Comprehensive methods for measuring regional multidimensional development and their applications in China

doi:10.1007/s11442-018-1549-y

Abstract

Abstract:

National and international research on regional development has matured from the use of single elements and indicators to the application of comprehensive multi-element and multi-indicator measures. We selected 12 indicators from six dimensions for analysis in this study, including income, consumption, education, population urbanization, traffic, and indoor living facilities. We then proposed the polyhedron method to comprehensively measure levels of regional multidimensional development. We also enhanced the polygon and vector sum methods to render them more suitable for studying the status of regional multidimensional development. Finally, we measured levels of regional multidimensional development at county, city, and provincial scales across China and analyzed spatial differences using the three methods above and the weighted sum method applied widely. The results of this study reveal the presence of remarkable regional differences at the county scale across China in terms of single and multidimensional levels of regional development. Analyses show that values of the regional multidimensional development index (RMDI) are high in eastern coastal areas, intermediate in the midlands and in northern border regions, and low in the southwest and in western border regions. Districts characterized by enhanced and the highest levels of this index are distributed in eastern coastal areas, including cities in central and western regions, as well as areas characterized by the development of energy and mineral resources. The regional distribution of reduced and the lowest levels of this index is consistent with concentrations of areas that have always been impoverished. Correlation analyses of the results generated by the four methods at provincial, city, and county scales show that all are equivalent in practical application and can be used to generate satisfactory measures for regional multidimensional development. Additional correlation analyses between RMDI values calculated using the polyhedron method and per capita gross domestic product (GDP) demonstrate that the latter is not a meaningful proxy for the level of regional multidimensional development.

Key words: regional multidimensional development, comprehensive methods, polyhedron method, polygon method, vector sum method, weighted sum method, China

Yong XU, Jian DUAN, Xiaoren XU. Comprehensive methods for measuring regional multidimensional development and their applications in China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(8): 1182-1196.

Figures/Tables 10

Table 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Table 2

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Table 3

Figure 7

References 30

1	Barro R J, Lee J W, 2010. A new data set of educational attainment in the World, 1950-2010.Journal of Development Economics, 104: 184-198.
2	Ediger V S, Tatlidil H, 2006. Energy as an indicator of human development: A statistical approach.The Journal of Energy and Development, 31(2): 213-232.
3	Fan Jie, 2015. Draft of major function oriented zoning of China.Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(2): 186-201. (in Chinese)
4	Fang Chuanglin, Mao Hanying, 1999. A system of indicators for regional development planning.Acta Geographica Sinica, 54(5): 410-419. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.1999.05.004
5	Fu Wei, Zhao Junquan, Du Guozhen, 2014. The evaluation of resources sustainable utilization: Based on empirical analysis of resources welfare index.Journal of Natural Resources, 29(11): 1902-1914. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2014.11.009
6	Fukuda-Parr S, Lawson-Remer T, Randolph S, 2010. An index of economic and social rights fulfilment: Concept and methodology.Journal of Human Rights, 8(3): 195-221. doi: 10.1080/14754830903110194
7	Galbraith J K, 1958. The Affluent Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
8	Grimm M, Harttgen K, Klasen Set al., 2008. A human development index by income groups.World Development, 36(12): 2527-2546. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.12.001
9	Jin F J, Wang C J, Li X Wet al., 2010. China’s regional transport dominance: Density, proximity, and accessibility.Journal of Geographical Sciences, 20(2): 295-309. doi: 10.1007/s11442-010-0295-6
10	Li X J, Luo Q, Hai B Bet al., 2016. Progress in the micro-perspective studies of economic geography in China since 1980s.Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(8): 1041-1056. doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1314-z
11	Liang Hong, 1994. Applicable appraise for population quality life index. Chinese Journal of Social Medicine, 6: 12-13, 16. (in Chinese)
12	Lin Yifu, Liu Peilin, 2003. Chinese development strategy and economic convergence.Economic Research Journal, 3: 19-25, 89. (in Chinese)
13	Liu Hui, 2006. Regional inequality measurement: methods and evaluations.Geographical Research, 25(4): 710-718. (in Chinese) doi: 10.1016/S1005-8885(07)60093-4
14	Liu W D, Song Z Y, Liu Z G, 2016. Progress of economic greography in China’s mainland since 2000. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 26(8): 1019-1040. doi: 10.1007/s11442-016-1313-0
15	Liu Y H, Xu Y, 2015. A geographic identification of multidimensional poverty in rural China under the framework of sustainable livelihoods analysis.Applied Geography, 73: 62-76. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.06.004
16	Lu Kangqiang, 2012. Component equilibrium: An improved composite method and its empirical test for HDI.Statistical Research, 29(10): 45-51. (in Chinese)
17	Mahbubul H, 1999. Reflections on Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
18	Mishan E J, 1967. The Cost of Economic Growth. London: Staples Press.
19	Morris M D, 1978. A physical quality of life index.Urban Ecology, 3(3): 225-240. doi: 10.1016/0304-4009(78)90015-3
20	Noorbakhsh F, 1998. A modified Human development index.World Development, 26(3): 517-528. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(97)10063-8
21	Nussbaum M C, 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22	Pradhan R, Sanyal G S, 2011. Good governance and human development: Evidence from Indian States.Journal of Social and Development Science, 1(1): 1-8.
23	Salvati L, Venanzoni G, Carlucci M, 2016. Towards (spatially) unbalanced development? A joint assessment of regional disparities in socioeconomic and territorial variables in Italy.Land Use Policy, 51: 229-235. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.013
24	Sen A, 1991. Welfare, preference, and freedom.Journal of Econometrics, 50(1/2): 15-29. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(91)90087-T
25	Silva R, Ferreira-Lopes A, 2014. A regional development index for Portugal.Social Indicators Research, 118: 1055-1085. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0455-z
26	UNDP, 1990. Human Development Report 1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
27	The State Council, 2010. National Major Function Zoning. The State Council Article No.46 in 2010. (in Chinese)
28	United Nations, 1954. Report on International Definition and Measurement of Standards and Levels of Living. New York: United Nations.
29	Wang Xiaolu, Fan Gang, 2004. Analysis on the regional disparity in China and the influential factors.Economic Research Journal, (1): 33-44. (in Chinese)
30	Xu Yong, Fan Jie, 2014. Index system for regional development disparity measurement.Progress in Geography, 33(9): 1159-1166. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.09.003

