Priority sites and conservation gaps of wintering waterbirds in the Yangtze River floodplain

doi:10.1007/s11442-020-1803-y

Abstract

Abstract:

The Yangtze River floodplain is critical for migratory waterbirds along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway (EAAF). Greater awareness of its global importance is urgently needed to ensure waterbird populations remain in favourable conservation status, as well as the enhancement of wider wetland biodiversity within this region. The designation of protected wetland areas and building a green ecological corridor in the Yangtze floodplain is now becoming a critical issue of interest to the Chinese government. Priority sites in this area were identified based on the criteria used to identify sites that qualify as Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Sites) and Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs) by using multi-source data. The results show that 140 of the sites surveyed are priority sites. The Importance Index (I) for the whole floodplain decreased slightly from 2001-2005 and an unbalanced distribution pattern is evident with Jiangxi and Hunan provinces significantly higher than the other provinces in the floodplain. Although more than 60% of the priority sites are currently located outside protected areas, the average Conservation Effectiveness Index (C) of the whole floodplain is 75.6%, which suggests the coverage of protected areas for most wintering waterbird population is reasonable. Conservation of the Yangtze River floodplain needs to be further strengthened due to declining waterbird abundances and the mismatch between the distribution of protected areas and their importance for wintering waterbirds. A comprehensive system for priority site identification and protection and scientific review is needed. Multi-sourced data from regular, systematic and coordinated monitoring of waterbird distribution and abundance across the EAAF, as well as national scale citizen science programmes are also critically important.

Key words: wintering waterbirds, Yangtze River floodplain, priority site, feeding guild

XIA Shaoxia, YU Xiubo, LEI Jinyu, HEARN Richard, SMITH Bena, LEI Gang, XIE Ping. Priority sites and conservation gaps of wintering waterbirds in the Yangtze River floodplain[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(10): 1617-1632.

Figures/Tables 16

Figure 1

Table 1

Table 2

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Table 3

Figure 5

Table 1

Appendix A Feeding guilds and 1% population thresholds for waterbird species in the Yangtze River floodplain"

Feeding guilds	English name	Scientific name	IUCN category	1% threshold
Grass eaters	Bar-headed Goose	Anser indicus	LC	560
Grass eaters	Bean Goose	Anser fabalis	LC	1100
Grass eaters	Greater White-fronted Goose	Anser albifrons	LC	1800
Grass eaters	Greylag Goose	Anser anser	LC	710
Grass eaters	Lesser White-fronted Goose	Anser erythropus	VU	260
Grass eaters	Snow Goose	Chen caerulescens	LC	1
Tuber eaters	Common Crane	Grus grus	LC	160
Tuber eaters	Hooded Crane	Grus monacha	VU	10
Tuber eaters	Siberian Crane	Grus leucogeranus	CR	35
Tuber eaters	Swan Goose	Anser cygnoides	VU	680
Tuber eaters	Tundra Swan	Cygnus columbianus	LC	1000
Tuber eaters	White-naped Crane	Grus vipio	VU	10
Tuber eaters	Whooper Swan	Cygnus cygnus	LC	600
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Baikal Teal	Anas formosa	LC	7100
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Common Coot	Fulica atra	LC	20,000
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Common Moorhen	Gallinula chloropus	LC	10,000
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Common Pochard	Aythya ferina	VU	3000
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Common Teal	Anas crecca	LC	7700
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Eurasian Wigeon	Anas penelope	LC	7100
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Falcated Teal	Anas falcata	NT	830
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Ferruginous Duck	Aythya nyroca	NT	1000
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Gadwall	Anas strepera	LC	7100
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Garganey	Anas querquedula	LC	1400
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Greater Scaup	Aythya marila	LC	2400
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Mallard	Anas platyrhynchos	LC	15,000
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Mandarin Duck	Aix galericulata	LC	400
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Northern Pintail	Anas acuta	LC	2400
e	Purple Swamphen	Porphyrio porphyrio	LC	250
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Ruddy Shelduck	Tadorna ferruginea	LC	710
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Spot-billed Duck	Anas poecilorhyncha	LC	1000
Seed / aquatic vegetation	Tufted Duck	Aythya fuligula	LC	2400
Invertebrate eaters	Water Rail	Rallus aquaticus	LC	10,000
Invertebrate eaters	Baer’s Pochard	Aythya baeri	CR	5
Invertebrate eaters	Common Shelduck	Tadorna tadorna	LC	1200
Invertebrate eaters	Black-tailed Godwit	Limosa limosa	NT	1500
Invertebrate eaters	Black-winged Stilt	Himantopus himantopus	LC	1000

