Please wait a minute...
 Home  About the Journal Subscription Advertisement Contact us   英文  
 
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited
Journal of Geographical Sciences    2008, Vol. 18 Issue (4) : 387-399     DOI: 10.1007/s11442-008-0387-8
Climate and Environmental Change |
A quantitative comparison and analysis on the assessment indicators of greenhouse gases emission
ZHANG Zhiqiang1, QU Jiansheng1,2, ZENG Jingjing1
1. Scientific Information Center for Resources and Environment, Lanzhou Branch Library of National Science Library, CAS, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. MOE Key Laboratory of Western Environmental Systems, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Download: PDF(566 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHG) emission and related global warming issues have been the focus of international communities for some time. The international communities have reached a consensus to reduce anthropogenic GHG emissions and restrain global warming. The quantitative assessment of anthropogenic GHG emissions is the scientific basis to find out the status of global GHG emission, identify the commitments of each country, and arrange the international efforts of GHG emission reduction. Currently the main assessment indicators for GHG emission include national indicator, per capita indicator, per GDP indicator, and international trade indicator etc. The introduction to the above indicators is put forward and their merits and demerits are analyzed. Based on the GHG emission data from the World Resource Institute (WRI), the US Energy Information Administration (EIA), and the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), the results of each indictor are calculated for the world, for the eight G8 industrialized countries (USA, UK, Canada, Japan, Germany, France, Italy and Russia), and the five major developing countries including China, Brazil, India, South Africa and Mexico. The paper points out that all these indicators have some limitations. The Indicator of Industrialized Accumulative Emission per Capita (IAEC) is put forward as the equitable indicator to evaluate the industrialized historical accumulative emission per capita of every country. IAEC indicator can reflect the economic achievement of GHG emission enjoyed by the current generations in every country and their commitments. The analysis of IAEC indicates that the historical accumulative emission per capita in industrialized countries such as UK and USA were typically higher than those of the world average and the developing countries. Emission indicator per capita per GDP, consumptive emission indicator and survival emission indicator are also put forward and discussed in the paper.

Keywords global warming      greenhouse gases (GHG) emission      assessment indicator      Industrialized Accumulative Emission per Capita (IAEC)      emission indicator per capita per GDP     
Fund:

The Key Project for Knowledge Innovation Program of CAS, No.KZCX2-YW-501; The Western Talent Project of CAS in 2005; The National S&T Pillar Program, No.007BAC03A11-05

Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Zhiqiang, QU Jiansheng, ZENG Jingjing. A quantitative comparison and analysis on the assessment indicators of greenhouse gases emission[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences,2008, 18(4): 387-399.
URL:  
http://www.geogsci.com/EN/10.1007/s11442-008-0387-8     OR     http://www.geogsci.com/EN/Y2008/V18/I4/387
[1] ZHANG Mingjun, DONG Lei, WANG Shengjie, ZHAO Aifang, QIANG Fang, SUN Meiping, WANG Qiong. Increasing free-air 0℃ isotherm height in Southwest China from 1960 to 2010[J]. , 2014, 24(5): 833-844.
[2] PANG Hongxi, LI Zongxing, Wilfred H. THEAKSTONE. Changes of the hydrological cycle in two typical Chinese monsoonal temperate glacier basins: A response to global warming?[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2012, 22(5): 771-780.
[3] LAN Yongchao, ZHAO Guohui, ZHANG Yaonan, WEN Jun, HU Xinglin, LIU Jinqi, GU Minglin, CHANG Junjie, MA Jianhua. Response of runoff in the headwater region of the Yellow River to climate change and its sensitivity analysis[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2010, 20(6): 848-860.
[4] JIANG Fengqing, HU Ruji, LI Zhen. Variations and trends of the freezing and thaw- ing index along the Qinghai-Xizang Railway for 1966?2004[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2008, 18(1): 3-16.
[5] LI Baolin, ZHANG Yichi, ZHOU Chenghu. Remote sensing detection of glacier changes in Tianshan Mountains for the past 40 years[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2004, 14(3): 296-302.
[6] GONG Dao-yi, ZHU Jin-hong, WANG Shao-wu. Flooding 1990s along the Yangtze River, has it concern of global warming?[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2001, 11(1): 43-52.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Journal of Geographical Sciences, All Rights Reserved.
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd