Journal of Geographical Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1969-1997.doi: 10.1007/s11442-022-2032-3
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Li1,2(), DU Mingxi3, ZHANG Wei4, LI Congjuan5, LIU Qiuyu6, KANG Xiang3, ZHOU Dian1,*(
)
Received:
2022-02-14
Accepted:
2022-05-20
Online:
2022-10-25
Published:
2022-12-25
Contact:
ZHOU Dian
E-mail:zl793781203@stu.xjtu.edu.cn;Dian-z@mail.xjtu.edu.cn
About author:
Zhao Li (1993-), PhD Candidate and Engineer, specialized in spatial planning and management policy of national parks and natural protected areas. E-mail: zl793781203@stu.xjtu.edu.cn
Supported by:
ZHAO Li, DU Mingxi, ZHANG Wei, LI Congjuan, LIU Qiuyu, KANG Xiang, ZHOU Dian. Functional zoning in national parks under multifactor trade-off guidance: A case study of Qinghai Lake National Park in China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2022, 32(10): 1969-1997.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
Current status of the existing natural protected areas in Qinghai Lake National Park
Name | County | Level | Approval time/ year | Approved area (km2) | Administrative department in charge | Main protected objects |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Qinghai Lake National Nature Reserve | Gangcha; Haiyan; Gonghe | National level | 1975 | 4588.81 | Qinghai Lake Scenic Area Protection and Utilization Administration | Lake wetland ecosystems such as Qinghai Lake and wetland around the lake, rare and endangered wild animals such as Przewalski’s gazelle and their habitats |
Qinghai Lake Naked Carp National Aquatic Germplasm Resources Reserve | Gangcha; Haiyan; Gonghe; Tianjun | National level | 2007 | 33,857 | Department of Agriculture | Qinghai Lake naked carp, ganzihe naked carp, hard spiny loach, stephensi loach, dorsal spotted loach and Longtou loach |
Qinghai Lake National Scenic Spot | Gangcha; Haiyan; Gonghe | National level | 1994 | 7577.84 | Qinghai Lake Scenic Area Protection and Utilization Administration | Qinghai Lake wetland ecosystem and migratory bird landscape, etc |
Tianjun Mountain Provincial Scenic Spot | Tianjun | Provincial level | 2013 | 90 | Forestry Department | Tianjun stone forest, Tianjun mountain and other natural landscapes and religious and cultural stone carvings and cultural landscapes |
Qinghai Lake National Geopark | Gangcha; Gonghe | National level | 2010 | 209.36 | Qinghai Lake Scenic Area Protection and Utilization Administration | Qinghai Lake plateau lake |
Tianjun Buha River National Wetland Park | Tianjun | National level | 2014 | 71.34 | Forestry Department | Swamp, river wetland ecosystem, rare and endangered waterfowl and their habitats |
Shaliuhe National Wetland Park, Gangcha, Qinghai | Gangcha | National level | 2016 | 29.81 | Forestry Department | Swamp, river wetland ecosystem, rare and endangered wild animals and their habitats |
Ketu National Desert Park, Haiyan County, Qinghai | Hanyan | National level | 2015 | 2.99 | Forestry Department | Alpine desert ecosystem and rare and endangered wild animals |
Qinghai Lake Bird Island International Important Wetland | Gangcha; Gonghe | National level | 1992 | 536 | Forestry Department | The wild animals inhabiting and breeding in Qinghai Lake, and the fragile plateau lake wetland ecosystem such as Qinghai Lake and its surrounding wetlands |
Qinghai Lake National Important Wetland | Gangcha; Haiyan; Gonghe | National level | 2011 | 4588.81 | Forestry Department | Waterfowl, birds, Qinghai Lake naked carp |
Table 2
Classification of ecosystem types
Terrestrial ecosystem type | Surface cover type |
---|---|
Cultivated land | Irrigated land and dry land |
Forest | Shrub woodland, arbor woodland and other woodlands |
Grassland | Natural grassland, artificial grassland and other grasslands |
Aquatics | River surface, pond surface, reservoir surface, river and lake |
Wetland | Inland beach and swamp |
Others | Construction land, various road pavements, other urban planning land, etc. |
Table 3
