The pattern, evolution, and mechanism of venture capital flows in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China

doi:10.1007/s11442-022-2038-x

Abstract

Abstract:

As an important innovation flow, venture capital has been examined in urban network research. However, the segmentation of capital categories and the cross-scale connection of capital remain scarcely analyzed. This study focuses on the structure and industry differentiation of venture capital flows in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) and its cross-scale network characteristics. Based on a venture capital database covering capital amount, investment subject address information, and industry information (2000-2018), this article examines the spatial distribution and network structure of venture capital in the GBA by means of a distance-based test of spatial concentration approach and social network analysis. Key findings show that: (1) Venture capital institutions and startups in the GBA present a high-concentration distribution pattern. In the past 20 years, venture capital activities in the GBA have substantially increased, forming a complex urban network structure with Guangzhou, Shenzhen, and Hong Kong as the core of this network. (2) Different types of venture capital show significantly different urban network structures, with manufacturing, the Internet industry, the financial sector, the cultural media industry, and the medical and health industry as the five industry types with the largest capital flow in the GBA. (3) Cross-scale research on the venture capital network reveals the position of the GBA as a capital hub in China, which forms a dense venture capital connection network with major cities on a national scale. (4) The network structure of venture capital in the GBA is influenced by multi-dimensional proximity, institutional factors, urban economy, and path dependence. Along with these three key mechanisms, the GBA has grown into a national-scale and even global-scale venture capital center.

Key words: venture capital, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, collaboration, scale

WU Kangmin, WANG Yang, ZHANG Hong’ou, LIU Yi, YE Yuyao, YUE Xiaoli. The pattern, evolution, and mechanism of venture capital flows in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2022, 32(10): 2085-2104.

