Journal of Geographical Sciences ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 603-620.doi: 10.1007/s11442-021-1861-9
• Research Articles • Previous Articles
XU Yong1,2, ZHAO Shen1,2,*(), FAN Jie1,2
Received:
2020-12-08
Accepted:
2021-02-20
Online:
2021-04-25
Published:
2021-06-25
Contact:
ZHAO Shen
E-mail:zhaos.14s@igsnrr.ac.cn
About author:
Xu Yong, Professor, specialized in land use research and carrying capacity of resources and environment research. E-mail: xuy@igsnrr.ac.cn
Supported by:
XU Yong, ZHAO Shen, FAN Jie. Urban planning construction land standard and its revision based on climate and topography in China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2021, 31(4): 603-620.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
The structure of per capita single construction land of basic standard for urban planning"
Land-use types | Basic standard | Current standard | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage (%) | Per capita area (m2/person) | Ratio interval (%) | Controlled value (m2/person) | |
Residential land | 32.50 | 30.88 | 25-40 | 23-38 |
Public management and service land | 7.42 | 7.05 | 5-8 | ≥ 5.5 |
Industrial land | 22.50 | 21.38 | 15-30 | ≥ 18 |
Transportation facilities land | 17.50 | 16.63 | 10-25 | ≥ 12 |
Green space | 12.50 | 11.88 | 10-15 | ≥ 10 |
Other types | 7.58 | 7.20 | - | - |
Total | 100.00 | 95.00 | - | - |
Table 2
Revision standard of population size for urban planning construction land"
Indicators | Unit of measurement | Small city | Medium city | Big city Ⅰ | Big city Ⅱ | Big city Ⅲ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Value range specified by current standards for per capita public management and service land area | m2/person | 5.5-7.6 | 5.8-8.1 | 5.9-8.2 | 6.3-8.8 | 6.8-9.2 |
Per capita public management and service land area | m2/person | 6.55 | 6.95 | 7.05 | 7.55 | 8.00 |
Per capita construction land | m2/person | 94.50 | 94.90 | 95.00 | 95.50 | 95.95 |
Figure 5
Spatial differentiation of per capita construction land area by climate revision in China’s urban planning system Note: This map is based on the standard map production of the GS (2016) No. 1594 from the Standard Mapping Service Website of the National Surveying and Mapping Geographic Information Bureau."
Table 3
The climate revision of per capita residential land and per capita construction land in major cities of China"
City | Longitude | Latitude | Sunshine spacing coefficient | Sunshine spacing | Adjustment of per capita residential land area | Per capita residential land area | Total amount of per capita construction land area |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(East longitude, E) | (North latitude, N) | (m) | (m2) | (m2) | (m2) | ||
Mohe | 122°32′20″ | 52°58′21″ | 3.21 | 45.84 | 25.46 | 56.34 | 120.46 |
Qiqihar | 123°56′15″ | 47°20′34″ | 2.32 | 33.13 | 15.21 | 46.09 | 110.21 |
Harbin | 126°40′10″ | 45°45′35″ | 2.15 | 30.70 | 13.25 | 44.13 | 108.25 |
Changchun | 125°19′47″ | 43°51′36″ | 1.97 | 28.13 | 11.17 | 42.05 | 106.17 |
Urumqi | 87°37′2″ | 43°49′30″ | 1.96 | 27.99 | 11.06 | 41.94 | 106.06 |
Duolun | 116°29′8″ | 42°12′13″ | 1.83 | 26.13 | 9.56 | 40.44 | 104.56 |
Shenyang | 123°25′52″ | 41°48′22″ | 1.80 | 25.70 | 9.22 | 40.10 | 104.22 |
Hohhot | 111°44′49″ | 40°50′37″ | 1.73 | 24.70 | 8.41 | 39.29 | 103.41 |
Datong | 113°18′3″ | 40°4′41″ | 1.67 | 23.85 | 7.72 | 38.60 | 102.72 |
Beijing | 116°23′32″ | 39°54′30″ | 1.67 | 23.85 | 7.72 | 38.60 | 102.72 |
Kashi | 75°59′24″ | 39°28′13″ | 1.61 | 22.99 | 7.03 | 37.91 | 102.03 |