Evaluation index of the climate regulation service function value of Qinghai Lake National Park
Ecosystem service | Evaluating indicator | Function category | Evaluation method |
---|---|---|---|
Climate regulation | Temperature adjustment | Regulation service | Energy substitution method |
Humidity regulation | Regulation service | Cost substitution method |
Table 4
The ecologically sensitive natural factors affecting Qinghai Lake National Park
Grading | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Topographic features | Geomorphology | Middle altitude plain, low altitude platform, low altitude hill | High altitude plain and mid altitude hilly area | Small ups and downs, low mountains and high-altitude platforms | Middle undulating mid-mountain | High altitude hills and high altitude plains | ||||
Altitude (m) | <2372 | 2372-2765 | 2765-3082 | 3082-33,691 | 3369-36,718 | |||||
Slope (°) | <5 | 5-10 | 10-15 | 15-19 | 19-24 | |||||
Climate and hydrology | Air temperature (℃) | 20-28 | 15-20 | 5-10 | 0-5 | -8-0 | ||||
Precipitation (mm) | 4000-4437 | 3700-4000 | 3400-3700 | 3000-3400 | 2800-3000 | |||||
River | Distance from river | - | Build a buffer zone 7-10 km away from the river center line | - | A 5-7 km buffer zone will be built from the river center line | |||||
≥10 km | ||||||||||
Lake | Distance from lake | - | Establish a buffer zone 15-20 km away from the lake | - | Establish a buffer zone 10-15 km away from the lake | |||||
>20 km | ||||||||||
Vegetation conditions | Vegetation type | Temperate deciduous shrub, subalpine deciduous broad-leaved shrub, and temperate tufted grass typical grassland | Cold temperate and temperate mountain coniferous forest, subalpine evergreen coniferous shrub | Cold temperate zone / temperate swamp, temperate grass / miscellaneous grass halophytic meadow, Alpine Kobresia / miscellaneous grass meadow | Once a year crop, short growth period cold tolerant crops (no fruit trees), alpine grass/Carex grassland | Temperate semi-shrub, dwarf semi- shrub desert | ||||
Vegetation coverage (km2) | >6500 | 5000-6500 | 4100-6500 | 3000-4100 | 1500-3000 | |||||
Net primary productivity of vegetation (g·m‒2·a‒1) | >337 | 271-377 | 217-271 | 167-217 | 124-167 | |||||
Soil condition | Soil type | - | Chernozem, light chernozem, chestnut soil, black felt soil, brown black felt soil, and wet black felt soil | Meadow chestnut soil, swamp soil, meadow swamp soil and black felt soil | Glebe meadow soil, sapropel swamp soil | Calcareous meadow soil, grass felt soil | ||||
Brown grass felt soil | ||||||||||
Bio- diversity | Bio-diversity | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
Grading | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ||||||
Topographic features | Geomorphology | Extremely high altitude tableland, extremely high altitude hills and small undulating mid-mountains | Small undulating high mountain, medium undulating low mountain and medium undulating high mountain | Small undulating extremely high mountain, large undulating middle mountain and large undulating high mountain | Medium undulating extremely high mountain and large undulating extremely high mountain | |||||
Altitude (m) | 3671-3943 | 3943-4215 | 4215-4517 | >4517 | ||||||
Slope (°) | 24-28 | 28-32 | 32-37 | >37 | ||||||
Grading | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ||||||
Climate and hydrology | Air temperature (℃) | -8- -15 | -15- -20 | -20- -30 | <-30 | |||||
Precipitation (mm) | 2600-2800 | 2500-2600 | 2400-2500 | 2344-2400 | ||||||
Rivers | - | Establish a 2-5 km buffer zone from the river centerline | - | Establish a 0-2 km buffer zone from the river centerline | ||||||
Lake | - | A 5-10 km buffer zone shall be established from the lake. | - | Build a buffer zone 0-5 km away from the lake | ||||||
Vegetation conditions | Vegetation type | Alpine sparse vegetation, alpine cushion dwarf semi-shrub desert | Others (impervious surface) | - | - | |||||
Vegetation coverage (km2) | 500-1500 | 400-500 | 150-400 | <150 | ||||||
Net primary productivity of vegetation (g·m‒2·a‒1) | 87-124 | 54-87 | 23.9-54 | <23.9 | ||||||