Table 1

Table 1

(Continued)"

Feeding guilds	English name	Scientific name	IUCN category	1% threshold
Invertebrate eaters	Common Goldeneye	Bucephala clangula	LC	10,000
Invertebrate eaters	Common Greenshank	Tringa nebularia	LC	1000
Invertebrate eaters	Common Redshank	Tringa totanus	LC	1000
Invertebrate eaters	Common Sandpiper	Actitis hypoleucos	LC	500
Invertebrate eaters	Common Snipe	Gallinago gallinago	LC	10,000
Invertebrate eaters	Dunlin	Calidris alpina	LC	1000
Invertebrate eaters	Eurasian Curlew	Numenius arquata	NT	1000
Invertebrate eaters	Eurasian Spoonbill	Platalea leucorodia	LC	100
Invertebrate eaters	Far Eastern Curlew	Numenius madagascariensis	EN	320
Invertebrate eaters	Green Sandpiper	Tringa ochropus	LC	1000
Invertebrate eaters	Grey Plover	Pluvialis squatarola	LC	1000
Invertebrate eaters	Grey-headed Lapwing	Vanellus cinereus	LC	1000
Invertebrate eaters	Kentish Plover	Charadrius alexandrinus	LC	1000
Invertebrate eaters	Little Ringed Plover	Charadrius dubius	LC	250
Invertebrate eaters	Long-billed Plover	Charadrius placidus	LC	250
Invertebrate eaters	Marsh Sandpiper	Tringa stagnatilis	LC	10,000
Invertebrate eaters	Northern Lapwing	Vanellus vanellus	LC	10,000
Invertebrate eaters	Northern Shoveler	Anas clypeata	LC	5000
Invertebrate eaters	Pacific Golden Plover	Pluvialis fulva	LC	1000
Invertebrate eaters	Pheasant-tailed Jacana	Hydrophasianus chirurgus	LC	1200
Invertebrate eaters	Pied Avocet	Recurvirostra avosetta	LC	1000
Invertebrate eaters	Pintail Snipe	Gallinago stenura	LC	10,000
Invertebrate eaters	Red-necked Stint	Calidis ruficollis	LC	3200
Invertebrate eaters	Spotted Redshank	Tringa erythropus	LC	250
Invertebrate eaters	Swinhoe’s Snipe	Gallinago megala	LC	1,000
Invertebrate eaters	Temminck’s Stint	Calidris temminckii	LC	1,000
Invertebrate eaters	Wood Sandpiper	Tringa glareola	LC	1,000
Fish eaters	Black Stork	Ciconia nigra	LC	1
Fish eaters	Black-crowned Night Heron	Nycticorax nycticorax	LC	1,000
Fish eaters	Black-headed Gull	Larus ridibundus	LC	20,000
Fish eaters	Black-necked Grebe	Podiceps nigricollis	LC	1000
Fish eaters	Black-tailed Gull	Larus crassirostris	LC	10,500
Fish eaters	Cattle Egret	Bubulcus ibis	LC	10,000
Fish eaters	Chinese Pond-Heron	Ardeola bacchus	LC	10,000
Fish eaters	Common Merganser	Mergus merganser	LC	710
Fish eaters	Common Tern	Sterna hirundo	LC	9800
Fish eaters	Dalmatian Pelican	Pelecanus crispus	VU	1
Fish eaters	Eurasian Bittern	Botaurus stellaris	LC	1000

Table 1

Table 2

Table 2

(Continued)"