Tianjin | 117°11′60″ | 39°5′51″ | 1.61 | 22.99 | 7.03 | 37.91 | 102.03 |
Baoding | 115°27′40″ | 38°52′32″ | 1.60 | 22.85 | 6.91 | 37.79 | 101.91 |
Yinchuan | 106°13′49″ | 38°29′16″ | 1.58 | 22.56 | 6.68 | 37.56 | 101.68 |
Shijiazhuang | 114°30′56″ | 38°2′35″ | 1.55 | 22.13 | 6.34 | 37.22 | 101.34 |
Taiyuan | 112°32′54″ | 37°52′16″ | 1.54 | 21.99 | 6.22 | 37.10 | 101.22 |
Jinan | 117°7′12″ | 36°39′4″ | 1.47 | 20.99 | 5.41 | 36.29 | 100.41 |
Xining | 101°46′40″ | 36°37′5″ | 1.47 | 20.99 | 5.41 | 36.29 | 100.41 |
Qingdao | 120°22′56″ | 36°4′5″ | 1.44 | 20.56 | 5.07 | 35.95 | 100.07 |
Lanzhou | 103°50′3″ | 36°3′40″ | 1.44 | 20.56 | 5.07 | 35.95 | 100.07 |
Zhengzhou | 113°37′35″ | 34°44′51″ | 1.36 | 19.42 | 4.15 | 35.03 | 99.15 |
Xuzhou | 117°16′59″ | 34°20′21″ | 1.35 | 19.28 | 4.03 | 34.91 | 99.03 |
Xian | 108°56′56″ | 34°15′59″ | 1.35 | 19.28 | 4.03 | 34.91 | 99.03 |
Bengbu | 117°21′23″ | 32°55′14″ | 1.28 | 18.28 | 3.23 | 34.11 | 98.23 |
Nanjing | 118°47′50″ | 32°3′36″ | 1.24 | 17.71 | 2.76 | 33.64 | 97.76 |
Hefei | 117°14′10″ | 31°49′24″ | 1.23 | 17.56 | 2.65 | 33.53 | 97.65 |
Shanghai | 121°28′23″ | 31°13′54″ | 1.21 | 17.28 | 2.42 | 33.30 | 97.42 |
Chengdu | 104°4′18″ | 30°39′27″ | 1.18 | 16.85 | 2.07 | 32.95 | 97.07 |
Wuhan | 114°18′19″ | 30°35′40″ | 1.18 | 16.85 | 2.07 | 32.95 | 97.07 |
Hangzhou | 120°10′41″ | 30°18′16″ | 1.17 | 16.71 | 1.96 | 32.84 | 96.96 |
Lhasa | 91°10′21″ | 29°39′11″ | 1.15 | 16.42 | 1.73 | 32.61 | 96.73 |
Chongqing | 106°33′3″ | 29°33′42″ | 1.14 | 16.28 | 1.61 | 32.49 | 96.61 |
Nanchang | 115°50′47″ | 28°41′11″ | 1.11 | 15.85 | 1.27 | 32.15 | 96.27 |
Changsha | 112°56′18″ | 28°13′43″ | 1.09 | 15.57 | 1.04 | 31.92 | 96.04 |
Guiyang | 106°38′56″ | 26°37′4″ | 1.03 | 14.71 | 0.35 | 31.23 | 95.35 |
Fuzhou | 119°17′48″ | 26°4′28″ | 1.01 | 14.42 | 0.12 | 31.00 | 95.12 |
Guilin | 110°17′24″ | 25°16′27″ | 0.99 | 14.14 | -0.12 | 30.76 | 94.88 |
Kunming | 102°42′32″ | 25°1′53″ | 0.98 | 13.99 | -0.23 | 30.65 | 94.77 |
Xiamen | 118°5′23″ | 24°28′47″ | 0.96 | 13.71 | -0.46 | 30.42 | 94.54 |
Guangzhou | 113°15′51″ | 23°7′45″ | 0.92 | 13.14 | -0.92 | 29.96 | 94.08 |
Nanning | 108°22′2″ | 22°49′1″ | 0.91 | 12.99 | -1.04 | 29.84 | 93.96 |
Zhanjiang | 110°21′35″ | 21°16′17″ | 0.86 | 12.28 | -1.61 | 29.27 | 93.39 |
Haikou | 110°11′52″ | 20°2′38″ | 0.83 | 11.85 | -1.96 | 28.92 | 93.04 |
Table 5
Revision standards of per capita construction land with different terrain slope grades"
Terrain | ω | SL (m2/person) | Increase rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|
0° | 1.00 | 95.00 | 0.00 |
3° | 1.04 | 98.49 | 3.68 |
5.5° | 1.07 | 101.84 | 7.20 |
8° | 1.11 | 105.68 | 11.25 |
11.5° | 1.18 | 112.13 | 18.03 |
15° | 1.26 | 120.16 | 26.49 |
17.5° | 1.34 | 127.25 | 33.95 |
20° | 1.43 | 135.85 | 43.00 |
22.5° | 1.54 | 146.50 | 54.21 |
25° | 1.68 | 160.04 | 68.47 |
1 | Brown L R, 1995. Who Will Feed China? New York: W. W. Norton & Company. |
2 | Cai Y L, Fu Z Q, Dai E F, 2002. Regional minimum per capita cultivated land area and regulation of cultivated land resources. Acta Geographica Sinca, 57(2):127-134. (in Chinese) |
3 | Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council(CCCPC and SC), 2015. Overall Plan of Ecological Civilization System Reform. Beijing: Xinhua News Agency. (in Chinese) |
4 | Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council(CCCPC and SC), 2016. Provincial Space Planning Pilot Program. Beijing: Xinhua News Agency. (in Chinese) |
5 | Chen B M, 1999. The existing states: Future change trends in land-use and food production capacities in China. AMBIO, 28(8):682-686. |