Soil condition | Soil type | Alluvial soil | Light cold calcium soil, grassland aeolian sand soil | Cold calcium soil, stone soil | Calcareous rocky soil, alkaline saline soil, cold frozen soil | |||||
Bio- diversity | Bio-diversity | Experimental area of the Qinghai Lake National Nature Reserve | Qinghai Lake National Nature Reserve, buffer zone and Tianjun Mountain Provincial Scenic Spot | Gangchashaliuhe National Wetland Park and Tianjun Buha River National Wetland Park | Core area of the Qinghai Lake National Nature Reserve and important habitat of Przewalski’s gazelle |
Table 5
Classification of the ecological sensitivity single-factor evaluation system for Qinghai Lake National Park
Ecological sensitivity factor | Insensitive area | Slightly sensitive area | Moderately sensitive area | Highly sensitive area | Extremely sensitive area |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Geomorphic type | 1 | 2, 3, 4 | 5 | 6, 7 | 8, 9 |
Altitude | 1, 2, 3 | 4, 5 | 6 | 7 | 8, 9 |
Slope | 1 | 2, 3 | 4, 5 | 6, 7 | 8, 9 |
Air temperature | 1, 2 | 3, 4 | 5, 6 | 7, 8 | 9 |
Precipitation | 1, 2 | 3 | 4, 5 | 6, 7 | 8, 9 |
River | 1 | 2, 3 | 4, 5 | 6, 7 | 8, 9 |
Lake | 1 | 2, 3 | 4, 5 | 6, 7 | 8, 9 |
Vegetation type | 1, 2 | 3, 4, 5 | 6, 7 | 8 | 9 |
Vegetation coverage | 1, 2, 3 | 4, 5 | 6, 7 | 9 | 9 |
Net primary productivity of vegetation | 1 | 2 | 3, 4, 5 | 6, 7 | 8, 9 |
Soil type | 1, 2 | 3 | 4, 5 | 6, 7 | 8, 9 |
Biodiversity | 1 | 2, 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Figure 6
Analysis of the importance of the ecosystem service functions of Qinghai Lake National Park: (a) importance of the climate regulation function, (b) importance of the water conservation function, (c) importance of the water and soil conservation function, (d) importance of the biodiversity protection function, and (e) importance of the social and cultural service function
Table 6
Functional zones of Qinghai Lake National Park
Functional partition type | Area (km2) | Proportion (%) | Number of areas | Protection objectives and control requirements |
---|---|---|---|---|
Strict protection zone | 15038.93 | 50.70 | 6 | The most stringent protection to maintain the authenticity and integrity of the natural process of the ecosystem, and prohibit development, construction and human activities. |
Ecosystem conservation zone | 6277.21 | 21.16 | 7 | Strictly protect to increase wetland diversity, protect flagship species habitat, and protect wildlife activities and feeding areas. In principle, human activities shall be restricted, the mining of key wild plants shall be prohibited, and appropriate watershed ecosystem and other related research shall be carried out. |
Coordinated control zone | 6923.48 | 23.34 | 2 | Moderately protect to control and repair grass (wet) land, curb wetland shrinkage, increase the coverage of natural wetland grassland, and control water and soil loss. Areas where long-term research and regular observation can be carried out under certain constraints on the premise of regional ecological stability. |
Native community zone | 131.13 | 0.44 | 18 | General protection, restricted use. Optimize the industrial structure and the structure of livestock breeds and herds. Animal husbandry shall be determined by grass, seasonal rest grazing and regional rotational grazing to realize the balance between grass and livestock. Ensure the basic living needs of indigenous residents. |
Research education and recreation zone | 1290.25 | 4.35 | 6 | General protection and moderate utilization. Carry out moderately popular science education, ecological experience, recreation and sightseeing, health care and other activities. Carry out the undertakings of "national sports" and "plateau sports". The development and construction of industrialization and urbanization are prohibited. |
[1] |
Adams V M, Iacona G D, Possingham H P, 2019. Weighing the benefits of expanding protected areas versus managing existing ones. Nature Sustainability, 2(5): 404-411.
doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0275-5 |
[2] | An C, Shen Q, 2013. Method of constructing network of green infrastructure based on ecological performance of space utilization. Landscape Architecture, 50(2): 22-32. (in Chinese) |
[3] |
Cao W, Wu D, Huang L et al., 2020. Spatial and temporal variations and signifcance identifcation of ecosystem services in the Sanjiangyuan National Park, China. Scientific Reports, 10: 6151.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63137-x |
[4] |
Chen Z J, Wang L, Wei A S et al., 2019. Land-use change from arable lands to orchards reduced soil erosion and increased nutrient loss in a small catchment. Science of The Total Environment, 648: 1097-1104.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.141 |
[5] |
Cheng Q, Cheng X, Ma K X et al., 2020. Offering the win-win solutions between ecological conservation and livelihood development: National parks in Qinghai. Geography and Sustainability, 1(4): 251-255.
doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2020.10.001 |
[6] |
Craigie I D, Baillie J E M, Balmford A et al., 2010. Large mammal population declines in Africa’s protected areas. Biological Conservation, 143(9): 2221-2228.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.06.007 |
[7] | Deng R, Shao H Y, Huang B R et al., 2021. Remote assessment on ecosystem integrity of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and research on National Parks Group construction sequence. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(3): 847-860. (in Chinese) |
[8] |
Domingo D, Palka G, Hersperger A M, 2021. Effect of zoning plans on urban land-use change: A multi-scenario simulation for supporting sustainable urban growth. Sustainable Cities and Society, 69: 102833.
doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102833 |
[9] | Dudley N, 2008. Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories. Switzerland: Iucn. |
[10] | Fan J, Zhong L S, Huang B R et al., 2019. Territorial function and feasibility of the Earth’s Third Pole National Park Cluster. Chinese Science Bulletin, 64(27): 2938-2948. (in Chinese) |
[11] |
Fu M D, Tian J L, Ren Y H et al., 2019. Functional zoning and space management of Three-River-Source National Park. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 29(12): 2069-2084.