No.	Region	Site name	Latitude	Feeding guilds
No.	Region	Site name	Latitude	Longitude	Protected area status	Importance Index	Tuber eaters	Grass eaters	Seed and aquatic vegetation eaters	Invertebrate eaters	Fish eaters
18	Anhui	Caizi Lake#	30.85	117.03	PNR	115.04	52.26	7.70	5.09	38.58	11.41
19	Jiangsu	Gaoyou Lake#	32.86	119.35	NR	106.36	1.62	2.42	95.80	3.37	3.15
20	Jiangxi	Dawu Lake#	29.02	116.15	UN	105.43	90.93	1.05	1.10	6.76	5.59
21	Hubei	Chenhu Lake*#	30.36	113.86	PNR	98.90	4.19	19.49	24.49	18.81	31.92
22	Hunan	West Dongting Lake*#	29.02	112.08	PNR	93.05	1.40	1.08	9.00	4.02	77.55
23	Jiangxi	Nanjiang Lake#	28.95	116.48	UN	86.02	50.46	4.95	0.80	1.89	27.92
24	Jiangxi	Zhouxi Lake#	29.21	116.05	UN	83.72	42.75	24.37	10.00	6.08	0.52
25	Shanghai	Chongming Dongtan*#	31.23	121.47	NNR	80.06	32.91	0.12	25.07	15.37	6.59
26	Jiangxi	Kangshan Lake#	28.89	116.58	NR	79.15	45.12	1.99	0.41	8.05	23.58
27	Hubei	Wang Lake*	29.87	115.38	PNR	60.55	4.55	3.28	22.95	8.45	21.32
28	Jiangxi	Jinxi Lake#	28.66	116.35	UN	43.48	36.51	0.69	2.95	3.00	0.33
29	Jiangsu/ Anhui	Shijiu Lake#	31.45	118.88	PNR	41.23	7.07	12.97	2.39	17.00	1.80
30	Anhui	Huanghu Lake	30.02	116.52	PNR	41.09	5.24	29.50	1.63	0.14	4.58
31	Jiangxi	Qinglan Lake	28.43	116.20	NR	40.80	7.77	2.53	26.14	2.27	2.09
32	Jiangxi	Chenjia Lake#	28.66	116.35	UN	40.55	26.87	0.25	5.55	5.66	2.22
33	Hubei	Hannan Lake	30.63	114.38	UN	40.55	0.31	1.49	28.11	0.28	10.36
34	Jiangxi	Nanbeigang Lake#	29.68	116.21	UN	40.19	0.93	0.92	1.60	15.35	21.39
35	Anhui	Bohu Lake	30.21	116.36	PNR	39.35	0.23	2.30	0.52	18.31	17.99
36	Anhui	Wuchang Lake	30.32	116.80	PNR	38.67	10.60	23.80	1.53	0.30	2.44
37	Jiangxi	Yugan Nanhu Lake	28.80	116.26	UN	35.35	26.61	0.97	2.75	3.15	1.87
38	Jiangxi	Yugan Donghu Lake	28.30	116.93	UN	35.08	28.37	0.55	0.83	4.09	1.24
39	Jiangxi	Boyang Lake	29.63	116.20	UN	34.54	2.44	1.50	1.24	23.73	5.63
40	Hubei	Dongxi Lake	30.56	114.26	UN	30.91	0.67	6.06	2.16	6.30	15.72
41	Jiangxi	Luojiao Lake#	29.09	116.04	UN	30.54	17.81	6.76	2.26	0.64	3.07
42	Hunan	Hengling Lake	28.82	112.76	PNR	29.86	0.14	1.14	12.31	6.44	9.83
43	Anhui	Fengsha Lake	30.96	117.65	PNR	29.36	18.16	0.33	8.05	1.21	1.61
44	Jiangxi	Duchang Xi Lake#	29.25	116.47	UN	29.21	5.67	3.12	3.82	15.40	1.20
45	Jiangxi	Fanghu Lake#	29.83	116.48	NR	29.10	11.00	7.65	5.20	3.01	2.24
46	Anhui	Baidang Lake	30.84	117.34	PNR	28.90	11.39	4.11	2.06	10.99	0.35
47	Jiangxi	Junshan Lake#	28.63	116.30	UN	27.53	15.59	0.72	5.34	0.57	5.31
48	Jiangxi	Xieshan Lake#	29.63	116.14	UN	26.40	3.49	10.84	0.20	4.79	7.08
49	Jiangxi	Qili Lake	29.69	115.91	UN	25.77	1.57	1.58	3.87	0.57	18.18
50	Jiangxi	Taibo Lake	30.01	116.70	NR	25.61	5.56	4.19	9.42	4.68	1.76
51	Jiangxi	Liaohuachi	29.34	116.00	NR	25.43	8.81	0.92	4.52	3.97	7.21
52	Jiangxi	Gaoqiang Lake	29.53	116.17	UN	25.13	1.27	6.67	13.86	3.19	0.14
53	Hubei	Liangzi Lake	30.28	114.61	PNR	25.04	3.28	0.15	13.50	1.55	6.56

Table 2

Table 2

(Continued)"

