Journal of Geographical Sciences ›› 2020, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 553-568.doi: 10.1007/s11442-020-1742-7
• Special Issue: Development and Protection of Territorial Space in the Yangtze River Economic Belt • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHENG Liang1, LIU Hai1,4, HUANG Yuefei1, YIN Shoujing2, JIN Gui3,*()
Received:
2019-04-25
Accepted:
2019-12-29
Online:
2020-04-25
Published:
2020-06-25
Contact:
JIN Gui
E-mail:jingui@igsnrr.ac.cn
About author:
Zheng Liang (1994-), Master Candidate, specialized in integrated watershed management. E-mail: 1241580102@qq.com
Supported by:
ZHENG Liang, LIU Hai, HUANG Yuefei, YIN Shoujing, JIN Gui. Assessment and analysis of ecosystem services value along the Yangtze River under the background of the Yangtze River protection strategy[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(4): 553-568.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 1
Classification of ecosystem services"
Provisioning services | Regulating services | Supporting services | Cultural services |
---|---|---|---|
Food production (FP) Raw material production (RP) Water supply (WS) | Gas regulation (GR) Climate regulation (CR) Environmental purification (EP) Hydrological regulation (HR) | Soil retention (SR) Species diversity (SD) | Aesthetic landscapes (AL) |
Table 2
Ecosystem service equivalent value per unit area (yuan/ha)"
Ecosystem service equivalent value per unit area | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ecosystem classification | Provisioning services | Regulating services | Supporting services | Cultural services | |||||||
Primary classification | Secondary classification | FP | RP | WS | GR | CR | EP | HR | SR | SD | AL |
Farmland | Dry land | 0.85 | 0.4 | 0.02 | 0.67 | 0.36 | 0.1 | 0.27 | 1.03 | 0.13 | 0.06 |
Paddy field | 1.36 | 0.09 | -2.63 | 1.11 | 0.57 | 0.17 | 2.72 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.09 | |
Forest | Coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest | 0.31 | 0.71 | 0.37 | 2.35 | 7.03 | 1.99 | 3.51 | 2.86 | 2.6 | 1.14 |
Grassland | Shrub | 0.19 | 0.43 | 0.22 | 1.41 | 4.23 | 1.28 | 3.35 | 1.72 | 1.57 | 0.69 |
Shrubs | 0.38 | 0.56 | 0.31 | 1.97 | 5.21 | 1.72 | 3.82 | 2.4 | 2.18 | 0.96 | |
Wetlands | Wetlands | 0.51 | 0.5 | 2.59 | 1.9 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 24.23 | 2.31 | 7.87 | 4.73 |
Desert | Desert | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.1 | 0.31 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.05 |
Bare land | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
Waters | River system | 0.8 | 0.23 | 8.29 | 0.77 | 2.29 | 5.55 | 102.24 | 0.93 | 2.55 | 1.89 |
Table 3
Correction of the ecosystem services value per unit area (yuan/ha) of the Yangtze River Basin"
Equivalent factor | China | Qinghai | Tibet | Sichuan | Yunnan | Chong-qing | Hubei | Hunan | Jiangxi | Anhui | Jiangsu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | 481.19 | 359.49 | 518.53 | 487 | 346.53 | 498.41 | 550.65 | 572.8 | 519.6 | 450.43 | 592.64 |
2017 | 532.66 | 349.69 | 540.32 | 525.41 | 419.84 | 504.3 | 562.41 | 593.69 | 561.09 | 506.25 | 633.41 |
Table 4
Value of different ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Basin in 2017 (billion yuan)"
Region | Upper reaches | Middle reaches | Lower reaches | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 km | 2 km | 1 km | 2 km | 1 km | 2 km | ||
Provisioning services | FP | 1.83 | 3.05 | 1.76 | 2.69 | 1.35 | 2.00 |
RP | 1.35 | 2.41 | 0.53 | 0.76 | 0.38 | 0.51 | |
WS | 4.92 | 4.42 | 6.25 | 5.26 | 6.43 | 5.97 | |
Regulating services | GR | 4.94 | 8.87 | 2.29 | 3.53 | 1.62 | 2.35 |
CR | 12.84 | 22.85 | 4.90 | 6.93 | 3.49 | 4.46 | |
EP | 7.17 | 10.29 | 6.12 | 7.03 | 5.52 | 6.19 | |
HR | 76.70 | 86.75 | 99.26 | 107.53 | 92.84 | 101.17 | |
Supporting services | SR | 5.36 | 9.49 | 1.92 | 2.65 | 1.43 | 1.78 |
SD | 6.15 | 10.02 | 3.65 | 4.57 | 3.29 | 3.87 | |
Cultural services | AL | 3.23 | 4.96 | 2.36 | 2.82 | 2.21 | 2.54 |
Table 5
Ecosystem services value of provinces in 1 km along the Yangtze River in 2017 (billion yuan)"
Province | Provisioning services | Regulating services | Supporting services | Cultural services | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FP | RP | WS | GR | CR | EP | HR | SR | SD | AL | |
