Journal of Geographical Sciences ›› 2019, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 1211-1227.doi: 10.1007/s11442-019-1654-6
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xukun SU1,2(), Wangya HAN1,2, Guohua LIU1,2,*(
)
Received:
2018-05-10
Accepted:
2019-01-22
Online:
2019-07-25
Published:
2019-07-25
Contact:
Guohua LIU
E-mail:xksu@rcees.ac.cn;ghliu@rcees.ac.cn
About author:
Author: Su Xukun, PhD, specialized in biodiversity conservation and landscape ecology. E-mail:
Supported by:
Xukun SU, Wangya HAN, Guohua LIU. Potential priority areas and protection network for Yunnan snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus bieti) in Southwest China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(7): 1211-1227.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
Weights of each variable"
Vegetation types | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Value | Name | Value | |||
Tsuga chinensis pritz and Betula alnoides | 100 | Cotinus nana | 50 | |||
Tsuga dumosa (D. Don) Eichler | 100 | Sophora davidii | 50 | |||
Betula platyphylla Suk | 75 | Imperata cylindrica | 50 | |||
Abies delavayi Franch | 75 | Bothriochloa ischaemum (L.) Keng | 50 | |||
Betula albo-sinensis Burk. var. septentrionalis Schneid | 75 | Rhododendron telmateium | 50 | |||
Platycladus orientalis | 75 | Arundinella setosa, Arundinella anomala | 50 | |||
Quercus aquifolioides | 75 | Rhododendron flavidum Franch | 50 | |||
bies forrestii | 75 | Salix cupularis | 50 | |||
Picea balfouriana | 75 | Themeda triandra Forsk. Var. Japonica (Willd. )Makino and Miscanthus | 50 | |||
Neosino calamus affinis | 75 | Caragana jubata (Pall.) Poir. | 50 | |||
Larix potaninii var. macrocarpa | 75 | Rosa sericea Lindl. | 50 | |||
Sabina tibetica Kom | 75 | Rhododendron heliolepis Franch. | 50 | |||
Lithocarpus variolosus (Fr.) Chun | 75 | Rhododendron delavayi Franch. | 50 | |||
Castanopsis delavayi Franch | 75 | Rhododendron fastigiatum Franch. | 50 | |||
Pinus densata | 75 | Vaccinium bracteatum Thunb. | 50 | |||
Quercus pseudosemecarpifolia A. Camus | 75 | Heteropogon contortus | 50 | |||
Betula albo-sinensis Burk | 75 | Malus baccata (L.) Borkh, Prunus padus L. | 50 | |||
Pinus armandii Franch | 75 | Rhododendron adenogynum Diels | 50 | |||
Quercus pannosa Hand.-Mazz. | 75 | Sabina pingiivar.wilsonii and Sabina squamata | 50 | |||
Fargesia spathacea Franch | 75 | Potentilla parvifolia | 50 | |||
Picea likiangensis | 75 | Rhododendron nivaleHook. f. | 50 | |||
Abies squamata Mast | 75 | Rhododendron racemosum Franch | 50 | |||
Pinus massoniana Lamb | 75 | Salix sclerophylla Anderss | 50 | |||
Quercus guyavaefolia Levl | 75 | Phyllanthus emblica L. | 50 | |||
Abies faxoniana Rehd | 75 | Rhododendron morii Hayata | 50 | |||
Pobulus davidiana | 75 | Sibiraea angustata (Rehd.) Hand.-Mazz. | 50 | |||
Quercus variabilis Bl | 75 | Kobresia littledalei C. B. Clarke | 25 | |||
Larix chinensis | 75 | Carex liparocarpos Gaudin | 25 | |||
Abies spectabilis (D. Don) Spach | 75 | Anaphalis flavescens Hand.-Mazz. | 25 | |||
Castanopsisindica (Roxb.) Miq, Castanopsis clarkei | 75 | Sanguisorba officinalisL. and Artemisia tanacetifolia Linn. | 25 | |||
Piceabrachytylavar.omplanata | 75 | B. sylvaticum (Huds) Beauv | 25 | |||
Castanopsis concolor Rehd. et Wils. | 75 | Blysmus sinocompressus Tang et Wang | 25 | |||