doi: 10.1007/s11442-019-1705-z |
[12] |
Geldmann J, Barnes M, Coad L et al., 2013. Effectiveness of terrestrial protected areas in reducing habitat loss and population declines. Biological Conservation, 161(3): 230-238.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.018 |
[13] | Geneletti D, Van D I, 2008. Protected area zoning for conservation and use: A combination of spatial multicriteria and multiobjective evaluation. Landscape & Urban Planning, 85(2): 97-110. |
[14] | General Office of the CPC Central Committee (GOCPC), General Office of the State Council (GOSC), 2017. The general plan for the establishment of National Park System. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-09/26/content_5227713.htm. (in Chinese) |
[15] | General Office of the CPC Central Committee (GOCPC), General Office of the State Council (GOSC), collab 2019. Guiding Opinions on Establishing a Natural Protected Area System with National Parks as the Main Body. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-06/26/content_5403497.htm. (in Chinese) |
[16] |
Han R, Feng C C, Xu N Y et al., 2020. Spatial heterogeneous relationship between ecosystem services and human disturbances: A case study in Chuandong, China. Science of The Total Environment, 721: 137818.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137818 |
[17] |
Hoffmann S, Irl S D H, Beierkuhnlein C, 2019. Predicted climate shifts within terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nature communications, 10 (1): 4787.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12603-w pmid: 31636257 |
[18] | Hull V, Xu W H, Liu W et al., 2011. Evaluating the efficacy of zoning designations for protected area management. Conservation Biology, 144(12): 3028-3037. |
[19] |
Jiang N, Xu W H, Zhao J J et al., 2018. Concept and assessment method of ecosystem authenticity: The case of Changbai Mountains area. Biodiversity Science, 29(10): 1288-1294. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.17520/biods.2020490 |
[20] |
Jiang Y F, Tian J, Zhao J B et al., 2021. The connotation and assessment framework of national park ecosystem integrity: A case study of Amur Tiger and Leopard National Park. Biodiversity Science, 29(10): 1279-1287. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.17520/biods.2021319 |
[21] |
Job H, Bittlingmaier S, Mayer M et al., 2021. Park-people relationships: The socioeconomic monitoring of national parks in Bavaria, Germany. Sustainability, 13(16): 8984.
doi: 10.3390/su13168984 |
[22] |
Keiser D, Lade G, Rudik I, 2018. Air pollution and visitation at U.S. national parks. Science Advances. 4(7): eaat1613.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat1613 |
[23] | Kong F, He Y B, Zhang H F et al., 2011. Present situation and Protection Countermeasures of Biodiversity in the Area around Qinghai Lake. Journal of Qinghai Environment, 21(2): 82-85. (in Chinese) |
[24] |
Kubacka M, Żywica P, Subiros J V et al., 2022. How do the surrounding areas of national parks work in the context of landscape fragmentation? A case study of 159 protected areas selected in 11 EU countries. Land Use Policy, 113:105910.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105910 |
[25] | Lai M, Wu S H, Dai E F et al., 2013. The indirect value of ecosystem services in the Three-River Headwaters Region. Journal of Natural Resources, 28(1): 38-50. (in Chinese) |
[26] |
Laurance W F, Useche D C, Rendeiro J et al., 2012. Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature, 489(7415): 290-294.
doi: 10.1038/nature11318 |
[27] |
Leroux S J, Schmiegelow F, Nagy J A, 2010. Potential spatial overlap of heritage sites and protected areas in a boreal region of Northern Canada. Conservation Biology, 21 (2): 376-386.
doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00626.x |
[28] |
Liu Q Q, Yu hu, 2020. Functional Zoning Mode and Management Measures of Qianjiangyuan National Park Based on Ecological Sensitivity Evaluation. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 11(6): 617-623.
doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.06.009 |
[29] | Liu Y, Fan L, Yang Y L et al., 2020. Discussion on the integration and optimization of natural reserves in Qinghai Lake Basin. Forest Resources Management, (2): 73-78. (in Chinese) |
[30] |
Maxwell S L, Cazalis V, Dudley N et al., 2020. Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century. Nature, 586(7828): 217-227.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2773-z |
[31] | Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China (MNRPRC), 2019. Xining Consensus of National Park Forum. Available online: http://www.mnr.gov.cn/dt/ywbb/201908/t20190826_2462111.html. |
[32] | Nabokov P, Loendorf L, 2004. Restoring a presence:American Indians and Yellowstone National Park. Noman: University of Oklahoma Press. |
[33] |
Nandy S, Singh C, Das K K et al., 2015. Environmental vulnerability assessment of eco-development zone of Great Himalayan National Park, Himachal Pradesh, India. Ecological Indicators, 57(10): 182-195.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.024 |
[34] | National Forestry and Grassland Administration (NFGA), 2020. 2019 China Forestry and Grassland Development Report. (in Chinese) |
[35] |
Norton, B A, Coutts A M, Livesley S J et al., 2015. Planning for cooler cities: a framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134: 127-138.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.018 |
[36] |
Pack S M, Ferreira M N, Krithivasan R et al., 2016. Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) in the amazon. Biological Conservation, 197: 32-39.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.004 |
[37] |
Pan F, Tian C Y, Shao F et al., 2012. Evaluation of ecological sensitivity in Karamay, Xinjiang, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 22(2): 329-345.