Qinghai | 0.0888 | 0.0865 | 0.5345 | 0.2902 | 0.8274 | 0.5401 | 6.5251 | 0.3537 | 0.4219 | 0.2317 |
Tibet | 0.0497 | 0.0696 | 0.0951 | 0.2322 | 0.6378 | 0.2315 | 1.1288 | 0.2845 | 0.2641 | 0.1217 |
Sichuan | 0.5278 | 0.4126 | 1.2240 | 1.4929 | 3.8585 | 1.9934 | 19.4919 | 1.6417 | 1.8025 | 0.9243 |
Yunnan | 0.4623 | 0.4130 | 0.7399 | 1.4977 | 3.9535 | 1.7036 | 13.3708 | 1.6477 | 1.7023 | 0.8297 |
Chongqing | 0.7058 | 0.3711 | 2.3247 | 1.4290 | 3.5615 | 2.6985 | 36.1861 | 1.4362 | 1.9590 | 1.1249 |
Hubei | 1.2793 | 0.4184 | 5.0206 | 1.7553 | 3.9179 | 4.7731 | 76.7507 | 1.5561 | 2.8869 | 1.8580 |
Hunan | 0.1489 | 0.0312 | 0.3402 | 0.1603 | 0.2808 | 0.3909 | 6.5989 | 0.1029 | 0.2228 | 0.1475 |
Jiangxi | 0.3294 | 0.0763 | 0.8858 | 0.3731 | 0.6996 | 0.9517 | 15.9076 | 0.2617 | 0.5429 | 0.3579 |
Anhui | 0.6930 | 0.1949 | 2.6488 | 0.8452 | 1.7636 | 2.4713 | 41.0256 | 0.7056 | 1.4649 | 0.9679 |
Jiangsu | 0.5792 | 0.1668 | 3.6851 | 0.6678 | 1.5509 | 2.8647 | 49.5145 | 0.6443 | 1.6248 | 1.1231 |
Shanghai | 0.0743 | 0.0214 | 0.0947 | 0.1034 | 0.1728 | 0.1803 | 2.3006 | 0.0784 | 0.1977 | 0.1202 |
Total | 4.9383 | 2.2616 | 17.5933 | 8.8472 | 21.2243 | 18.7990 | 268.8007 | 8.7127 | 13.0897 | 7.8070 |
Table 6
Ecosystem services value of provinces in the 2 km along the Yangtze River in 2017 (billion yuan)"
Province | Provisioning services | Regulating services | Supporting services | Cultural services | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FP | RP | WS | GR | CR | EP | HR | SR | SD | AL | |
Qinghai | 0.1360 | 0.1658 | 0.6309 | 0.5587 | 1.5916 | 0.8025 | 7.6446 | 0.6807 | 0.7299 | 0.3721 |
Tibet | 0.0921 | 0.1356 | 0.1295 | 0.4485 | 1.2359 | 0.4127 | 1.4988 | 0.5502 | 0.4970 | 0.2242 |
Sichuan | 0.9252 | 0.7399 | 1.0231 | 2.7135 | 6.9125 | 2.9420 | 22.3420 | 2.9174 | 2.9888 | 1.4504 |
Yunnan | 0.7629 | 0.7825 | 0.7285 | 2.8046 | 7.5283 | 2.7674 | 15.9221 | 3.1201 | 3.0620 | 1.4293 |
Chongqing | 1.1381 | 0.5844 | 1.9039 | 2.3408 | 5.5787 | 3.3670 | 39.3446 | 2.2183 | 2.7440 | 1.4803 |
Hubei | 2.0489 | 0.6096 | 4.1675 | 2.7886 | 5.5997 | 5.5100 | 83.2283 | 2.1601 | 3.6448 | 2.2321 |
Hunan | 0.2524 | 0.0452 | 0.2274 | 0.2627 | 0.3933 | 0.4650 | 7.6276 | 0.1352 | 0.2814 | 0.1797 |
Jiangxi | 0.3853 | 0.1015 | 0.8639 | 0.4829 | 0.9351 | 1.0541 | 16.6703 | 0.3547 | 0.6477 | 0.4092 |
Anhui | 1.0070 | 0.2531 | 2.3904 | 1.1915 | 2.2195 | 2.7624 | 44.6651 | 0.8684 | 1.7111 | 1.1021 |
Jiangsu | 0.8026 | 0.2086 | 3.5493 | 0.9202 | 1.8903 | 3.1166 | 52.6429 | 0.7676 | 1.8346 | 1.2410 |
Shanghai | 0.1869 | 0.0442 | 0.0316 | 0.2337 | 0.3500 | 0.3094 | 3.8588 | 0.1471 | 0.3275 | 0.1942 |
Total | 7.7373 | 3.6705 | 15.6460 | 14.746 | 34.2348 | 23.5090 | 295.4449 | 13.9198 | 18.4686 | 10.3145 |
[1] | Anselin L , 1995. Local indicators of spatial association: LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2):93-115. |
[2] | Berta M L, Erik G B, Marina G L et al., 2014. Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecological Indicators, 37(A):220-228. |
[3] | Bolliger J, Bttig M, Gallati J et al., 2011. Landscape multifunctionality: A powerful concept to identify effects of environmental change. Regional Environment Change, 11:203-206. |
[4] | Chen W, Li J, Zhu L , 2019. Spatial heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis of ecosystem services value in the Middle Yangtze River region. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(2):325-337. (in Chinese) |
[5] | Cheng J, Cheng J, Wu J et al., 2017. Changes of land use and ecosystem service functions in Yangtze River Basin from 2000-2010. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 26(6):894-901. (in Chinese) |
[6] | Costanza R, Ralph d’Arge, Rudolf G et al., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. World Environment, 387(1):3-15. |
[7] | Daily G C, Polasky S, Goldstein J et al., 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 7(1):21-28. |
[8] | Fisher B, Turner R K , 2008. Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation. Biological Conservation, 141(5):1167-1169. |
[9] | Fu B , 2010. Trends and priority areas in ecosystem research of China. Geographical Research, 29(3):383-396. (in Chinese) |
[10] | Fu B, Yu D, Lv N , 2017. Indicator systems and methods for evaluating biodiversity and ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(2):341-348. (in Chinese) |