Pinus yunnanensis | 75 | Cyperaceae | 25 | |||
Picea asperata Mast. | 75 | Kobresia humilis and Polygonum macrophyllum D. Don | 25 | |||
Abies georgei Orr | 75 | Festuca ovina L. and Deyeuxia arundinacea | 25 | |||
Pinus palustris Mill. | 75 | Polygonum macrophyllum D. Don and Polygonum viviparum L | 25 | |||
Picea purpurea Mast | 75 | Poa annua L. | 25 | |||
Quercus monimotricha | 50 | Non-vegetation | 0 | |||
Land cover | ||||||
Name | Value | Name | Value | |||
Forest | 100 | Wetland | 0 | |||
Shrub | 75 | Lake | 0 | |||
Meadow | 25 | River | 0 | |||
Steppe | 25 | Farmland | 0 | |||
Vegetation types | ||||||
Forest wetland | 50 | Settlement | 0 | |||
Sparse bushes | 50 | Road | 0 | |||
Shrub wetland | 0 | |||||
Aspect | ||||||
Class | Value | Class | Value | |||
0 | 0 | 136°-225° | 100 | |||
1-45° | 25 | 226°-270° | 75 | |||
46°-90° | 50 | 271°-315° | 50 | |||
91°-135° | 75 | |||||
Slope | ||||||
Class | Value | Class | Value | |||
0° | 0 | 20°-40° | 100 | |||
0°-90° | 25 | Above 40° | 25 | |||
15°-20° | 50 | |||||
Water | ||||||
Distance | Value | Distance | Value | |||
Water source | 0 | 3.5 km away from water source | 50 | |||
1 km away from water source | 100 | More than 3.5 km away from water source | 25 | |||
Elevation | ||||||
Class | Value | Class | Value | |||
764-2600 m, 4501-4700 m | 25 | 2801-3600 m | 100 | |||
2601-2700 m, 4301-4500 m | 50 | Above 4701 m | 0 | |||
2701-2800 m, 3601-4300 m | 75 | |||||
Settlement | ||||||
Class | Value | Class | Value | |||
1 km away from settlement | 0 | More than 3 km away from settlement | 100 | |||
3 km away from settlement | 50 | |||||
Road | ||||||
Distance | Value | Distance | Value | |||
50 m away from road | 0 | More than 100 m away from road | 100 | |||
100 m away from road | 50 |
Figure 3
Existing location of the YSMs in the study area (a); location of the PCCs in scenario I (b); distribution of the PCHs and PCCs in scenario II (c); distribution of the PCHs and PCCs in scenario III (d); distribution of the PCHs and PCCs in scenario IV (e); distribution of the PCHs and PCCs in scenario V (f)"
Table 3
Total number, total distance and average length of the PCCs in different scenarios"
Total number | Total distance (km) | Average length (km) | |
---|---|---|---|
Scenario I | 5 | 391.68 | 78.34 |
Scenario II | 31 | 4329.05 | 139.65 |
Scenario III | 16 | 3570.07 | 223.13 |
Scenario IV | 122 | 12126.41 | 99.40 |
Scenario V | 182 | 11842.43 | 65.07 |
1 | Abson D J, von Wehrden H, Baumgärtner S et al., 2014. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 103: 29-37. |
2 |
Beier P, Spencer W, Baldwin R et al., 2011. Best science practices for developing regional connectivity maps. Conservation Biology, 25(5): 879-892.
doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01716.x |
3 | Bleisch W, Richardson M, 2008. Rhinopithecus bieti. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008. |
4 |
Breininger D R, Mazerolle M J, Bolt M R et al., 2012. Habitat fragmentation effects on annual survival of the federally protected eastern indigo snake. Animal Conservation, 15(4): 361-368.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00524.x |
5 |
Carroll C, McRae B H, Brookes A, 2012. Use of linkage mapping and centrality analysis across habitat gradients to conserve connectivity of gray wolf populations in western North America. Conservation Biology, 26: 78-87.
doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01753.x |
6 |
Clauzel C, Deng X Q, Wu G S et al., 2015. Assessing the impact of road developments on connectivity across multiple scales: Application to Yunnan snub-nosed monkey conservation. Biological Conservation, 192: 207-217.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.09.029 |
7 | Cui M H, Yang G B, Yang S J, 2011. Protection status and management recommendations on Yunnan snub-nosed monkey in Lanping Yunling Provincial Nature Reserve. Forest Inventory and Planning, 36(4): 43-51. (in Chinese) |
8 | Cyril C G, Li D Y, Feng S K et al., 2010. Niche partitioning between sympatric rhesus macaques and Yunnan snub-nosed monkeys at Baimaxueshan Nature Reserve, China. Zoological Research, 31(5): 516-522. |
9 |
Durán A P, Rauch J, Gaston K J, 2013. Global spatial coincidence between protected areas and metal mining activities. Biological Conservation, 160: 272-278.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.02.003 |
10 |
Fahrig L, 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 34(1): 487-515.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 |
11 |
Fu W, Liu S L, Degloria S D et al.2010. Characterizing the “fragmentation-barrier” effect of road networks on landscape connectivity: A case study in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95(3): 122-129.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.12.009 |
12 |
Galpern P, Manseau M, Fall A, 2011. Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: A guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation. Biological Conservation, 144(1): 44-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.09.002 |
13 | Grueter C C, Li D Y, Ren B P et al., 2012. Food abundance is the main determinant of high-altitude range use in snub-nosed monkeys. International Journal of Zoology, doi: 10.1155/2012/739419. |
14 | Huang Z P, Scott M B, Li Y P et al., 2017. Black-and-white snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus bieti) feeding behavior in a degraded forest fragment: Clues to a stressed population. Primates, doi: 10.1007/s10329-017-0618-7. |
15 | Karanth K U, 2003. Tiger ecology and conservation in the Indian subcontinent. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 100: 169-189. |
16 | Li D Y, Peng Z S, Ren B P et al., 2006. Early autumn habitat selection by the Yunnan snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus biett) in Tacheng, Yunnan. Journal of China West Normal University (Natural Sciences), 27(3): 233-238. (in Chinese) |
17 | Li D Y, Ren B P, Cyril C G et al., 2009. Seasonal selection of sleeping sites in Yunnan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) at Gehuaqing in Baimaxueshan Nature Reserve. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 29(4): 389-395. (in Chinese) |
18 | Li D Y, Ren B P, He X M et al., 2011. Diet of Rhinopithecus bieti at Xiangguqing in Baimaxueshan National Nature Reserve. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 31(4): 338-346. (in Chinese) |
19 | Li D Y, Ren B P, Hu J et al., 2013. Time budgets of Rhinopithecus bieti at Xiangguqing in the Baimaxueshan National Nature Reserve, Northwest Yunnan, China. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 33(3): 223-231. (in Chinese) |
20 | Li G Q, Yang Y M, Xiao W, 2007. A study on vegetation types of Rhinopithecus bieti habitat. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 36(1): 95-98. (in Chinese) |
21 |
Li H L, Li D H, Li T et al., 2010. Application of least-cost path model to identify a giant panda dispersal corridor network after the Wenchuan earthquake: Case study of Wolong Nature Reserve in China. Ecological Modelling, 221(6): 944-952.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.12.006 |
22 | Li L, Xue Y D, Wu G S et al., 2015. Potential habitat corridors and restoration areas for the black-and-white snub-nosed monkey Rhinopithecus bieti in Yunnan, China. Oryx, 49(4): 719-726. |
23 | Li X Y, Yan S J, 2009. Winter Food Habits of the Yunnan snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus bieti) found at Mt. Longma, Yunnan. Acta Anthropologica Sinica, 28(4): 391-399. (in Chinese) |
24 | Liu, S L, Deng L, Dong S K et al., 2014. Landscape connectivity dynamics based on network analysis in the Xishuangbanna Nature Reserve, China. Acta Oecologica, 55: 66-77. |
25 |
Liu, S L, Dong Y H, Deng L et al., 2014. Forest fragmentation and landscape connectivity change associated with road network extension and city expansion: A case study in the Lancang River Valley. Ecological Indicators, 36: 160-168.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.018 |
26 | Liu, Z J, Ren B P, Wu R D, 2009. The effect of landscape features on population genetic structure in Yunnan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) implies an anthropogenic genetic discontinuity. Molecular Ecology, 18(18): 3831-3846. |
27 | Long Y C, Craig K, Zhong T et al., 1996. Status and conservation strategy of the Yunnan snub-nosed monkey. Chinese Biodiversity, 4(3): 145-152. (in Chinese) |
28 |
Martín-López B, García-Llorente M, Palom I et al., 2011. The conservation against development paradigm in protected areas: Valuation of ecosystem services in the Doñana social-ecological system (southwestern Spain). Ecological Economics, 70(8): 1481-1491.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.009 |
29 |
McRae B H, Dickson B G, Keitt T H et al., 2008. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology, 89: 2712-2724.
