Regional differentiation of ecological conservation and its zonal suitability at the county level in China

doi:10.1007/s11442-018-1458-0

Abstract

Abstract:

China’s investments, financial incentives and deductions in terms of ecological conservation are based at the county level. Therefore, the monitoring and assessment of the effects of ecological conservation at the county level is important to provide a scientific basis for the assessment of the ecological and environmental quality at the county scale. This paper quantitatively estimated the dynamics of high-quality ecosystems and vegetation coverage over the past 15 years, and their relationships with the number of ecological conservation programs at the county level were analyzed. Then, the effects of ecological conservation measures on ecological changes at the county level and their regional suitability were assessed and discussed. The results showed that counties with a percentage of high-quality ecosystems greater than 50% were primarily distributed in northeastern China, southern subtropical China and the southeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, and those with a percentage lower than 20% were mostly distributed in northwestern China, the southwestern karst region and the North China Plain. In recent decades, ecological conservation has focused on ecologically fragile regions; more than five ecological conservation programs have been implemented in most counties of the Three River Source Region in Qinghai Province, southeastern Tibet, western Sichuan, the Qilian Mountains, southern Xinjiang and other western regions, while only one or zero have been implemented in the eastern coastal area of China. Over the past 15 years, the proportional area of high-quality ecosystems has increased in approximately 53% of counties. The vegetation coverage of counties in the Loess Plateau, Huang-Huai-Hai Plain, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (Jing-Jin-Ji), Sichuan-Guizhou-Chongqing, and Guangdong-Guangxi provincial-level areas has increased significantly. However, it decreased in northern Xinjiang, central Tibet, central and eastern Inner Mongolia, the Yangtze River Delta and other regions. The relationships between the numbers of ecological conservation programs and the indicators of ecosystem restoration response, such as high-quality ecosystem and vegetation coverage, do not show positive correlations. These results suggest that ecological conservation programs should be planned and implemented according to the distribution patterns of high-quality ecosystems and that restoration measures such as afforestation should follow natural principles and regional differentiation under the background of climate change.

Key words: ecological conservation, high-quality ecosystem, regional differentiation, suitability assessment, county scale, China

Lin HUANG, Yuhan ZHENG, Tong XIAO. Regional differentiation of ecological conservation and its zonal suitability at the county level in China[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(1): 46-58.