[11] | Huang C, Yang J, Zhang W , 2013. Development of ecosystem services evaluation models: Research progress. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 32(12):3360-3367. (in Chinese) |
[12] | Xu H, Newton A, Wolanski E et al., 2015. The fate of phosphorus in the Yangtze (Changjiang) Estuary, China, under multi-stressors: Hindsight and forecast. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 20(9):1-6. |
[13] | Jin G, Chen K, Wang P et al., 2019. Trade-offs in land-use competition and sustainable land development in the North China Plain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141:36-46. |
[14] | Jin G, Deng X Z, Zhao X D et al., 2018. Spatiotemporal patterns in urbanization efficiency within the Yangtze River Economic Belt between 2005 and 2014. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(8):1113-1126. |
[15] | Jin G, Li Z H, Deng X Z et al., 2019. An analysis of spatiotemporal patterns in Chinese agricultural productivity between 2004 and 2014. Ecological Indicators, 105:591-600. |
[16] | Kreuter U, Hrris H, Malock M et al., 2001. Change in ecosystem service values in the San Antonio area, Texas. Ecological Economics, 39(3):333-346. |
[17] | Li S C, Bing Z L, Jin G , 2019. Spatially explicit mapping of soil conservation service in monetary units due to land use/cover change for the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Remote Sensing, 11(4):468. |
[18] | Liu H, Wu J, Chen X , 2018. Study on spatial-temporal change and trade-off/synergy relationships of ecosystem services in the Danjiangkou water area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(13):4609-4624. (in Chinese) |
[19] | Liu Y, Long H , 2017. Study on the spatiotemporal patterns of land use transition and its impact on ecological service function of the middle of Yangtze River Economic Belt. Economic Geography, 37(11):161-170. (in Chinese) |
[20] | Meijer K , 2008. Ecosystems and human well-being: Our human planet: Summary for decision makers (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series). Journal of Chromatography A, 1180(1/2):66-72. |
[21] | Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA), 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. Washington DC: World Resources Institute. |
[22] | National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China, 2010. Chinese Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. |
[23] | National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China, 2017. China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. |
[24] | Nieto-Romero M, Oteros-Rozas E, González, José A et al., 2014. Exploring the knowledge landscape of ecosystem services assessments in Mediterranean agroecosystems: Insights for future research. Environmental Science & Policy, 37(3):121-133. |
[25] | Ouyang Z, Wang X, Miao H , 1999. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 19(5):607-613. (in Chinese) |
[26] | Priess J, Minler M, Klein A , 2007. Linking deforestation scenarios to pollination services and economic return in coffee agroforestry systems. Ecological Applications, 17:407-417. |
[27] | Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G D, Mooney B H A , 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(11):5242-5247. |
[28] | The Price Department of the State Development and Reform Commission of China, 2011. National Agricultural Products Cost Return Assembly. Beijing: China Statistics Press. |
[29] | Wang L, He Q , 2015. A review of the ecosystem value based on emergy theory. Ecological Economy, 31(4):133-136. (in Chinese) |
[30] | Wiens J , 2009. Landscape ecology as a foundation for sustainable conservation. Landscape Ecology, 24:105-1065. |
[31] | Wilson C L, Matthews W H , 1970. Mans impact on the global environment: Assessment and recommendations for action. Report of the Study of Critical Environment Problems (SCEP) 1970. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 319. |
[32] | Xie G, Zhang C, Zhang L et al., 2015. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area. Journal of Natural Resources, 30(8):1243-1254. (in Chinese) |
[33] | Xie G, Zhen L, Lu C et al., 2008. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 23(5):911-919. (in Chinese) |
