Does cultivated land function transition occur in China?

doi:10.1007/s11442-015-1204-9

Abstract

Abstract:

Land function change has been the focus of scientific research and policy making worldwide. Agricultural development and land use demand at present in China shared common characteristics with the countries such as Japan, South Korea, USA, and European developed countries, which have undergone cultivated land function transition. Whether cultivated land function transition occurred is of significance for land change science and cultivated land protection in China. However, there has been no explicit methodology for cultivated land function change research. This paper firstly presents a methodology by integrating policy development analysis based on the normative connotation of cultivated land function or termed cultivated land function demand and quantitative assessment based on the positive connotation of cultivated land function or termed cultivated land function supply. Then, cultivated land function transition is diagnosed by analyzing cultivated land function change in 1949-2012. Results show that cultivated land function transition overall occurred in 2006. Specifically, the normative cultivated land function or cultivated land function demand fragmented into seven types in 1985 and upgraded in 2004. Total value of the positive cultivated land function or cultivated land function supply turned to rise with an increase from 2.40 to 2.45 as the coefficients of variability (CV) of the value of the seven functions decreased from 2.94 to 2.29 in 2006-2012. The two-year gap between these two aspects of transition mainly resulted from the time lag effects of policy implementation. In the process of the transition, co-ordination and malposition of supply and demand of cultivated land function coexisted with supply lag and function morphology distortion. Considering the transition experiences in the developed countries mentioned above, suggestions on multifunctional cultivated land management are proposed. Moreover, route of land use transition research is discussed.

Key words: cultivated land, multifunction, land use, transition, policy, China

Xiaoqing SONG, Yuan HUANG, Zhifeng WU, Zhu OUYANG. Does cultivated land function transition occur in China?[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2015, 25(7): 817-835.