doi: 10.1007/s11442-012-0930-5 |
[38] |
Pringle R M, 2017. Upgrading protected areas to conserve wild biodiversity. Nature, 546 (7656): 91-99.
doi: 10.1038/nature22902 |
[39] |
Ross S R P J, Arnoldi J F, Loreau M et al., 2021. Universal scaling of robustness of ecosystem services to species loss. Nature Communications, 12(1): 5167.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25507-5 pmid: 34453056 |
[40] | Schulze K, Knights K, Coad L et al., 2018. An assessment of threats to terrestrial protected areas. Conservation Letters, 11(3): e12435. |
[41] | Shadie P S, Dudley, N. 2013. IUCN WCPA Best Practice Guidance on Recognising Protected Areas and Assigning Management Categories and Governance Types, Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. |
[42] |
Shen X L, Li S, McShea W J et al., 2020. Effectiveness of management zoning designed for flagship species in protecting sympatric species. Conservation Biology, 34(1): 158-167.
doi: 10.1111/cobi.13345 pmid: 31069848 |
[43] | State Council of the People’s Republic of China (SCPRC), 2017. Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Nature Reserves. (in Chinese) |
[44] | Su S, Yao A J, Zhao Q L et al., 2019. Natural resource protection zoning in a pilot area of the Beijing Great Wall National Park System. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(22): 8319-8326. (in Chinese) |
[45] | Sun H Y, Yu L, Cai F et al., 2019. Discussion on controlled zoning and functional zoning of national park. Forestry Construction, (3): 1-6. (in Chinese) |
[46] | Sun Q Y, Zhang Y J, 2020. Landscape character identification and its value assessment in natural areas: A case study of Qinghai Lake Basin. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 36(9): 76-81. (in Chinese) |
[47] |
Tang J, Lu H, Xue Y D et al., 2021. Data-driven planning adjustments of the functional zoning of Houhe National Nature Reserve. Global Ecology and Conservation, 29: e01708.
doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01708 |
[48] |
Ustaoglu E, Collier M J, 2018. Farmland abandonment in Europe: An overview of drivers, consequences, and assessment of the sustainability implications. Environmental Reviews, 26 (4): 396-416.
doi: 10.1139/er-2018-0001 |
[49] |
Yang J Y, Yang J, Luo X Y et al., 2019. Impacts by expansion of human settlements on nature reserves in China. Journal of Environmental Management. 248: 109233.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.07.004 |
[50] | Yang R, Zhuang Z B, Zhao Z C, 2020. Planning for National Parks. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press. (in Chinese) |
[51] | Yin H W, Kong F H, 2014. Lab Manual for Spatial Analysis in Urban and Rural Planning. Nanjing: Southeast University Press. (in Chinese) |
[52] |
Ustaoglu E, Collier M J, 2018. Farmland abandonment in Europe: An overview of drivers, consequences, and assessment of the sustainability implications. Environmental Reviews, 26 (4): 396-416.
doi: 10.1139/er-2018-0001 |
[53] |
Visconti P, Butchart S H M, Brooks T M et al., 2019. Protected area targets post-2020. Science, 364(6437): 239-241.
doi: 10.1126/science.aav6886 pmid: 30975769 |
[54] | Wagner Frederic H, Hamilton Wayne L, Jeigley Richard B, 2006. Yellowstone’s Destabilized Ecosystem:Elk Effects, Science, and Policy Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press. |
[55] |
Wan B T, Xu H G, Ding H et al., 2007. Methodology of comprehensive biodiversity assessment. Biodiversity Science, 15(1): 97-106. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.1360/biodiv.060132 |
[56] |
Wan L L, Ye X Y, Lee J et al., 2015. Effects of urbanization on ecosystem service values in a mineral resource-based city. Habitat International, 46: 54-63.
doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.020 |
[57] |
Wang H, Hou P, Jiang J B et al., 2021. Ecosystem health assessment of Shennongjia National Park, China. Sustainability, 12(18): 7672.
doi: 10.3390/su12187672 |
[58] | Wang Y J, Yang H B, Qi D W et al., 2021. Efficacy and management challenges of the zoning designations of China’s national parks. Conservation Biology, 254: 108962. |
[59] |
Wei D Y, Feng A X, Huang J Y, 2020. Analysis of ecological protection effect based on functional zoning and spatial management and control. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 8(3): 166-172.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.06.003 |
[60] |
Wu R D, Hua C L, Yu G Z et al., 2020. Assessing protected area overlaps and performance to attain China's new national park system. Biological Conservation, 241: 108382.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108382 |
[61] | Zhang C Y, Xie N G, 2003. Principle of integrity and authenticity and protection of the World Heritage. Journal of Peking University: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 40(2): 62-68. (in Chinese) |
[62] |
Zhang H F, Xia W C, Zhang C et al., 2021. Functional zoning of China’s protected area needs to be optimized for protecting giant panda. Global Ecology and Conservation, 25: e01392.
doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01392 |
[63] | Zhang J H, Bai L, 2002. A general picture of Japan natural park. Journal of Chinese Landscape Architecture, 18(5): 87-90. (in Chinese) |
[64] |
Zhang T, Wang P, Sun Y, 2018. Research on resource protection for national parks in China based on goal orientation and value perception. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 6(2): 72-85.
doi: 10.17149/ijgp.j.issn.2577.4441.2018.02.005 |
[65] |
Zhang Z M, Sherman R, Yang Z J et al., 2013. Integrating a participatory process with a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for protected area zoning in China. Journal for Nature Conservation, 21(4): 225-240.
doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2012.12.006 |
[66] |
Zhao Z C, Yang R, 2021. The concept of national park authenticity and integrity in China and its evaluation framework. Biodiversity Science, 29(10): 1271-1278. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.17520/biods.2021287 |
[67] |
Zhou K, Wu J Y, Liu H C, 2021. Spatio-temporal estimation of the anthropogenic environmental stress intensity in the Three-River-Source National Park region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318: 128476.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128476 |
[1] | CHEN Dongjun, ZHONG Linsheng, FAN Jie, YU Hu, YANG Ding, ZENG Yuxi. Evaluation and structural analysis of the functions of the Tibetan Plateau National Park Cluster [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2022, 32(5): 957-980. |
[2] | Martha Elizabeth APPLE, Macy Kara RICKETTS, Alice Caroline MARTIN. Plant functional traits and microbes vary with position on striped periglacial patterned ground at Glacier National Park, Montana [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(7): 1127-1141. |
[3] | XU Baicui, PAN Jinghu. Spatial distribution characteristics of national protected areas in China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(12): 2047-2068. |
[4] | FU Mengdi, TIAN Junliang, REN Yueheng, LI Junsheng, LIU Weiwei, ZHU Yanpeng. Functional zoning and space management of Three-River-Source National Park [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(12): 2069-2084. |
[5] | WANG Lianyong, CHEN Anze, GAO Zhaofeng. An exploration into a diversified world of national park systems: China’s prospects within a global context [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2011, 21(5): 882-896. |
[6] | ZHANG Baiping, WU Hongzhi, XIAO Fei, Mo Shenguo. Protecting the national parks and the world heritage sites in China: challenge and strategy [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2004, 14(Z): 87-90. |
|