Figures/Tables 9

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Table 1

Figure 7

Figure 8

References 45

[1]	Adler P, Florida R, King K et al., 2019. The city and high-tech startups: The spatial organization of Schumpeterian entrepreneurship. Cities, 87: 121-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.013
[2]	Akhavan M, Ghiara H, Mariotti I et al., 2020. Logistics global network connectivity and its determinants. A European city network analysis. Journal of Transport Geography, 82: 102625. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102625
[3]	Alperovych Y, Groh A, Quas A, 2020. Bridging the equity gap for young innovative companies: The design of effective government venture capital fund programs. Research Policy, 49(10): 104051. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104051
[4]	Boschma R A, 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1): 61-74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
[5]	Boschma R A, Frenken K, 2006. Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(3): 273-302. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbi022
[6]	Bustamante C V, Mingo S, Matusik S F, 2021. Institutions and venture capital market creation: The case of an emerging market. Journal of Business Research, 127: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.008
[7]	Chen K, Chen G, 2015. The rise of international financial centers in mainland of China. Cities, 47: 10-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2014.11.012
[8]	Cheung T K Y, Wong C W H, Zhang A, 2020. The evolution of aviation network: Global airport connectivity index 2006-2016. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics Transportation Review, 133: 101826. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2019.101826
[9]	Colombo M G, D’Adda D, Quas A, 2019. The geography of venture capital and entrepreneurial ventures’ demand for external equity. Research Policy, 48(5): 1150-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.004
[10]	Dong X F, Zheng S Q, Kahn M E, 2020. The role of transportation speed in facilitating high skilled teamwork across cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 115: 103212. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2019.103212
[11]	Duan L L, Sun W Z, Zheng S Q, 2020. Transportation network and venture capital mobility: An analysis of air travel and high-speed rail in China. Journal of Transport Geography, 88: 102852. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102852
[12]	Duranton G, Overman H G, 2005. Testing for localization using micro-geographic data. Review of Economic Studies, 72(4): 1077-1106. doi: 10.1111/0034-6527.00362
[13]	Enkel E, Sagmeister V, 2020. External corporate venturing modes as new way to develop dynamic capabilities. Technovation, 96/97: 102128. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102128
[14]	Fang C, Yu X, Zhang X et al., 2020. Big data analysis on the spatial networks of urban agglomeration. Cities, 102: 102735. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102735
[15]	Florida R, Adler P, Mellander C, 2017. The city as innovation machine. Regional Studies, 51(1): 86-96. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1255324
[16]	Florida R D, Smith F, 1993. Venture capital formation, investment, and regional industrialization. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 83(3): 434-451. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1993.tb01944.x
[17]	He Z, Chong Z, Yang Y et al., 2020. Evolutionary investment network and the emerging energy power in Central Asia: From the perspective of cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Geograhical Sciences, 30(11): 1849-1870.
[18]	Hui E C M, Li X, Chen T et al., 2020. Deciphering the spatial structure of China’s megacity region: A new bay area: The Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in the making. Cities, 105: 102168. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.10.011
[19]	Kuebart A, 2019. Geographies of relational coordination in venture capital firms. European Planing Studies, 27(11): 2206-2226.
[20]	Lee N, Luca D, 2019. The big-city bias in access to finance: Evidence from firm perceptions in almost 100 countries. Journal of Economic Geography, 19(1): 199-224. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbx047
[21]	Li T, Wang J, Huang J et al., 2020. Exploring temporal heterogeneity in an intercity travel network: A comparative study between weekdays and holidays in China. Journal of Geograhical Sciences, 30(12): 1943-1962.
[22]	Li Y, Phelps N A, 2017. Knowledge polycentricity and the evolving Yangtze River Delta megalopolis. Regional Studies, 51(7): 1035-1047. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1240868
[23]	Li Y, Phelps N A, 2019. Megalopolitan glocalization: The evolving relational economic geography of intercity knowledge linkages within and beyond China’s Yangtze River Delta region, 2004-2014. Urban Geography, 40(9): 1310-1334. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2019.1585140
[24]	Ma H, Li Y, Huang X, 2021. Proximity and the evolving knowledge polycentricity of megalopolitan science: Evidence from China’s Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, 1990-2016. Urban Studies, 58(12): 2405-2423. doi: 10.1177/0042098020942665
[25]	Makkonen T, 2016. Producer service linkages and city connectivity in the mega-city region of China: A case study of the Pearl River Delta. European Planning Studies, 24(9): 1623-1642. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1184626
[26]	Marshall A, 1890. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
[27]	Masucci M, Parker S C, Brusoni S et al., 2021. How are corporate ventures evaluated and selected? Technovation, 99: 102126. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102126
[28]	Pan F, Bi W, Lenzer J et al., 2017. Mapping urban networks through inter-firm service relationships: The case of China. Urban Studies, 54(16): 3639-3654. doi: 10.1177/0042098016685511
[29]	Pan F, Yang B, 2019. Financial development and the geographies of startup cities: Evidence from China. Small Business Economics, 52(3): 743-758. doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9983-2
[30]	Pan F, Zhao S X B, Wojcik D, 2016. The rise of venture capital centres in China: A spatial and network analysis. Geoforum, 75: 148-158. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.07.013
[31]	Tahmasebi A, Askaribezayeh F, 2021. Microfinance and social capital formation: A social network analysis approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 76: 100978. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100978
[32]	Tian X, Kou G, Zhang W, 2020. Geographic distance, venture capital and technological performance: Evidence from Chinese enterprises. Technological Forecasting Social Change, 158: 120155. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120155
[33]	Wang J, Chandra K, Du C et al., 2021. Assessing the potential of cross-border regional innovation Systems: A case study of the Hong Kong-Shenzhen region. Techonlogy in Society, 65: 101557.
[34]	Wang J, Zhang X, Yeh A G O, 2016. Spatial proximity and location dynamics of knowledge-intensive business service in the Pearl River Delta, China. Habitat International, 53: 390-402. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.041
[35]	Wang N, Wang H, Du Y et al., 2021. Population migration across the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: Spatiotemporal patterns and driving factors. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31(2): 195-214. doi: 10.1007/s11442-021-1842-z
[36]	Wray F, 2012. Rethinking venture capital in economic geographical research. Geography Compass, 6(10): 589-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2012.00499.x
[37]	Wu K M, Wang Y, Zhang H O et al., 2021a. Impact of the built environment on the spatial heterogeneity of regional innovation productivity: Evidence from the Pearl River Delta, China. Chinese Geographical Sciences, 31(3): 413-428.
[38]	Wu K M, Wang Y, Zhang H O et al., 2021b. On innovation capitalization: Empirical evidence from Guangzhou, China. Habitat International, 109: 102323. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102323
[39]	Yang C, 2012. Restructuring the export-oriented industrialization in the Pearl River Delta, China: Institutional evolution and emerging tension. Applied Geography, 32(1): 143-157. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.013
[40]	Ye Y, Wu K, Xie Y et al., 2019. How firm heterogeneity affects foreign direct investment location choice: Micro-evidence from new foreign manufacturing firms in the Pearl River Delta. Applied Geography, 106: 11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.03.005
[41]	Yeh A G O, Yang F F, Wang J, 2015. Producer service linkages and city connectivity in the mega-city region of China: A case study of the Pearl River Delta. Urban Studies, 52(13): 2458-2482. doi: 10.1177/0042098014544762
[42]	Zacharias J, Tang Y, 2010. Restructuring and repositioning Shenzhen, China’s new mega city. Process in Planning, 73: 209-249.
[43]	Zhang X, Chen S, Luan X et al., 2021. Understanding China’s city-regionalization: Spatial structure and relationships between functional and institutional spaces in the Pearl River Delta. Urban Geography, 42(3): 312-339. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2019.1710399
[44]	Zhang X, Guo Q E, Cheung D M W et al., 2018. Evaluating the institutional performance of the Pearl River Delta integration policy through intercity cooperation network analysis. Cities, 81: 131-144. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.002
[45]	Zook M A, 2002. Grounded capital: Venture financing and the geography of the Internet industry, 1994-2000. Journal of Economic Geography, 2(2): 151-177. doi: 10.1093/jeg/2.2.151

	Based on total investment amount			Based on investment events
	Degree centrality	Out-degree	In-degree	Degree centrality	Out-degree	In-degree
Shenzhen	15.422	13.227	12.195	13.44	13.16	11.175
Guangzhou	5.062	2.663	3.701	4.506	2.708	4.156
Hongkong	3.194	2.905	0.373	0.638	0.638	0.125
Zhuhai	1.464	0.794	1.015	0.7	0.591	0.553
Foshan	1.415	0.256	1.342	0.327	0.117	0.327
Huizhou	0.745	0.357	0.694	0.311	0.047	0.311
Dongguan	0.626	0.134	0.535	0.576	0.249	0.568
Zhongshan	0.474	0.106	0.463	0.21	0.047	0.21
Jiangmen	0.135	0.06	0.131	0.086	0.023	0.086
Zhaoqing	0.053	0.001	0.053	0.078	0.008	0.078