
The role of landscape pattern analysis in understanding concepts of land cover change
Jerry A GRIFFITH
Journal of Geographical Sciences ›› 2004, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1) : 3-17.
The role of landscape pattern analysis in understanding concepts of land cover change
Landscape ecology and landscape pattern analysis are important components of national-scale programs to identify trends in land cover change because: 1) Statistics on changes in land cover proportions are not spatial. A change matrix derived from GIS provides useful information, but it does not show the spatial form of change in the landscape. Landscape pattern metrics reveal spatial pattern. 2) A growing body of literature has shown that a change in landscape pattern might indicate important changes in ecological functions: forest connectivity and species movements, number and size of farm patches, effects on water quality. Spatial pattern is important in structuring ecological communities and in maintaining existence of competitors. Spatial pattern may be determined by disturbance and may in turn, determine how disturbances propagate through the system. 3) Sometimes landscape pattern may not significantly change, even though land cover proportions do change. Or, vice-versa, sometimes landscape pattern can significantly change, even though land cover proportions don't significantly change. 4) Landscape pattern is an inherent and important part of describing landscapes: based on the literature, one of the most important descriptive characteristics of a landscape is its texture. The objectives of this paper are to: 1) Explain the importance of the role of landscape ecology and landscape pattern analysis in land cover change studies; 2) Review the literature that specifically incorporates landscape ecology into land cover change studies; and 3) List the theoretical and technical issues involved and suggest solutions for them.
landscape pattern / landscape monitoring / landscape ecology / land cover change {{custom_keyword}} /
[1] Antrop M, 2000. Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe. Landscape Ecology, 15: 257-270.
[2] Attore F, A Rosetti, B Sbregra et al., 1998. Landscape changes in Rome, Italy. Coenoses, 13(2): 57-64.
[3] Barbault R, 1995. Biodiversity dynamics: from population and community ecology approaches to a landscape ecology point of view. Landscape and Urban Planning, 31: 89-98.
[4] Benson B, M Mackenzie, 1995. Effects of spatial sensor resolution on landscape structure parameters. Landscape Ecology, 10(2): 113-120.
[5] Brown D, J Duh, S Drzyzga, 2000. Estimating error in an analysis of forest fragmentation change using North American Landscape Characterization (NALC) Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 71: 106-117.
[6] Burel F, 1993. Time lags between spatial pattern changes and species distribution changes in dynamic landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 24: 161-166.
[7] Cain D, K Riitters, K Orvis, 1997. A multi-scale analysis of landscape statistics. Landscape Ecology, 12: 199-212.
[8] Cairns J Jr, B Niederlehner, 1996. Developing a field of landscape ecotoxicology. Ecological Applications, 6(3): 790-796.
[9] Cherril A, C McClean, 1995. An investigation of uncertainty in field habitat mapping and the implications for detecting land cover change. Landscape Ecology, 10(1): 5-21.
[10] Chuvieco E, 1999. Measuring changes in landscape pattern from satellite images: short-term effects of fire on spatial diversity. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(12): 2331-2346.
[11] Cushman S, D Wallin, 2000. Rates and patterns of landscape change in the central Sikhhote-Alin Mountains, Russian Far east. Landscape Ecology, 15: 643-659.
[12] Duncan B, S Boyle, D Breininger et al., 1999. Coupling past management practice and historic landscape change on John F. Kennedy Space Center, Florida.
[13] EPA (Undated). A Landscape Atlas of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
[14] EPA, 1994. Landscape Monitoring and Assessment Research Plan. EPA 620/R-94/009. Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas, NV. 64 pp.
[15] EPA, 1997. An ecological assessment of the U.S. Mid-Atlantic Region. EPA 600/R-97/130 Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
[16] EPA, 1999. A National Assessment of Landscape Change and Impacts for Aquatic Resources: a 10-year Strategic Plan of the Landscape Sciences Program. U.S. EPA. Office of Research and Development. National Exposure Research Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division. Las Vegas, NV. 12.
[17] Farina A, 1997. Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology. London: Chapman and Hall, 234 pp.
[18] Ferguson B, 1991. Landscape hydrology. Journal of Environmental Systems, 21(3): 193-206.
[19] Forman R, 1995. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecology, 10(3): 133-142.
[20] Forman R, 1995. Land Mosaics:The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. New York:Cambridge University Press.
[21] Forman R, M Godron, 1986. Landscape Ecology. New York: Wiley, 619 pp.
[22] Gardner R H, B T Milne, M G Turner et al., 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 1: 19-28.
[23] Giles R Jr, M Trani,1999.Key elements of landscape pattern measures. Environmental Management,23(4):477-481.
[24] Griffith J, 1998. Connecting ecological monitoring and ecological indicators: a review of the literature. Journal of Environmental Systems, 26(4): 325-363.
[25] Griffith J, E Martinko, K Price, 2000. Analyzing landscape structure of Kansas at three scales. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52(1): 45-61.