Element	Feature indicator/ Dimension	Attribute indicator	Equation
Economy	Level of residential income (I)	Per capita disposable income of urban households (I_C) Per capita net income of rural households (I_R) Per capita local financial budget revenue (I_F)	I=I_C×B+I_R×(1-B)+I_i
Economy	Level of residential consumption (C)	Per capita total retail sales of urban and rural consumer goods
Society	Level of labor-force education (E)	Average number of education years for population of school age
Society	Level of population urbanization (U)	Rate of population urbanization (β)
Human settlement	Allocation level of indoor living facilities (F)	Allocation rate for indoor tap water (F_W) Allocation rate for indoor kitchens (F_K) Allocation rate for indoor toilets (F_T) Allocation rate for indoor bathrooms(F_B)	F=1/4×(F_W+F_K+F_T+F_B) Values for indicators have been normalized
Human settlement	Level of traffic development (T)	Proportion of traffic land to total land (T_P) Traffic Dominance (T_D) (Jin et al., 2008)	T=1/2×(T_P+T_D) Values for indicators have been normalized

Indicator/dimension	Rank	Range	Number of counties	Average value
Level of residential income	Highest	0.39-1	103	0.49
	Higher	0.25-0.39	305	0.3
	Medium	0.14-0.25	993	0.18
	Lower	0.1-0.14	578	0.12
	Lowest	0-0.1	397	0.08
Level of residential consumption	Highest	0.15-1	153	0.229
	Higher	0.08-0.15	405	0.106
	Medium	0.035-0.08	1,006	0.053
	Lower	0.018-0.035	563	0.027
	Lowest	0-0.018	249	0.013
Level of labor-force education	Highest	0.75-1	259	0.81
	Higher	0.68-0.75	515	0.71
	Medium	0.6-0.68	1,114	0.64
	Lower	0.4-0.6	415	0.54
	Lowest	0-0.4	73	0.32
Level of population urbanization	Highest	0.75-1	212	0.88
	Higher	0.5-0.75	318	0.60
	Medium	0.3-0.5	1,018	0.38
	Lower	0.2-0.3	562	0.26
	Lowest	0-0.2	266	0.14
Allocation level of indoor living facilities	Highest	0.8-1	406	0.87
	Higher	0.65-0.8	648	0.72
	Medium	0.45-0.65	849	0.56
	Lower	0.25-0.45	370	0.37
	Lowest	0-0.25	103	0.15
Level of traffic development	Highest	0.42-1	344	0.508
	Higher	0.323-0.42	610	0.346
	Medium	0.2-0.323	1,034	0.241
	Lower	0.102-0.2	280	0.110
	Lowest	0-0.102	108	0.101

