Journal of Geographical Sciences ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 1249-1265.doi: 10.1007/s11442-020-1780-1
• Research Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
CAO Juan1, ZHANG Zhao1,*(), ZHANG Liangliang1, LUO Yuchuan1, LI Ziyue1, TAO Fulu2,3
Received:
2020-03-10
Accepted:
2020-05-12
Online:
2020-08-25
Published:
2020-10-25
Contact:
ZHANG Zhao
E-mail:zhangzhao@bnu.edu.cn
About author:
Cao Juan, PhD Candidate, specialized in agricultural disaters and agricultural insurance
Supported by:
CAO Juan, ZHANG Zhao, ZHANG Liangliang, LUO Yuchuan, LI Ziyue, TAO Fulu. Damage evaluation of soybean chilling injury based on Google Earth Engine (GEE) and crop modelling[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(8): 1249-1265.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
The observation information of key growth period, planting density and yield of crop fields"
Year | Crop field | Wuchagou | Xingsheng | Chuntinge | Chunlin | Naimuhe | Xiaokumo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | Sowing date | 16 May. | 18 May. | 1 May. | 18 May. | 28 May. | 11 May. |
Flowering date | 14 Jul. | 12 Jul. | 30 Jun. | 6 Jul. | 18 Jul. | 30 Jul. | |
Maturity date | 26 Sept. | 28 Sept. | 18 Sept. | 28 Sept. | 28 Sept. | 24 Sept. | |
Plant density (plants/m2) | 39.69 | 30.42 | 47.73 | 36.75 | 37.98 | 38.47 | |
Yield(kg/ha) | 1160 | 1350 | 1650 | 1150 | 610 | 1050 | |
2015 | Sowing date | 16 May. | 16 May. | 28 May. | 8 May. | 17 May. | 18 May. |
Flowering date | 16 Jul. | 10 Jul. | 2 Jul. | 12 Jul. | 16 Jul. | 8 Jul. | |
Maturity date | 16 Sept. | 14 Sept. | 28 Sept. | 28 Sept. | 28 Sept. | 8 Sept. | |
Plant density (plants/m2) | 47.94 | 35.6 | 38.18 | 26.24 | 25.84 | 28.58 | |
Yield(kg/ha) | 980 | 1100 | 1410 | 1030 | 510 | 860 | |
2016 | Sowing date | 6 Jun. | 16 May. | 6 May. | 22 May. | 18 May. | 18 May. |
Flowering date | 20 Jul. | 14 Jul. | 28 Jul. | 28 Jul. | 2 Jul. | 2 Jul. | |
Maturity date | 30 Sept. | 26 Sept. | 18 Sept. | 30 Sept. | 18 Sept. | 14 Sept. | |
Plant density (plants/m2) | 32.97 | 30.55 | 40.04 | 42.9 | 40.8 | 35.82 | |
Yield(kg/ha) | 1280 | 1450 | 1850 | 1370 | 670 | 1110 | |
2017 | Sowing date | 24 May. | 23 May. | 21 May. | 18 May. | 24 May. | 2 Jun. |
Flowering date | 8 Jul. | 12 Jul. | 22 Jul. | 8 Jul. | 1 Jul. | 14 Jul. | |
Maturity date | 28 Sept. | 24 Sept. | 22 Sept. | 18 Sept. | 18 Sept. | 24 Sept. | |
Plant density (plants/m2) | 43.5 | 35.76 | 27.56 | 36.9 | 40.6 | 52.36 | |
Yield(kg/ha) | 1350 | 1500 | 1240 | 1500 | 750 | 1200 |
Table 2
The basic information of six crop fields"
Crop field | Wuchagou | Xingsheng | Chuntinge | Chunlin | Naimuhe | Xiaokumo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Longitude (°) | 124.42 | 124.49 | 124.49 | 124.42 | 124.11 | 124.17 |
Latitude (°) | 50.10 | 49.97 | 49.83 | 49.83 | 49.4 | 49.7 |
Elevation (m) | 486 | 393 | 380 | 365 | 381 | 447 |
Cultivar | Heihe 38 | Heilong 35 | Hefeng 50 | Hefeng 25 | Hefeng 39 | Heihe 18 |
Maturity | Medium | Medium | Medium | Mid-late | Medium | Medium |