No.	Region	Site name	Latitude	Feeding guilds
No.	Region	Site name	Latitude	Longitude	Protected area status	Importance Index	Tuber eaters	Grass eaters	Seed and aquatic vegetation eaters	Invertebrate eaters	Fish eaters
54	Jiangxi	Wuxingkenzhichang	28.72	116.18	UN	20.86	20.86
55	Jiangsu	Shang Lake	31.65	120.68	UN	20.78			3.67	0.18	16.93
56	Jiangxi	Yufeng	28.87	116.23	UN	20.00					20.00
57	Shanghai	Hengsha Dongtan	31.63	121.39	UN	19.57		0.01	5.14	10.27	4.15
58	Jiangxi	Zaohu Lake#	29.59	116.19	UN	18.69	1.03	1.30	1.37	8.58	6.41
59	Jiangxi	Meixi Lake#	29.51	116.07	UN	17.52	11.16	1.35	0.98	2.10	1.93
60	Hunan	South Dongting Lake*#	28.83	112.50	PNR	17.11	1.51	0.79	10.30	1.59	2.92
61	Anhui	Daguan Lake	30.05	116.25	PNR	16.42	2.47	7.04	1.56	1.02	4.33
62	Hubei	Chong Lake	29.91	112.29	UN	15.17			13.86	1.18	0.13
63	Jiangxi	Embankment in Shuanggang Town	29.03	116.59	UN	15.08	0.01			0.06	15.01
64	Shanghai	Nanhui Dongtan#	30.88	121.97	UN	14.78	0.03	0.01	3.83	8.93	1.98
65	Jiangsu	Hongze Lake#	33.37	118.63	PNR	14.25	5.56		8.62		0.07
66	Hubei	Donghu Lake	30.56	114.37	UN	13.34	6.82		0.03	0.09	6.40
67	Jiangxi	Nanshan Lake#	31.78	118.58	UN	12.38	8.30	0.27	0.67	0.20	2.94
68	Hubei	Shishoutian’e zhou#	29.70	112.43	NNR	11.80	0.12	0.08	0.56	2.91	8.13
69	Hubei	Zhangdu Lake	30.65	114.73	NR	11.38	0.04	0.56	5.58	1.78	3.42
70	Jiangxi	Liufang Lake#	28.93	116.21	UN	10.59			0.02		10.57
71	Anhui	Shibasuo	30.76	117.78	PNR	10.52	0.40	0.60	2.59	0.02	6.91
72	Jiangxi	Caowan Lake#	28.84	116.30	UN	10.51	0.15	9.93	0.41	0.01	0.01
73	Hubei	Honghu Lake*#	29.82	113.28	PNR	10.05		2.16	4.38	0.85	2.66
74	Anhui	Tangduo Lake	32.47	116.42	PNR	9.40	9.40
75	Hunan	Qingtanyuan	28.87	112.84	UN	8.93	0.01	0.04	0.11	0.42	8.35
76	Shanghai	Baogangshuiku	31.41	121.49	UN	8.55			5.08	3.13	0.34
77	Jiangxi	Jiujiang Lake#	29.70	115.74	UN	8.28	6.01	1.09	0.19		0.99
78	Anhui	Chenyao Lake	30.86	117.63	PNR	7.83	1.12	5.87	0.54	0.09	0.21
79	Jiangxi	Gushan Lake#	29.60	116.11	UN	7.81	0.18	0.02	6.23	0.45	0.93
80	Shanghai	Chongming north lake	31.68	121.62	UN	7.73			1.44	0.34	5.95
81	Jiangxi	Zhangong Lake#	28.88	116.67	UN	7.26	7.16		0.04	0.01	0.05
82	Jiangxi	Yaohu Lake	28.71	116.06	UN	7.21	1.52	0.47	4.39	0.45	0.38
83	Hubei	Futou Lake	29.99	114.26	UN	7.17	0.15	3.64	0.41	1.33	1.64
84	Hubei	Wuhu Lake	30.79	114.47	NR	7.09	0.21	1.26	2.98	0.96	1.68
85	Shanghai	Haiwan coast	30.83	121.52	UN	6.94			0.83	4.65	1.46
86	Jiangxi	Dahu Lake#	28.74	116.35	UN	6.54	4.76	1.78
87	Jiangxi	Shili Lake	29.41	116.01	UN	6.11	1.76	0.97	0.78	2.51	0.09
88	Hubei	Baiji Dolphin Reserve	29.83	112.58	UN	6.00					6.00

Table 2

Table 2

(Continued)"