6 | Chen Y F, Du P F, Zheng Y J et al., 2006. Ecological suitability evaluation of construction land in Nanning based on GIS. Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science Edition), 46(6):801-804. (in Chinese) |
7 | Dai J L, Gao X L, Du S S, 2010. Spatial expansion and land use control in the process of urbanization. Geographical Research, 29(10):1823-1832. (in Chinese) |
8 | Dan H M, Li X B, Lv C H, 2004. Construction land expansion and its occupation of cultivated land in large and medium cities in China in 1990s. Science China D: Terrae, 34(12):1157-1165. (in Chinese) |
9 |
Dang L J, Xu Y, Tang Q, 2015. The pattern of available construction land along the Xijiang River in Guangxi, China. Land Use Policy, 42:102-112.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.010 |
10 | Feng Z M, Tang Y, Yang Y Z et al., 2007. Topographic relief and its correlation with population distribution in China. Acta Geographica Sinca, 62(10):1073-1082. (in Chinese) |
11 | Han D, Feng C C, Gu W Y, 2010. Factors of economically and intensively use of rural residential land and its regional difference. Chinese Journal of Agriculture Resources and Regional Planning, 31(5):29-35. (in Chinese) |
12 | Huang G Y, 2006. Principles of Mountain City Science. Beijing: China Construction Industry Press, 1-5. (in Chinese) |
13 | Jiang D W, 1996. The standard of urban construction land should be tailored. City Planning, 20(5):58. (in Chinese) |
14 | Jiang H Y, Zhou C H, Xiao R B, 2010. Spatial differentiation and social equity of public parks in Guangzhou. City Planning Review, 34(4):43-48. (in Chinese) |
15 | Li H P, Xiao J, 2013. Multidimensional analysis of the relationship between mountain city and mountain city. City Planning, 20(8):40-46. (in Chinese) |
16 | Li M, Jiang H, 2008. Theories and policies on intensive use of land for construction. China Land Science, 22(2):55-61. (in Chinese) |
17 | Lin J, Zhang P, Liu S Y, 2009. Discussion on technical system and perspectives of evaluation on construction land saving and intensive use. China Land Science, 23(4):4-10. (in Chinese) |
18 | Liu Z Q, Song X M, Wang X M et al., 2005. Problems and countermeasures of replacement of construction land index. China Land, ( 4):25-26. (in Chinese) |
19 | Lu D D, Fan J, 2009. 2050: The Regional Development of China. Beijing: Science Press, 2-7. (in Chinese) |
20 | Mao Y L, 2009. Climate responsive mountain towns and architectural design. Journal of Mountain Science, 27(5):605-611. (in Chinese) |
21 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Urban Land Classification and Planning and Construction Land Standards (GB 50137-2011).(in Chinese) |
22 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Urban Land Classification and Planning and Construction Land Standards (GBJ 137-90).(in Chinese) |
23 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Code for design of civil buildings (GB 50352-2005).(in Chinese) |
24 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Urban Public Facilities Planning Code (GB 50442-2008).(in Chinese) |
25 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Standard of climatic regionalization for architecture (GB 50178-93).(in Chinese) |
26 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Code for Planning and Design of Urban Residential District(GB 50180-93, Revised Edition of 2016). (in Chinese) |
27 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for Classification of Urban Green Space (CJJ/T 85-2002).(in Chinese) |
28 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for Classification of Urban Green Space (CJJ/T 85-2017).(in Chinese) |
