Review on carbon emissions, energy consumption and low-carbon economy in China from a perspective of global climate change

doi:10.1007/s11442-016-1302-3

Abstract

Abstract:

Accompanying the rapid growth of China’s population and economy, energy consumption and carbon emission increased significantly from 1978 to 2012. China is now the largest energy consumer and CO₂ emitter of the world, leading to much interest in researches on the nexus between energy consumption, carbon emissions and low-carbon economy. This article presents the domestic Chinese studies on this hotpot issue, and we obtain the following findings. First, most research fields involve geography, ecology and resource economics, and research contents contained some analysis of current situation, factors decomposition, predictive analysis and the introduction of methods and models. Second, there exists an inverted “U-shaped” curve connection between carbon emission, energy consumption and economic development. Energy consumption in China will be in a low-speed growth after 2035 and it is expected to peak between 6.19-12.13 billion TCE in 2050. China’s carbon emissions are expected to peak in 2035, or during 2020 to 2045, and the optimal range of carbon emissions is between 2.4-3.3 PgC/year (1 PgC=1 billion tons C) in 2050. Third, future research should be focused on global carbon trading, regional carbon flows, reforming the current energy structure, reducing energy consumption and innovating the low-carbon economic theory, as well as establishing a comprehensive theoretical system of energy consumption, carbon emissions and low-carbon economy.

Key words: carbon emissions, energy consumption, low-carbon economy, global climate change

Lei SHEN, Yanzhi *SUN. Review on carbon emissions, energy consumption and low-carbon economy in China from a perspective of global climate change[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2016, 26(7): 855-870.

Figures/Tables 10

Figure 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Figure 2

Table 4

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Table 5

The main research methods and models"

Method and model	Basic algorithm	Application description
IPCC greenhouse gas emission inventory preparation method (Cheng, 2014)	c=a×f	C indicates carbon emission, a is the activity level, f is the emission factor. It provides a unified algorithm and reference standard for the estimation of carbon emission.
LMDI model	C=P×(Y/P)×(E/Y)× (C/E)	C indicates carbon emission, P is the population, Y/P is per capita GDP, E/Y represents the energy consumption intensity, C/E is the energy structure intensity; the method is widely used in carbon emissions calculation and its effect decomposition.
IPAT model	I=P×A×T	I depicts the impact of evaluation, P is the population, A expresses the wealthy degree, T represents the scientific and technological progress; the model is originally used for environmental impact assessment, after being improved for carbon dioxide impact factor analysis.
STIRPAT model (Song, 2012)		The model is an extension of IPAT model, and a new factor is introduced in the model.
Econometric model		y indicates carbon emission, x is the influencing factor of carbon emissions, α is the intercept, β is the coefficient, i is the number of cross section, t is the time, M represents the number of influencing factors of carbon emission; compared to the traditional time-series and cross-sectional data model, this model expands the amount of information, with dynamic reliability analysis, which is helpful to reflect the system structure.
Granger causality tests (Wu et al., 2013)	If X helps to predict Y, then X is the granger cause of Y	This model can only be used for the test of smooth sequence, and the information contained in the past X can improve the forecast of Y.
EKC model	The relationship between economic development and environmental factors in inverted U-shaped curve	Environmental Kuznets curve is used to illustrate the relationship between economic growth and carbon emissions, energy consumption.
Kaya identical equation		GHG indicates the greenhouse gas emissions, TOE represents the energy consumption, GDP is the gross domestic product, POP is the population, f is the energy structure intensity, e is the energy consumption intensity, g is the per capita GDP, p is the population; the model is mainly used for analysis of the driving factors of carbon dioxide emissions.
Hierarchical Analysis	Target-Criterion-Scheme	The model is a kind of weight decision analysis method, which is mainly used to construct the evaluation system of low carbon economy. It is the basic step for the qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Input-output Analysis (Wang et al., 2015)	c=f(I-A)^-1×Y	c denotes the energy carbon emissions vector, f is the direct carbon emission vector of the department, I is the intensity matrix, A is the input coefficient matrix, Y is the final demand matrix, (I-A)^-1 is the Leontief inverse matrix; this model is used to analyze the carbon emissions of intermediate products in the economic operation process.

Table 5

References 71

1	Andres R J, Marland G, Fung Iet al., 1996. A 1 degrees x1 degrees distribution of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement manufacture, 1950-1990.Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 10(3): 419-429.
2	Begum R A, Sohag K, Abdullah S M Set al., 2015. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41: 594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.205
3	Bi Chao, 2015. Scheme and policies for peaking energy carbon emission in China.China Population Resources and Environment, 25(5): 20-27. (in Chinese)
4	Cansino J M, Sánchez-Braza A, Rodríguez-Arévalo M L, 2015. Driving forces of Spain’s CO2 emissions: A LMDI decomposition approach.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 48: 749-759.
5	Cao Haixia, Zhang Fuming, 2010. Review of low carbon economy in China and abroad.Productivity Research, (3): 1-6. (in Chinese)
6	Chen Dehu, Zhang Jin, 2012. An empirical study of the environment Kuznets curve for China’s carbon emission: Based on spatial panel model.Statistics & Information Forum, 27(5): 48-53.
7	Cheng Hao, 2014. How to calculate the carbon emissions: IPCC national greenhouse gas inventory guide in 2006.China Statistics, (11): 28-30. (in Chinese)
8	Contestabile M, 2012. Sociology: Economic and emissions trends.Nature Climate Change, 2(10): 709-709.
9	Cui Jia, 2015. Study of driving factors and spatial driving types of carbon emission intensity in China [D]. Changchun: Jilin University. (in Chinese)
10	Du Jianli, Lin Zhenshan, Zhang Zhenzhenet al., 2009. Analysis on correlation of the increase of GDP and energy consumption in China based on empirical mode decomposition method.Progress in Geography, 28(1): 119-124. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.01.016
11	Fan J, Wang Q, Sun W, 2015. The failure of China’s Energy Development Strategy 2050 and its impact on carbon emissions.Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 49: 1160-1170.
12	Fu Xun, Ma Yonghuan, Liu Yijunet al., 2008. Development patterns of low carbon economy. China Population, Resources and Environment, 18(3): 14-19. (in Chinese)
13	Greening L A, Greene D L, Difiglio C, 2000. Energy efficiency and consumption: The rebound effect: A survey.Energy Policy, 28(6): 389-401.
14	Grossman G M, Krueger A B, 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi: 10.3386/w3914
15	Grubb M, 2012. Emissions trading: Cap and trade finds new energy. Nature, 491(7426): 666-667. doi: 10.1038/491666a pmid: 23192130
16	Gu Chaolin, Tan Zongbo, Liu Wanet al., 2009. A study climate carbon emissions and low-carbon city planning.Urban Planning Forum, (3): 38-45. (in Chinese)
17	Guo Chaoxian, 2010. Decomposition of China’s carbon emissions based LMDI. China Population,Resources and Environment, 20(12): 4-9. (in Chinese)
18	He Jiankun, Liu Bin, 2004. Analysis of carbon emission intensity as the main index for greenhouse gas emission mitigation commitments. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 44(6): 740-743. (in Chinese)
19	Holtz-Eakin D, Selden T M, 1995. Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth.Journal of Public Economics, 57(1): 85-101.
20	Hu Chuzhi, Huang Xianjin, Zhong Taiyanget al., 2008. Character of carbon emission in China and its dynamic development analysis. China Population,Resources and Environment, 18(3): 38-42. (in Chinese)
21	International Energy Agency, 2010. World Energy Outlook 2010. Paris: IEA.
22	International Energy Agency, 2013. CO2 emissions from fuel combustion highlights. Paris: IEA.
23	Kolstad C D, Krautkraemer J A, 1993. Natural resource use and the environment. Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, (3): 1219-1265.
24	Kuang Xinrui, 2009. A research on China’s economic development and CO2 emission [D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University. (in Chinese)
25	Li Bo, Zhang Junbiao, Li Haipeng, 2011. Research on spatial-temporal characteristics and affecting factors decomposition of agricultural carbon emission in China. China Population,Resources and Environment, 21(8): 80-86. (in Chinese)
26	Li Xin, Wang Haibin, Chen Chaozhenet al., 2015. Inter-provincial discrepancy and spatiotemporal characteristics of carbon dioxide emission intensity from power energy consumption in China.Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 29(1): 43-47. (in Chinese)
27	Lin B Q, Moubarak M, 2013. Decomposition analysis: change of carbon dioxide emissions in the Chinese textile industry.Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26: 389-396.
28	Lin B Q, Wang X L, 2015. Carbon emissions from energy intensive industry in China: Evidence from the iron & steel industry.Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47: 746-754.
29	Lin Jinhui, Liu Jun, 2011. Antidumping jumping FDI employment and welfare of the host country. On Economic Problems,(3): 37-40, 56. (in Chinese)
30	Liu Hongguang, Liu Weidong, 2009. Decomposition of energy-induced CO2 emissions in industry of China.Progress in Geography, 28(2): 285-292. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2009.02.018
31	Liu Hui, Cheng Shengkui, Zhang Lei, 2002. The international latest research of the impacts of human activities on carbon emission.Progress in Geography, 21(5): 420-429. doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2002.05.003
32	Liu Lancui, Gan Lin, Cao Donget al., 2009. Analysis and enlightenment from climate policies of major economies.Sino-Global Energy, 14(9): 1-8. (in Chinese) doi: 10.5366/jope.2012.01
33	Liu Litao, Shen Lei, 2011. Scenario analysis of energy zoning and function orientation on sustainable development of China.Journal of Natural Resources, 26(9): 1484-1495. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2011.09.004
34	Liu Weidong, Zhang Lei, Wang Limaoet al., 2010. A sketch map of low-carbon economic development in China.Geographical Research, 29(5): 778-788. doi: 10.1017/S0004972710001772
35	Liu Zhixiong, 2011. The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and carbon emissions in China. Coal Economic Research,(4): 37-41, 65. (in Chinese)
36	Makarov A A, Bashmakov I, 1991. An energy development strategy for the USSR: Minimizing greenhouse gas emissions.Energy Policy, 19(10): 987-994. doi: 10.1016/0301-4215(91)90119-9
37	National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), 2015. The 2015 Annual Report of China’s Response to Climate Change Policies and Action. Beijing.
38	Nulíček V, 1993. Possibilities of reduction of carbon dioxide emissions from energy processes in the Czech Republic.Energy Conversion and Management, 34(9): 753-774. doi: 10.1016/0196-8904(93)90017-5