Level	Method	Equation	R²
City	RMDI__A VS RMDI__M	RMDI__M = 0.3902ln(RMDI__A) + 1.5412	0.9322
	RMDI__A VS RMDI__W	RMDI__W = 0.1624ln(RMDI__A) + 0.5655	0.9462
	RMDI__M VS RMDI__W	RMDI__W = 0.3403(RMDI__M)^1.1574	0.9838
Provincial	RMDI__A VS RMDI__M	RMDI__M = 0.427ln(RMDI__A) + 1.567	0.9721
	RMDI__A VS RMDI__W	RMDI__W = 0.1821ln(RMDI__A) + 0.583	0.9664
	RMDI__M VS RMDI__W	RMDI__W = 0.1143e^1.0723(RMDI^_M⁾	0.9747

[1]	WEI Wei, GUO Zecheng, SHI Peiji, ZHOU Liang, WANG Xufeng, LI Zhenya, PANG Sufei, XIE Binbin. Spatiotemporal changes of land desertification sensitivity in northwest China from 2000 to 2017 [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2021, 31(1): 46-68.
[2]	MA Bin, ZHANG Bo, JIA Lige. Spatio-temporal variation in China’s climatic seasons from 1951 to 2017 [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(9): 1387-1400.
[3]	LIU Xiaojing, LIU Dianfeng, ZHAO Hongzhuo, HE Jianhua, LIU Yaolin. Exploring the spatio-temporal impacts of farmland reforestation on ecological connectivity using circuit theory: A case study in the agro-pastoral ecotone of North China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(9): 1419-1435.
[4]	WU Li, SUN Xiaoling, SUN Wei, ZHU Cheng, ZHU Tongxin, LU Shuguang, ZHOU Hui, GUO Qingchun, GUAN Houchun, XIE Wei, KE Rui, LIN Guiping. Evolution of Neolithic site distribution (9.0-4.0 ka BP) in Anhui, East China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(9): 1451-1466.
[5]	YE Chao, LI Simeng, ZHANG Zhao, ZHU Xiaodan. A comparison and case analysis between domestic and overseas industrial parks of China since the Belt and Road Initiative [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(8): 1266-1282.
[6]	WANG Xueqin, LIU Shenghe, QI Wei. Mega-towns in China: Their spatial distribution features and growth mechanisms [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(7): 1060-1082.
[7]	YANG Fan, HE Fanneng, LI Meijiao, LI Shicheng. Evaluating the reliability of global historical land use scenarios for forest data in China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(7): 1083-1094.
[8]	LIU Ruiqing, XU Hao, LI Jialin, PU Ruiliang, SUN Chao, CAO Luodan, JIANG Yimei, TIAN Peng, WANG Lijia, GONG Hongbo. Ecosystem service valuation of bays in East China Sea and its response to sea reclamation activities [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(7): 1095-1116.
[9]	FANG Chuanglin, WANG Zhenbo, LIU Haimeng. Beautiful China Initiative: Human-nature harmony theory, evaluation index system and application [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(5): 691-704.
[10]	CHEN Mingxing, LIANG Longwu, WANG Zhenbo, ZHANG Wenzhong, YU Jianhui, LIANG Yi. Geographical thoughts on the relationship between ‘Beautiful China’ and land spatial planning [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(5): 705-723.
[11]	TANG Zhipeng, MEI Ziao, LIU Weidong, XIA Yan. Identification of the key factors affecting Chinese carbon intensity and their historical trends using random forest algorithm [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(5): 743-756.
[12]	WANG Shaojian, GAO Shuang, HUANG Yongyuan, SHI Chenyi. Spatiotemporal evolution of urban carbon emission performance in China and prediction of future trends [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(5): 757-774.
[13]	SONG Zhouying, ZHU Qiaoling. Spatio-temporal pattern and driving forces of urbanization in China’s border areas [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(5): 775-793.
[14]	ZHAO Ting, BAI Hongying, YUAN Yuan, DENG Chenhui, QI Guizeng, ZHAI Danping. Spatio-temporal differentiation of climate warming (1959-2016) in the middle Qinling Mountains of China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(4): 657-668.
[15]	WANG Jiayue, XIN Liangjie, WANG Yahui. How farmers’ non-agricultural employment affects rural land circulation in China? [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(3): 378-400.