Figures/Tables 9

Table 1

Table 2

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

References 51

1	Bae J S, Joo R W, Kim Y S, 2012. Forest transition in South Korea: Reality, path and drivers.Land Use Policy, 29(1): 198-207.
2	Bi Y Y, Zheng Z Y, 2000. The actual changes of cultivated area since the foundation of New China.Resources Science, 22(2): 8-12. (in Chinese)
3	Boody G, Vondracek B, Andow D Aet al., 2005. Multifunctional agriculture in the United States.BioScience, 55(1): 27-38.
4	Brouwer F, Heide C M.Multifunctional Rural Land Management: Economics and Policies. London: Earthscan, 2009.
5	Cai Y L, Fu Z Q, Dai E F, 2002. The minimum area per capita of cultivated land and its implication for the optimization of land resources allocation.Acta Geographica Sinica, 57(2): 127-134. (in Chinese)
6	de Groot R S, Wilson M A, Boumans R M J, 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services.Ecological Economics, 41(3): 393-408.
7	Deelstra T, Boyd D, van den Biggelaar Met al., 2001. Multifunctional land use: An opportunity for promoting urban agriculture in Europe.Urban Agriculture Magazine, 4: 1-7.
8	Department of Rural Social and Economic Survey of National Bureau of Statistics of China, 1986-2013. China Rural Statistics Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1986-2013. (in Chinese)
9	Department of Rural Social and Economic Survey of National Bureau of Statistics of China, 1986-2013. China Yearbook of Agricultural Price Survey. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1986-2013. (in Chinese)
10	Eurostat. Agricultural holdings with agricultural area. . 2013-03-07.
11	Feng Z M, Liu B Q, Yang Y Z, 2005. A study of the changing trend of Chinese cultivated land amount and data reconstructing: 1949-2003.Journal of Natural Resources, 20(1): 35-43. (in Chinese)
12	Global Land Project (GLP), 2005. Global Land Project: Science plan and implementation strategy. IGBP Report No.53/IHDP Report No.19. IGBP Secretariat, Stockholm.
13	Grainger A, 1995. The forest transition: An alternative approach.Area, 27(3): 242-251.
14	Jongeneel R A, Polman N B P, Slangen L H G, 2008. Why are Dutch farmers going multifunctional?Land Use Policy, 25(1): 81-94.
15	Koomen E, Stillwell J, Bakema Aet al., 2007. Modelling Land-use Change: Progress and Applications. Netherlands: Springer.
16	Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P, 2010. Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change.Land Use Policy, 27(2): 108-118.
17	Lin G C S, Ho S P S, 2003. China’s land resources and land-use change: Insights from the 1996 land survey.Land Use Policy, 20(2): 87-107.
18	Liu C W, Li X B, 2006. Diagnosis on the marginalisation of arable land use in China.Geographical Research, 25(5): 895-904. (in Chinese)
19	Liu Y S, Liu Y, Chen Y F, 2011. Territorial multi-functionality evaluation and decision-making mechanism at county scale in China.Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(10): 1379-1389. (in Chinese)
20	Long H L, Heilig G K, Li X Bet al., 2007. Socio-economic development and land-use change: Analysis of rural housing land transition in the Transect of the Yangtse River, China.Land Use Policy, 24(1): 141-153.
21	Lu L S, 2003. New development of agriculture and food security.Food and Nutrition in China, 11: 11-14. (in Chinese)
22	Lu L S, 2008. Study on Strategy of Rational Allocation of Regional Agricultural Resources, Comprehensive Treatment of Environment and Coordinative Development of Agricultural Regions in China. Beijing: China Agricultural Press. (in Chinese)
23	Mather A S, 1992. The forest transition.Area, 24(4): 367-379.
24	Mather A S, Fairbairn J, Needle C L, 1999. The course and drivers of the forest transition: The case of France.Area, 15(1): 65-90.
25	Mather A S, Needle C L, 1998. The forest transition: A theoretical basis.Area, 30(2): 117-124.
26	Matsuno Y, Nakamura K, Masumoto Tet al., 2006. Prospects for multifunctionality of paddy rice cultivation in Japan and other countries in monsoon Asia.Paddy Water Environment, 4: 189-197.
27	Meyfroidt P, Lambin E, 2009. Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(38): 16139-16144.
28	Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China, 2009.Sixty-year Agricultural Statistics of New China. Beijing: China Agricultural Press. (in Chinese)
29	Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China, 1996-2013. China Land and Resources Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: Geological Press, 1996-2013. (in Chinese)
30	National Bureau of Statistics of China, 1986-2013. China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 1986-2013. (in Chinese)
31	National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies, 2010. Farm operations according to utilized agricultural area. , 2013-03-03.
32	OECD. Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2001.
33	Organic-World. Organic area in the European Union 2000-2010. , 2012-05-22.
34	Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL. Organic agricultural land and other certified areas, breakdown by country 2005-2010. , 2013-03-04.
35	Rudel T K, Coomes O T, Moran Eet al., 2005. Forest transitions: Towards a global understanding of land use change.Global Environmental Change, 15(1): 23-31.
36	Song X Q, Ma Z H, Zeng Yet al., 2007. Spatio-temporal evaluation of intensive construction land use based on comprehensive integration granting weight.Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources, 24(3): 55-59. (in Chinese)
37	Song X Q, Ouyang Z, 2012a. Connotation of multifunctional cultivated land and its implications for cultivated land protection.Progress in Geography, 31(7): 859-868. (in Chinese)
38	Song X Q, Ouyang Z, 2012b. Route of multifunctional cultivated land management in China.Journal of Natural Resources, 27(4): 540-551. (in Chinese)
39	Song X Q, Ouyang Z, Li Y Set al., 2012. Cultivated land use change in China, 1999-2007: Policy development perspectives.Journal of Geographical Sciences, 22(6): 1061-1078.
40	Song X Q, Wu Z F, 2013. Modelling and mapping trends in grain production growth in China.Outlook on Agriculture, 42(4): 255-263.
41	Statistics Japan. Farm households by degree of engagement and size of operating cultivated land, 1974-2007.
42	. 2013-03-07.
43	Stuart D, Canty D, Killebrew K, 2010. Guide to environmental markets for farmers and ranchers. American Farmland Trust. 2011-01-02.
44	Statistics Sweden.Agricultural enterprises by region, size class and period, 1981-2007.
45	, 2013-03-07.
46	Tian Y J, Li X B, Xin L J, 2009. Impacts of the rise of labor opportunity cost on agricultural land use changes: A case study of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.Journal of Natural Resources, 24(3): 369-377. (in Chinese)
47	United States Census Bureau. Farms by size and type of organization, 1974-2007.
48	, 2013-03-07.
49	Yeo I Y, Huang C Q, 2013. Revisiting the forest transition theory with historical records and geospatial data: A case study from Mississippi (USA).Land Use Policy, 32(1): 1-13.
50	Zhang L X, Huang J K, Qiao F B, 2006. Economic evaluation and analysis of chemical fertilizer use of farm household. In: Zhu Zhaoliang, Nuo Si, Sun Bo. Countermeasure of Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution Control in China. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press.
51	Zube E H, 1987. Perceived land use patterns and landscape values.Landscape Ecology, 1(1): 37-45.