Figures/Tables 7

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

References 30

[1]	Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes Det al., 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, 15-86.
[2]	Deng L, Liu G B, Shangguan Z P, 2014. Land-use conversion and changing soil carbon stocks in China’s ‘Grain-for-Green’ Program: A synthesis.Global Change Biology, 20(11): 3544-3556. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12508 pmid: 24357470
[3]	Fu B J, 2010. Trends and priority areas in ecosystem research of China.Geographical Research, 29(3): 383-396. (in Chinese) doi: 10.1631/jzus.A1000244
[4]	Huang L, Cao W, Gong G Let al., 2016. Spatial and temporal variations in ecosystems in the three northern regions of China, 2000-2010.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(1): 107-117. (in Chinese) doi: 10.5846/stxb201408281708
[5]	Li G P, Liu Q, Zhang W Bet al., 2014. Transfer payment system in the national key ecological function area and the ecological environmental quality: Empirical study based on the countryside data of Shaanxi Province.Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University, 34(2): 27-31. (in Chinese)
[6]	Li S D, Zhai H B, 2002. The comparison study on forestry ecological projects in the world.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 22(11): 1976-1982. (in Chinese) doi: 10.1007/s11769-002-0026-8
[7]	Li S S, Yan J P, Wan J, 2013. Response of vegetation restoration to climate change and human activities in Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia Region.Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(1): 98-112. doi: 10.1007/s11442-013-0996-8
[8]	Liu H J, Zhang J H, He L Het al., 2010. Analysis of the status and spatial distribution patterns of county-level eco-environmental quality of China.Environmental Monitoring of China, 26(6): 62-65. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1088.2010.00432
[9]	Liu J, Diamond J, 2005. China’s environment in a globalizing world.Nature, 435(7046): 1179-1186. doi: 10.1038/4351179a pmid: 15988514
[10]	Liu J Y, Kuang W H, Zhang Z Xet al., 2014. Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns, and causes of land-use changes in China since the late 1980s.Journal of Geographical Sciences, 24(2): 195-210. doi: 10.1007/s11442-014-1082-6
[11]	Liu J Y, Xu X L, Shao Q Q, 2008. Grassland degradation in the “Three-River Headwaters” region, Qinghai Province.Journal of Geographical Sciences, 18(3): 259-273. doi: 10.1007/s11442-008-0259-2
[12]	Liu R, Wang S X, Zhou Yet al., 2012. Ecological environment condition evaluation mode of county region based on remote sensing techniques.China Environmental Science, 32(1): 181-186. (in Chinese)
[13]	Liu Y S, Liu Y, Chen Y F, 2011. Territorial multi-functionality evaluation and decision-making mechanism at county scale in China.Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(10): 1379-1389. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1011.2011.00415
[14]	Lü Y, Zhang L, Feng Xet al., 2015. Recent ecological transitions in China: Greening, browning, and influential factors.Scientific Reports, 5(1): 8732. doi: 10.1038/srep08732 pmid: 25736296
[15]	Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China(MEP-PRC), 2016. The 13th Five-Year Planning Outline of National Ecological Protection. (in Chinese)
[16]	Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China (MEP-PRC),Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), 2017. Investigation and Assessment of National Ecological Environment by Remote Sensing for Ten Years from 2000 to 2010. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
[17]	Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China (MF-PRC), 2011. Notice on the Issuance of the Transfer Payment Method for National Key Ecological Function Areas. (in Chinese)
[18]	Shao Q Q, Fan J W, Liu J Yet al., 2017. Effects of an ecological conservation and restoration project in the Three-River Source Region, China.Journal of Geographical Sciences, 27(2): 183-204. doi: 10.1007/s11442-017-1371-y
[19]	Shao Q Q, Liu J Y, Huang Let al., 2013. Integrated assessment on the effectiveness of ecological conservation in Sanjiangyuan National Nature Reserve.Geographical Research, 32(9): 1645-1656. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11821/dlyj201309007
[20]	State Forestry Administration of the People’s Republic of China (SFA-PRC),2008. Development report of the Three-North Shelter Forest System in the Past 30 Years (1978-2008). Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. (in Chinese)
[21]	State Forestry Administration of the People’s Republic of China (SFA-PRC), 2016a. National Report on Ecological Benefit of Grain for Green Program (2015). Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. (in Chinese)
[22]	State Forestry Administration of the People’s Republic of China (SFA-PRC), 2016b. National Report on Ecological Benefit of Natural Forest Resources Protection Program in Key State-owned Forest Area in Northeast China and Inner Mongolia (2015). Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. (in Chinese)
[23]	Thornthwaite C, 1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate.Geographical Review, 38(1): 55-94.
[24]	Wang B, Zhang G H, Liu G Bet al., 2012. Ecological and environmental evaluation for water and soil loss comprehensive harness in loess hilly region.Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 28(20): 150-161. (in Chinese)
[25]	Wang L, Fu B J, Lv Y Het al., 2010. Spatio-temporal variations of vegetation cover in northern Shaanxi province under the background of ecological restoration.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21(8): 2109-2116. (in Chinese)
[26]	Wang S, Fu B J, Piao S Let al., 2015. Reduced sediment transport in the Yellow River due to anthropogenic changes.Nature Geoscience, 9: 38-41.
[27]	Wang T, 2004. Progress in sandy desertification research of China.Journal of Geographical Sciences, 14(4): 387-400.
[28]	Yue T X, Zhao N, Ramsey R Det al., 2013. Climate change trend in China, with improved accuracy.Climatic Change, 120(1): 137-151.
[29]	Zhang Y M, Zhao S D, 2007. The condition and trends of the world’s ecosystems.Advances in Earth Science, 22(4): 403-409. (in Chinese)
[30]	Zhuo L, Cao X, Chen Jet al., 2007. Assessment of grassland ecological restoration project in Xilin Gol Grassland.Acta Geographica Sinica, 62(5): 471-480. (in Chinese)