Cultivation way | Drilling | Drilling | Drilling | Ridge tillage | Drilling | Drilling |
Table 3
CROPGRO-Soybean model parameters and the genetic coefficients of crop fields"
Coefficient | Definition | Default value | Wuchagou | Xingsheng | Chuntinge | Chunlin | Naimuhe | Xiaokumo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSDL | Critical short day length below which reproductive development progresses with no day length effects (h) | 12.15 | 14.03 | 12.23 | 13.06 | 14.58 | 11.9 | 14.03 |
PPSEN | Slope of the relative response of development to photoperiod with time (1/h) | 0.2 | 0.235 | 0.294 | 0.287 | 0.229 | 0.146 | 0.304 |
EM-FL | Time between plant emergence and flower appearance (day) | 21 | 13.09 | 18.33 | 15.46 | 16.53 | 26.14 | 22.74 |
FL-SH | Time between first flower and first pod (day) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
FL-SD | Time between first flower and first seed (day) | 12 | 19.82 | 21.06 | 18.42 | 18.39 | 11.26 | 12.06 |
SD-PM | Time between first seed and physiological maturity (day) | 26 | 37.56 | 24.5 | 36.63 | 31.27 | 22.25 | 34.33 |
FL-LF | Time between first flower and end of leaf expansion (day) | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 |
LFMAX | Maximum leaf photosynthesis rate at 30℃, 350 vpm CO2, and high light (mg CO2/m2 s) | 1.03 | 1.023 | 1.052 | 1.034 | 1.011 | 1.196 | 1.257 |
SLAVR | Specific leaf area of cultivar under standard growth conditions (cm2/g) | 385 | 311.2 | 303.8 | 301 | 317.6 | 337.9 | 301.1 |
SIZLF | Maximum size of full leaf (three leaflets (cm2) | 137 | 138.1 | 145.1 | 138 | 141.2 | 188.5 | 217.6 |
XFRT | Maximum fraction of daily growth that is partitioned to seed+shell (-) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
WTPSD | Maximum weight per seed (g) | 0.155 | 0.162 | 0.157 | 0.161 | 0.181 | 0.195 | 0.186 |
SFDUR | Seed filling duration for pod cohort at standard growth conditions (day) | 22 | 25.42 | 24.88 | 24.22 | 25.36 | 21.62 | 21.94 |
SDPDV | Average seed per pod under standard growing conditions (numbers per pod) | 2.2 | 2.415 | 2.276 | 2.09 | 2.24 | 2.397 | 1.794 |
PODUR | Time required for cultivar to reach final pod load under optimal conditions (day) | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 |
Figure 6
The maximum LAI and its specific observation dates of early and late growing season windows obtained from Sentinel-2 in 2018 (a and c represent the maximum LAI and its specific observation dates of early growing season windows; b and d for late growing season windows, respectively)"
Figure 7
Estimated yields by calibrated CROPGRO-Soybean model under different cold injury scenarios (scenarios S1, S2 and S3 are set as reducing 3℃, 2℃ and 1℃ at the whole growth stages, respectively. Scenario N4 is set as actual weather. Scenarios S5, S6, S7 and S8 are set randomly as minimum temperature of 0℃ for 5 consecutive days during the periods from seedling emergence to flowering stage, flowering stage to pod bearing stage, and pod bearing stage to filling stage, and filling stage to maturity stage, respectively.)"