No.	Region	Site name	Latitude		Feeding guilds
No.	Region	Site name	Latitude		Longitude	Protected area status	Importance Index	Tuber eaters	Grass eaters	Seed and aquatic vegetation eaters	Invertebrate eaters	Fish eaters
89	Shanghai	Jiuduansha	31.19	121.69		NNR	5.89	0.25		3.16	1.32	1.16
90	Hunan	Muping Lake	28.88	112.23		PNR	5.68	0.15	0.41		0.01	5.11
91	Jiangxi	Daming Lake#	29.02	116.52		UN	4.91	0.84	3.94	0.04	0.01	0.08
92	Hunan	Zhongzhou	29.02	112.15		UN	4.89			4.81		0.08
93	Hubei	Shangshe Lake	30.61	114.29		NR	4.74	0.02	3.06	1.07	0.34	0.25
94	Jiangsu	Longpao	32.20	118.95		UN	4.54	0.03		1.09	0.18	3.24
95	Jiangxi	Fanhu Lake	28.83	116.07		UN	4.53					4.53
96	Anhui	Chengdong Lake	32.33	116.38		UN	3.91		1.31	1.60		1.00
97	Jiangsu	Yangcheng Lake	31.46	120.78		UN	3.46			2.74	0.06	0.66
98	Hubei	Changhu Lake	30.42	112.40		NR	3.37			2.37	0.09	0.91
99	Hubei	Chidong Lake	30.10	115.40		UN	3.17			1.28	0.52	1.37
100	Shanghai	Chongming north coast	31.42	121.47		UN	2.97			2.22	0.12	0.63
101	Anhui	Shitang Lake	30.43	116.42		UN	2.96			0.04	0.01	2.91
102	Anhui	Pogang Lake	30.54	116.97		PNR	2.52	1.60	0.08	0.01	0.64	0.19
103	Hubei	Huangpohuanghualao	30.55	114.30		UN	2.47			0.83	0.59	1.05
104	Jiangxi	Nanxi Lake#	29.22	116.33		UN	2.33	1.87	0.10		0.35	0.01
105	Anhui	Chengxi Lake	32.35	116.20		UN	2.19		0.99			1.20
106	Jiangxi	Yugan Xi Lake	28.87	116.22		UN	2.16	2.08			0.08
107	Hubei	Huangmei Taibai Lake	29.96	115.78		UN	2.17		0.02	0.77	0.95	0.43
108	Hubei	Tongjia Lake	29.93	116.06		UN	2.03		0.04	1.36	0.31	0.32
109	Jiangxi	Fenghuangzhou	28.69	115.85		UN	2.02			0.04	1.84	0.14
110	Hubei	Houguan Lake	30.51	113.99		UN	1.95			0.79	0.31	0.85
111	Jiangxi	Dahukou	28.89	116.54		UN	1.92				0.03	1.89
112	Jiangxi	Yuanyang Lake	29.32	117.52		UN	1.90			1.82		0.08
113	Jiangsu	Chishan Lake	31.84	119.05		UN	1.88			0.51	0.98	0.39
114	Jiangxi	Wangluo Lake#	28.78	116.30		UN	1.70	1.61				0.09
115	Jiangxi	Chouchi Lake#	29.24	116.57		UN	1.67		1.67
116	Jiangsu	Yanweigang	34.47	119.78		UN	1.61				0.88	0.73
117	Shanghai	Changxing Island	31.62	121.50		UN	1.53			0.63	0.64	0.26
118	Jiangxi	Jiucai Lake#	29.00	116.65		UN	1.51			0.21	1.29	0.01
119	Shanghai	Minhang binjiang park	31.01	121.42		UN	1.49				0.05	1.44
120	Hunan	Hanshou Taibai Lake	29.07	112.15		UN	1.45			1.45
121	Shanghai	Xinghuo Farm	30.87	121.56		UN	1.44			0.04	0.79	0.61
122	Jiangxi	Qingshan Lake#	29.02	116.65		UN	1.41		1.02	0.04	0.29	0.06
123	Jiangsu	Dafeng Nature Reserve	33.20	120.46		NNR	1.34		0.04	0.06	0.81	0.43

Table 2

References 59

1	Amano T, Szekely T, Sandel B et al., 2018. Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance. Nature, 553(7687):199-202.
2	Ambal R, Duya M, Cruz M et al., 2012. Key biodiversity areas in the Philippines: Priorities for conservation. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 4(8):2788-2796.
3	Barter M, Lei G, Cao L , 2005. Waterbird Survey of the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Floodplain (February 2004). Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House.
4	Barter M, Lei G, Cao L , 2006. Waterbird Survey of the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Floodplain (February 2005). Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House.
5	Waterbird Specialist Group of Chinese Ornithological Association, 1994. Waterbird Research in China. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.
6	Bonn A, Gaston K J , 2005. Capturing biodiversity: Selecting priority areas for conservation using different criteria. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14(5):1083-1100.
7	Brooks T, Mittermeier R, Da Fonseca G et al., 2006. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science, 313(5783):58-61.
8	Cao L, Fox A D , 2009. Birds and people both depend on China’s wetlands. Nature, 460(7252):173-173.
9	Cao L, Tang S, Wang X et al., 2009. The importance of eastern China for shorebirds during the non-breeding season. Emu, 109(2):170-178.
10	Cao L, Zhang Y, Barter M et al., 2010. Anatidae in eastern China during the non-breeding season: Geographical distributions and protection status. Biological Conservation, 143(3):650-659.
11	Chape S, Harrison J, Spalding M et al., 2005. Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360(1454):443-455.
12	Cohn J P , 2008. Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3):192-197.
13	Cowling R M, Pressey R L, Rouget M et al., 2003. A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot - the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biological Conservation, 112(1/2):191-216.
14	Cui P, Wu Y, Ding H et al., 2014. Status of wintering waterbirds at selected locations in China. Waterbirds, 37(4):402-409.
15	Fishpool L, Evans M , 2001. Important Bird Areas (IBA) in Africa and associated islands: Priority sites for conservation. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International (Conservation Series No.11).
16	Fox A D, Cao L, Zhang Y et al., 2011. Declines in the tuber-feeding waterbird guild at Shengjin Lake National Nature Reserve, China: A barometer of submerged macrophyte collapse. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 21(1):82-91.
17	Freudenberger L, Hobson P, Schluck M et al., 2013. Nature conservation: Priority-setting needs a global change. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22(5):1255-1281.
18	Fu B J, Yu D D, Lu N , 2017. Indicator system for biodiversity and ecosystem services evaluation in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(2):341-348. (in Chinese)
19	Gao C, Zhang T L , 2010. Eutrophication in a Chinese context: Understanding various physical and socio-economic aspects. Ambio, 39(5/6):385-393.
20	Gu C, Hu L, Zhang X et al., 2011. Climate change and urbanization in the Yangtze River Delta. Habitat International, 35(4):544-552.
21	Guan L, Lei J L, Zuo A J et al., 2016. Optimizing the timing of water level recession for conservation of wintering geese in Dongting Lake, China. Ecological Engineering, 88:90-98.
22	Heiner M, Higgins J, Li X H et al., 2011. Identifying freshwater conservation priorities in the upper Yangtze River Basin. Freshwater Biology, 56(1):89-105.
23	Hoekstra J M, Boucher T M, Ricketts T H et al., 2005. Confronting a biome crisis: Global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecology Letters, 8(1):23-29.
24	Hu R, Wen C, Gu Y et al., 2017. A bird’s view of new conservation hotspots in China. Biological Conservation, 211:47-55.
25	Iwamura T, Possingham H P, Chades I et al., 2013. Migratory connectivity magnifies the consequences of habitat loss from sea-level rise for shorebird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, 280(1761):20130325.
26	Kear J , 2005. Ducks, Geese and Swans: Species Accounts (Cairina to Mergus). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27	Kirby J S, Stattersfield A J, Butchart S H M et al., 2008. Key conservation issues for migratory land- and waterbird species on the world’s major flyways. Bird Conservation International, 18(Suppl.1):S49-S73.
28	Kordi M N, O’Leary M , 2016. A spatial approach to improve coastal bioregion management of the north western Australia. Ocean & Coastal Management, 127:26-42.
29	Lei G, Lei J Y, Tao X et al., 2011. Report on waterbird survey of the Middle and Lower Yangtze in 2011. In: Living Yangtze Program, World Wide Fund for Nature China.
30	Li X Y, Liang L, Gong P et al., 2013. Bird watching in China reveals bird distribution changes. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(6):649-656.
31	Li Z W D, Mundkur T, Bakewell D et al., 2009. Status of waterbirds in Asia: Results of the Asian waterbird census, 1987-2007. Wetlands International Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