39	Ozturk I, Acaravci A, 2010. CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Turkey.Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9): 3220-3225. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.005
40	Panayotou T, 1997. Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve turning a black box into a policy tool.Environment and Development Economics, 2(4): 465-484. doi: 10.1017/S1355770X97000259
41	Qin Dahe, 2014. Climate change science and sustainable development.Progress in Geography, 33(7): 874-883. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2014.07.002
42	Qu Shenning, Guo Chaoxian, 2010. Forecast of China’s carbon emission based on STIRPAT model. China Population,Resources and Environment, 20(12): 10-15. (in Chinese)
43	Ramachandra T V, 2012. Decentralized carbon footprint analysis for opting climate change mitigation strategies in India.Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8): 5820-5833. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.05.035
44	Shen L, Gao T M, Zhao J Aet al., 2014. Factory-level measurements on CO2 emission factors of cement production in China.Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34: 337-349. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.025
45	Shen Lei, Liu Litao, Wang Limaoet al., 2015. 2050 energy consumption projection for China.Journal of Natural Resources, 30(3): 361-373. (in Chinese)
46	Shen Lei, Xue Jingjing, 2011. Development path choice and strategy framework of China’s energy security. China Population,Resources and Environment, 21(10): 49-54. (in Chinese)
47	Song Deyong, Lu Zhongbao, 2009. The factor decomposition and periodic fluctuations of carbon emission in China.China Population, Resources and Environment, 19(3): 18-24. (in Chinese)
48	Song Dongfeng, 2010. Current situation of China’s low-carbon economy.Ecological Economy, (9): 85-87. (in Chinese)
49	Song Xiaohui, Zhang Yufen, Wang Yimeiet al., 2012. Analysis of impacts of demographic factors on carbon emission based on the IPAT model.Research of Environmental Sciences, 25(1): 109-115. (in Chinese)
50	Sun Jianwei, Zhao Rongxin, Huang Xianjinet al., 2010. Research on carbon emission estimation and factor decomposition of China from 1995-2005.Journal of Natural Resources, 25(8): 1284-1295. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2010.08.006
51	Tunç G I, Türüt-Aşık S, Akbostancı E, 2009. A decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions from energy use: Turkish case.Energy Policy, 37(11): 4689-4699. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.019
52	Wang Qian, 2014. Research on the affecting factors of carbon emissions in Guangdong based on LMDI [D]. Guangzhou: Guangdong Academy of Social Sciences. (in Chinese)
53	Wang Saojian, Liu Yanyan, Fang Chuanglin, 2015. Review of energy-related CO2 emission in response to climate change.Progress in Geography, 34(2): 151-164. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2015.02.004
54	Wang Yuan, Zhao Lixia, Yu Xiaet al., 2015. Carbon emission change of energy consumption and its stress evaluation on local climate change in Shanghai. Journal of Fudan University (Natural Science), (4): 439-448. (in Chinese)
55	Wu Hong, Gu Shuzhong, Guang Xinglianget al., 2013. Analysis on relationship between carbon emission from fossil energy consumption and economic growth in China.Journal of Natural Resources, 28(3): 381-390. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.03.003
56	Wu Hong, Gu Shuzhong, Zhou Honget al., 2011. Relationship between energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Hebei province.Resources Science, 33(10): 1897-1905. (in Chinese)
57	Yan Qiongwei, Chen Hao, 2011. Research on the relationship between GDP and energy consumption. China Population, Resources and Environment, 21(7): 13-19. (in Chinese)
58	Yang Jian, Liu Huajun, 2012. Regional difference decomposition and influence factors of China’s carbon dioxide emissions. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics,(5): 36-49, 148. (in Chinese)
59	Yang Wei, Wang Chengjin, Jin Fengjunet al., 2013. Decomposition of energy intensity change in industrial sub-sectors and its spatial-temporal variation in China.Journal of Natural Resources, 28(1): 81-91. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2013.01.009
60	Yang J, Chen B, 2014. Carbon footprint estimation of Chinese economic sectors based on a three-tier model.Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29: 499-507. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.013
61	Yue Chao, Wang Shaopeng, Zhu Jianglinget al., 2010. 2050 carbon emissions projection for China-carbon emission and social development.Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 46(4): 517-524. (in Chinese)
62	Zhang Li, Lei Jun, Zhang Xiaolei, 2012. Variations and influential factors of carbon emission of primary energy consumption in Xinjiang during the period 1952-2008.Resources Science, 34(1): 42-49. (in Chinese)
63	Zhang Weiyang, Duan Xuejun, 2012. The research progress in the relationship among economic growth, industrial structure, and carbon emissions.Progress in Geography, 31(4): 442-450. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2012.04.007
64	Zhang X P, Cheng X M, 2009. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China.Ecological Economics, 68(10): 2706-2712. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.011
65	Zhang Xu, Qi Tianyu, Zhang Daet al., 2015. Research focus and trend of energy development and climate change.Renewable Energy Resources, (8): 1214-1218. (in Chinese)
66	Zhang Y J, Da Y B, 2015. The decomposition of energy-related carbon emission and its decoupling with economic growth in China.Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41: 1255-1266. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.021
67	Zhang Z X, 2013. An analysis of China’s energy demand and supply policy framework. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews:Energy and Environment, 2(4): 422-440.
68	Zhao Aiwen, Li Dong, 2011. Co-integration and causal relationship between carbon emission and economic growth in China.Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 20(11): 1297-1303.
69	Zhao Jinwen, Fan Jitao, 2007. Empirical research on the inherent relationship between economy growth and energy consumption in China.Economic Research Journal, 8: 31-42. (in Chinese) doi: 10.1109/HPDC.1996.546171
70	Zhao X T, Burnett J W, Fletcher J J, 2014. Spatial analysis of China province-level CO2 emission intensity.Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33: 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.060
71	Zhu Ling, Zhang Zhen, 2011. Decomposition analysis of carbon emission intensity in Shanghai city.Research of Environmental Sciences, 24(1): 20-26. (in Chinese)