Table 4
The estimated yield losses of soybean at town level"
Town | Yield loss (%) | Town | Yield loss (%) | Town | Yield loss (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Karichu | 21.23 | Wobei | 29.77 | Xiangyang | 24.35 |
Lingnan | 14.64 | Zhaxi | 19.54 | Wuerqi | 31.14 |
Neerkeqi | 22.61 | Wuchagou | 15.86 | Chaoyangliehu | 21.19 |
Qingsonggou | 24.52 | Naimuhe | 25.15 | Shiliudongfang | 32.28 |
Tuanjie | 19.38 | Maweishan | 18.34 | Nuominghe | 6.54 |
Yuchang | 8.76 | Kuweidi | 22.58 | Xiaoerhong | 18.08 |
Xinxing | 9.55 | Yuejing | 28.83 | Longtou | 29.25 |
Oukenhe | 18.24 | Kuilehe | 5.29 | Xinfeng | 20.63 |
Xingsheng | 28.04 | Dongsheng | 21.52 | Woluohe | 30.79 |
Ershili | -29.94 | Xiaokumo | 17.63 | Tiedong | 30.05 |
Wulubutie | 9.53 | Doushigou | 21.30 | Dakumo | 21.58 |
Hongqi | 22.65 | Chaoyanggou | 22.67 | Ergenghe | 7.97 |
Maanshan | 18.52 | Xinfa | 26.92 | Dongsheng | 21.52 |
Chunlin | 26.02 | Chuntinge | 16.09 | Maojiapu | 18.77 |
[1] |
Angstrom A, 1924. Solar and terrestrial radiation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 50(210):121-126.
doi: 10.1002/qj.49705021008 |
[2] |
Anthony N R, Anatoly G, Yi P et al., 2012. Green leaf area index estimation in maize and soybean: Combining vegetation indices to achieve maximal sensitivity. Agronomy Journal, 104(5):1336-1337.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2012.0065 |
[3] |
Boote K J, Jones J W, Batchelor W D et al., 2003. Genetic coefficients in the CROPGRO-soybean model. Agronomy Journal, 95(1):32-51.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2003.0032 |
[4] | Chen D, 2017. Study on monitoring and evaluating the chilling injury of rice in northeast China by remote sensing and crop model[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Information Technology. (in Chinese) |
[5] | Chen Z X, Ren J Q, Tang H J et al., 2016. Progress and perspectives on agricultural remote sensing research and applications in China. Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(5):748-767. (in Chinese) |
[6] |
Das A, Parida S K, 2014. Advances in biotechnological applications in three important food legumes. Plant Biotechnology Reports, 8(2):83-99.
doi: 10.1007/s11816-013-0299-7 |
[7] | Fang H, Zhang Y, Wei S, et al. 2019. Validation of global moderate resolution leaf area index (LAI) products over croplands in northeastern China. Remote Sensing of Environment, 233:11377. |
[8] |
Gorelick N, Hancher M, Dixon M et al., 2017. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202(3):18-27.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031 |
[9] |
Han R Q, Li W J, Ai W X et al., 2010. The climatic variability and influence of first frost dates in Northern China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 65(5):525-532. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11821/xb201005002 |
[10] | Hao T Y, Wang S G, Shang K Z et al., 2010. Research progress and outlook of low temperature chilling injury in Northeast China. Meteorological and Environmental Research, 11(3):85-91. |
[11] | Hellal F A, Abdelhamid T, 2013. Nutrient management practices for enhancing soybean (glycine max l.) production. Acta Biologica Colombiana, 18(2):3-14. |
[12] |
Jiang H, Hu H, Zhong R et al., 2019. A deep learning approach to conflating heterogeneous geospatial data for corn yield estimation: A case study of the US Corn Belt at the county level. Global Change Biology, 26(3):1754-1766.
