reservoirs along the Mekong. Geomorphology, 1919(3-46): 181-197.
Lu X X, Ashmore P, Wang J, 2003. Sediment yield mapping in a large river basin: The Upper Yangtze, China. Environmental Modeling and Software, 19: 339-353.
Lu X X, Higgitt D, 1999. Sediment yields variability in the Upper Yangtze. Earth Surface Processes & Landforms, 24(11): 1077-1093.
Ludwig W, Probst J L, 1998. River sediment discharge to the oceans: Present-day controls and global budgets. American Journal of Science, 298: 265-295.
Martinez J, 2003. A spatial information technology approach for the mapping and quantification of gully erosion. Catena, 50(2-4): 293-308.
Ministry of Agriculture, 1993. National soil map and land use project. The Soil of Jordan, (1): 1-20.
Salama H, 1980. Geomorphological analysis of the morphometric characteristics of basins in Jordan. Journal of Drasat, (1): 32-50.
Smith B, Baptista N, McAllister J, 1999. Sediment logical evidence of human impact on a near shore environment. Applied Geography, 19(2): 153-177.
Smith K, 1950. Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. American Journal Sci., 248: 655-668.
Stephane B, Melanie B, Jean V, 2001. Drainage network expansion of the Salagou drainage basin (S. France): An example of relief response to recent climate change? Terra Nova, 13: 214-219.
Tamene S J, Park R, Dikau P L et al., 2006. Analysis of factors determining sediment yield variability in the high lands of northern Ethiopia. Geomorphology, 6: 76-91.
Thapa B, Raju S, Biraj S, 2005. Problems of Nepalese hydropower projects due to suspended sediments. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 8: 251-257.
Trimble S W, 1981. Changes in sediment storage in the Coon Creek basin, Driftless Area, Wisconsin, 1853-1975. Science, 214: 181-183.
Verstraeten G, Poeson J, 2001. Factors controlling sediment yield from small intensively cultivated catchments in a temperate humid climate. Geomorphology, 40: 123-144.
Walling D E, 1997. The response of sediment yields to environmental change. In: Human Impact on Erosion and Sediment Yield. IAHS, 245: 77-89.
Walling D E, Webb B W, 1983. Patterns of sediment yield. In: Gregory K J (ed.). Background to Palaeohydrology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 69-100.
Wang X, Shang S, Yang W et al., 2008. Simulation of land use-soil interactive effects on water and sediment yields at watershed scale. Ecological Engineering, 36(3): 328-344.
Williams J R, 1977. Sediment delivery ratios determined with sediment and runoff models. IAHS, 122: 168-179.
Zheng M, Cal Q, Chen H, 2007. Effect of vegetation on the runoff-sediment yield relationship at different spatial scales in hilly areas of the Loess Plateau, North China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(9): 3572-3581.

Outlines

/