Authors	Methods	Time	Research subjects	Decomposition of impact factors
Authors	Methods	Time	Research subjects	Impact factors	Promoting factors	Inhibitory factors
Zhu and Zhang, 2011	IDA	1995-2008	Carbon emission intensity	Energy intensity, energy structure, industrial structure	Energy intensity	Energy structure, industrial structure
Zhao et al., 2014	Spatial Panel Data Analysis	1991-2010	Carbon emission intensity of energy consumption	Per capita GDP, population density, energy consumption structure, transportation, energy price	Per capita GDP, population density	Energy consumption structure
Liu and Liu, 2009	LMDI	1992-2005	Carbon emissions of industrial combustion	Energy consumption, energy structure, technical factors, intermediate inputs, industrial structure, industrial output	Energy consumption, energy structure, industrial output
Song and Lu, 2009	LMDI	1990-2005	Carbon emissions of energy consumption	Output scale, energy structure, emission intensity, energy intensity	Output scale	Energy intensity
Li et al., 2011	Kaya	1993-2008	Agricultural carbon emission	Economic development, efficiency factor, structure factor, labor force scale	Economic development	Efficiency factor, structure factor, labor force scale
Yang and Liu, 2012	STIRPAT, EKC	1995-2009	Carbon emissions	Per capita GDP, population size, energy intensity, energy structure, industrial structure, urbanization rate, trade openness, foreign direct investment	Per capita GDP, energy intensity
Guo, 2010	LMDI	1995-2007	Carbon emissions	Economic aggregate, economic structure, energy use efficiency, energy consumption structure, carbon emission coefficient	Economic aggregate	Energy use efficiency