32	Ma Z J, Cai R, Li R et al., 2010. Managing wetland habitats for waterbirds: An international perspective. Wetlands, 2010,30(1):15-27.
33	Ma Z J, Chen Y, Melville D S et al., 2019. Changes in area and number of nature reserves in China. Conservation Biology, 33(5):1066-1075.
34	Mackinnon J, Verkuil Y I, Murray N , 2012. IUCN situation analysis on East and Southeast Asian intertidal habitats, with particular reference to the Yellow Sea (including the Bohai Sea). Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission 47.
35	Manel S, Williams H C, Ormerod S J , 2001. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: The need to account for prevalence. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38(5):921-931.
36	Margules C R, Pressey R L , 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature, 405:243-253.
37	Murray N J, Fuller R A , 2015. Protecting stopover habitat for migratory shorebirds in East Asia. Journal of Ornithology, 156:S217-S225.
38	Ramsar Convention Secretariat(RCS), 2010. Designating Ramsar sites: Strategic framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance. 4th ed. Ramsar Handbooks for the Wise Use of Wetlands Vol.17. Ramsar Convention Secretariat, Gland, Switzerland. www.ramsar.org/pdf/lib/hbk4-17.pdf.
39	Rodrigues A S L, Akcakaya H R, Andelman S J et al., 2004. Global gap analysis: Priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network. Bioscience, 54(12):1092-1100.
40	Runge C A, Watson J E M, Butchart S H M et al., 2015. Protected areas and global conservation of migratory birds. Science, 350(6265):1255-1258.
41	State Forestry Administration(SFA), 2014. The Second Investigation of Wetland Resources in China. http://xzsp.forestry.gov.cn/.(in Chinese)
42	Snall T, Kindvall O, Nilsson J et al., 2011. Evaluating citizen-based presence data for bird monitoring. Biological Conservation, 144(2):804-810.
43	Stralberg D, Cameron D R, Reynolds M D et al., 2011. Identifying habitat conservation priorities and gaps for migratory shorebirds and waterfowl in California. Biodiversity and Conservation, 20(1):19-40.
44	Sullivan B L, Wood C L, Iliff M J et al., 2009. eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biological Conservation, 142(10):2282-2292.
45	Tantipisanuh N, Gale G A , 2018. Identification of biodiversity hotspot in national level: Importance of unpublished data. Global Ecology & Conservation, 13:e00377.
46	Tao X, Lei J Y, Hearn R et al., 2015. Report on the Coordinated Survey for Wintering Waterbirds of the Central and Lower Yangtze. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House.
47	Tavares D C, Guadagnin D L, Moura J F D et al., 2015. Environmental and anthropogenic factors structuring waterbird habitats of tropical coastal lagoons: Implications for management. Biological Conservation, 186:12-21.
48	Vohland K, Mlambo M C, Horta L D et al., 2011. How to ensure a credible and efficient IPBES? Environmental Science & Policy, 14(8):1188-1194.
49	Wang S M, Dou H S , 1998. Lakes in China. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
50	Wang W J, Fraser J D, Chen J K , 2017. Wintering waterbirds in the middle and lower Yangtze River floodplain: Changes in abundance and distribution. Bird Conservation International, 27(2):167-186.
51	Wang Y, Jia Y, Guan L et al., 2013. Optimising hydrological conditions to sustain wintering waterbird populations in Poyang Lake National Natural Reserve: Implications for dam operations. Freshwater Biology, 58(11):2366-2379.
52	Wetlands International , 2015. Waterbird Population Estimates. 5th ed.http://wpe.wetlands.org/ .
53	Williams G, Stroud D A, Hirons G J M et al., 2016. Developing a quantitative index as a pragmatic aid to assessing implementation of European Union Birds Directive site protection measures for individual species. Bird Study, 63(4):1-12.
54	Xia S X, Yu X B, Millington S et al., 2017a. Identifying priority sites and gaps for the conservation of migratory waterbirds in China’s coastal wetlands. Biological Conservation, 210:72-82.
55	Xia S X, Wang Y Y, Lei G et al., 2017b. Restriction of herbivorous waterbird distributions in the middle and lower Yangtze River floodplain in view of hydrological isolation. Wetlands, 37:79-88.
56	Zhang L, Wang X, Zhang J J et al., 2017. Formulating a list of sites of waterbird conservation significance to contribute to China’s ecological protection red line. Bird Conservation International, 27(2):153-166.
57	Zhang Y, Fox A D, Cao L et al., 2019. Effects of ecological and anthropogenic factors on waterbird abundance at a Ramsar Site in the Yangtze River floodplain. Ambio, 48:293-303.
58	Zhao G H, Tian Y, Tang Z Y et al., 2013. Distribution of terrestrial national nature reserves in relation to human activities and natural environments in China. Biodiversity Science, 21(6):658-665. (in Chinese)
59	Zhao M, Cong P, Barter M et al., 2012. The changing abundance and distribution of Greater White-fronted Geese Anser albifrons in the Yangtze River floodplain: Impacts of recent hydrological changes. Bird Conservation International, 22(2):135-143.