[26] Griffith J, S Stehman, T Sohl et al., 2003. Detecting trends in landscape pattern metrics over a 20-year period using a sampling-based monitoring programme. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(1): 175-181.
[27] Griffith J, S Stehman, T Loveland, In Press. Landscape trends in mid-Atlantic and southeastern United States ecoregions. Environmental Management.
[28] Gustafson E, 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state-of-the-art? Ecosystems, 1: 143-156.
[29] Haines-Young R, 1999. Landscape pattern: context and process. Pages 33-37. In: J Wiens, M Moss (eds.), Issues in Landscape Ecology Pioneer Press of Greely, Inc. Greely, Co. 151 pp.
[30] Haines-Young R, 1996. Quantifying landscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their applications to forested landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography, 20(4): 418-446.
[31] Herzog F, A Lausch, E Muller et al., 2001. Landscape metrics for assessment of landscape destruction and rehabilitation. Environmental Management, 27(1): 91-107.
[32] Hessburg P, B Smith, R Salter, 1999. Detecting change in forest spatial patterns from reference conditions. Ecological Applications, 9(4): 1232-1252.
[33] Hessburg P, B Smith, R Salter et al., 2000. Recent changes (1930s-1990s) in spatial patterns of interior northwest forests, USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 136: 53-83.
[34] Hobbs R, 1997. Future landscapes and the future of landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37: 1-9.
[35] Hunsaker C, R O'Neill, B Jackson et al., 1994. Sampling to characterize landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, 9(3): 207-226.
[36] Hunsaker C, S Timmins, B Jackson, 1994. Unpublished. Characterizing landscape pattern for the conterminous United States. Report submitted to the EPA Environmental Systems Analysis Laboratory. Las Vegas, NV.
[37] Jones K, D Heggem, T Wade et al., 2000. Assessing landscape condition relative to water resources in the western United States: a strategic approach. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 64: 227-245.
[38] Keane R, P Morgan, J White, 1999. Temporal patterns of ecosystem processes on simulated landscapes in Glacier National Park, Montana, USA. Landscape Ecology, 14(3): 311-328.
[39] Kepner W, C Watts, C Edmonds et al., 2000. A landscape approach for detecting and evaluating change in a semi-arid environment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 64: 179-195.
[40] Kupfer J, 1995. Landscape ecology and biogeography. Progress in Physical Geography, 19(1): 18-35.
[41] Loveland T R, J Merchant, D O Ohlen et al., 1991. Development of a land cover characteristics data base for the conterminous U.S. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 57: 1453-1463.
[42] Loveland T, A Gallant, J Vogelmann, 1999. Perspectives on the use of land cover data for ecological investigations. Pages 28-32. In: J Wiens, M Moss (eds.), Issues in Landscape Ecology. Pioneer Press of Greely, Inc. Greely, CO.
[43] Loveland T, T Sohl, S Stehman et al., 2002. A strategy for estimating the rates of recent United States land cover change. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68(10): 1091-1099.
[44] Lubchenco J, A Olsen, L Brubaker et al., 1991. The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological research agenda. A Report from the Ecological Society of America. Ecology, 72(2): 371-412.
[45] Luque S, R Lathrop, J Bognar, 1994. Temporal and spatial changes in an area of the New Jersey Pine Barrens landscape. Landscape Ecology, 9(4): 287-300.
[46] McGarigal K, B Marks, 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report. PNW-GTR-351, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR. 122 pp.
[47] McGarigal M, W McComb, 1995. Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in Oregon's Coast Range. Ecological Monographs, 65(3): 235-260.
[48] McGarigal K, 1999. FRAGSTATS 3.01.02. Software and User's Manual. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/ fragstats/documents/fragstats_documents.html.
[49] Medley K, B Okey, G Barrett et al., 1995. Landscape change with agricultural intensification in a rural watershed, southwestern Ohio, U.S.A. Landscape Ecology, 10(3): 161-176.
[50] Milne B, 1988. Measuring the fractal geometry of landscapes. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 27: 67-79.
[51] Moss M, 2000. Interdisciplinarity, landscape ecology, and the "Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes". Landscape Ecology, 15: 303-311.
[52] Napton D, T Sohl, R Auch et al., In Press. Land use and land cover change in the North Central Appalachians ecoregion. Pennsylvania Geographer.
[53] Naveh Z, A Liebermann, 1994. Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application. 2nd edn. New York: Springer-Verlag, 360 pp.
[54] Omernik J M, 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77: 118-125 (and map supplement).
[55] Omernik J M, 1995. Ecoregions: a framework for environmental management. Pages 49-62. In: W Davis, T Simon (eds.), Biological Assessment and Criteria, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Fla., USA. 432 pp.
[56] O'Neill R, J Krummel, R Gardner et al., 1988. Indices of landscape patter. Landscape Ecology, 1: 153-162.
[57] O'Neill R, K Riitters, J Wickham et al., 1999. Landscape pattern metrics and regional assessment. Ecosystem Health, 5(4): 225-233.