29 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Technical Code for Building Slope Engineering (GB 50330-2013).(in Chinese) |
30 | Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Code for Design of Urban Road Engineering(CJJ37-2012, Revised Edition of 2016). (in Chinese) |
31 | Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Current Land Use Classification (GB/T 21010-2017).(in Chinese) |
32 | Niu S W, Li J M, Li S H et al., 2014. Suitability evaluation of construction land based on terrain complexity: A case study of Tianshui, Gansu. Resource Science, 36(10):2092-2102. (in Chinese) |
33 | Qiao L Y, Zhou W, Cao Y G et al., 2010. Study on appraisal indicator system of urban land intensive use. Ecological Economy, ( 6):31-34. (in Chinese) |
34 | Qu F T, Chen J L, Chen H G, 2007. Economic Development and Land Conversion in China. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1-23. (in Chinese) |
35 | Sun Q, Cai Y L, 2008. Historical experience of farmland protection and land management in Japan and its enlightenment to China. Journal of Peking University (Natural Science Edition), 44(2):249-256. (in Chinese) |
36 | Tian F, Song X D, 2005. Comparison of residential sunshine regulations in China and Japan. Journal of Urban Planning, ( 1):75-78. (in Chinese) |
37 | Tu Z H, Wang X P, Cheng C P, 2013. The discussion about the optimization of urban and rural construction land use standards: Based on the views of planning and management. Urban Development Studies, 20(9):58-65. (in Chinese) |
38 | Wang J, Zhao M, 2011. Influencing factors and multivariate control of planning and construction land standards. Modern Urban Studies, ( 9):30-38. (in Chinese) |
39 | Wu Y L, Qu F T, 2007. Mechanism of intensive urban land use in China: Theoretical and practical study. Resources Science, 29(6):106-113. (in Chinese) |
40 | Xie S M, 1994. Introduction to the Standard GB 0178-93 for Building Climatic Zoning. Architectural Science, ( 4):57-61. (in Chinese) |
41 |
Xu Y, Tang Q, Fan J et al., 2011. Assessing construction land potential and its spatial pattern in China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 103:207-216.
doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.013 |
42 | Yu H, Zeng H, Jiang Z Y, 2001. Distribution characteristics of landscape components on topographic gradients in rapid urbanization area. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 21(1):64-69. (in Chinese) |
43 | Zhao W K, 2002. Sunlight ordinance. City Planning, 26(12):90-91. (in Chinese) |
44 | Zhou K H, Tan R H, Liu Y F et al., 2012. Land use potential assessment of regional land use based on per capita construction land standard. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 28(19):222-231. (in Chinese) |
[1] | Fangyan CHENG, Shiliang LIU, Xiaoyun HOU, Xue WU, Shikui DONG, COXIXO Ana. The effects of urbanization on ecosystem services for biodiversity conservation in southernmost Yunnan Province, Southwest China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(7): 1159-1178. |
[2] | John Prince Soundranayagam, P. Sivasubramanian, N. Chandrasekar, K.S.P. Durairaj. An analysis of land use pattern in the industrial development city using high resolution satellite imagery [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2011, 21(1): 79-88. |
[3] | REN Liyan, YUE Wenze, LI Jialin, WU Cifang. Impact of economic development on wetlands in Hangzhou Bay Industrial Belt [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2010, 20(3): 406-416. |
|