	Energy demand (100 million tons of standard coal)					Proportion (%)
	1990	2008	2020	2030	2035	2008	2035
Coal	7.78	20.55	30.60	35.22	37.43	66	61
Petroleum	1.66	5.37	8.25	10.15	10.98	17	18
Natural gas	0.19	1.03	2.60	3.93	4.74	3	8
New energy	0.00	0.26	1.80	2.53	2.75	1	4
Hydrogen	0.16	0.73	1.34	1.54	1.63	2	3
Biomass energy	2.91	2.95	2.78	2.68	2.85	10	5
Renewable energy	0.00	0.10	0.47	0.79	0.92	0	1
Total	12.68	30.99	47.82	56.82	61.30	100	100

[1]	Guohua HE, Yong ZHAO, Jianhua WANG, Yongnan ZHU, Shan JIANG, Haihong LI, Qingming WANG. The effects of urban water cycle on energy consumption in Beijing, China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019, 29(6): 959-970.
[2]	Wensong SU, Yanyan Liu, Shaojian WANG, Yabo ZHAO, Yongxian SU, Shijie LI. Regional inequality, spatial spillover effects, and the factors influencing city-level energy-related carbon emissions in China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28(4): 495-513.
[3]	Changjian WANG, Fei WANG, Xiaolei ZHANG, Hongou ZHANG. Influencing mechanism of energy-related carbon emissions in Xinjiang based on the input-output and structural decomposition analysis [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2017, 27(3): 365-384.
[4]	Huimin ZHANG,Fangdao QIU,Qiang WEI,Lianjun TONG,Xinyue YE,Yeqing CHENG. Economic development and energy efficiency in Jilin Province, China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 24(5): 875-888.
[5]	CHUAI Xiaowei, HUANG Xianjin, WANG Wanjing, WEN Jiqun, CHEN Qiang, PENG Jiawen. Spatial econometric analysis of carbon emissions from energy consumption in China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2012, 22(4): 630-642.
[6]	LI Qiang, REN Zhiyuan. Energy production and consumption prediction and their response to environment based on coupling model in China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2012, 22(1): 93-109 .
[7]	CHUAI Xiaowei, LAI Li, HUANG Xianjin, ZHAO Rongqin, WANG Wanjing, CHEN Zhigang. Temporospatial changes of carbon footprint based on energy consumption in China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2012, 22(1): 110-124 .
[8]	WU Pu, SHI Peihua. An estimation of energy consumption and CO₂ emissions in tourism sector of China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2011, 21(4): 733-745.
[9]	ZHAO Rongqin, HUANG Xianjin, ZHONG Taiyang, PENG Jiawen. Carbon footprint of different industrial spaces based on energy consumption in China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2011, 21(2): 285-300.
[10]	WEI Benyong, FANG Xiuqi, WANG Yuan. The effects of international trade on Chinese carbon emissions: An empirical analysis [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2011, 21(2): 301-316.
[11]	QIAN Huaisui, YUAN Shunquan, SUN Jiulin, LI Zehui. Relationships between energy consumption and climate change in China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2004, 14(1): 87-93.