Criteria	Source	Thresholds for identifying priority sites
Criterion 1 Sites in which a globally threatened species occurs in significant numbers	Criterion 2 for identifying Ramsar sites (Ramsar Convention Secretariat, 2010); Criterion A1 to determine Important Bird Area (Fishpool and Evans, 2001)	Regular presence of a single individual for Critically Endangered (CR) and Endangered (EN) species; presence of 30 individuals for Vulnerable species (VU) according to IUCN Red List category
Criterion 2 Sites that hold a significant proportion of the flyway population	Criterion 6 for identifying Ramsar sites (Ramsar Convention Secretariat, 2010); Criterion A4 to determine Important Bird Area (Fishpool and Evans, 2001)	Population exceeds 1% of flyway population (hereafter Ramsar 1% criterion)
Criterion 3 Sites that support a significant aggregation of individual waterbirds	Criterion 5 for identifying Ramsar sites (Ramsar Convention Secretariat, 2010)	Supports 20,000 or more waterbirds

Items (Regions)	Anhui	Hubei	Hunan	Jiangsu	Jiangxi	Shanghai	MLY
Number of suevey sites	32	71	43	64	78	21	309
Total Importance Index	672.44	610.66	677.87	154.27	5142.45	152.19	7409.88
Importance Index of sites being protected	661.22	516.69	660.72	121.98	3557.17	86.66	5604.44
Protected area (10³ ha)	328.51	289.44	485.64	533.47	341.94	93.88	2072.88
Proportion of protected area to wetland area (%)	31.5	20.0	47.6	18.9	34.6	20.2	26.90
Conservation gap rate (%)	30.0	52.0	58.3	62.5	75.8	75.0	62.10
Conservation Effectiveness Index (%)	98.3	84.6	97.5	79.1	69.1	56.9	75.63

No.	Region	Site name	Latitude					Feeding guilds
No.	Region	Site name	Latitude	Longitude	Protected area status	Importance Index	Tuber eaters	Grass eaters	Seed and aquatic vegetation eaters	Invertebrate eaters	Fish eaters
1	Jiangxi	Poyang Lake NNR*#	29.18	116.01	NNR	1235.50	465.97	168.91	99.57	314.15	186.90
2	Jiangxi	Duchang PNR#	29.14	116.35	PNR	522.31	170.50	90.47	109.79	104.68	46.87
3	Hunan	East Dongting Lake NNR*#	29.48	112.80	NNR	515.02	95.78	167.35	87.94	130.54	33.41
4	Jiangxi	Nanji wetland NNR*#	28.83	116.22	NNR	443.89	126.58	47.55	56.28	170.78	42.70
5	Jiangxi	Zhuhu Lake#	29.15	116.60	UN	356.14	123.89	8.05	86.41	26.24	111.55
6	Anhui	Shengjin Lake*#	30.35	117.08	NNR	280.10	103.25	58.73	28.12	43.56	46.44
7	Hubei/ Anhui	Longgan Lake#	30.08	116.15	PNR	249.25	170.67	19.99	3.89	4.98	49.72
8	Jiangxi	Hanchi Lake#	28.95	116.39	UN	234.42	161.89	9.12	3.24	18.46	41.71
9	Jiangxi	Dalianzi Lake#	28.91	116.53	UN	155.62	81.55	4.00	30.50	7.74	31.83
10	Jiangxi	Baishazhou#	29.20	116.65	NR	153.87	95.33	7.54	13.40	23.62	13.98
11	Jiangxi	Sanhu Lake#	28.91	116.27	NR	153.35	23.47	4.03	1.85	80.61	43.39
12	Jiangxi	Linchong Lake#	28.83	116.29	UN	152.54	41.21	12.93	9.92	71.90	16.58
13	Jiangxi	Qihu Lake#	28.77	116.40	UN	150.79	98.15	3.48	3.14	10.73	35.29
14	Jiangxi	Chihu Lake#	29.75	115.68	UN	137.57	11.98	13.81	105.27	3.29	3.22
15	Jiangxi	Nanhu Lake (in Gongqing)#	29.22	115.91	NR	135.20	103.88	0.06	0.56	16.24	14.46
16	Jiangxi	Chengjiachi#	28.81	116.33	UN	124.14	53.57	1.95	6.25	3.84	58.53
17	Jiangxi	Saicheng Lake	29.46	116.14	NR	122.25	52.92	10.53	48.85	3.96	5.99