[58] O'Neill R, C Hunsaker, S Timmins et al., 1996. Scale problems in reporting landscape pattern at the regional scale. Landscape Ecology, 113: 169-180.
[59] O'Neill R, C Hunsaker, K Jones et al., 1997. Monitoring environmental quality at the regional scale. Bioscience,47(8): 513-519.
[60] Qi Y, J Wu, 1996. Effects of changing spatial resolution on the results of landscape pattern analysis using spatial autocorrelation indices. Landscape Ecology, 11(1): 39-49.
[61] Riitters K H, J Wickham, R O'Neill et al., 2002. Fragmentation of continental United States forests. Ecosystems, 5: 815-822.
[62] Riitters K, R O'Neill, C Hunsaker et al., 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology, 101: 23-39.
[63] Riitters K, J Wickham, 1995. Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixels size. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16(18): 3585-3594.
[64] Risser P, J Karr, R Forman, 1984. Landscape ecology: directions and approaches. Special Publication #2. Illinois Natural History Survey.
[65] Rogers C, 1993. Describing landscapes: indices of structure. Master's Thesis. Department of Natural Resources Management. Simon Fraser University.
[66] Sachs D, P Sollins, W Cohen, 1998. Detecting landscape changes in the interior of British Columbia from 1975 to 1992 using satellite imagery. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28: 23-36.
[67] Simpson J, R Boerner, M DeMers et al., 1994. Forty-eight years of landscape change on two contiguous Ohio landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 9(4): 261-270.
[68] Sohl T, A Gallant, T Loveland, In Press. The characteristics and interpretability of land surface change and implications for project design. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing.
[69] Swenson J, J Franklin, 2000. The effects of future urban development on habitat fragmentation in the Santa Monica Mountains. Landscape Ecology, 15: 713-730.
[70] Stehman S, T Sohl, T Loveland, In Press. Statistical sampling to characterize recent United States land cover change. Remote Sensing of Environment.
[71] Tinker D, C Resor, G Beauvis et al., 1998. Watershed Analysis of forest fragmentation by clearcuts and roads in a Wyoming forest. Landscape Ecology, 13: 149-165.
[72] Trani M, R Giles, 1999. An analysis of deforestation: metrics used to describe pattern change. Forest Ecology and Management, 114: 459-470.
[73] Turner M, 1987. Spatial simulation of landscape changes in Georgia: a comparison of three transition models. Landscape Ecology, 1: 29-36.
[74] Turner M, 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20: 171-197.
[75] Turner M, R Carpenter, 1998. At last: a journal devoted to ecosystems. Ecosystems, 1(1): 1-4.
[76] Turner M, R Gardner (eds.), 1991. Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology: The Analysis and Interpretation of Landscape Heterogeneity. New York: Springer-Verlag, 536 pp.
[77] Turner M, Gardner R, O'Neill R V, 2001. Landscape Ecology. New York: Springer-Verlag.
[78] Turner M, D Wear, R Flamm, 1996. Land ownership and land-cover change in the southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula. Ecological Applications, 64(4): 1150-1172.
[79] Urban D, R O'Neill, H Shugart Jr, 1987. Landscape ecology. Bioscience, 37: 119-127.
[80] Vitousek P, 1994. Beyond global warming: ecology and global change. Ecology, 75: 1861-1876.
[81] Wickham J, D Norton, 1994. Mapping and analyzing landscape patterns. Landscape Ecology, 9(1): 7-24.
[82] Wickham J, R O'Neill, K Riitters, 1997. Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to land cover misclassification and differences in land cover composition. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63: 397-402.
[83] Wickham J, R O'Neill, K Jones, 2000. Forest fragmentation as an economic indicator. Landscape Ecology.
[84] Wickham J, K Riitters, 1995. Sensitivity of landscape metrics to pixel size. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16: 3585-3594.
[85] Wickham J, K Riitters, R O'Neill et al., 2000. Land cover as a framework for assessing risk of water pollution. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36(6): 1417-1422.
[86] Yang W, J Merchant, 1997. Impacts of upscaling techniques on land cover representation in Nebraska, USA. GeoCarto International, 12(1): 27-39.
[87] Yi Z, L Zhenguo, X Lan. 1996. Changes of landscape pattern and its influence on environment in Dongling District, Shenyang City, China. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 8(4): 466-473.
[88] Zheng D, D Wallin, Z Hao, 1997. Rates and patterns of landscape change between 1972 and 1988 in the Changbai Mountain area of China and North Korea. Landscape Ecology, 12: 241-254.
[89] Zonneveld I, 1995. Land Ecology: An Introduction to Landscape Ecology as a Basis for Land Evaluation, Land Management, and Conservation. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing, 199.
USGS Geographic Research and Applications Program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Landscape Ecology Program in Las Vegas (Interagency Agreement DW14938108-01-0), and the NASA Land Cover/Land Use Change Program
/
〈 |
|
〉 |