[34] | Yang R J, Wang L J, Liu W L et al., 2019. Design and progress of joint research on ecological environment protection and restoration of the Yangtze River. Environment and Sustainable Development, 44(5):37-42. (in Chinese) |
[35] | Yang S, Hu S, Qu S , 2018. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service value in middle Yangtze River Economic Region from 1990 to 2014. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 25(3):164-169. (in Chinese) |
[1] | GAO Jiangbo, ZUO Liyuan. Revealing ecosystem services relationships and their driving factors for five basins of Beijing [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2021, 31(1): 111-129. |
[2] | GAO Yang, JIA Junjie, LU Yao, SUN Xiaomin, WEN Xuefa, HE Nianpeng, YANG Tiantian. Progress in watershed geography in the Yangtze River Basin and the affiliated ecological security perspective in the past 20 years, China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(6): 867-880. |
[3] | Xiaoyun HOU, Shengyan DING, Shuang ZHAO, Xiaobo LIU. The response of spiders to less-focused non-crop habitats in the agricultural landscape along the lower reach of the Yellow River [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(7): 1113-1126. |
[4] | Li ZENG, Jing LI. A Bayesian belief network approach for mapping water conservation ecosystem service optimization region [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(6): 1021-1038. |
[5] | Rubo ZHOU, Meizhen LIN, Jianzhou GONG, Zhuo WU. Spatiotemporal heterogeneity and influencing mechanism of ecosystem services in the Pearl River Delta from the perspective of LUCC [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(5): 831-845. |
[6] | Yuanyuan LI, Minghong TAN, Haiguang HAO. The impact of global cropland changes on terrestrial ecosystem services value, 1992-2015 [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(3): 323-333. |
[7] | Lijie SHAN, Liping ZHANG, Jiyun SONG, Yanjun ZHANG, Dunxian SHE, Jun XIA. Characteristics of dry-wet abrupt alternation events in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River Basin and the relationship with ENSO [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(8): 1039-1058. |
[8] | Zhan TIAN, Yinghao JI, Laixiang SUN, Xinliang XU, Dongli FAN, Honglin ZHONG, Zhuoran LIANG, Gunther FICSHER. Changes in production potentials of rapeseed in the Yangtze River Basin of China under climate change:A multi-model ensemble approach [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(11): 1700-1714. |
[9] | Pengtao WANG, Liwei ZHANG, Yingjie LI, Lei JIAO, Hao WANG, Junping YAN, Yihe LÜ, Bojie FU. Spatio-temporal variations of the flood mitigation service of ecosystem under different climate scenarios in the Upper Reaches of Hanjiang River Basin, China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(10): 1385-1398. |
[10] | Bingzhen DU, Lin ZHEN, Yunfeng HU, Huimin YAN, GROOT Rudolf DE, Rik LEEMANS. Comparison of ecosystem services provided by grasslands with different utilization patterns in China’s Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(10): 1399-1414. |
[11] | Shicheng LI, Zhaofeng WANG, Yili ZHANG. Crop cover reconstruction and its effects on sediment retention in the Tibetan Plateau for 1900-2000 [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017, 27(7): 786-800. |
[12] | Yingjie LI, Liwei ZHANG, Junping YAN, Pengtao WANG, Ningke HU, Wei CHENG, Bojie FU. Mapping the hotspots and coldspots of ecosystem services in conservation priority setting [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017, 27(6): 681-696. |
[13] | Zhongxue ZHOU, Mengtao LI. Spatial-temporal change in urban agricultural land use efficiency from the perspective of agricultural multi-functionality: A case study of the Xi’an metropolitan zone [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017, 27(12): 1499-1520. |
[14] | Xiangzheng DENG, Zhihui LI, GIBSON John. A review on trade-off analysis of ecosystem services for sustainable land-use management [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26(7): 953-968. |
[15] | Li WANG, Xinfa QIU, Peifa WANG, Xiaoying WANG, Aili LIU. Influence of complex topography on global solar radiation in the Yangtze River Basin [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 24(6): 980-992. |
|