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14885 pmid: 31789455 |
[13] |
Jones J W, Hoogenboom G, Porter C H et al., 2003. The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy, 18(34):235-265.
doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00107-7 |
[14] | Li W B, Song C X, Chang X C et al., 2019. Drought resistance evaluation of 20 soybean varieties under drought stress. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 50(4):1-10. (in Chinese) |
[15] |
Liu X, Jin J, Wang G et al., 2008. Soybean yield physiology and development of high-yielding practices in Northeast China. Field Crops Research, 105(3):157-171.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.09.003 |
[16] | Liu D, Yu C L, Du C Y, 2016a. Dynamic monitoring rice delayed type chilling damage based on remote sensing in Northeast China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 32(15):157-164. (in Chinese) |
[17] | Liu X F, Ma S Q, Zhao H Q et al., 2016b. Evaluation on maize chilling injury based on WOFOST model in Hetao irrigation region in Inner Mongolia. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 37(3):352-360. |
[18] |
Liu X F, Zhang Z, Shuai J B et al., 2012. Effect of chilling injury on rice yield in Heilongjiang Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(9):1223-1232. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.11821/xb201209007 |
[19] |
Lobell D B, Thau D, Seifert C et al., 2015. A scalable satellite-based crop yield mapper. Remote Sensing of Environment, 164(11):324-333.
doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.04.021 |
[20] | Ma S Q, Xi Z X, Wang Q, 2003. Risk evaluation of cold damage to corn in Northeast China. Journal of Natural Disasters, 12(3):137-141. (in Chinese) |
[21] | Pang T H, Fang Z S, Zhao H K, et al., 1983. Crop Low Temperature Damage and Its Defense. Beijing: Agriculture Press. (in Chinese) |
[22] | Pang Z K, 2015. Integration of remote sensing and crop growth model for regional low temperature impact monitoring early warning and yield estimation[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2015. (in Chinese) |
[23] | Sang S P, 2013. Study on measures to cope with low temperature damage in different growth stages of soybean, Soybean Science & Technology, 5(1):53-54. (in Chinese) |
[24] |
Sinclair T R, Rawlins S L, 1993. Inter-seasonal variation in soybean and maize yields under global environmental change. Agronomy Journal, 85(2):406-409.
doi: 10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500020043x |
[25] | Tomar I S, Badaya A K, Vani D K et al., 2009. Impact of front line demonstrations on soybean by adoption of improved production technology. Soybean Research, 7:106-110. |
[26] | Wang X L, Wang F T, Qiu G W, 1995. Application of optimizing theory to determining genetic parameters involved in CERES-Soybean model. Journal of Applied Meteorology, a01:49-54. (in Chinese) |
[27] |
Yang J, Ye W, Wang X et al., 2020. An Improved Method for the Identification of Soybean Resistance to Phytophthora sojae applied to germplasm resources from the Huanghuaihai and Dongbei regions of China. Plant Disease, 104(2):408-413.
doi: 10.1094/PDIS-01-19-0168-RE pmid: 31790644 |
[28] |
Zhang J P, Wang C Y, Zhao Y X et al., 2012. Impact evaluation of low temperature to yields of maize in Northeast China based on crop growth model. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32(13):4132-4138. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.5846/stxb |
[29] | Zhang S L, 2017. Analysis on the characteristics of chilling injury in Oroqen. Agricultural Engineering and Energy, 48(4):181-182. (in Chinese) |
[30] | Zhou L W, 2017. Spatiotemporal characteristics of maize low temperature and cold damage and its effect on maize yield in Heilongjiang Province[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University. (in Chinese) |
[31] |
Zhu D W, Jin Z Q, 2008. Impacts of changes in both climate and its variability on food production in Northeast China. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 34(9):1588-1597. (in Chinese)
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01588 |
[1] | Yue DOU, Felipe Bicudo da SILVA Ramon, Hongbo YANG, Jianguo LIU. Spillover effect offsets the conservation effort in the Amazon [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(11): 1715-1732. |
[2] | LIU Xiaofei, ZHANG Zhao, SHUAI Jiabing, WANG Pin, SHI Wenjiao, TAO Fulu, CHEN Yi. Impact of chilling injury and global warming on rice yield in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2013, 23(1): 85-97. |
|