doi: 10.1890/07-1861.1 |
30 |
McRae B H, Hall S A, Beier P et al., 2012. Where to restore ecological connectivity? Detecting barriers and quantifying restoration benefits. Plos One, 7(12): e52604.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052604 |
31 | McRae B H, Kavanagh D M, 2011. Linkage mapper connectivity analysis software. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle WA. Available at: . |
32 | Ren B P, Li D Y, Liu Z J et al., 2016. Overview on populations and distribution, home range, diet and conservation status of Yunnan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti). Chinese Journal of Zoology, 51(1): 148-150. (in Chinese) |
33 |
Ren B P, Li M, Long Y C et al., 2009. Home range and seasonality of Yunnan snub-nosed monkeys. Integrative Zoology, 4(2): 162-171.
doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2009.00153.x |
34 |
Roever C L, van Aarde R J, Legget K, 2013. Functional connectivity within conservation networks: Delineating corridors for African elephants. Biological Conservation, 157: 128-135.
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.025 |
35 |
Sawyer S, Epps C, Brashares J, 2011. Placing linkages among fragmented habitats: Do least-cost path models reflect how animals use landscapes?Journal of Applied Ecology, 48: 668-678.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01970.x |
36 | Shi F Q, 2009. Research on population and distribution of Yunnan snub-nosed monkey in Baimaxueshan Nature Reserve. Inner Mongolia Forestry Investigation and Design, 32(5): 102-105. (in Chinese) |
37 | Su X K, Dong S K, Liu S L et al., 2014. Effects of land use/land cover change (LUCC) on habitats of Tibetan wild donkey in Aerjin Mountain National Nature Reserve. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 33(1): 141-148. (in Chinese) |
38 |
Su X K, Dong S K, Liu S L et al., 2016. Identifying suitable habitats of three ungulates in Arjinshan National Nature Reserve, China. Journal of Mountain Science, 13(1): 157-168.
doi: 10.1007/s11629-015-3497-7 |
39 | Su X K, Liu S L, Dong S K et al., 2015. Effects of potential mining activities on migration corridors of Chiru (Pantholops hodgsonii) in the Altun National Nature Reserve, China. Journal for Nature Conservation, 28: 119-126. |
40 | Wang Y M, Xue Y D, Xia Y F, 2011. Landscape pattern and its fragmentation evaluation of habitat of Rhinopithecus bieti in Northwest Yunnan. Forest Inventory and Planning, 36(2): 34-37. (in Chinese) |
41 | Wu R D, Zhou R L, Long Y C et al., 2005. Analysis of suitable habitat for Yunnan Golden Monkey with remote sensing. Remote Sensing Information, (6): 24-28. (in Chinese) |
42 | Xia F, Zhu P F, Li M et al., 2016. Mating behavior of Yunnan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) at Xiangguqing in Baimaxueshan National Nature Reserve, Yunnan, China. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 36(1): 1-14. (in Chinese) |
43 | Xiang Z F, Xiao W, Huo S et al., 2013. Ranging pattern and population composition of Rhinopithecus bieti at Xiaochangdu, Tibet: Implications for conservation. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(16): 1505-1512. |
44 | XueY D, Li L, Li D Q et al., 2011. Analysis of habitat connectivity of the Yunnan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) using landscape genetics. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(20): 5886-5893. (in Chinese) |
45 | Zhang Y, Li L, Wu G S et al., 2016. Analysis of landscape connectivity of the Yunnan snub-nosed monkeys (Rhinopithecus bieti) based on habitat patches. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(1): 51-58. (in Chinese) |
46 |
Zhao H D, Liu S L, Dong S K et al., 2014. Characterizing the importance of habitat patches in maintaining landscape connectivity for Tibetan antelope in the Altun Mountain National Nature Reserve, China. Ecological Research, 29(6): 1065-1075.
doi: 10.1007/s11284-014-1193-7 |
47 | Zhao W D, Yang P F, Shen Y S et al., 2009. Study on food item and resource of Rhinopithecus bieti at Tacheng in the Baimaxueshan National Nature Reserve. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 44(3): 49-56. (in Chinese) |
No related articles found! |
|