[1]	WEI Wei, GUO Zecheng, SHI Peiji, ZHOU Liang, WANG Xufeng, LI Zhenya, PANG Sufei, XIE Binbin. Spatiotemporal changes of land desertification sensitivity in northwest China from 2000 to 2017 [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2021, 31(1): 46-68.
[2]	MA Bin, ZHANG Bo, JIA Lige. Spatio-temporal variation in China’s climatic seasons from 1951 to 2017 [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(9): 1387-1400.
[3]	LIU Xiaojing, LIU Dianfeng, ZHAO Hongzhuo, HE Jianhua, LIU Yaolin. Exploring the spatio-temporal impacts of farmland reforestation on ecological connectivity using circuit theory: A case study in the agro-pastoral ecotone of North China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(9): 1419-1435.
[4]	WU Li, SUN Xiaoling, SUN Wei, ZHU Cheng, ZHU Tongxin, LU Shuguang, ZHOU Hui, GUO Qingchun, GUAN Houchun, XIE Wei, KE Rui, LIN Guiping. Evolution of Neolithic site distribution (9.0-4.0 ka BP) in Anhui, East China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(9): 1451-1466.
[5]	ZHU Wenbo, ZHANG Jingjing, CUI Yaoping, ZHU Lianqi. Ecosystem carbon storage under different scenarios of land use change in Qihe catchment, China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(9): 1507-1522.
[6]	YAO Yonghui, HU Yufan, KOU Zhixiang, ZHANG Baiping. Spatial patterns of Pinus tabulaeformis and Pinus massoniana forests in Qinling-Daba Mountains and the boundary of subtropical and warm temperate zones [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(9): 1523-1533.
[7]	YE Chao, LI Simeng, ZHANG Zhao, ZHU Xiaodan. A comparison and case analysis between domestic and overseas industrial parks of China since the Belt and Road Initiative [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(8): 1266-1282.
[8]	ZHAO Zhilong, FANG Xiuqi, YE Yu, ZHANG Chengpeng, ZHANG Diyang. Reconstruction of cropland area in the European part of Tsarist Russia from 1696 to 1914 based on historical documents [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(8): 1307-1324.
[9]	GE Dazhuan, ZHOU Guipeng, QIAO Weifeng, YANG Mengqi. Land use transition and rural spatial governance: Mechanism, framework and perspectives [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(8): 1325-1340.
[10]	WANG Xueqin, LIU Shenghe, QI Wei. Mega-towns in China: Their spatial distribution features and growth mechanisms [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(7): 1060-1082.
[11]	YANG Fan, HE Fanneng, LI Meijiao, LI Shicheng. Evaluating the reliability of global historical land use scenarios for forest data in China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(7): 1083-1094.
[12]	LIU Ruiqing, XU Hao, LI Jialin, PU Ruiliang, SUN Chao, CAO Luodan, JIANG Yimei, TIAN Peng, WANG Lijia, GONG Hongbo. Ecosystem service valuation of bays in East China Sea and its response to sea reclamation activities [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(7): 1095-1116.
[13]	LONG Hualou, QU Yi, TU Shuangshuang, ZHANG Yingnan, JIANG Yanfeng. Development of land use transitions research in China [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(7): 1195-1214.
[14]	YU Xia, ZHOU Weijian, WANG Yunqiang, CHENG Peng, HOU Yaoyao, XIONG Xiaohu, DU Hua, YANG Ling, WANG Ya. Effects of land use and cultivation time on soil organic and inorganic carbon storage in deep soils [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(6): 921-934.
[15]	FANG Chuanglin, WANG Zhenbo, LIU Haimeng. Beautiful China Initiative: Human-nature harmony theory, evaluation index system and application [J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(5): 691-704.